Bishop of major Catholic diocese exempts parishioners from Mass over fears of ICE raids
Bishop Alberto Rojas of the Diocese of San Bernardino wrote that "such fear constitutes a grave inconvenience that may impede the spiritual good of the faithful."
Catholic bishops have occasionally granted Mass exemptions during natural disasters, war or societal events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. But this appears to be the first time a bishop has invoked such a decree over immigration enforcement.
"All members of the faithful in the Diocese of San Bernardino who, due to genuine fear of immigration enforcement actions, are unable to attend Sunday Mass or Masses on holy days of obligation are dispensed from this obligation, as provided for in Canon 1247, until such time as this decree is revoked or amended," Rojas wrote in the decree released Tuesday.
The Diocese of Sen Bernardino is among the largest in the United States, and serves approximately 1.6 million Catholics in San Bernardino and Riverside counties in Southern California.
"In issuing this decree, I am guided by the Church's mission to care for the spiritual welfare of all entrusted to my care, particular those who face fear or hardship," Rojas wrote.
Rojas encouraged members of the diocese to find alternative ways to "maintain their spiritual communion with Christ," including through virtual Masses when offered.
For decades, American presidents have traditionally limited the authority of federal agencies to conduct civil immigration enforcement actions in sensitive locations like churches, hospitals and schools.
President Donald Trump revoked these restrictions on his first day in office. Since then, federal immigration officials have detained people suspected of being undocumented in schools and on church grounds.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom pointed to the decree to highlight the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement actions, which have included ICE raids at stores and courthouses.
"Freedom of religion? Not in Donald Trump's America," Newsom wrote on X. "People now have to choose between their faith and their freedom."
The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for comment on the decree or Newsom's comments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
34 minutes ago
- Fox News
Massachusetts bill would force ICE agents to unmask
A new bill in Massachusetts aims to require U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and other federal immigration enforcement officers to unmask. The legislative proposal was introduced Wednesday by Democratic state Rep. James Hawkins. It calls for a new section to the Massachusetts Penal Code that states, "A law enforcement officer shall not wear any mask or personal disguise while interacting with the public in the performance of their duties, except for medical grade masks that are surgical or N95 respirators designed to prevent the transmission of airborne diseases and masks designed to protect against exposure to smoke or toxins during a state of emergency." "A violation of this section shall be punishable as a misdemeanor," the bill, which was co-sponsored by another 10 Democratic state representatives, said. It says the intent of the legislature is to enact legislation "to require law enforcement officers to include their name or badge number on their uniforms," as well as to enact legislation to "ensure that Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team officers can utilize gear necessary to protect their faces from physical harm while they perform their SWAT responsibilities." ICE acting director Todd Lyons defended mask-wearing by his agents during a May press conference announcing an operation had resulted in nearly 1,500 arrests across Massachusetts. "I'm sorry if people are offended by them wearing masks, but I'm not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line, their family on the line, because people don't like what immigration enforcement is," Lyons during a press conference in Boston. "Is that the issue here that we're upset about, the masks? Or is anyone upset about the fact that ICE officers' families were labeled terrorists?" During an operation in Los Angeles weeks prior, Lyons said, ICE agents were "doxed" – having their personal information publicized – and people took photos of agents' names and faces and posted them online "with death threats to their families and to themselves." Most of those arrested in the Massachusetts operation had "significant criminality in the U.S. or abroad" and agents targeted "the most dangerous alien offenders in some of the most crime-infested neighborhoods of Massachusetts," officials said. "If sanctuary cities would change their policies and turn these violent criminal aliens over to us, into our custody, instead of releasing them to the public, we would not have to go out to the communities and do this," Lyons added. "Boston's my hometown, and it really shocks me that officials all over Massachusetts would rather release sex offenders, fentanyl dealers, drug dealers, human traffickers and child rapists back into the neighborhoods." Hawkins cited the March arrest of Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk by masked Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents outside of her home in Somerville, Mass. ICE accused the 30-year-old Turkish national of supporting Hamas, and DHS later confirmed her student visa had been revoked. She was subsequently transported to ICE detention centers in New Hampshire, Vermont and Louisiana, until a judge approved her release and return to Massachusetts in May. The bill is only the latest of a series of legislative proposals brought by Democrats seeking to unmask ICE agents. U.S. Sens. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Alex Padilla, D-Calif., introduced the "Visible Identification Standards for Immigration-Based Law Enforcement" or VISIBLE Act this week. They argue the bill would "strengthen oversight, transparency, and accountability for the Trump Administration's indiscriminate and alarming immigration enforcement tactics that have terrorized communities across California and the nation." Reacting to the Senate bill, President Donald Trump noted how demonstrators protesting ICE and other Trump administration policies don masks and other face coverings regularly to hide their identities. "It's sort of funny when people picket in front of Columbia, in front of Harvard, and they have masks on – more than masks. I mean, you can't see anything. Nobody complains about that. But when a patriot who works for ICE or Border Patrol puts a mask on so that they won't recognize him and his family, so they can lead a little bit of a normal life after having worked so hard and so dangerously, there's a problem with that," Trump said Wednesday during a White House meeting with African leaders. "This is the problem with the Democrats. They have a lot of bad things going on in their heads," Trump added. "They've lost their confidence, number one. And they're really – they've become somewhat deranged. I want to do whatever is necessary to protect our great law enforcement people. And they are right at the top of the list." The Justice Department told Fox News Digital on Wednesday it is actively tracking the recent uptick in "targeted assaults" against federal immigration enforcement agents and ICE facilities.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is threatening tariffs on a Beijing-backed group. What's got him so worried?
As US President Donald Trump wages a trade war across the globe, a new target has come into his line of fire: the BRICS group of emerging major economies. Trump in recent days has threatened members of the China- and Russia-backed club with 10% tariffs on goods imported to the US – in addition to heightened tariffs already looming for some of them. 'Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS' will face those duties with 'no exceptions,' Trump wrote on social media Sunday, as leaders from the group met for an annual summit in Rio de Janeiro. Days later, he went further, suggesting he wants to break up the group. 'If they're a member of BRICS, they are going to have to pay a 10% tariff, just for that one thing – and they won't be a member long,' Trump said during a cabinet meeting. Trump's focus on BRICS comes at a time when the club appears to be ascendant. Eponymous members Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have since last year expanded their club to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates – and more countries are waiting in the wings for entry. It's not clear if Saudi Arabia has accepted an invitation to join. It also turns up the international spotlight on the group, which roughly serves as the Global South's answer to the US-led Group of Seven (G7) advanced economies, but is often dismissed by experts as comprising nations too politically and ideologically disparate to be effective. That raises the question of just what Trump is so concerned about as he eyes BRICS warily from Washington. In his railings against the group, Trump has homed in on one area he sees as a specific threat: currency. 'BRICS was set up to hurt us, BRICS was set up to degenerate our dollar and take our dollar, take it off as the standard,' Trump said during the cabinet meeting on Tuesday. It's not the first time he's said something like this. In November, as president-elect, Trump threatened he would put '100% tariffs' on BRICS countries unless they committed to never create a 'a new BRICS Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty U.S. Dollar.' He reiterated the threat against 'seemingly hostile' BRICS countries earlier this year. The lofty goal of a 'BRICS currency' was suggested by Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in 2023, but the proposition, – so complex it may be practically impossible – has not been a focus of the body. BRICS countries are, however, interested in expanding trade in their national currencies, rather than relying on the US dollar – an aim that, if successful, could reduce the dollar dependence of a significant chunk of the global economy. By some estimates, BRICS members account for more than a third of global GDP based on purchasing power parity. Currently, the size of the US economy and the stability of the dollar have made the greenback the lifeblood of global finance – and a significant factor in American global power. In a joint declaration released during their summit Sunday, the group of BRICS leaders backed ongoing discussions of a 'cross-border payments initiative' between member countries. Analysts say that such a system, if developed, could potentially become an alternative to the SWIFT inter-bank network, using BRICS countries' currencies or their digital equivalents. Bypassing SWIFT and a dollar-denominated trade system has obvious benefits for certain BRICS countries, such