logo
US short seller calls Vedanta Group a house of cards built on unsustainable debt; firm says allegation baseless

US short seller calls Vedanta Group a house of cards built on unsustainable debt; firm says allegation baseless

The Print09-07-2025
'Vedanta Resources Ltd (VRL) is a 'parasite' holding company with no significant operations of its own, propped up entirely by cash extracted from its dying 'host': Vedanta Ltd (VEDL),' Viceroy said in an 85-page report.
The US firm took a short position against the debt of Vedanta Resources, the UK-based parent of Indian miner Vedanta Ltd, alleging that the group 'is a house of cards built on a foundation of unsustainable debt, looted assets, and accounting fiction.' Vedanta responded saying the report was 'a malicious combination of selective misinformation and baseless allegations' and that its authors issued it without contacting the group.
New Delhi, Jul 9 (PTI) US short seller Viceroy Research on Wednesday called billionaire Anil Agarwal-led British firm Vedanta Resources a 'parasite' that is 'systematically draining' its Indian unit, an allegation which the group called as 'selective misinformation and baseless' aimed at discrediting it.
VEDL has paid dividends worth Rs 75,800 crore in the last four fiscal years, while its unit Hindustan Zinc paid another Rs 57,300 crore over the same period. 56.38 per cent of the dividend payout at VEDL went to Vedanta Resources in line with its shareholding, and 61.62 per cent in Hindustan Zinc.
Viceroy said VEDL has accrued USD 5.6 billion free cash flow shortfall against dividends over the last 3 years while its net debt has increased by USD 6.7 billion (around 200 per cent) since FY22.
'VEDL has depleted its cash reserves and exhausted its ability to borrow money and 'liquidate' working capital items,' it said.
Conversely, over the same period, VRL's interest costs have increased by USD 200 million per year. It reported FY25 total interest costs of USD 835 million against USD 4.9 billion of gross debt implies an effective interest rate of 15.8 per cent, the report said adding this was inexplicable as the London-based company's publicly issued bonds and disclosed term loans carry rates closer to 9-11 per cent.
'We see only three possible explanations, all of which suggest a level of financial misconduct: Undisclosed, off-balance sheet debt is being serviced, with the costs disguised as interest expenses. This would be fraud. (Secondly) high-cost intra-period loans are being used and repaid before reporting dates to mask the true level of debt. (And thirdly) loan rates or conditions are materially misreported to the market,' it said.
The same phenomenon is observed at VEDL, where actual interest expenses in FY25 were USD 368 million higher than its reported weighted average borrowing costs would suggest, implying significant intra-period borrowing to manage liquidity. This is supported by VEDL's precarious working capital ratio, which has been well below 1.0 since FY23, indicating its current liabilities vastly exceed its current assets.
On mechanisms of cash extraction, it said VRL employs several key mechanisms to drain cash from VEDL – unsustainable dividends (VEDL's dividend policy is dictated entirely by VRL's financing needs, not by its own ability to generate cash), Artificial Brand Fees (VRL extracts hundreds of millions of dollars annually from VEDL and its subsidiaries through 'brand fees' that lack any commercial justification), VRL loans from VEDL subsidiaries.
'Our forensic investigation into Vedanta's key operating subsidiaries reveals a portfolio riddled with financially unviable assets, undisclosed liabilities, systematic fraud, and profound governance failures. The book values reported by VEDL are fiction,' the report said.
It went on to cite the example of VEDL's Dubai-based subsidiary, Fujairah Gold, which it said has multiple red flags suggesting it deals in undocumented or illicit gold.
'The Vedanta Group is a house of cards built on a foundation of unsustainable debt, looted assets, and accounting fiction. The VRL financial zombie being kept alive by transfusions of cash from its subsidiary VEDL,' the report said. 'The proposed demerger will merely spread the group's insolvency across multiple, weaker entities, each burdened with a legacy of impaired assets and unserviceable debt. The structure is fundamentally broken and headed for a disorderly collapse.' VEDL plans to split different businesses into separate entities.
Viceroy said it was shorting the debt stack of Vedanta Resources (VRL), the parent company and majority owner of Mumbai-listed Vedanta Ltd (VEDL), as it released the 85-page report.
