R1. 4bn wasted: Sapo's epic failure
THE SA Post Office (Sapo) has been declared financially 'unsustainable' and riddled with systemic mismanagement.
Image: Independent Newspapers Archives
THE SA Post Office (Sapo) has been declared financially 'unsustainable' and riddled with systemic mismanagement after receiving its fourth consecutive failed audit opinion from the Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA), sparking outrage from MPs who demanded answers on why the failing institution keeps consuming public money.
AGSA's damning report, presented to Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) on June 11, exposed: R152 million lost to fruitless and irregular spending in 2023/24, with R136 million dismissed without repercussions.
A dismal 13% achievement rate on performance targets, despite a R381m bailout from the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) for staff salaries.
R86 million paid to business rescue practitioners (BRPs) and advisors since 2023, with little progress to show.
No stable leadership, severe staff shortages, and repeated violations of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA).
AGSA officials delivered a stark verdict: Sapo is being propped up by taxpayer funds. 'Costs keep outstripping income. Debts are mounting, and the organisation isn't earning enough to survive,' said AGSA's Makhai Motshekga. ActionSA's Alan Beesley was more blunt: 'It's time to pull the plug. Sapo cannot be saved.'
The BRPs, brought in July 2023, have already burned through R86m, including payments to consultants, tax experts, and lawyers. The EFF's Ntombovuyo Mente-Nkuna demanded answers: 'Who are these advisors? What have they actually fixed? We can't keep throwing money at a sinking ship.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
AGSA's Nathan Lawnet said the BRPs — from firms SNG and Legae — were 'qualified' but admitted survival depends on 'new income sources and partnerships,' which still don't exist.
MPs pressed AGSA on Sapo's unaccounted-for assets, with Mente-Nkuna noting rural branch closures force grant recipients to travel far. 'How many buildings does Sapo still control? Why aren't they helping our communities?' she asked. AGSA confirmed Sapo owns properties and old equipment, but said almost nothing has been upgraded in years.
Postbank's separation from Sapo — required by banking laws — has created confusion. Though Postbank is now audited independently, it still depends on Sapo's failing systems. ANC's Gijimani Skosana warned: 'Postbank once helped fund Sapo. Now, both are drowning.'
Wasteful spending continues unchecked, with R200m squandered since 2021. Mente-Nkuna slammed the impunity: 'R136 million just written off? Who checked this? Who was held responsible?' AGSA admitted probes were lacking, blaming write-offs on debt settlements, not internal crackdowns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
South Africa's unique audit mandate influences global peers ahead of SAI20 summit
Auditor General Tsakani Maluleke speaking duiring the SAI20 Supreme Auditors Summit 2025. Image: Supplied The Auditor General of South Africa (AGSA), Tsakani Maluleke has underscored the significance of the country's distinctive mandate to audit all public institutions annually. This capacity, not commonly shared by her international counterparts, is increasingly admired globally as a model for promoting accountability and transparency in public finance. Addressing the media on the Supreme Audit Institutions of the G20 (SAI20) in Johannesburg, Maluleke expressed concern that the unique perspective of the AGSA often goes unnoticed. "Not every AG sees all the states in the way AGSA does. Sometimes I fear that gets lost when we issue a general report which gives you a sense of not just on municipality but what is happening across the country," she said. "It is the perspective that is unique to AGSA in this country but it also a perspective that is becoming more and more aspirational for our peers across the globe." This perspective, according to Maluleke, is vital as it provides citizens, administrators, parliamentarians, councils, and municipal executives with crucial information to inform decision-making processes. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ "One of the things unique about SAI and team AGSA is that the Constitution requires that the AG audits every public institution every single year. The public audit act also provides that the AG must look at financials, performance information, compliance and internal controls," Maluleke said. She said SAI20 had come up with a good series of conversations that have culminated in the consesus-driven Communique. The SAI20 summit aims to explore developmental themes such as unlocking public infrastructure funding to foster equality and enhance citizens' quality of life. Another key focus will be on bridging the skills gap to prepare a future-ready workforce, signalling a collaborative approach to economic growth that prioritises sustainability. Maluleke said SAI20 sets out the service of what the Supreme Audit Institutions are going to start doing differently in countries as they audit independently, the type of focus areas they will choose, the type of perspectives they will focus on and how they will engage with that work. This will also include recommendations for implementation for AGs. "The second, perhaps there are things we can start to recommend to governments that will will help them to start making gains in the two things," Maluleke said. Addressing concerns regarding municipalities' preparedness for the upcoming G20 meeting, especially given that only 41 of 257 municipalities achieved clean audits, Maluleke stressed the importance of focusing on infrastructure projects. "The work as team AGSA has taught us what goes wrong, how to frame our recommendations to governments, how to resource our teams," Maluleke said. "Team AGSA is no longer resourced by people who are bean counters but supplementing to include engineers and quantity surveyors so that the work we do provides credible insight and is impactful. We were able to bring lessons such as that to a room full of other AGs."
