UK Sikhs threaten Labour boycott over Operation Blue Star inquiry delay
LONDON: Sikh Federation UK has warned PM Keir Starmer it will campaign to no-platform Labour MPs from Aug 1 unless a judge-led public inquiry into Britain's role in 1984's Operation Blue Star is announced in Parliament by the end of July.
No-platforming is a political strategy where people actively work to prevent certain politicians or public figures from speaking publicly, often due to disagreements with their views.
The warning, delivered in a letter signed by 455 gurdwaras and Sikh organisations, follows a rally of more than 10,000 Sikhs at Trafalgar Square Sunday marking the 41st anniversary of the military operation at Amritsar's Golden Temple against Sikh militants hiding there.
Deputy PM Angela Rayner had publicly committed to the inquiry just before the 2024 general elections. Labour also promised it in two consecutive manifestos.
The federation insists the inquiry must investigate both UK involvement in the Indian military operation and anti-Sikh actions in Britain during Margaret Thatcher's tenure. It plans to contact every MP individually, asking them to confirm written support for a judge-led inquiry by July-end.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Ile-de-france: Voici l'astuce pour avoir des panneaux solaires sans payer l'installation !
Programme Ecologique
Undo
The letter warns Starmer that failing to act 'could have massive consequences for the re-election of many Labour MPs', citing rising support for Reform UK and independent candidates. Sikh Federation UK also said it is in talks with Reform UK, Liberal Democrats, and SNP to secure broader political backing.
Documents declassified in Jan 2014 showed Thatcher's government sent an SAS officer to India in Feb 1984 after Indian officials requested help planning an operation to remove Sikh militants from the Golden Temple.
In Feb 2014, then-cabinet secretary Jeremy Heywood concluded there was 'no record of any assistance to the June 1984 operation other than the limited military advice provided in mid-February,' describing it as a 'one-off'.
Sikh Federation disputes this, citing its 2017 Sacrificing Sikhs report. 'The papers released prove training and equipment was secretly provided by Britain before the Indian army assault in June 1984,' the letter says. 'In addition, counter-insurgency training and equipment were provided to Indian army and police to deal with the Sikh uprising that followed the massacre. We are confident a judge-led public inquiry will prove the UK involvement had a massive rather than limited impact.
'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
'Stopped war': Trump again makes a claim India has repeatedly refuted on 4-day Pakistan clash
Trump has once again claimed credit for 'stopping war' between India and Pakistan, this time saying he intervened to prevent a nuclear conflict. His remarks have drawn sharp criticism from the Congress, which questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence on the matter. read more US President Donald Trump has once again claimed credit for averting a war between India and Pakistan, drawing sharp criticism from the Congress, which questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's continued silence on the matter. Speaking at a reception at the White House on Tuesday (July 23, 2025), Trump said, 'We stopped wars between India and Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda.' He further claimed that five aircraft were shot down during the India-Pakistan confrontation and that the situation was close to spiraling into a nuclear conflict. 'It was going back and forth. I called them and said, 'No more trade. If you do this, it's not going to be good.' They're both powerful nuclear nations, and that would have happened. I stopped it,' Trump asserted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD #WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "We have stopped wars between India and Pakistan. They were probably going to end up in a nuclear war. They shot down five planes in the last attack. It was back and forth, back and forth. I called them and I said no more trade if you do… — ANI (@ANI) July 23, 2025 The congress said that this marks the 25th time in the past 73 days that Trump has repeated his claim of preventing a war between the two South Asian neighbours. Reacting to the remarks, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh took a swipe at PM Modi, saying while Trump has made a 'silver jubilee' out of his claim, the Indian prime minister remains conspicuously silent. 'He has trumpeted his claim 25 times in 73 days, yet the Prime Minister of India has not uttered a word—choosing instead to travel abroad and destabilise democratic institutions at home,' Ramesh said in a post on X. He also slammed the Modi government for refusing to give firm dates for a parliamentary debate on the Pahalgam-Sindoor issue, adding that the PM has not committed to responding in the House. Trump also expanded his list of purported diplomatic achievements, claiming the U.S. had 'taken out Iran's entire nuclear capability' and stopped conflicts in Kosovo and Serbia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump has frequently credited his trade diplomacy for de-escalating global tensions, there has been no official confirmation from New Delhi or Islamabad regarding his role in the alleged ceasefire or the reported aerial engagement.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
India-UK FTA: A bold new trade era set to take off