Shorting debt, also known as short selling of bonds, is a trading strategy where an investor looks to profit from a decline in the price of bonds or other debt instruments. It involves borrowing the bond, selling it at the current market price, and then buying it back later at a potentially lower price to return to the lender, pocketing the difference as profit.
Vedanta stocks fell as much as 6 per cent following the report release but recovered some losses and closed at Rs 440.80 on the BSE, down 3.4 per cent over the previous close.
Calling VRL a 'heavily indebted parent', Viceroy said, 'The entire group structure is financially unsustainable, operationally compromised, and poses a severe, under-appreciated risk to creditors'.
To service its own debt burden, VRL is 'systematically draining' VEDL, forcing the operating company to take on ever-increasing leverage and deplete its cash reserves. 'This looting erodes the fundamental value of VEDL, which constitutes the primary collateral for VRL's own creditors,' the report added.
Responding to the report, Vedanta in a statement said, 'The report is a malicious combination of selective misinformation and baseless allegations to discredit the Group'.
'It has been issued without making any attempt to contact us with the sole objective of creating false propaganda. It only contains a compilation of various information, which is already in the public domain, but the authors have tried to sensationalise the context to profiteer from market reaction,' it said.
Alleging that some of the 'material quantitative and qualitative discrepancies' in Vedanta group could 'tantamount to fraud', Viceroy highlighted what it called the 'Bait and Switch Funding Model' where VEDL promotes ludicrous capital-intensive projects that it cannot afford in order to raise fresh capital. This capital is then paid out to the PropCo (parent company) to service its debt.
Among others, it called out Vedanta's interest expenses vastly exceeding its reported note rates, evidence of inflated asset values, expenses across operating subsidiaries being systematically capitalised to artificially inflate profits and asset values, and billions of dollars of disputed expenses kept off-balance sheet and undisclosed in financial reports.
'Vedanta presents systematic governance failures across management and auditors, including inappropriate auditor choices,' it alleged.
'To cure its maladies, VRL has proposed a demerger of the entities it has rolled up through its decades-long acquisition strategy, which it now claims are more valuable individually. This fails to address the fundamental cash crunch and will saddle the resultant companies with unsustainable debts from their inception.' It goes on to term VRL 'a financial zombie' that is being kept alive by transfusions of cash from its subsidiary VEDL.
The report came on a day before Agarwal, chairman of Vedanta Ltd, is to address the company's shareholders at the annual general meeting.
'The timing of the Report is suspect and could be to undermine the forthcoming corporate initiatives. Our stakeholders are discerning enough to understand such tactics,' Vedanta said. 'In fact, to avoid any responsibility, authors of the report have added various disclaimers that the Report has been prepared for educational purposes only and expresses their opinions and are not statements of fact.' Vedanta said it remains focused on the business and growth, and requested everyone to avoid speculation and unsubstantiated allegations.
In response, the Viceroy Group wrote on 'X' that Vedanta has dismissed its 85-page 'thoroughly referenced' report without any attempt to disapprove their work. 'This is likely because they cannot refute our findings. We stand behind our work and are happy to take questions,' Viceroy said.
The strategy to make a profit from a declining stock deployed by Viceroy is the same as that used by another US short seller Hindenburg Research in January 2023 against the Adani group. Hindenburg, which has since shut down, had called the alleged 'brazen stock manipulation and accounting fraud' by the Adani Group.
While Adani group refuted the allegations, calling them 'baseless' and 'malicious', the Hindenburg report led to group stocks losing as much as USD 150 billion in value at their lowest point.
In another post, Viceroy said, 'In lieu of a response: Vedanta simply has outlined details of our legal disclaimer. This is the laziest response to any report we have published in our 8+ year history'.
'We stand behind our work, and are happy to take questions,' it added. PTI ANZ MR MR
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's Next lifts profit outlook as warm weather, M&S disruption boost trade
UK's Next lifts profit outlook as warm weather, M&S disruption boost trade