IOL News
5 days ago
- IOL News
G20: How supreme audit institutions support infrastructure development and help fight corruption
Deputy finance minister Dr. David Masondo has praised the role played by supreme audit institutions (SAis) such as the Auditor-General South Africa at the two-day SAi20 summit at Melrose Arch in Johannesburg. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers Deputy finance minister Dr. David Masondo has praised supreme audit institutions (SAi) such as Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA), saying they assist governments achieve their developments goals and tackle graft. Masondo was speaking at the two-day SAi20 summit at Melrose Arch, Johannesburg on Tuesday. The SAi20 summit is part of the gatherings held under the country's year-long G20 presidency, with the main Summit taking place in November. 'This summit of the supreme audit institutions of the G20 nations serves as an important tributary to the broader G20 discussions, which in turn will flow into the even broader global discussions related to the sustainable development goals (SDGs),' he said. According to Masondo, SAis play the crucial role that they do in auditing government and are a key enabler of their countries' abilities to deliver on their infrastructure development goals in the same way that the AGSA plays the key role that it does in enabling the country to realise its infrastructure development aspirations. 'The audits, both – financial and performance – contribute towards our ability to raise funding from development financial institutions, private sector funders and other organisations,' he explained. In addition, investors rely on the audit reports produced by SAis and the audit reports help countries in examining the controls that need to be in place to ensure the efficient and effective deployment of resources towards the infrastructure delivery programmes. 'The SAis enhance our ability to exercise oversight on the nature, quality and diligence of our maintenance of our infrastructure. These actions are essential in ensuring that infrastructure investment not only happens but delivers value for money, reduces risks of cost overruns and corruption and accelerates progress toward the SDGs,' added Masondo. Among the SDGs, for which a target of 2030 has been set, are building resilient infrastructure, promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialisation and fostering innovation. Masondo said infrastructure is a key enabler of economic development, employment creation and delivering services to citizens. 'Mindful of this, as the South African sovereign, we have committed significant investments towards infrastructure development. We have an ambitious infrastructure development programs that have ever been undertaken in our country,' he said. The AGSA, Masondo stated, has helped the government gain insight into the manner in which policies across skills development and education translate into action and outcomes in citizens' lived reality. 'We have an enhanced ability to exercise oversight on the various aspects of our service delivery efforts – being able to be specific in our inquiries and interventions, particularly with respect to the manner in which resources are being deployed and the extent to which they are generating the desired outcomes,' Masondo said.
Daily Maverick
5 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Swiftnet sells, Telkom swells: one deal, big dividends — for now
Telkom dazzled investors with its financial results recently, but a deeper dive reveals that the sale of the Swiftnet tower infrastructure business – once considered central to Telkom's strategy – provided the windfall that lit up the numbers. But strip out Swiftnet, and the glow fades fast. The Department of Communications and Digital Technologies (DCDT) congratulated Telkom on its 'phenomenal' results, with Minister Solly Malatsi hailing it as 'a key enabler of South Africa's digital future' in a statement on 10 June. Unlike traditional SOEs like Eskom or Transnet, Telkom is listed on the JSE and not governed under Schedule 2 of the Public Finance Management Act – but with 54.5% of its shares held by state-linked entities, it behaves more like a public-interest asset than a private firm. Despite these apparently strong financials, all of these indicators are positive as a result of the sale of a core business within Telkom's holding – Swiftnet, which owns all of the company's mast and tower business. The numbers vs the narrative Telkom's FY2025 performance was strong across all headline metrics: group revenue rose 3.3% to R43.9-billion, adjusted EBITDA jumped 25.1% to R11.8-billion and free cash flow surged to R2.78-billion – a 555% increase on the prior year, almost unbelievable on paper. The company declared dividends for the first time in four years, totalling R1.3-billion. Every number on the switchboard appears to be green, with the state emerging as a major beneficiary: a R540-million dividend windfall flowed into government coffers just in time to help buffer the