logo
Agribusiness and Trade: Drones transform NZ farms from above

Agribusiness and Trade: Drones transform NZ farms from above

NZ Herald5 days ago
'Ag drones have been in the background for a couple of years,' he says. 'But we have recently hit a sweet spot where they are able to carry enough liquid and fly long enough to make them genuinely effective. That's when the market really took off.'
Drones fill a practical niche between ground-based equipment and helicopters, and their rise is changing how agricultural contractors operate. They can open up access to land that might previously have been too steep or too wet for traditional agricultural machinery, or that require immediate attention and more precision.
Fieldays 2025 Drone Zone. Photo / Danielle Zollickhofer
'If you've got 100 hectares to do, a helicopter is always going to be the best choice,' he says. 'And if you've got lots of ground, it is dry, not steep, and you have got plenty of room to move vehicles, then a tractor or a truck is going to be better.
New Zealand's geography makes drones particularly well-suited.
'We farm intensively and make the most out of small holdings,' says Simpson. 'We've got a lot of arable land but not a huge amount of it is flat. Even with beef and sheep, we run stock on quite steep country. A drone is a real nice fit.'
This is opening up new possibilities. 'Some farmers never dealt with gorse on steep blocks because the only option was spraying with a backpack. A helicopter wasn't economical. Now a drone contractor can do the job at a reasonable rate.'
Urgency has also become a significant factor in the technology's uptake. Simpson points to Wairarapa, which has had to deal with heavy rain this year.
'There is a point at which you can't use a vehicle. In the past you might ring a helicopter provider and be told there is a four-week wait. Meanwhile, the fungus gets a foothold.
'A drone provider might be the same price, but they can be there the next day. You can deal with the problem faster and ultimately use less chemicals.'
Safety is another driver of demand.
'Why drive a quad bike or a vehicle across a steep hillside when you can instead fly over it with a drone and keep everyone safe?' says Simpson.
Given the compliance requirements, most agricultural drone users aren't farmers themselves, but agricultural contractors.
'Since an ag drone is over 25 kilos, you need a certificate with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA),' says Simpson. 'You're also required to deal with the Environmental Protection Authority for chemicals, WorkSafe for health and safety, as well as local councils for regulations – that's a lot for one person in a ute with a drone.'
The Agricultural Drone Association has grown to around 60 members – even more since Fieldays – and will play a crucial role in advocating for New Zealand's agricultural drone operators and enhancing skills and knowledge within the industry.
'The association is aimed at drone users,' says Simpson. 'They needed a community, and it means that we can speak to regulators with a collective voice.'
Fieldays 2025: Craig Simpson, president of the Agricultural Drone Association and founder of Aerolab. Photo / Danielle Zollickhofer
He says the CAA has been a constructive partner. Certification wait times have fallen from 18 months to about eight.
'That is a real improvement – but it is still a barrier. If the industry keeps growing, that bottleneck could get worse.
'We'd like to see the regulator continue working closely with industry so we can maintain momentum. This is a great farming technology, and it's important we don't let red tape slow down its potential.'
Simpson says that with their speed, precision, and ability to tackle challenging terrain, agricultural drones are on their way to becoming a familiar sight on New Zealand farms – not just a novelty attraction at Fieldays.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt proposes ban on in-store payment surcharges
Govt proposes ban on in-store payment surcharges

