logo
Nigeria's Opposition Leaders Form Alliance In Effort To Unseat The Ruling Party In 2027

Nigeria's Opposition Leaders Form Alliance In Effort To Unseat The Ruling Party In 2027

Al Arabiyaa day ago
Nigeria's key opposition leaders on Wednesday unveiled a new coalition which they say is aimed at unseating the ruling party in Africa's biggest democracy ahead of the 2027 presidential elections.
The Africa Democratic Congress coalition challenging President Bola Tinubu's All Progressives Congress party is led by Abubakar Atiku and Peter Obi, both runners-up in the last presidential vote. They are joined by other top figures, including former federal lawmakers and former governors from the ruling party. 'The coalition will stop Nigeria from becoming a one-party state,' said David Mark, a former Senate president and the interim chairman of the alliance, at the unveiling in the capital, Abuja.
Tinubu has been accused of plans to turn Nigeria into a one-party state by allegedly using state mechanisms to convince high-profile politicians to defect from opposition parties to the governing party. Although the Nigerian leader has denied the allegations, some of his closest allies, including within ruling party leadership, appeared to be supporting it, triggering concerns in a region threatened with shrinking democratic space. The battle for the country's top job has intensified even two years ahead of the next elections as several federal lawmakers and state governors have defected to the ruling party in recent months, and opposition politicians have coalesced to contest Tinubu's second term.
The new coalition is reminiscent of the alliance that defeated Nigeria's former ruling party, the Peoples Democratic Party, in 2015 after an uninterrupted 16-year rule. As was the case in 2015, many see the current administration as not delivering on their key promises to improve the country's ailing security and economic sectors. Tinubu's government has battled the fallout of unpopular economic reforms after removing decades-long subsidies and floating the country's currency. The reforms have sparked an inflation crisis as the country deals with a resurgence of attacks by extremist groups across the country.
Cheta Nwanze, lead partner at SBM Intelligence, a geo-political consultancy, said only a united opposition bloc stands a chance of unseating Tinubu in 2027. 'You cannot remove a sitting government if the opposition is disunited,' Nwanze said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Supreme Court sides with Trump in South Sudan deportation fight
US Supreme Court sides with Trump in South Sudan deportation fight

Arab News

timean hour ago

  • Arab News

US Supreme Court sides with Trump in South Sudan deportation fight

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court again sided with President Donald Trump's administration in a legal fight over deporting migrants to countries other than their own, lifting on Thursday limits a judge had imposed to protect eight men who the government sought to send to politically unstable South Sudan. The court on June 23 put on hold Boston-based US District Judge Brian Murphy's April 18 injunction requiring migrants set for removal to so-called 'third countries' where they have no ties to get a chance to tell officials they are at risk of torture there, while a legal challenge plays out. The court on Thursday granted a Justice Department request to clarify that its June 23 decision also extended to Murphy's separate May 21 ruling that the administration had violated his injunction in attempting to send a group of migrants to South Sudan. The US State Department has urged Americans to avoid the African nation 'due to crime, kidnapping and armed conflict.' Two liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the decision. The court said that Murphy should now 'cease enforcing the April 18 injunction through the May 21 remedial order.' Murphy's May 21 order mandating further procedures for the South Sudan-destined migrants prompted the US government to keep the migrants at a military base in Djibouti. Murphy also clarified at the time that non-US citizens must be given at least 10 days to raise a claim that they fear for their safety. After the Supreme Court lifted Murphy's April injunction on June 23, the judge promptly ruled that his May 21 order 'remains in full force and effect.' Calling that ruling by the judge a 'lawless act of defiance,' the Justice Department the next day urged the Supreme Court to clarify that its action applied to Murphy's May 21 decision as well. Murphy's ruling, the Justice Department said in court filings, has stalled its 'lawful attempts to finalize the long-delayed removal of those aliens to South Sudan,' and disrupted diplomatic relations. Its agents are being 'forced to house dangerous criminal aliens at a military base in the Horn of Africa that now lies on the borders of a regional conflict,' it added. Even as it accused the judge of defying the Supreme Court, the administration itself has been accused of violating judicial orders including in the third-country deportation litigation. The administration has said its third-country policy is critical for removing migrants who commit crimes because their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back. The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal members dissented from the June 23 decision pausing Murphy's injunction, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor calling it a 'gross abuse' of the court's power that now exposes 'thousands to the risk of torture or death.' After the Department of Homeland Security moved in February to step up rapid deportations to third countries, immigrant rights groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of a group of migrants seeking to prevent their removal to such places without notice and a chance to assert the harms they could face. In March, the administration issued guidance providing that if a third country has given credible diplomatic assurance that it will not persecute or torture migrants, individuals may be deported there 'without the need for further procedures.' Murphy found that the administration's policy of 'executing third-country removals without providing notice and a meaningful opportunity to present fear-based claims' likely violates due process requirements under the US Constitution. Due process generally requires the government to provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before taking certain adverse actions. The Justice Department on Tuesday noted in a filing that the administration has received credible diplomatic assurances from South Sudan that the aliens at issue will not be subject to torture.' The Supreme Court has let Trump implement some contentious immigration policies while the fight over their legality continues to play out. In two decisions in May, it let Trump end humanitarian programs for hundreds of thousands of migrants to live and work in the United States temporarily. The justices, however, faulted the administration's treatment of some migrants as inadequate under constitutional due process protections.

