logo
West Lothian schools to get more support teachers thanks to extra £1m funding

West Lothian schools to get more support teachers thanks to extra £1m funding

Daily Record14 hours ago
It comes amid a 'spike' in the numbers of pupils needing additional support in schools and to learn at home.
An extra £1.3m has been awarded to West Lothian Council to help develop Additional Support Learning across schools from August.
It will mean more teachers and support staff as well as more specialised training for teachers to work with children and young people.

It comes amid a 'spike' in the numbers of pupils needing additional support in schools and to learn at home.

Councillors across the chamber welcomed the extra funding which is part of a £1bn pot given to local authorities by the Scottish Government to boost Additional Support Learning in the new school year.
In a report to the Education Policy development and Scrutiny Panel Kristyna Macsween, the council's Additional Support Needs and Inclusion Improvement Manager said: 'The Additional Support For Learning (ASL) Action Plan is already deep rooted in our Education Services and continues to be a high priority across all areas of education.'
The additional funding has allowed the recruitment of five teachers as well as more school support staff.
Other key improvements include:-
Increasing teacher availability to support children and young people debilitated by mental health crisis and unable to attend school.
Increasing nurture support and resources within schools with specific supports provided by educational psychology services and additional support needs service.
National Autistic society training packages.
Improved family engagement through the delivery of Early Bird parent programmes to help parents develop understanding of autism.
The council has also recruited a Quality Improvement Officer to focus on developing Additional Support Learning across the schools estate, in primary, secondary and ASN schools.

Councillor Pauline Orr said: 'Audit Scotland said there's a wide gap exists in attainment in those deemed to have Additional Support Needs and those who don't. How does the council measure the achievements?
Ms Macsween said: 'We measure in a range of different ways across schools. We pay a lot of attention to the fact that some ASN learners progress in a different manner. We're not looking at academic success they are looking at confidence building, looking at what national approaches they can take.
'We are very cognisant of the fact that there is a gap that exists however it's about how that gap is seen,and for me it is about the measure of wider achievement is often much more important to out young people to give them access to future life chance and that's where our focus will always be. We go at their pace.'

Answering a question from SNP depute leader Pauline Stafford on the growing number of ASN placements Ms Macsween said there was an increase 'year on year' of need in children and young people.
She added: 'The level of need has significantly increased year on year we have seen a spike, with many factors around that. We are looking at the impact of Covid, the lack of socialisation. We have been working closely with NHS partners such as speech and language seeing that there is a deficit there as well.
'We are seeing an increase and we want to make sure we meet that need at all costs. Any decision is never around placement on a monetary decision it is taken on the needs of the pupils.'

Councillor Orr thanked the team for their work and added: 'It's very welcome to see us going in such a constructive and positive direction.'
Councillor Stafford said: 'It's really good to hear just how wide ranging support is for staff and learners, and also to hear the benefits of presumption of mainstream education. It is also a welcome boost to funding from the Scottish Government. Let's hope that's going to continue.'
Chair of the PDSP Councillor Andrew McGuire added: 'I think the funding boost is very much welcome, and we are doing a lot with that money.
'It would be good to provide some permanency to that funding given the issues and the challenges that we face. We should encourage the Scottish Government to make sure that funding becomes permanent.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scotland's childhood obesity 'rising' amid calls for tougher action on food
Scotland's childhood obesity 'rising' amid calls for tougher action on food

STV News

timean hour ago

  • STV News

Scotland's childhood obesity 'rising' amid calls for tougher action on food

Health experts warn Scotland continues to suffer some of Europe's worst diet-related outcomes, with obesity and type 2 diabetes on the rise — particularly in deprived communities New figures reveal children in Scotland's poorest areas are more than twice as likely to be at risk of obesity Food Standards Scotland says government progress on diet and public health reform is welcome but far too slow The watchdog accuses policymakers of allowing commercial pressures to override health priorities Scotland is now in danger of missing its 2030 target to halve childhood obesity Scotland continues to face some of the 'poorest diet-related health outcomes' in Europe, according to health experts. Food Standards Scotland (FSS) says levels of obesity, type 2 diabetes and other non-communicable diseases are rising, particularly among those in the most deprived areas. Data from Public Health Scotland (PHS) shows that children living in the most deprived areas are now more than twice as likely to be at risk of obesity compared to those in the least deprived areas. FSS says recent commitments from the Scottish Government to improve public health by taking a preventative approach are welcome. However, progress has been described as 'too slow and not far-reaching enough' to meet the scale of the challenges faced. Heather Kelman, chair of the FSS Board, said: 'We welcome the direction of travel, but action must be stronger, faster, and better resourced. 'Public health cannot continue to take a back seat to commercial interests. Delays and compromises only serve to deepen existing health inequalities with a continuing increase in dietary related health costs.' FSS warns that the current restrictions on food promotions must go further if they are to be fully effective. Mrs Kelman continued: 'This should not be a choice between health or growth. When HFSS sales increase, the NHS and taxpayers pick up the bill. 'Of course we recognise that growth is important, but we need a system that prioritises public health over commercial interests.' FSS also noted that Scotland continues to lag behind other parts of the UK in implementing diet-related measures, calling for stronger collaboration with the UK Government to tackle issues. Mrs Kelman continued: 'Without urgent and coordinated action, Scotland risks missing its ambition to halve childhood obesity by 2030, and allowing diet-related illness to continue placing unsustainable pressure on the NHS. 'Clinical solutions can help, but are not a panacea, and preventing diet-related ill-health conditions is still a much better solution. 'We need a bold strategy to reshape the food environment. The intent is there. Now we need delivery, leadership, and the political will across all UK administrations to follow through.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Former health secretary Matt Hancock to face Covid Inquiry for sixth time
Former health secretary Matt Hancock to face Covid Inquiry for sixth time

