Tax shortfall prompts excise to step up recovery
The Excise, Taxation and Narcotics Control Department has intensified its commercial and domestic property tax recovery campaign in the Rawalpindi zone following a 55 per cent shortfall in property, professional, and luxury tax collections.
In a move to accelerate collections, the secretary of excise and taxation has imposed an immediate ban on transfers and leave for excise inspectors and field staff until June 30.
Property tax offices will also remain open on weekends throughout the month of June. The director general of excise and taxation has issued strict directives to ensure all tax targets are met by the end of June.
Property tax collections in Rawalpindi, Attock, Chakwal, and Jhelum districts are reportedly 5054 per cent below targets, while the newly designated tourist district of Murree, known as Malika Kohsar, has recorded a shortfall of up to 60 per cent.
In response, the department has launched a large-scale operation, sealing 126 defaulting property units and recovering a total of Rs2.89 million in outstanding taxes.
Seven excise and taxation officers in the Rawalpindi Zone have been served show-cause notices under the Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability (PEEDA) Act for failing to meet recovery targets and may face dismissal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Punjab opens online bidding for vehicle number plates
LAHORE: To facilitate the public, citizens across Punjab can now apply for attractive registration numbers for commercial vehicles, along with motorcycles (bikes) and motorcars, from the comfort of their homes. According to the Punjab Information Technology Board (PITB) on Wednesday, the registration is open via the e-Auction app and web portal, developed by PITB in collaboration with the Punjab Excise, Taxation and Narcotics Control Department. Applicants can register and place bids for their desired numbers until July 30. Highlighting the initiative, PITB Chairman Faisal Yousaf stated, 'The e-Auction system ensures complete transparency and allows users to participate in the bidding process from anywhere, at their convenience.' He further added that the details of successful bidders will be available directly on the app, making the process seamless and paperless. 'This system is helping eliminate the role of middlemen and agent mafias, while building public trust through an efficient and corruption-free mechanism,' he added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 days ago
- Business Recorder
LHC explains how a govt servant absent from duty can be sacked
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has held that a government servant who remains absent from his duty for less than one year cannot be removed from service without cogent reasons. The court said Section 4 of Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act (PEEDA) manifests that where absence from duty is for more than one year and same is proved, the authority has no option but to impose penalty of compulsory retirement or removal or dismissal from service. However, where absence from duty is less than one year, the authority under Section 4 of PEECA has discretion to impose penalty of compulsory retirement or removal or dismissal from service supported by cogent justification, in accordance with principles of proportionality, structured discretion and administrative fairness, the court added. The court passed this order on a petition of a government employee, Abusar Ghaffary, who was working as computer operator with the Punjab Emergency Services Department. The court allowed the petition and reinstating the petitioner into service and set aside impugned order and observed that no reasons are recorded to impose major penalty of removal from service against the petitioner. The court; however, held that the petitioner will not be entitled for back benefits as per the law. The petitioner's counsel submitted that under Section 7 (f) (ii) of PEEDA, where charge of absence of duty is less than one year, major penalty including removal or dismissal from service cannot be imposed. Admittedly, the regular inquiry against the petitioner was dispensed with under Section 5 (1) of the PEEDA and petitioner was removed from service under Section 4 (1) (b) (v) of PEEDA for being absent from duty for 63 days, the court observed. Where the regular inquiry is dispensed with, the procedure prescribed under section 7 of PEEDA is to be followed, the court added. The court also observed that the respondent keeping in view the principles of proportionality has not exercised discretion in structured manner. No doubt, in the impugned order, the petitioner's previous service record and penalties have been referred to; however, the said record was neither confronted to the petitioner nor petitioner was charge sheeted in show-cause notice on account of poor previous service record, the court added. The court said, when petitioner was already penalised previously, his current removal from service order on the basis of said previous penalties will amount to double jeopardy. The court; however, observed that the petitioner's reinstatement shall be subject to a fresh determination by the competent authority regarding the imposing of penalty against the petitioner, which must commensurate with the gravity of misconduct and after giving cogent reasons. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
6 days ago
- Business Recorder
Tax fraud via bank account to land holder in jail
ISLAMABAD: The person, whose bank account has been used to commit tax fraud, would be considered as 'abettor' and would be subjected to prosecution including punishment/ imprisonment. Thus, the person operating business bank account to facilitate tax fraud would be considered as 'abettor'. The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has revised the definition of 'abettor'. Key amendments made to Finance Bill: Tax fraud arrests only post-inquiry According to the amended Bill, the 'abettor' means a person who intentionally abets or connives in tax fraud as defined in clause (37) of section 2 or in the commission of any offence warranting prosecution under Sales Tax Act, and includes a person who, prepares, or causes to be prepared with or without authorization of the registered person, invoices for false claim of input tax adjustment. The 'abettor' also included a person who allows use of bank account held or operated by him for abetting tax fraud or other offence warranting prosecution under this Act or unauthorisedly or illegally maintains or operates business bank account in other registered person's name, amended Finance Bill 2025-26 added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