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

UK's Next lifts profit outlook as warm weather, M&S disruption boost trade

British clothing retailer Next raised its annual profit outlook for the third time in five months as it reported better-than-expected second-quarter sales, benefiting from warm weather and disruption at cyberattack-hit rival Marks & Spencer. Next has around 460 stores in the UK and Ireland and an online presence in over 70 countries selling the Next brand and more than 700 other brands. With the United Kingdom accounting for around 80% of its sales, it is often considered a useful gauge of how British consumers are faring. It said on Thursday full-price sales in the 13 weeks to July 26 rose 10.5% versus last year - ahead of guidance of 6.5% and compared to growth of 11.4% in the first quarter. Sales overperformed against Next's expectations in both the UK and overseas, it said. The retailer said UK sales growth of 7.8% was largely due to better than expected weather and "trading disruption at a major competitor", which it did not name. However, Next's second quarter overlapped a period where M&S stopped taking online clothing orders following a cyberattack which has cost it 300 million pounds ($398 million) in profit. Industry data has shown Next to be a beneficiary of M&S' woes, along with Zara and H&M. Next said international sales grew a faster than expected 26.4% mainly because its digital marketing proved more effective than anticipated. Though Next raised its guidance for second half full price sales growth to 4.5% from 3.5% previously, it remained cautious for the period. It expects UK employment opportunities to continue to diminish, with the effects of April's employer tax increases continuing to filter through into the economy. "We believe that this will increasingly dampen consumer spending as the year progresses," it said. Reflecting that caution, Next shares were flat on Thursday, having risen 29% in 2025 so far. "Next is cautious about the second half of the year, but the company has a good track record of under-promising and over-delivering," Zoe Gillespie, wealth manager at RBC Brewin Dolphin, said. Next raised its forecast for year to January 2026 pretax profit by 25 million pounds to 1.105 billion pounds. Profit topped 1 billion pounds for the first time in 2024/25. On Wednesday, Next bought the brand rights to maternity retailer Seraphine.

China, Now Trump: Pakistan And The Art Of Somehow Finding Patrons
China, Now Trump: Pakistan And The Art Of Somehow Finding Patrons

NDTV

time29 minutes ago

  • NDTV

China, Now Trump: Pakistan And The Art Of Somehow Finding Patrons

Since many Indians are upset about the latest oil deal between the US and Pakistan, this move has seemingly achieved its goal before the first drill even touches Pakistani soil. As the announcement is made, predictably on US President Donald Trump's social media handle, on the heels of 25% tariffs announcement for India, it is somewhat natural for New Delhi to feel jilted. Trump seems to have counted on this feeling. After announcing the India-Pakistan ceasefire in May, and never shutting up about it since then, Trump has been coddling both military and civil establishments in Pakistan. Whether it is the much-discussed hosting of Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir or this latest oil trade deal, the US and Pakistan appear to be inching closer, reminiscent of the War on Terror days. Since the Afghanistan war is officially over for the US, one may wonder why Islamabad has suddenly become relevant for Washington yet again. 'Just Do It' A quick answer could be Trump's idiosyncratic foreign policy, wherein what Trump thinks in any moment is what Trump does the next, irrespective of how outlandish the thought may be. A serious deliberation, however, may reveal some other factors in no particular order of importance. In 2023, Pakistan received USD 1.8 billion in Foreign Direct Investment, as opposed to India's mammoth USD 44.4 billion. What is more perplexing about these figures is that Pakistan received this sum mostly from China in the form of energy investments. This sum, although not significant, may have irked someone in Washington, prompting a reestablishment of the principal-agent relationship between the US and Pakistan. China's influence needs to be contained anyhow, especially if it involves an agent state. Even without Afghanistan in the equation, Pakistan remains an important box in the "Eurasian chessboard" - or so it wants everyone in the West to believe. Pride And Persuasion Pakistan has successfully lobbied Western capitals into believing in its indispensability in the regional strategic landscape. Portraying their country as a victim of terrorism, Pakistan's civil and military establishments have managed to elicit benefits from the West by playing on the latter's security anxieties. The US continues to buy this narrative for various reasons, not discounting the naivete among them. India may not be thrilled about the latest deal, but bigger maybe the disappointment of Pakistani dissenters. There are growing voices against this constant duping of the public by the establishment. With each such highfalutin 'deal' - like the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) - there is an expectation of a socio-economic turnaround in Pakistan. With a beleaguered economy crumbling under massive international debt, Pakistan has very little going for itself at present. What Pakistan lacks in terms of state-building, it more than makes up for in the realm of being obsequious towards its principal states, be it China or the US. At Least Someone Is Happy Going by the public discourse, obtaining an International Monetary Fund loan is a cause for national celebration. Grant announcements from the Arab countries give Pakistan a sense of inflated importance. No hint of irony is lost here. When dissenters question this fiction, they are either killed or jailed. Pakistan's playing the vassal state to global superpowers doesn't translate into the country's development, but it keeps the political and military elite and their coterie well-fed. At this very moment, Pakistan's human rights activists are protesting alongside Baloch women in Islamabad against forced disappearances. After a violent crackdown on a similar protest in Karachi earlier this year, the Pakistan government is playing deaf this time. Fissures in Pakistan's socio-political structure are getting exacerbated by economic duress. It is, therefore, a question of Pakistan's survival to make outlandish promises, economic and strategic, to whomsoever it may concern. Keeping America Interested Since the CPEC has underperformed, partially due to the armed resistance it has faced in the Baloch areas and mainly because Pakistan doesn't have a substantial industrial base to take advantage of the corridor, there may be anxieties in Pakistan around exclusive reliance on China. It is important, therefore, to keep the US interested in the utility of Pakistan. In turn, the US may want to keep its non-NATO ally content with deal announcements, with an eye fixed firmly on China. Locked in an impasse over trade with China, the US has been exploring any and all avenues to check China's geopolitical influence. While Pakistan may not overtly defy China - especially after having used Chinese defence hardware and intelligence against India - its proclivity for the original principal state will lead to certain concessions for the US. Should this rekindling bother India? Definitely. Can India do anything about it? Very little, if at all.

