EU hopes for Trump tariff deal by July deadline after ‘good exchange'
It was not immediately clear, however, whether there had been a meaningful breakthrough in talks to stave off the imposition of sweeping tariff hikes on the United States' largest trading partner.
The clock is ticking down on a deadline for countries around the world to conclude deals with the U.S. after Trump unleashed a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies.
Trump says U.S. close to several trade deals as higher tariffs set to take effect August 1
As he keeps much of the world guessing, Trump on Sunday said the U.S. was close to finalizing several trade pacts in coming days and would notify other countries by July 9 of higher tariff rates. He said they would not take effect until August 1, a three-week reprieve.
He also put members of the developing nations' BRICS group in his sights as its leaders met in Brazil, threatening an additional 10 per cent tariff on any countries aligning themselves with the 'anti-American' policies.
The BRICS group comprises Brazil, Russia, India and China and South Africa along with recent joiners Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates.
The EU has been torn over whether to push for a quick and light trade deal or back its own economic clout in trying to negotiate a better outcome. It had already dropped hopes for a comprehensive trade agreement before the July deadline.
'We want to reach a deal with the U.S. We want to avoid tariffs,' the spokesperson told reporters at a daily briefing. 'We want to achieve win-win outcomes, not lose-lose outcomes.'
Trump threatens extra 10% tariffs on BRICS as leaders meet in Brazil
Without a preliminary agreement, broad U.S. tariffs on most imports would rise from their current 10 per cent to the rates set out by Trump on April 2. In the EU's case that would be 20 per cent.
Von der Leyen also held talks with the leaders of Germany, France and Italy at the weekend, Germany said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has repeatedly stressed the need for a quick deal to protect industries vulnerable to tariffs ranging from cars to pharmaceuticals.
'Time is money in the truest sense of the word,' the German spokesperson told reporters in Berlin.
'In this respect, we should give ourselves another 24 or 48 hours to come to a decision.'
Russia said the BRICS group had never tried to undermine other countries.
'It is very important to note here that the uniqueness of a group like BRICS is that it is a group of countries that share common approaches and a common world view on how to cooperate, based on their own interests,' said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
'And this cooperation within BRICS has never been and will never be directed against any third countries.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
34 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Colombia's president backtracks on accusations against US officials in letter to Trump
BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Colombian President Gustavo Petro attempted to ease tensions with the United States in June by sending a letter to President Donald Trump saying he did not intend to accuse U.S. officials of trying to overthrow his government. The confidential letter, dated June 23, was leaked to Colombian media outlets on Monday. Relations between the two countries are at their worst since the 1990s, when the U.S. stripped a Colombian president of his visa following allegations that his campaign was financed by drug traffickers.
Canada News.Net
36 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Tariff-wielding president punctures U.S. stock markets
NEW YORK, New York - Monday's trading session saw mixed performances across U.S. and global markets, with several major indices posting losses amid cautious investor sentiment. Piercing the record-breaking run on Wall Street, U.S. stocks tanked on Monday following President Donald Trump's decision to impose tariffs of up to 40 percent on some countries. Allies Japan and South Korea have each been hit with 25 percent levies. "I am pleased to announce that the UNITED STATES TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals, with various Countries from around the World, will be delivered starting 12:00 P.M. (Eastern), Monday, July 7th. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, President of The United States of America," the president posted on his social media platform Truth Soical on Tuesday. The S&P 500 (^GSPC) fell 49.37 points, or 0.79 percent, to close at 6,229.98, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) dropped 422.17 points, or 0.94 percent, settling at 44,406.36. The NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) also declined, losing 188.59 points, or 0.92 percent, to end at 20,412.52. The NYSE Composite (^NYA) slipped 180.19 points, or 0.87 percent, to 20,545.60, while the Russell 2000 (^RUT) saw a steeper drop of 34.81 points, or 1.55 percent, closing at 2,214.23. The CBOE Volatility Index (^VIX), a key measure of market fear, rose 0.31 points, or 1.77 percent, to 17.79. European Markets Show Resilience European indices largely bucked the downtrend, with Germany's DAX (^GDAXI) climbing 286.22 points, or 1.20 percent, to 24,073.67. France's CAC 40 (^FCHI) added 27.20 points, or 0.35 percent, reaching 7,723.47, and the EURO STOXX 50 (^STOXX50E) gained 52.73 points, or 1.00 percent, closing at 5,341.54. UK Markets Drift Lower The UK's FTSE 100 (^FTSE), however, edged down 16.38 points, or 0.19 percent, to 8,806.53. Asia and Pacific Markets Mixed In Asia, Japan's Nikkei 225 (^N225) fell 223.20 points, or 0.56 percent, to 39,587.68, while Australia's S&P/ASX 200 (^AXJO) dipped 13.70 points, or 0.16 percent, to 8,589.30. Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index (^HSI) slipped 28.23 points, or 0.12 percent, to 23,887.83. On the upside, South Korea's KOSPI (^KS11) rose 5.19 points, or 0.17 percent, to 3,059.47. Commodities and Currencies The U.S. Dollar Index ( strengthened, gaining 0.37 points, or 0.38 percent, to 97.55. Meanwhile, the Japanese Yen Currency Index (^XDN) fell 0.50 points, or 0.73 percent, to 68.45, and the Australian Dollar Currency Index (^XDA) dropped 0.80 points, or 1.21 percent, to 64.91. Latin America and Emerging Markets Brazil's IBOVESPA (^BVSP) tumbled 1,773.86 points, or 1.26 percent, to 139,489.70, while Mexico's IPC (^MXX) lost 488.29 points, or 0.84 percent, closing at 57,489.47. Argentina's MERVAL (^MERV) declined sharply by 28,762.88 points, or 1.38 percent, to 2,049,934.12. Investors remain cautious ahead of key economic data and central bank decisions later in the week. Market participants will closely monitor inflation figures and employment reports for further direction. U.S. Markets UK and European Markets FTSE 100 (^FTSE): 8,806.53 ▼ 16.38 (↓ 0.19 percent) DAX (^GDAXI): 24,073.67 ▲ 286.22 (↑ 1.20 percent) CAC 40 (^FCHI): 7,723.47 ▲ 27.20 (↑ 0.35 percent) EURO STOXX 50 (^STOXX50E): 5,341.54 ▲ 52.73 (↑ 1.00 percent) Euronext 100 (^N100): 1,576.47 ▲ 6.65 (↑ 0.42 percent) BEL 20 (^BFX): 4,487.49 ▲ 2.45 (↑ 0.05 percent) Asia and Pacific Markets Hang Seng Index (^HSI): 23,887.83 ▼ 28.23 (↓ 0.12 percent) Nikkei 225 (^N225): 39,587.68 ▼ 223.20 (↓ 0.56 percent) S&P/ASX 200 (^AXJO): 8,589.30 ▼ 13.70 (↓ 0.16 percent) All Ordinaries (^AORD): 8,826.40 ▼ 15.50 (↓ 0.18 percent) KOSPI (^KS11): 3,059.47 ▲ 5.19 (↑ 0.17 percent) TWSE (^TWII): 22,428.72 ▼ 118.78 (↓ 0.53 percent) STI Index (^STI): 4,031.86 ▲ 18.24 (↑ 0.45 percent) IDX Composite (^JKSE): 6,900.93 ▲ 35.74 (↑ 0.52 percent) FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (^KLSE): 1,537.54 ▼ 12.65 (↓ 0.82 percent) S&P/NZX 50 (^NZ50): 12,764.95 ▼ 1.65 (↓ 0.01 percent) Middle East & Africa TA-125 (^ 3,097.79 ▼ 15.87 (↓ 0.51 percent) EGX 30 (^CASE30): 33,037.60 ▲ 123.90 (↑ 0.38 percent) Top 40 USD Net TRI (^ 5,433.72 ▼ 22.65 (↓ 0.42 percent) Americas (Ex-U.S.) S&P/TSX Composite (^GSPTSE): 27,020.28 ▼ 15.88 (↓ 0.06 percent) IBOVESPA (^BVSP): 139,489.70 ▼ 1,773.86 (↓ 1.26 percent) IPC Mexico (^MXX): 57,489.47 ▼ 488.29 (↓ 0.84 percent) S&P IPSA (^IPSA): 8,257.14 ▼ 28.15 (↓ 0.34 percent) MERVAL (^MERV): 2,049,934.12 ▼ 28,762.88 (↓ 1.38 percent) Currency & Global Indices U.S. Dollar Index ( 97.55 ▲ 0.37 (↑ 0.38 percent) MSCI Europe (^125904-USD-STRD): 2,427.20 ▲ 2.60 (↑ 0.11 percent) British Pound Index (^XDB): 136.01 ▼ 0.47 (↓ 0.35 percent) Euro Currency Index (^XDE): 117.09 ▼ 0.47 (↓ 0.40 percent) Japanese Yen Index (^XDN): 68.45 ▼ 0.50 (↓ 0.73 percent) Australian Dollar Index (^XDA): 64.91 ▼ 0.80 (↓ 1.21 percent) Key Takeaways U.S. markets led declines, with the Dow and S&P 500 both falling nearly 1 percent following new tariffs. European stocks outperformed, with Germany's DAX surging 1.2 percent. Asia was mixed, with slight gains in South Korea and Singapore offset by losses in Japan and Australia.
