Asian shares cautious on trade angst, oil falls
Synopsis Asian shares experienced slight declines as investors await progress on trade negotiations with the US, with a looming July 9 deadline. The US may impose higher tariffs on some countries starting August 1, while others might receive extensions for negotiations. OPEC+'s decision to increase oil production is expected to create a surplus, potentially lowering prices later in the year. Asian shares posted modest moves at the open as investors awaited progress on trade deals with the US ahead of the July 9 deadline imposed by President Donald Trump.
ADVERTISEMENT Indexes in Japan, Australia and South Korea posted small declines after Trump administration officials signaled Aug. 1 as the date for higher levies to kick in and said some countries may get more time to negotiate deals. Oil fell 1.1% to $67.57 a barrel as OPEC+ said it will increase production. Treasuries were steady as cash trading resumed after the July 4 holiday.
Investors are focusing on the outcomes of several trade negotiations for clues on the next turn in markets. Stocks have rebounded to a record since their plunge in April, when Trump introduced his sweeping levies and then announced a 90-day pause for countries to negotiate with the US. Major US trading partners hurried over the weekend to secure trade deals.
'This is a reflection of some uncertainty over the July 9 reciprocal tariff expiry deadline,' said Tony Sycamore, an analyst at IG in Sydney. A tariff rate of 10%-15% on most if not all countries would be welcome by traders, whereas a rate greater than 20% 'would rattle markets to varying degrees depending on the extent of the increase,' he said.US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said country-by-country tariffs will take effect Aug. 1. Negotiations still remained ongoing ahead of the deadline, with European leaders pushing for a deal that would allow tariff relief on carmakers for increasing US investments. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated some countries may be offered a three-week extension to negotiate.
ADVERTISEMENT 'We judge there is a risk that President Trump reinstates higher 'reciprocal' tariffs on major economies such as Japan and Europe,' Commonwealth Bank of Australia strategists including Joseph Capurso wrote in a note to clients.Separately, China said it will impose some reciprocal curbs on medical-device procurement for companies based in the European Union, adding tensions between the two major trading partners just as Beijing seeks to shore up ties with the US.
ADVERTISEMENT Meanwhile, the latest oil supply shockwave unleashed by OPEC+ is set to swell a surplus later this year, pressuring prices for producers the world over while answering Trump's calls for lower fuel costs.The increase, faster than traders and analysts foresaw, may contribute to a crude surplus later this year with firms such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. anticipating that prices sink near $60 a barrel in the fourth quarter.
ADVERTISEMENT
'For now, the oil market remains tight, suggesting it can absorb additional barrels,' said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS AG in Zurich. 'But there are rising risks like ongoing trade tensions, implying that the market could look less tight over the coming 6-12 months, which would pose downside risks to prices.'
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share
Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained
Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms
Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips
L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first?
Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more
SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders
API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading
Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains
Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains The rise of Crypto Futures in India: Leverage, tax efficiency, and market maturity, Avinash Shekhar of Pi42 explains
NEXT STORY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Textiles exporters face fresh trade uncertainty amid Trump's latest announcements
NEW DELHI: US President 's latest tariff announcements have resulted in fresh uncertainty, with buyers expected to go slow on new orders. While textiles exporters seem to have got an advantage over Bangladesh, which has been slapped with 35% duty by Trump, industry is keeping close tabs on India's bilateral trade deal with the US as the American president has claimed the agreement with Vietnam allows him to impose a 20% tariff, although there may be product-specific concessions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In any case, the final word is not out on where tariffs settle in the coming weeks, with countries, including Bangladesh, once again rushing to Washington to rebalance the equations. "We need to watch how tariffs move. Buyers are a little confused at the moment," said V Elangovan, managing director of Tirupur-based SNQS International. What is adding to the complications is China. "Retailers have to fill their shelves. Last week, our merchandisers were in Shanghai, we could not compete because the Chinese were quoting better prices this year than last year. It is not clear how they can do so when the tariff for them is higher. We need more hand-holding from govt," he added. Govt and industry has been pushing for zero duty for garments and home textiles, where Indian products are competitive, although it is unlikely even if a trade deal is worked out as the Trump administration has refused to remove the 10% baseline tariff applicable on all countries. At 10%, Indian exporters are seen to be better off than rivals, provided subsidies are not doled out to Chinese manufacturers. In natural garments, where India has traditional strength, the cost disadvantage is relatively small, 3-4%. However, in synthetic garments, the gap widens to 10-11% due to higher production costs, Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) said. "India, even with the existing reciprocal tariff rate (26% announced in April), will gain in export competitiveness vis-a-vis major garment exporting competing countries. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Besides, we are quite hopeful of India striking a favourable trade deal which will further improve the competitiveness of India's apparel exports in all important US market... even a moderate reduction in the reciprocal tariff to around 15% could significantly improve our competitiveness across both natural and synthetic garment categories, thereby opening infinite export possibilities for India amid shifting global sourcing trends," said AEPC CEO Mithileshwar Thakur. With current tariff levels - India at 26%, Vietnam at 20%, and Bangladesh at 35% - India is seen to be competitive against Bangladesh in natural garments but faces pressure in the synthetics segment. "It is looking good for us and a trade deal will help," said K M Subramani, president of Tirupur Exporters' Association. The big question is the ability of Indian garment makers to manufacture on a scale, especially given their reluctance to invest in capacity addition.
