iPhone users' privacy at risk under competition crackdown, Apple warns
The $3tn (£2.2tn) business has said that new measures unveiled by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) will threaten the 'privacy and security' of iPhone users by forcing Apple to open up its platforms and release more data to rival tech companies.
Not only will this 'undermine' the protection of customers, according to Apple, but it will also mean it will have to 'give away our technology for free'.
The criticism comes after the CMA confirmed plans to label Apple and Google as having 'strategic market status' over their respective iPhone and Android smartphone systems, arguing that they have unfair power over the market for smartphone apps and services.
The watchdog will now consult on measures requiring Apple to share more data with rivals.
It will also allow app makers to offer alternative ways for customers to pay for services, giving them an opportunity to avoid the 30pc fees that Apple charges for purchases through its App Store.
It will also consider allowing digital wallet developers greater access to Apple's data.
However, Apple has argued the measures will force it to release sensitive user data to rival technology giants such as Facebook, putting the privacy of millions of iPhone customers at risk.
Home Office battle
The clash with the CMA threatens to escalate tensions between Apple and British officials, as the tech giant is also battling the Home Office over access to encrypted user data.
The request from the Home Office has triggered scrutiny from US officials. Donald Trump described the request as 'something you hear about with China'.
The CMA's latest crackdown threatens to attract similar complaints from the White House, with the president having already criticised the imposition of European red tape on America's most successful companies.
As part of the CMA review, both Apple and Google will be required to introduce a more transparent process for approving new apps, while also bringing in clear app store rankings for developers.
Will Hayter, the CMA's director for digital markets, said Apple's App Store threatened to 'disadvantage UK app developers and mean UK users miss out on innovations, as well as facing fewer choices and higher costs'.
An Apple spokesman said: 'We're concerned the rules the UK is now considering would undermine the privacy and security protections that our users have come to expect, hamper our ability to innovate, and force us to give away our technology for free to foreign competitors.
'We will continue to engage with the regulator to make sure they fully understand these risks.'
'Disappointing and unwarranted'
Google, meanwhile, said the CMA's decision was 'disappointing and unwarranted'.
Executives at Apple are understood to be concerned that the UK risks following the European Union into an assault on the technology sector, which could block the release of new products and slow innovation.
After the EU introduced rules requiring Apple to unlock its App Store to rivals, the company is understood to have received 150 requests for information on its App Store, including from Facebook-owner Meta.
Requests have included demands to share Wi-Fi data on users and all information on message and email notifications.
The moves against Apple and Google come as the regulator faces pressure from Labour to prioritise growth and cut red tape for businesses.
In January, Marcus Bokkerink, the CMA's former chairman, was ousted amid concerns from ministers that the watchdog had not been focused on boosting growth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
7 minutes ago
- Finextra
Barclays follows HSBC out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance
Barclays has followed HSBC in withdrawing from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), claiming that the departure of a host of other global lenders means the organisation "no longer has the membership to support our transition". 1 Founded in 2021, the UN-convened NZBA requires members to commit to "transition the operational and attributable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their lending and investment portfolios to align with pathways to net-zero by 2050 or sooner". At its peak it had around 150 members, including most of the world's largest banks. However, that number has dwindled in the last few months. At the beginning of 2025, ahead of Donald Trump's return to the White House, a host of US banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, pulled out of the global climate-focused alliance. The American banks quit amid attacks from Republicans on "woke" capitalism, with the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican Jim Jordan, claiming that financial environmental alliances have created "a climate cartel". Now, UK-headquartered HSBC and Barclays have joined their US counterparts. Barclays says it is committed to its "ambition" to be a net zero bank by 2050. Says a statement: "Our targets to mobilise $1 trillion of Sustainable and Transition Financing and for financed emissions remain unchanged. We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients." Earlier this week, the CEO of Standard Chartered, Bill Winters, hit out at banks that have rowed back on their climate commitments. 'People that said a lot of stuff, but [when] it was fashionable to say it, [and] who are saying either nothing or the opposite now: shame on them,' said Winters, according to the Guardian.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Drivers should be ‘very pessimistic' over car finance claims, say lawyers
Drivers should be 'very pessimistic' about getting any compensation for taking out a car loan after a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court, experts have warned. Industry analysts also said on Friday that banks will 'breathe a sigh of relief' after the Supreme Court ruled they are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes. Nevertheless, the financial watchdog has said it is still considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who potentially receive compensation. Lawyers have also indicated that some consumers should still consider pursuing their claims over 'unfair' treatment. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, went to the UK's highest court to challenge a Court of Appeal ruling which found 'secret' commission payments paid by buyers to car dealers in agreements before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent were unlawful. The ruling last year found three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, should receive compensation. But in a decision on Friday, justices at the UK's highest court overturned the Court of Appeal, though some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). Lawyers for the lenders told the Supreme Court at a three-day hearing in April the decision was an 'egregious error', while the Financial Conduct Authority intervened in the case and claimed the ruling 'goes too far'. However, the judges upheld a claim brought by one driver under the CCA that his relationship with the finance company had been 'unfair', awarding him the commission amount of £1,650.95 plus interest. Lizzy Comley, chief operating officer of consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, said the ruling still reinforces the right of many consumers to pursue claims. She said: 'This landmark ruling is positive news for the millions of people who have lost money due to the car finance mis-selling. 'The court confirmed that for years, consumers have potentially been unfairly overcharged on car finance agreements, and this ruling reinforces their right to pursue justice and recover the compensation they deserve.' However, others have said that the ruling will make it harder for most claims. Nicola Pangbourne, partner at Kennedys law firm, said: 'If I was a driver, I would be very pessimistic about getting compensation. There's now quite a few hurdles they've got to get through.' Industry experts have suggested the ruling will be broadly seen as a success for lenders, who had been preparing for significant compensation payments. Caroline Wayman, global head of financial Services at PA Consulting, said: 'Lenders will breathe a sigh of relief at the ruling, but it should still be a wake-up call for firms to scrutinise any large, undisclosed commissions in their business. 'Firms should ask themselves whether it still feels justifiable or could be considered unfair, particularly if they haven't disclosed commercial ties to the broker and it won't be enough to expect customers to have read and understood the fine print.' On Friday, a spokesperson for the Financial Conduct Authority said after the ruling that it would confirm whether it will consult on any such scheme by 8am on Monday. They said: 'We want to bring greater certainty for consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible.'
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Isak negotiations in the balance
It was a busy Friday, with Liverpool making a first official bid for Alexander Reds have tabled an offer of £110m, which was rejected by Newcastle Liverpool are prepared to walk away from negotiations and BBC Sport understands they do not think a deal for Isak is achievable this summer as it can read more on the saga here and get fan thoughts and opinion on the page below.