Violent Togo protest crackdown must be investigated: Amnesty
Violent Togo protest crackdown must be investigated: Amnesty

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

Violent Togo protest crackdown must be investigated: Amnesty

ABIDJAN: Amnesty International called Thursday for an independent investigation into allegations that Togo's security forces killed, tortured and kidnapped people in a violent crackdown on anti-government protests last month. Ruled for 58 years by leader Faure Gnassingbe and his late father, Togo has been rocked in recent weeks by rare protests in the capital, Lome, against electricity price hikes, arrests of government critics and a constitutional reform consolidating Gnassingbe's grip on power. At least seven people have been killed, dozens wounded and more than 60 arrested, according to civil society groups. Amnesty International said it had interviewed victims and witnesses who described a series of abuses by security forces at banned protests in late June. According to witnesses, 'men identified as security forces carried out unlawful killings, arbitrary arrests and detentions, acts of torture and other ill-treatment, and several cases of abduction,' said Marceau Sivieude, the rights group's interim director for west and central Africa. 'These cases must be independently and transparently investigated as a matter of urgency,' he said in a statement. At least six people are still reported missing after the protests, said Amnesty, which also condemned the alleged torture of protesters at another series of demonstrations in early June against Gnassingbe, 59, who took power in 2005 after the death of his father. Authorities said Sunday that two bodies found in a lagoon after the protests were victims of drownings. A lawyer for victims, Darius Atsoo, told the rights group the number of people detained in connection with the protests was unknown. As of Monday, at least 31 were still in custody, he said.

Cameroon's President, the world's oldest, likely faces election challenge from close allies
Cameroon's President, the world's oldest, likely faces election challenge from close allies

Al Arabiya

time3 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Cameroon's President, the world's oldest, likely faces election challenge from close allies

Cameroon's longtime President Paul Biya is gearing up for a likely election challenge from two of his closest allies after they both resigned from his government and announced their candidacy in the October election. Bello Bouba Maigari, Cameroon's tourism minister, quit the government this week after Issa Tchiroma Bakary resigned as minister of employment and vocational training last week, both pitching themselves as the right candidates to succeed Biya. Biya, 92, has been in power since 1982 – nearly half his lifetime – making him Cameroon's second president since independence from France in 1960. The world's oldest and Africa's second longest-serving president, Biya has not made a formal decision on seeking another term in office, although he has hinted at accepting the ruling party's requests for him to run again. He is frequently sick and abroad, and last year a rumor spread that he had died, prompting the government to publicly deny the rumors. In 2018, he cruised to victory with over 70 percent of the vote in an election marred by irregularities and low turnout due to ongoing separatist and terrorist violence. The upcoming election, however, could mark a turning point for a country that has only ever seen two presidents – one from the Christian south and one from the Muslim north. Both of the close allies-turned-opponents hail from the north, while Biya is from the south and would be 99 by the time he completes a new term. Supporters of the defecting allies claim they will represent a new era of politics and questioned the elderly president's ability to govern. 'We signed an alliance with the president when he was very apt and held full powers. Today we don't know exactly in which state he is,' Maidadi Dadou, the national communication secretary for Maigari's political party, said in a statement to the Associated Press. The over 40 years of Biya's stay in power have left a lasting impact in the country as ongoing separatist violence in the English-speaking parts has forced thousands out of school. Extremist violence has also spilled over from neighboring Nigeria. His government is also accused of corruption. In a region threatened with shrinking democratic space, several other African countries also have presidents accused of using state mechanisms to prolong their stay in power. Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni recently sought nomination for a seventh term, a move that would bring him closer to five decades in power in the East African country.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store