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
Dollar Dominance, Trade Risks & Delhi's Balancing Act – Why Trump's BRICS Threats Matter For India
New Delhi: At a time when India inches closer to finalising a trade deal with the United States, a thunderclap from Washington has cast shadows over the celebration. US President Donald Trump's blunt message, posted publicly this week, warned that any country aligning with what he described as BRICS' 'anti-American policies' would face an additional 10% tariff without exceptions. As one of the founding members of BRICS, India finds itself at the centre of this growing storm. The recently concluded Rio de Janeiro summit of the bloc had laid out an ambitious declaration. There was no mention of the United States, but it still sent ripples through Washington. The BRICS statement challenged unilateral economic measures, defended multilateralism, voiced concern over tariffs that disrupt global trade and pushed for changes to global governance. These words appear to have stung. What followed was Trump's retaliation. On his Truth Social platform, he wrote that siding with BRICS' economic vision would come at a cost. The timing could not have been more crucial. He is expected to begin announcing trade deals from Monday, and India is among the countries on the list. In Delhi, this new tension is being watched with a mix of caution and calculation. Trade experts in the capital believe the core of Trump's anger lies deeper within the BRICS push for currency alternatives. For years, Russia and China have spoken of a new financial system to bypass the dollar. In 2022, Russia even floated a proposal for a BRICS reserve currency. Many Indian analysts suspect this is what triggered Trump's fury. The dollar remains Washington's most powerful economic weapon. The United States used it in 2012 to isolate Iran and again in 2022 against Russia. Any attempt to weaken its grip invites blowback. Despite its lack of political cohesion, BRICS still threatens that power by raising the idea of currency diversification. Indian economists see the bigger picture. The call for a common BRICS currency faces hurdles. Political will is scattered. China's dominance in the bloc sparks unease among other members. But the conversations alone unsettle Washington. That is why even vague references to multilateral financial systems draw fire. Meanwhile, India, experts are of the view, must walk a fine line. It is preparing for what is being described as a 'mini trade deal' with the United States. Reports suggest Delhi has already agreed to a baseline 10% tariff, but higher rates – up to 26% – remain on the table. Agriculture and dairy continue to be sticking points. At the same time, India cannot ignore its standing in BRICS. It shares that space with strategic rivals like China but also long-standing defence and energy partners like Russia. The bloc includes emerging economies looking for new trade paths. Turning away completely would be costly. Domestic industry lobbies in India are growing nervous. Sectors like textiles, pharma and information technology could suffer if Trump hikes tariffs further. Executives fear the fallout of a new wave of American protectionism. What adds to the anxiety is the unpredictability. Trump has changed course before. His sudden termination of a long-standing free trade pact with Vietnam has become a cautionary tale. Despite the tensions, some foreign policy voices in Delhi urge calm. They argue that BRICS has always been an idea more than an institution. Its members rarely share political agendas or geographical interests. But that has not stopped it from becoming a target. Others believe Trump's aggressive approach may backfire. His posture could push India to double down on groups such as BRICS and the Global South. But that path brings its own dilemmas, especially with China pulling the strings in many of these platforms. At the heart of it all, the challenge remains the same – can India navigate between its old allies and emerging coalitions without inviting punishment from either? With Trump's new tariffs looming, the question is no longer hypothetical. The countdown has begun.
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US Supreme Court clears way for Donald Trump's federal workforce downsizing plan
The Supreme Court of the United States on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's sweeping plan to downsize the federal workforce, overriding lower court rulings that had temporarily blocked the move. Demonstrators protesting against President Donald Trump and his policies march toward the White House on Friday.(AP File) The decision comes despite warnings that critical government services could be disrupted and hundreds of thousands of federal employees risk losing their jobs. In an unsigned order, the justices overturned multiple lower court freezes on the cuts, which have been spearheaded by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the Associated Press reported. The court clarified that no specific personnel cuts were under review, only the executive order signed by Trump and a subsequent administration directive instructing agencies to undertake reductions in force. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson cast the sole dissenting vote, criticising the majority for a 'demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.' President Trump has repeatedly claimed that voters gave him a mandate to overhaul the federal government and has entrusted that mission to billionaire businessman Elon Musk, who led DOGE until his recent departure. Since the directive's introduction, tens of thousands of federal employees have either been terminated, entered deferred resignation programmes, or been placed on administrative leave. Over 75,000 US federal employees opt for deferred resignation While the administration has not released an official figure, at least 75,000 employees are reported to have opted for deferred resignation, and thousands of probationary workers have already been dismissed. In May, US District Judge Susan Illston ruled that the administration required congressional approval to make such substantial cuts to the federal workforce. A panel of the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld her order in a 2–1 vote, warning that the reductions could affect essential functions, including the nation's food safety system and veterans' healthcare. Following her ruling, Illston ordered multiple federal agencies to cease implementing both the president's executive order, issued in February, and a subsequent memorandum from DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was appointed to the bench by former Democratic President Bill Clinton. Labour unions and non-profit organisations that filed suit against the downsizing presented the Supreme Court with several examples of potential consequences if the plan were allowed to proceed, including anticipated staff reductions of between 40 and 50 per cent at several key agencies. Among the agencies affected by the executive order are the Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labour, the Interior, State, the Treasury, and Veterans Affairs. The cuts also impact the National Science Foundation, the Small Business Administration, the Social Security Administration, and the Environmental Protection Agency. With AP inputs