"In Securing Our Energy Needs...": India's Calm Reply To US' Russia Oil Fury
"In Securing Our Energy Needs...": India's Calm Reply To US' Russia Oil Fury

NDTV

time29 minutes ago

  • NDTV

"In Securing Our Energy Needs...": India's Calm Reply To US' Russia Oil Fury

New Delhi: India has issued a measured reply to US' criticism of its continued Russian oil purchases. "In securing our energy needs, we are guided by what is on offer in the market and the prevailing global circumstance," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said Friday. The US has ramped up pressure on India to stop buying Russian oil, arguing it amounts to funding Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the purchases "a point of irritation" in comments this morning, as Delhi and Washington toil to secure a trade deal and scale down Donald Trump's 25 per cent 'reciprocal tariff'. Rubio acknowledged India's vast energy needs - analysts expect crude oil demand from the world's fourth largest economy to cross 6.6 million barrels per day by 2030 - and that it was buying oil and gas from Russia because the sanction-hit country is offering steep discounts. "But that, unfortunately, is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So, it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India," he told American broadcaster Fox News. Trump, he said, expressed "very clear frustration… with so many vendors available India continues to buy so much from Russia, which in essence is helping to fund the war effort…" Rubio's comments follow Trump's scathing remarks about Delhi still buying crude and gas from Moscow. The US President pointed out Russian oil accounted for 35 per cent of India's supply in the first half of the year, and demanded it, instead, buy from his country. On Thursday Trump decreed a 25 per cent 'reciprocal tariff' on Indian goods imported into the US and levied an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. NDTV Explains | The Story Behind Donald Trump's 25% 'Reciprocal Tariff' On India "... they (India) have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy... at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine. India will, therefore, be paying a tariff of 25 per cent, plus a penalty..." The new tariff - to which India will not retaliate, at this time - came into effect this morning. India has always said Russia is a 'close, all-weather friend", and that it will not be bullied, by any country, into re-defining decades-old foreign policies and current economic concerns. In the past - when faced with criticism over buying Russian oil - External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said, quite categorically, that India would prioritise its citizens' needs first. READ | US Penalty On Buying Russian Oil. What Is India's Stance This, he said, would mean buying oil from anyone who sells at the best possible price. "India is a big oil consumer... We are a big oil importer because we don't have oil. Now, it is not like there is a political strategy to buy oil... There is an oil strategy to buy oil... There is a market strategy," Mr Jaishankar said in August 2024. Prior to the war in Ukraine, India rarely bought Russian crude due to high freight costs. By 2023, though, Moscow was selling about 1.66 million barrels per day, up from less than 700,000 in 2022. India eventually became the biggest buyer of seaborne Russian crude since the West halted purchases and imposed sanctions against Moscow. In an effort to placate Trump, India committed, in February, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Trump in Washington, to buy more oil and gas from the US, which will also help, to some extent, hit the ambitious mark of $500 billion in bilateral trade within the next five years. However, the sheer volume of India's energy demands means the US cannot be the sole, or even a major, supplier. As of today, India's largest are Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Russia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store