STV News

time5 hours ago

  • STV News

Former health secretary Matt Hancock to face Covid Inquiry for sixth time

Former health secretary Matt Hancock is set to face the UK Covid Inquiry for the sixth time. The inquiry is currently taking evidence on the impact of the pandemic on the care sector, and it is considering evidence about the steps taken in adult care and residential homes to prevent the spread of Covid-19. It will also consider the consequences of government decision-making on those living and working within the sector, including the decision to free up capacity in hospitals by discharging patients into adult care and residential homes. Hancock is scheduled to face questions from the inquiry on Wednesday. The inquiry was originally set up to examine the UK's response to and impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, and learn lessons for the future. It was launched by former prime minister Boris Johnson in June 2022, more than a year after he said the government's actions would be put 'under the microscope'. The first public hearings took place in London in June 2023. Subsequent hearings have been held in Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast. There is no specific timescale for how long the inquiry will last, but inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett is currently hearing evidence for module six out of ten. Scotland is holding its own separate inquiry into the pandemic. The care sector module kicked off on Monday and will continue until the end of July. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Millions will lose health insurance under Trump tax bill
Millions will lose health insurance under Trump tax bill

The Herald Scotland

time7 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Millions will lose health insurance under Trump tax bill

Another 5 million could lose coverage if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made Affordable Care Act plans more affordable for consumers. The legislation amounts to "the biggest rollback in health care coverage in the history of the United States," said Joan Alker, a research professor and executive director and co-founder of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Vice President JD Vance, who cast the tiebreaking vote July 1 to pass the Senate bill 51-50, said in social media posts the Medicaid cuts are "immaterial" compared to savings the bill will fund through bolstered immigration enforcement. The House is scheduled to consider the legislation on July 2 in advance of Trump's self-imposed July 4th deadline for his signature domestic policy legislation. How will the legislation cut Medicaid? The legislation would require states to double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states, which administer Medicaid, would have to set up systems to verify a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation requires "able-bodied" Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month or qualify for an exemption, such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The original House version limited the work requirement to low-income adults without children, but the Senate version added the work requirement to parents of children older than 13. The legislation defines "able-bodied" people as those not medically certified as physically or mentally unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks because of administrative miscues. What do hospitals and doctors think of bill? Medicaid insures 83 million low-income children and adults, according to KFF, a health policy nonprofit. That represents more than 1 in 5 Americans. Health policy experts have warned the cuts could harm rural hospitals and doctors who serve a higher percentage of people enrolled in Medicaid. The Senate bill added a $50 billion rural health care fund, double the amount that an earlier version of the legislation proposed. Still, hospitals are "deeply disappointed" the bill cleared the Senate, said Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the American Hospital Association, a trade group. Pollack said the $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts would cause "irreparable harm to our health care system," and reduce access to care for all Americans. Hospitals are required to diagnose and stabilize anyone who visits an emergency room. Eliminating coverage of nearly 12 million Americans will "drive up uncompensated care for hospitals and health systems," Pollack said. Pollack said hospitals might be forced to cut services and staff, and patients could face longer wait times in emergency rooms. Some rural hospitals and facilities in underserved communities could close, Pollack said. Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said the cuts to Medicaid and a federal food assistance program "will make our country sicker, put children at risk of going hungry and make it harder for families to afford basic necessities" while delivering tax cuts. When will the Medicaid cuts take effect? Medicaid recipients won't immediately be impacted by the legislation. The bill sets a Jan. 1, 2027, deadline for states to begin twice-a-year eligibility checks and verify work or exemption status of non-disabled enrollees. However, some states already have submitted waivers to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to begin Medicaid work requirements. CMS might choose to approve the waivers and allow some states to launch Medicaid work requirements before January 2027, Alker said. A KFF survey found nearly 2 in 3 people on Medicaid are employed full or part time, and others would qualify for an exemption from the work requirement because they are caregivers or students. Just 8% were not working due to inability to find work, retirement or other reasons, KFF said. While the bill doesn't mandate work requirements before January 2027, states will likely need to plan for big changes before then, said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the KFF program on Medicaid and the uninsured. States will need to prepare for smaller Medicaid payments from the federal government while adding the extra administrative duties of verifying an enrollee's work or volunteer status. "Some states are anticipating this reduced revenue," Tolbert said. "At the same time, they are also required to make pretty costly changes to their eligibility systems." 'Death by a trillion cuts': Health care workers lobby Republicans in Congress Johannah Alabi's days usually consist of feeding, bathing, and caring for residents at two nursing homes in Bloomfield, Conn. She said most of her patients depend on government health insurance programs, so she is concerned about what will happen to them and her job if Trump signs the bill into law. Medicaid is the primary payer for 63% of nursing home facility residents and an additional 13% rely on Medicare as their primary payer, according to KFF, a health policy nonprofit headquartered in San Francisco. "If some of that money is going to be taken away, something has to give," Alabi said. "It's going to come down to the resident care. It's going to come down to the food. It's going to come down to the activities." That's why she was inspired to join Service Employees International Union members to lobby lawmakers to vote against the bill last week. They arrived at the Capitol with signs reading, "Death by a trillion cuts," and wearing shirts with the message, "Republican cuts kill." Jennifer Woods, another SEIU member who works in the claims department at Kaiser Permanente, ran into Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, during her trip to Washington. She said she tried to explain how cuts could "ruin people's lives" and potentially lead to some patients' deaths as she followed him through the Capitol building. "He just shook his head and would keep going," Woods said. "He didn't really say anything. None of them did."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store