as Russia and Iran, as it could allow them to circumvent heavy Western sanctions. But other countries also see a benefit in not relying on the US dollar for trade. China has long looked to make its renminbi an international currency and chip away at what it's called the US' 'financial hegemony.' In comments last month at a financial forum in Shanghai, the head of China's central bank Pan Gongsheng called for the development of a 'multi-polar international monetary system' – or one in which no single currency is dominant. But even with the will, reaching that point would be no quick transition – and there are likely many different views and competing interests within BRICS on how to get it done, not to mention technical challenges. Brazil's Lula on Monday alluded to that when he repeated his view that global trade needs alternatives to the US dollar, but added that this would be something that 'happens gradually' and 'carefully.' The economic coalition of founding members Brazil, Russia, India and China was launched in 2009 in the wake of the US financial crisis that damaged America's financial reputation and gave new confidence to emerging markets about their place in the global economy. The group, which invited South Africa in 2010, is even more of a geopolitical hodgepodge today than it was then, made up of authoritarian nations – both Communist Party-ruled and theological, vibrant, sprawling democracies, and others in between. It includes close partners of the US, like India and the UAE; those that consider the US an enemy, like Iran; and countries that don't see eye to eye, like India and China. That can blunt the force of BRICS when it makes finding consensus on a range of issues challenging, observers say. But BRICS countries are also united by a simple view: that the global balance of power skews too much toward the US and its European allies to the exclusion of emerging economies – and that the system should be reformed. To that end, the body set up its own development bank in 2015, and backs Brazil and India's aspirations to play a greater role in the UN Security Council. Members of the group have denied this makes BRICS 'anti-Western.' But as Russia and China in the past decade have faced more friction with the West amid China's growing assertiveness on the global stage and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, observers say both have pushed to shape the group into a more pointed tool to counter US power. Not everyone is on board. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned other members at a BRICS summit last year to 'be careful to ensure that this organization does not acquire the image of one that is trying to replace global institutions.' Meanwhile, this year's gathering was missing top leaders of several countries, among them China, UAE and Egypt, suggesting the body is not at the top of their immediate agendas. That said, Trump's global tariff war has been a rallying point for BRICS. During their summit in Rio, the leaders released a joint declaration voicing 'serious concerns' about the 'rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures' – an apparent jibe at the Trump administration's trade policy. Members have also found common ground on points counter to the US outside the realm of economics, even as they've voiced them carefully. Their latest declaration referenced a 12-day conflict between Israel and member state Iran by condemning recent military strikes on Iran and expressing 'serious concern' over 'deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure' and 'peaceful' nuclear facilities. It did not, however, name Israel on that point, after Israel carried out days of strikes against Iran last month. It also didn't name the United States, which bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities as part of the same onslaught. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Take Our Poll: Do You Think Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Help or Hurt Your Financial Situation?
President Donald Trump's 2025 tax and spending bill is being hailed on one side as 'a key cornerstone of America's new golden age' and on the other as 'the worst job-killing bill in American history.' Typical antithetical views for any new massive legislation like this. Tell Us: Do You Think Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Help or Hurt Your Financial Situation? Trump's self-proclaimed 'Big Beautiful Bill' includes a $6,000 credit on Social Security income for those 65 and over who make under $75,000, plus tax breaks on tipped workers and overtime. It also extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Meanwhile, it reduces support for Medicaid and food stamps by $1.2 trillion. The Congressional Budget Office said the law will add $3.4 trillion to the deficit in the next decade and around 12 million people will lose health insurance. The richest households will get a $12,000 increase while the poorest people will lose $1,600 a year, largely due to those Medicaid and food assistance reductions, according to the CBO analysis. More than 71 million Americans use Medicaid, and 40 million take advantage of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Tell Us: Do You Think Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Help or Hurt Your Financial Situation? This article originally appeared on Take Our Poll: Do You Think Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Help or Hurt Your Financial Situation?