Canada News.Net
36 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Could new pipelines shield Canada from U.S. tariffs? The answer is complicated
It should come as no surprise that United States President Donald Trump's tariff threats have renewed interest in building pipelines that don't rely on access to the American market. Almost four million barrels of crude oil cross the Canada-U.S. border each day, generating revenue of more than $100 billion per year - a quarter of Alberta's GDP. A February survey by the Angus Reid Institute found that half of Canadians believe the federal government isn't doing enough to expand pipeline capacity. Meanwhile, two-thirds said they would back reviving the Energy East project - a cancelled pipeline that would have transported oil from western Canada to New Brunswick and Quebec. But would new pipelines truly insulate Canada from the threat of U.S. tariffs? And how much new pipeline capacity is necessary? Despite the apparent urgency of approving new infrastructure projects, these questions remain surprisingly unexplored. In a recent paper I co-authored with researcher Jotham Peters, which is currently under revision, we applied formal economic modelling techniques to parse through the costs and benefits of new pipelines, and in particular to understand the role of American tariffs in shaping these costs and benefits. In a worst-case scenario where the U.S. follows through on its threat of a 10 per cent tariff on Canadian oil exports, Canadian producers could lose as much as $14 billion in annual revenue - roughly a 10 per cent decrease. Simply put, Canada's existing pipeline network severely limits access to markets other than the U.S., and as a consequence oil producers bear the full brunt of American tariffs. But what if Northern Gateway and Energy East - two previously cancelled pipelines that would have brought Canadian oil to tidewater - had been built? If Northern Gateway and Energy East were operational in 2025, Canada would be more resilient, but not completely immune, to U.S. tariffs. Instead of a $14 billion loss, tariffs would reduce annual revenue by $9 billion. Ultimately, the combined capacity of Northern Gateway and Energy East, which would be 1.625 million barrels per day, pales in comparison to the four million barrels per day of existing pipeline capacity connecting Canadian producers with American refineries. Closing this gap would require an expansion of east-west pipeline capacity far beyond the cancelled pipelines of the last decade. So have the recent shifts in U.S. trade policy fundamentally altered the economic case in favour of new east-west pipelines? As with most economic analyses, the answer is complicated. On the one hand, any progress that mitigates the significant cost of U.S. tariffs are likely dollars well spent. Building new pipelines strengthens the bargaining power of Canadian producers, which carries an additional benefit of potentially increasing the return on each barrel sold to our southern neighbour. There's also a long-term capacity issue. Existing pipelines may reach their limit by 2035. In the absence of new pipelines, any new production after 2035 would either need to be transported by rail at a higher cost, or left in the ground. On the other hand, if the U.S. never follows through on tariffs on energy exports - or if future administrations do not share Trump's affinity for chaotic trade policy - Canada could end up right back where it started when these projects were cancelled. All pipelines carry some economic benefit, but such benefits were not enough in 2016 and 2017 to warrant the construction of the Northern Gateway and Energy East pipelines. The elephant in the room is whether a significant expansion in pipeline capacity could realistically be achieved at reasonable cost. Recent evidence suggests it could be a challenge. The Trans Mountain expansion project, for instance, was initially estimated to cost $5.4 billion in 2013. By the time it was completed in 2024, the final price tag had ballooned to $34 billion - a cost overrun of 380 per cent when accounting for inflation. The Coastal GasLink pipeline, which transports natural gas, faced similar issues. It was initially projected to cost $4 billion in 2012 and was completed in 2023 at a final cost of $14.5 billion, with an inflation-adjusted overrun of 180 per cent. While some of these costs were circumstantial - a major flood affected Trans Mountain, for example - increased efficiency in pipeline construction is necessary for the economic benefits of new pipelines to be realized, regardless of U.S. trade policy. While our research explores the economic impact of new pipelines in the face of U.S. tariffs, we acknowledge there are other issues that need to be considered. Chief among them is ensuring Canada meets its constitutional obligation to consult First Nations on decisions, like natural resources projects, that affect their communities and territories. Although this lies beyond our area of expertise, it will inevitably be an important element of consideration for any new pipeline developments. The environmental impacts of new pipelines are another key concern. These impacts range from local exposure to oil spills to upstream greenhouse gas emissions associated with oil production. While these varying and complex impacts are also beyond the scope of our current work, future research should focus on quantifying the potential environmental impacts of new pipelines. Our research cannot say whether any new pipeline project is good, bad or in Canada's national interest. But we can help Canadians reach an informed decision about how changes in U.S. trade policy may or may not alter the economic case for new pipelines in this country. While Canada would undoubtedly be in a stronger position to respond to U.S. tariffs were Northern Gateway and Energy East operational in 2025, it would still find itself significantly exposed to Trump's tariff threats. Fully removing this exposure would require not one but seven pipelines equivalent to Northern Gateway. Whether that's a goal worth pursuing is a broader question - one we hope our research can help Canadians and policymakers reach on their own.
