Man gets life imprisonment in murder case
According to the SP Madhava Reddy, the Komarada police received compliant on 2019 May 26.
As per the complaint, Pulamamma of Nayi village married Ganapathi, and they had a daughter together.
However, after the birth of the child, Ganapathi began suspecting Pulamamma's fidelity and claimed he was not the father of the new born baby. He reportedly harassed her continuously and threatened to bring the matter before the local panchayat.
On the night of the incident, during an altercation driven by his suspicions, Ganapathi fatally stabbed Pulamamma with a knife. She fell in blood pool and breathes her last.
Later, he was arrested by then SI M Rajesh and a charge sheet was later filed with proper evidance. After a thorough trial, Second Additional District Court Judge Sri S Damodar Rao found the accused guilty and sentenced him to life imprisonment.
A fine of Rs 1,000 was also imposed, and in case of default, the convict will serve an additional one month of simple imprisonment.
SP SV Madhav Reddy commended the efforts of Public Prosecutor Majji Jagannadha Rao, CI G Rambabu, CI Govinda Rao, and SI K Neelakantam for their dedicated work that led to the successful conviction.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Avadi sub-registrar, bizman booked for usurping Rs 2 crore government land
CHENNAI: The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) has booked a former sub-registrar of Avadi for allegedly helping a real estate businessman fraudulently register government poramboke land worth Rs 2.34 crore in his relative's name in 2021. An FIR was registered last week under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sections of the BNS against S Maligeshwari, who is currently serving as Arani sub-registrar, and businessman V Somasundaram. The case pertains to a government land in Poonamallee block of Tiruvallur. In August 2021, Somasundaram prepared a settlement deed to show he was gifting two plots – measuring 8,720 sqft and 3,014 sqft and classified as government poramboke land – to his brother. The document was registered by Maligeshwari at the Avadi sub-registrar office, the DVAC said. The agency alleged that Somasundaram bribed Maligeshwari to process the registration without verifying original pattas and other revenue records to ensure the executing party had rightful ownership. The poramboke land in question had no supporting parental documents or legal ownership records, the DVAC said.
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bombay HC raps EOW for inacion, transfers builder fraud case to crime branch
MUMBAI : In a rare and significant move, the Bombay High Court transferred the builder fraud case-registered under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) Act-to the Mumbai Crime Branch, citing serious lapses in the investigation by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW). The move came after the victims, who had alleged a scam of over Rs 100 crore, filed a petition expressing loss of faith in EOW's probe. In its detailed order dated July 7, the court strongly criticised EOW DCP Sangramsinh Nishandar for failing to take concrete steps since taking over the case in March 2024. "Ex-facie we find that the concerned DCP has hardly taken any efforts in the investigation. An amount of approximately ₹100 crore was siphoned off by the accused and the DCP is unable to follow the money trail." The high court was particularly scathing about the freezing of bank accounts, noting that some had negligible balances of around ₹2,000 to ₹3,000, stating that none of the accused's personal accounts, vehicles, or immovable properties had been attached, barring one project site. 'Laxity and negligence' The affidavit submitted by Nishandar on July 15 drew further criticism, with the court calling his justifications "lame excuses." He claimed that an anticipatory bail order barred coercive action against the accused, which limited his investigation. However, the court rejected this reasoning, saying the order merely protected against arrest and did not restrict investigation. The court also pulled up Nishandar for blaming the Income Tax Department, BKC, for not providing property details linked to PAN numbers. Upon reviewing records, the court found that the EOW's letter merely asked for PAN details, and not property records. "A false blame is put on the Income Tax Department whereas the Senior Police Inspector himself has shown laxity and negligence," it stated. Another major lapse involved the failure to track property transactions. The court noted that a notice was sent on October 20, 2023, to the Joint Sub Registrar of Assurances, Andheri-IV and VI, regarding fresh registrations linked to the accused. Despite subsequent agreements being registered, no action was taken to collect or examine them by the EOW. The court held this demonstrated a lack of initiative on the part of EOW Investigating Officer Mr. Kate. Further, the court pointed out that notices sent to the Inspector General of Registration in November 2023 and March 2024 seeking property details of the accused yielded no results as no follow-up efforts were made by the EOW. In December 2023, the BMC's Building Proposal Department provided project-related documents, including approved plans and IOD receipts, but the EOW again failed to act on this information. Failure to freeze accused's accounts The court also recalled that on June 11, 2025, another bench directed Home Department officials present in court to begin attaching the accused's properties and prevent the sale of assets, yet, significant sums were allowed to move through various accounts. In one instance, ₹45 crore was parked in an account that should have been frozen earlier. By the time action was taken, nearly the entire amount was withdrawn. Similarly in another account, ₹13.14 crore was credited after the FIR, and ₹13.16 crore was later withdrawn. A third account saw ₹3.16 crore credited and quickly moved out. "Now, notices are being issued to identify companies having independent accounts," Nishandar claimed in his affidavit. But the court dismissed this move as "too little too late", while remarking: "We are reminded of an old English phrase: 'locking the gates of the stable, after the horses have bolted.'" The court also noted that the accounts listed in the affidavit now contain merely ₹5,000 to ₹10,000, despite the fraud running into ₹45 crore. "It is quite glaring that though the affidavit runs into 15 pages and refers to a dozen documents, not a single copy has been placed on record. It appears the affiant does not want this Court to examine them," the bench said. Given the petitioners' plea to change the entire investigation team, the court has transferred the probe to the Mumbai Crime Branch under Joint Commissioner Lakhmi Gautam, who has been asked to shortlist his team. The matter will next be heard on July 30. What is the case? An FIR was registered at Amboli Police Station in September 2023 against prominent developers Imtiyaz Maredia , Pyarali Maredia , and others. for allegedly defrauding 139 homebuyers of ₹45 crore. The amount was collected under the pretext of building luxury residential towers named Meridian Heights in Jogeshwari. However, the project has remained incomplete since 2008. Victims have also alleged that the collected funds may have been diverted for personal use. Victims speak "I bought a flat in between 2020 and 2021, and possession was promised by 2023. As per RERA, the builder was to hand it over by the end of 2024, but the project is still incomplete," said Abdul Malik Khan, one of the victims. "Work has only reached the 12th floor, and construction has been stalled for the last 5 years. The site is completely shut. Every time we asked, the builders assured us that work would resume in 15 days and promised 'good news'-which never came. We're under immense mental stress. Despite paying around ₹2 crore, I'm still living in a rented apartment." Another victim, 62-year-old Ruknuddin Mansoori, said that he planned to return to India from UAE but now has nowhere to live. "In August 2008, I invested ₹87 lakh in Meridian Heights. The builder, Imtiyaz, promised me possession, but I had to push them to even sign an agreement in 2016. I'm a senior citizen. This flat was supposed to be my retirement home, bought with my hard-earned money. I don't want a refund-I just want my flat, where I dreamt of living with my children. I have tried calling the builders several times, but he doesn't respond." Mirror reached out to Nishandar, but he refused to comment. Sources in the crime branch have said that a different team has been formed.
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
UP court sentences man to 20-year imprisonment in rape case
Agency: PTI Meerut (UP), Jul 30 (PTI) A court here on Tuesday sentenced a man to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for raping a minor girl in 2017. Additional District Judge (POCSO), Meerut, Mohd Babar Khan on Tuesday held Bhure guilty and sentenced him to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. The court also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on him. A case was registered against Bhure and two juveniles on charges of raping the 16-year-old girl. The case against juvenile offenders is pending in the court. PTI COR NAV DV DV Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