1News

timean hour ago

  • 1News

Govt proposes ban on in-store payment surcharges

The Government is proposing a ban on surcharges for most in-store payments, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson announced today. 'By May 2026 at the latest, we will ban surcharges for in-store payments," Simpson said. "Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet.' Transactions made through the Visa and Mastercard networks, and by EFTPOS, were the main method of card payment in New Zealand, and Simpson said surcharges on some purchases were "a hassle and an unwelcome surprise when shoppers get to the till". "That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past," he said. "We're banning surcharges so consumers can shop with confidence knowing how much they will pay for their purchases. ADVERTISEMENT Scott Simpson. (Source: Getty) The Retail Payment System (Ban on Surcharges) Amendment Bill was expected to be introduced by the end of this year. Kiwis paid an estimated $150 million in surcharges annually, including $45-$65 million in excessive surcharges. Simpson said this was "money that could be saved or spent elsewhere". However, retail and hospitality groups have cautioned that businesses might raise total prices to pass fees on. Earlier this month, the Commerce Commission moved to lower interchange fees paid by businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments, citing high costs for businesses. The commission put the overall cost of interchange fees at around $1 billion for businesses, which were often passed on to customers through surcharges and higher product costs. Visa and Mastercard logos on credit cards (File image). (Source: ADVERTISEMENT "Surcharges cover the fees businesses pay for accepting contactless payments and credit cards, but we know these are often excessive," Simpson said. "In some cases, the retailer doesn't even make it clear what the percentage is. "A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money. It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it." The ban would not apply to online payments, foreign-issued cards, prepaid gift or travel cards, or cards issued by other networks like American Express or UnionPay. Surcharges may be absorbed into total prices — groups Reacting to the announcement, business groups were positive that it would improve customer experiences at the checkout. But they noted businesses could pass the costs on through higher prices. ADVERTISEMENT BusinessNZ advocacy director Catherine Beard welcomed the change and said it was "the way the rest of the world is regulating". "We used to pride ourselves on being early-adopters of new technology, but surcharges felt like a step back for New Zealand." Hospitality NZ chief executive Steve Armitage said consumer savings would depend on how businesses responded and "whether cost recovery mechanisms remain viable." "It's important to recognise that electronic payments come with real costs to businesses. If surcharges are removed, many operators will have to adjust their pricing to reflect that — particularly for small hospitality operators already under pressure," he said. (Source: "Margins across the hospitality sector remain very tight. Some operators may be able to absorb the cost, but for many, particularly smaller businesses, that won't be realistic. These businesses may have no option but to reflect those costs in their pricing." Retailers 'have no choice but to pass the costs on' ADVERTISEMENT Dairy and Business Owners Group chairperson Ankit Bansal said the big banks were to blame for high transaction fees for small businesses. "If these changes go ahead, small retailers will have no choice but to pass these costs on to consumers through higher prices," he said in a statement. "If the Government wants to eliminate surcharges, then it should start by fixing the root cause — the banking sector's lack of competition and its unfair pricing model." But Consumer NZ advocacy head Jessica Walker said she was "thrilled" at the change.' "The ban is a no-brainer. These new rules will bring an end to a very messy situation." Walker said the cost of products "shouldn't increase by that much" if at all. "Any increase should be very minimal because interchange is being lowered which will reduce the cost to businesses of accepting payments." ADVERTISEMENT A Mastercard spokesperson "welcomed" the changes, at a time when the multinational giant said "payment acceptance costs have never been lower". Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young said work would be needed to ensure terminals had the ability to distinguish between domestic debit and credit cards, and commercial or international credit cards, and charge differential surcharge rates. Paying for a doctor's appointment (file image) (Source: Young said Retail NZ wanted certainty around the Commerce Commission's ability to monitor and enforce both the new interchange fees and the ban on surcharging. "The Commerce Commission will need to ensure that the fees being charged to merchants reflect the new legislation, that the savings are passed on to retailers and that other fees are not increased. "We will be seeking more detail on the surcharge changes, particularly around commercial credit cards which are not mentioned in today's announcement, and possible future changes to online transactions," she said.

Plan to ban credit card and PayWave surcharges
Plan to ban credit card and PayWave surcharges

Otago Daily Times

time3 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Plan to ban credit card and PayWave surcharges

The government plans to ban surcharges on card payments in-store, saving shoppers from being stung with surprise fees when paying with contactless technology. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson announced the change on Monday afternoon, declaring: "That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past." "Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet." Legislation is expected to be introduced to Parliament by the end of the year, with the ban to kick into effect no later than May 2026. The proposed law would cover most in-store payments made using Visa and Mastercard debit and credit cards, as well as EFTPOS, but not online purchases or other international card schemes. The move follows growing public frustration at the cost and transparency of such surcharges. Retailers are increasingly using them to recover merchant service fees charged by banks and payment providers, but the fees are often added without clear explanation. The Commerce Commission estimates New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges each year - including $45 to $65 million in what it considers excessive charges. In March, Consumer NZ called for an outright ban, citing hundreds of complaints about fees being too high, confusing or oblique. Both Mastercard and Visa have also supported proposals for a ban. Retail NZ has previously argued businesses did not like charging extra but should have the right to recover payment costs. It called for more clarity from banks about the fees charged for different services. The ban builds on the Commerce Commission's recent decision to reduce the interchange fees imposed on businesses for accepting Visa and Mastercard payments. Interchange fees make up approximately 60% of merchant service fees. "A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money," Simpson said. "It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it." The changes would bring New Zealand into line with the United Kingdom and the European Union, where such surcharges are already prohibited. Australia still allows surcharges but requires them to reflect the actual cost to retailers. The Reserve Bank of Australia has also recently proposed an outright ban on surcharges for EFTPOS and debit and credit card payments.

Govt to ban surcharges on in-store payments
Govt to ban surcharges on in-store payments

Otago Daily Times

time3 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Govt to ban surcharges on in-store payments

The government plans to ban surcharges on card payments in-store, saving shoppers from being stung with surprise fees when paying with contactless technology. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson announced the change on Monday afternoon, declaring: "That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past." "Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet." Legislation is expected to be introduced to Parliament by the end of the year, with the ban to kick into effect no later than May 2026. The proposed law would cover most in-store payments made using Visa and Mastercard debit and credit cards, as well as EFTPOS, but not online purchases or other international card schemes. The move follows growing public frustration at the cost and transparency of such surcharges. Retailers are increasingly using them to recover merchant service fees charged by banks and payment providers, but the fees are often added without clear explanation. The Commerce Commission estimates New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges each year - including $45 to $65 million in what it considers excessive charges. In March, Consumer NZ called for an outright ban, citing hundreds of complaints about fees being too high, confusing or oblique. Both Mastercard and Visa have also supported proposals for a ban. Retail NZ has previously argued businesses did not like charging extra but should have the right to recover payment costs. It called for more clarity from banks about the fees charged for different services. The ban builds on the Commerce Commission's recent decision to reduce the interchange fees imposed on businesses for accepting Visa and Mastercard payments. Interchange fees make up approximately 60% of merchant service fees. "A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money," Simpson said. "It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it." The changes would bring New Zealand into line with the United Kingdom and the European Union, where such surcharges are already prohibited. Australia still allows surcharges but requires them to reflect the actual cost to retailers. The Reserve Bank of Australia has also recently proposed an outright ban on surcharges for EFTPOS and debit and credit card payments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store