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi undertakes his fourth visit to the United Kingdom this week, the economic relationship that India has with the country has come into focus afresh. Both countries are going to sign a free trade agreement (FTA) during the PM's visit, which is his first since Keir Starmer came to power. The signing of the FTA will mark the culmination of three-year-long negotiations, a process that started in the year 2022 and saw both countries iron out significant differences to achieve a mutually beneficial deal. Once operational, this trading agreement is expected to boost India-UK bilateral trade from its current volume of $55 billion to $120 billion by 2030. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The UK remains a key economic partner for India and is also the sixth-largest investor in India, with cumulative investments of around $36 billion. India itself is a key contributor to the British economy, with at least 1,000 Indian companies operating in the country, employing more than one lakh people, with a total investment of $20 billion. Inking an FTA with an emerging economic powerhouse like India is significant for the UK, and maybe this is why they have called it their 'biggest and economically most significant' bilateral agreement since exiting the European Union. For India, this FTA is equally important, as the country is an important market for Indian exports—one with which it also enjoys a modest trade surplus. The FTA is also crucial because it is one of those agreements that India has signed after overhauling its approach to trade liberalisation under the leadership of PM Modi. In 2014, when Modi came to power, one of the first things on his priority list was to review the existing trading arrangements that India had with countries across the world. Prior to this, the previous government had indiscriminately signed FTAs regardless of whether they were securing market access for Indian products or not. Within a decade, India had signed trade agreements with Singapore, ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, among others. This one-sided economic liberalism did provide the UPA coalition with an image of a progressive government that was doing a 'lot' for the country's economy, but by the time they went out of power, India's trade deficit with key countries—including China (with which there was no FTA but just ambitious bilateral trade targets)—had zoomed to unsustainable levels. The India-ASEAN FTA particularly faced a huge domestic backlash because it made India a dumping ground for cheap offerings, while Indian products struggled to survive. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Naturally, the issue of the trade deficit and India's lack of capacity to compete in the global market was of grave concern to the Modi government, which preferred to adopt a strategic approach to FTAs—one that focused on securing market access for Indian products on a reciprocal basis. This was more than evident when his government put a pause on signing FTAs till 2021 and even withdrew from the China-dominated Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Though Modi faced a lot of flak from his detractors—who called him a socialist, a protectionist, and considered his move to not sign FTAs as adversarial to India's economic interest—he did not budge, as if he knew what was best to protect the country's economic interests. While a strategic pause was put on signing new trading agreements and a careful review of the existing ones was being undertaken, his government took concrete steps on one very important front—building India's indigenous manufacturing capacity so as to compete effectively at the global level. The spirit of Aatmanirbhar Bharat, the early launch of the 'Make in India' program, and the game-changing Production-Linked Incentive Scheme were some of the essential steps that were taken before actually boarding the FTA wagon again. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Along with this, the government was also planning a new approach to integration with the global economy, where emphasis was on using this integration to boost India's economy and not just become a market open to exploitation by much more developed countries. When India signs the FTA with the United Kingdom this week during PM Modi's visit, the changed approach to bilateral trading arrangements would be more than visible. Because this time, it has literally put in unprecedented efforts to negotiate a favourable deal with a much-developed economy. The FTA with the UK is set to provide duty-free access to 99 per cent of Indian goods, with key sectors such as automobiles—including electric vehicles—engineering goods, sports goods, and even services benefiting. Most importantly, India, being a labour-intensive economy, will gain access to a wide market, particularly for its leather products, apparel and footwear, toys, marine products, and gems and jewellery. In the last decade, the Modi government's efforts to revive the electronics sector—making it a leading engine of the country's manufacturing story—will be suitably rewarded by this trade deal, as electronics exports from India to the UK have already surged from $450 million in 2020 to $1.7 billion in 2023. India's textiles sector will also benefit from the FTA, which already exports knit apparel and raw materials worth Rs 1.5 billion to the United Kingdom annually. The sheer scope of job creation due to a boost in these exports is going to be huge, with the country's large and cost-wise globally most competitive labour force finding meaningful avenues for employment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Interestingly, India has also allowed for liberalisation in the auto sector—but on a strictly reciprocal basis and that too with well-thought-out caution in place in the form of a quota-based easing of tariffs. This will definitely provide traction to Indian automakers in the UK market, unlocking newer opportunities for them. Another interesting aspect of the trade deal is India's access to the British public procurement market. This means Indian firms will be handed non-discriminatory treatment while applying to fulfil public procurement tenders floated by the UK government. While the exact figures for the UK's total procurement are not available, it is estimated to be an opportunity worth hundreds of billions of pounds that Indian suppliers can now readily tap into. In return, India has also allowed UK-based businesses to participate in public procurement contracts—but only in non-sensitive sectors, with a caveat that they must have at least 20 per cent Indian content. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Along with other wins, a crucial victory for Indian negotiators is the provision for exemption from UK's social security contributions in the form of the Double Contributions Convention Agreement (DCCA). Due to this, Indian workers who are temporarily in the UK—and their employers—will not have to contribute anything towards social security in the country, thus leading to savings of around 20 per cent of their salaries. This will set a good precedent for other developed countries to follow with India. India's unexplored side as a tough negotiator has really come to the fore through this deal, as India has also secured exemption for sensitive agricultural products such as dairy products, apples, cheese, oats, etc., which would have collapsed due to fierce competition from British products in the category. Even sensitive industrial goods that need protection before they can compete globally—such as plastics, optical fibres, TV camera tubes, etc.—have also been excluded from the deal. On certain other goods, India has agreed to cut duties only on a gradual basis over a longer period of time. This also includes liquor, where duties will be reduced only over a period of ten years so as to protect the domestic market. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This week, when PM Modi signs the FTA with the UK, it will not only signal India's new-found willingness to integrate with the global market, but it will also demonstrate its resolve to do it only on beneficial terms. The days of signing FTAs for the sake of appearing liberal and seeking validation from economists are over for India. This dispensation has shown that it is willing to walk the talk of trade liberalisation with the developed world—but only when it also boosts the country's own economy. The agreement is an example of India's growing assertiveness in the domain of foreign economic policy, and other developed countries who are looking to seal a deal with India must duly take note of it. The author is a New Delhi-based commentator on geopolitics and foreign policy. She holds a PhD from the Department of International Relations, South Asian University. She tweets @TrulyMonica. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bengal Cong leaders cautious over Mamata Banerjee's silent message from Martyrs' Day rally
Kolkata: After West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee gave a subtle message to Congress by refraining from attacking it at Trinamool Congress' annual Martyrs' Day rally, the state leaders of the grand old party are treading cautiously, accepting this 'silence' as her 'initial friendly gesture', ahead of the 2026 state Assembly polls. At the same time, as regards the Chief Minister's war cry announcing sustained protests against the alleged harassment of Bengali-speaking people in BJP-ruled states, the Bengal Congress leaders are taking that war cry with a pinch of salt. They feel that before seeking Congress' support on this issue, the Chief Minister should elaborate on her government's plans to prevent such harassment by taking positive measures to arrest brain-drain and workers' migration from West Bengal to other states. On July 21, while addressing the annual Martyrs' Day rally, the Chief Minister launched a scathing attack against the BJP and CPI(M) and accused them of having a clandestine "understanding" in West Bengal. However, in her address, the Chief Minister carefully avoided her pet version of putting 'BJP-Congress-CPI(M)' within the same bracket in the West Bengal perspective, which she had done till the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. According to West Bengal Pradesh Congress Committee leader Ashok Bhattacharya, it does not matter for the country's oldest national party whether the Chief Minister remains silent on it or not at the Martyrs' Day rally. 'First, the Chief Minister should make her stand clear on Congress both at the state level and the national level. She should explain why Trinamool Congress ensured BJP's victory in Assembly elections in certain other states like Goa and Tripura by dividing the anti-BJP votes,' Bhattacharya added. Former state Congress president and five-time former party Lok Sabha member Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, too, feels that the Chief Minister's silence about Congress at the Martyrs' Day rally proves nothing, since there had been several instances in the past where she proved that "Trinamool Congress and BJP are made for each other". According to senior state Congress leader and party spokesman Soumya Aich Roy, while Congress unequivocally condemned the attack and harassment of Bengalis in BJP ruled states and also protested against it, the party's question for the Chief Minister is that what her government is doing to prevent such harassment by taking positive measures to arrest brain-drain and workers' migration from the West Bengal to other state. "Mamata Banerjee is trying to tap into the Bengali sentiment by bringing reference to Bhasa Andolan. Instead of doing this, she must provide jobs to the people so that this migration stops," he said.