fiscus. Still, one question remains on the line: are these numbers the result of strategic depth, or a carefully choreographed series of asset disposals? A towering turnaround At first glance, the turnaround reads like a textbook recovery play: streamlining, divestiture, energy efficiency, capital discipline. However, a detailed analysis of the financials shows that nearly all the key indicators of Telkom's turnaround hinge on a single major action: the sale of Swiftnet, Telkom's mast and tower managed more than 4,000 high sites – many in remote areas – serving as the physical spine of Telkom's mobile and fixed wireless networks. Its sale means Telkom will now pay to access the infrastructure it once owned, with long-term lease costs baked into future operations. Swiftnet's disposal generated R6.6-billion in proceeds, cut net debt to almost half of what it was, bringing it to R7.48-billion, and unlocked the funds for dividend reinstatement. The buyer was a consortium led by Actis, alongside Royal Bafokeng Holdings and the Mineworkers Investment Company. Not insignificantly, the R4.4-billion net gain on Swiftnet's sale also inflated reported profit, pushing EBITDA margins higher. Free cash flow surged by 555% – impressive, yes, but primarily due to this windfall, a reduction in capex and tightened cost controls. That eye-watering number highlights the real concern: Telkom's FY2025 turnaround looks like a one-trick pony, unless the company intends to keep selling off core infrastructure. Telkom brought back dividends this year, promising to pay out between 30% and 40% of its free cash flow to shareholders. But in 2025 it went even higher, paying out 48%. That extra payout was made possible by the cash it earned from selling Swiftnet, which gave the company a big financial boost. Notably, Telkom hadn't paid dividends since 2021, citing pandemic pressures, margin decline and capital requirements. The 2025 payout signals a strategic shift, though not necessarily a structural one. 'Without Swiftnet's R4.4-billion disposal gain, Telkom's core profit story looks significantly more modest – and its future operating costs are now structurally higher,' the company noted in its investor release. Divestment-driven growth The Swiftnet deal transferred control of income-generating infrastructure to an external operator. Telkom now leases back some of these same towers at a cost. While the short-term capital unlocked helped reduce debt and deliver dividends, it baked in long-term lease liabilities. Selling vs leasing towers – a case study in strategic trade-offs MTN's 2021 sale of more than 5,700 towers to IHS Towers unlocked immediate capital and was initially hailed as a strategic move to streamline its balance sheet. However, the deal later attracted criticism as leaseback costs began to rise, eroding the expected financial benefit. More significantly, MTN ceded control over key passive infrastructure, which reportedly led to delays in site upgrades, reduced agility in rural network expansion and strained relationships with the tower operator over access and maintenance. The long-term implications of relinquishing infrastructure ownership became a cautionary tale in the telecoms industry – one that Telkom may now be echoing with the Swiftnet sale. What this means for you Telkom's big numbers might look great for now, but they came from selling key parts of the business, like its cellphone towers. That helped pay shareholders, but it also means Telkom now has to rent back the infrastructure it once owned. If this cuts into future network investment, you could see slower upgrades, patchy coverage in rural areas, or even higher prices. If you're a Telkom customer, it's fair to ask: will I get less for more? Will my signal suffer? Or should I start looking at other networks? Whether this will, in fact, be the case will likely only be seen by Telkom's performance and service over the current financial year. On the spectrum – litigation and market dominance In 2021-22, Telkom challenged Icasa's high-demand spectrum auction, claiming the process favoured comparative incumbents such as Vodacom and MTN. It cited ignored roaming agreements (such as Vodacom-Rain) and obsolete competition models. 'Icasa failed to conduct a new competition assessment and relied on outdated frameworks,' Telkom argued in its court application filed with the North Gauteng High Court at the time. While the litigation was eventually withdrawn, the company's underlying point may now work against it. With debt slashed and cash freed up, Telkom is better placed than ever to bid aggressively, potentially replicating the very dominance it previously challenged. Paper tiger or infrastructure backbone? Telkom's 2025 performance is no doubt impressive, but many of its gains are the result of concretely one-off, non-repeatable actions. The 2025 financial year gave Telkom a fiscal breather. The current financial year will determine whether that space becomes structural headroom, or whether the company suffers in delivery of key services due to the sales it has made. DM
