Support dog boosting Bath lecturer's confidence and independence
Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a group of rare inherited conditions that affect connective tissue.Ms Herbert was diagnosed 15 years ago and told she would have to spend the rest of her life using two walking sticks.It came as a shock for Ms Herbert, who had unknowingly grown up with the genetic condition but been labelled "a clumsy kid", despite excelling at athletics due to being "stretchy and strong".She always had a dog while growing up, and discovered support dogs when reading about disability assistance dogs.
Campus 'rock star'
Ms Herbert looked into getting a puppy and spent a lot of time and effort in ensuring her new pet had the right temperament and would not be a big dog that would pull her over.That is when she found Rafa, a goldendoodle and labradoodle cross, which became a life-changer."Now when I'm walking with him, it's as if my brain feels as though there's an extra body part on the ground, and it's reopened up my sensory and motor pathways," Ms Herbert said.
Rafa also helps his owner at home too, fetching her phone, the TV remote and helping take her shoes and socks off for her.And he is well-known at the university where Ms Herbert works. "He's a bit of a rock star on campus," she said.Another way Rafa helps is that people now see his blue support dog jacket and realise she is "part of a vulnerable population"."People are much kinder and it eases my anxiety," Ms Herbert said."It's really been such a positive experience for my self-esteem and my mental health as I can continue to be independent," said Ms Herbert.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
4 days ago
- ITV News
Support Dogs charity to get new state-of-the-art fur-ever home
• Sheffield-based charity Support Dogs is to get a national centre of excellence for assistance dog training.
Metro
16-06-2025
- Metro
More than 100,000 people sign Scope's petition against government disability cut
Volunteers from learning disability charity Scope today handed a petition to the government with the voices of 100,0000 people opposing the cuts to welfare and PIP. Today, members of the charity gathered at Downing Street after receiving the backing of people across the UK and the disabled community. In March, Labour announced plans to save £5bn a year by overhauling the welfare system, plans which have been called 'barbaric' by campaigners. Volunteers for the charity included Rachel Batton, 53, from Cardiff, who, if the government papers are given the green light, her PIP cuts would be halved. She told Metro she was 'really scared' about the future and in 'constant stress waiting on tenterhooks' awaiting what cuts the government is going to make. Rachel has classical type EDS (Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome). EDS impacts Rachel by causing joint and muscle pain, easy bruising, frequent dislocations, and severe fatigue. She also has Multiple Sclerosis (MS), which further affects her mobility and fatigue. She said she felt 'resilient' but that there was a 'black cloud' over her everyday. She said: 'You feel like you're walking through treacle, just because your symptoms are getting worse and things and your pain is getting significantly worse. 'I can't remember a time when my pain was as bad as this, because I'm stressing about it every single day.' Rachel receives Personal Independence Payment (PIP) at the enhanced rate for daily living and the standard rate for mobility. Without PIP, Rachel would not be able to afford to manage the extra costs she is faced with. It's like, it feels like this is a tick box exercise, and the decision has already been made, and they're not going to change their mind but we've got to try.' 'It's like, it feels like this is a tick box exercise, and the decision has already been made, and they're not going to change their mind but we've got to try.' Rachel has a number of disability related extra costs and the amount of money she is about to receive from the government is going to be halved, she said. She needs frequent hot baths and consistent heating to manage her symptoms. Fatigue and mobility issues make food preparation difficult, so she relied on more expensive pre-cut ingredients and ready meals Scope said in the petition: 'Needing more financial support is not a choice. Disabled people often live in pain and in fear of losing vital support. 'After years of rising prices, many disabled people are already on the brink. Cutting disability benefits will deal another catastrophic blow to disabled people's lives.' Jessica Leigh, campaigns manager at disability equality charity Scope, said: 'We're here to urge the government to drop these catastrophic plans to rip billions from the welfare budget. 'Life costs a lot more when you're disabled, and these cuts will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work, as in Rachel's case. 'Without PIP, she won't be able to afford the things she needs to manage her conditions and the pain which comes with them, meaning she could no longer be able to work. 'The government must listen to disabled people and change course.' Last year, Scope research found that on average, disabled households need an additional £1,010 a month to have the same standard of living as non-disabled households. If you want to find out more information about the petition visit: Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Jamie Vardy next club odds: Striker will be in demand after leaving Leicester and could head north of the border MORE: 'Monster' 18ft python rescued along with three others after being found dumped in woods MORE: Astrid & Miyu launch unmissable summer sale on jewellery for a limited time only
Daily Mail
09-06-2025
- Daily Mail
Social media curfews for children WON'T work - and could even create divides in friendships and lead to isolation, experts warn
The government's proposed social media curfew won't make children any safer online, experts have warned. Ministers are considering implementing an 'app cap', to reduce teenagers' exposure to harmful online content. However, scientists have told MailOnline that there is no evidence to suggest these restrictions will have any positive effects. In fact, such restrictions could actually harm children by increasing isolation and facing more social problems during the day, the experts say. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle suggested children's social media time could be cut down by law to two hours per day outside of school time and before 10 pm. Studies have shown that using social media shortly before going to bed can lead to poor sleep patterns, falling academic achievement, and poor mental health. While that might make a curfew appealing, the scientific evidence suggests that curfews don't actually help children reduce their screen time or get more sleep. Professor Peter Etchells, an expert on the effects of digital technology from Bath Spa University, told MailOnline: 'If we're worried that social media is harmful, bans don't fix those problems - they just delay access.' The idea of a social media curfew has been raised as a possible solution to the serious harms that can be caused by excessive social media use. A study of nearly 10,000 teenagers aged between 13 and 16 found that excessive social media use disrupts positive activities like sleep while increasing exposure to harmful content, especially in the form of cyberbullying. This can lead to teenagers experiencing increased anxiety, depression, falling grades and even physical health issues. A recent survey conducted by BSI found that 50 per cent of British young people felt that a social media curfew would improve their lives. Likewise, there is very strong evidence that taking breaks from social media can have pronounced positive impacts. Dr Rachel Kent, a leading digital health expert from King's College London and host of the podcast Digital Health Diagnosed, told MailOnline: 'There is a wealth of evidence that suggests restrictions and boundaries can be incredibly beneficial. 'Short periods of time away from our devices can drastically reduce the stress and anxiety that comes from increased screen time.' Dr Kent says that the curfew would be a 'good thing' because it signals to children that they need to have boundaries in their relationship with technology. However, as Dr Kent acknowledges, a curfew would be extremely difficult and highly impractical to implement at a national level. It isn't clear how the Government intends to enforce any proposed curfew, but it is likely that many 'digitally native' children would find a way around any restriction. In 2011, South Korea implemented the 'shutdown law' which prevented under-16s from playing online video games between midnight and 6am. Years later, research showed that children were only getting 1.5 minutes of extra sleep per night and had simply shifted their online activity to other points in the day, leading to the ban being repealed in 2021. Professor Etchells says: 'It's not clear that it had any positive effect, even though at face value it feels like it should work. 'I think curfews feel like they are a good solution, but we don't have good evidence to suggest that they would work in the way that we want them to.' Recently, a Youth Select Committee report on the effects of social media found that social media bans were 'neither practical nor effective'. Experts have also raised concerns that a ban might create inadvertent consequences that cause more harm than good. WHAT ARE THE GUIDELINES FOR CHILD SCREEN TIME? There are no official guidelines for screen time limits. But there are calls for interventions to be put in place due to growing concern about the impact of screen time, and social media use, on the mental health and well-being of young people. The Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health and American Association of Pediatrics give guidance for parents: For children younger than 18 months, avoid use of screen media. Parents of children 18 to 24 months of age who want to introduce digital media should choose high-quality programming, and watch it with their children. For children ages 2 to 5 years, limit screen use to 1 hour per day of high-quality programs. Parents should view media with children to help them understand what they are seeing. Designate media-free times. Social media expert Rhea Freeman told MailOnline: 'For everything that's bad about social media, there are many good things too- finding like-minded people, chatting to friends, connection to family. 'Restrictions could potentially create divides in friendships and lead to isolation if people's allocated usage doesn't line up, I could see this being an issue.' Likewise, studies conducted among university students found that interventions designed to limit social media use led to negative effects like fear of missing out (FOMO). However, experts' biggest concern with the potential curfew is that this restriction doesn't solve the underlying problem of harmful content on social media As Professor Etchells points out, bans and curfews only delay access to social media rather than making the internet any safer for children. The Online Safety Act has passed into law, and from this year will require tech platforms to follow new Ofcom-issued codes of practice to keep users safe online, particularly children. However, experts say that adding a curfew won't solve the gaps and weaknesses of this regulation. Dr Kent says: 'I would argue that the curfew misses the point. The point is about making sure that the tech companies are taking accountability for the circulation of harmful content, moderating it, censoring it. What is the Online Safety Act? The Online Safety Act is a set of laws intended to protect children online. The act places a duty of care on online platforms, making them responsible for protecting users from harmful content. Sites must take measures to remove harmful or misleading content and change their algorithms to avoid sharing pornography and material promoting suicide or eating disorders They will also be required to introduce 'highly effective' checks to block under-18s accessing age-restricted sites. Ofcom has the power to fine technology firms up to £18 million or 10 per cent of their global revenue if they breach their duties under the landmark Online Safety Act. However, the act has been criticised for not doing enough to keep children safe from addictively designed apps. 'Tech companies need to be held to account and the government needs to be enforcing this.' Mr Kyle was asked on Sunday morning whether he would look at limiting the time children spend on social media to two hours per app after the Sunday People and Mirror reported the measure was being considered by ministers. 'I'm trying to think how we can break some of the addictive behaviour and incentivise more of the healthy developmental… and also the good communicative side of online life,' Mr Kyle told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show. This came after the government was criticised by the father of a teen who took her own life after viewing harmful content. Mr Ian Russell, whose 14-year-old daughter Molly died in 2017, said that 'sticking plasters' would not solve the problem of harmful content online. Andrew Burrows, CEO of the Molly Rose Foundation, told MailOnline: 'It's welcome to hear Peter Kyle look to strengthen online safety protections, but these measures would not change the dial on the harmful content that continues to be bombarded at children. 'Unless Ministers fix the structural issues that have hamstrung the Online Safety Act, even if it is effective at reducing time spent on platforms, a code of practice on addictive design will be just another sticking plaster.' What experts would like to see instead is more focus on educating children and carers on how to stay safe online and manage their own social media usage. Children should be taught how to recognise harmful content online and know what to do when they encounter it, the experts argue. Professor Etchells says: 'What we need to be talking more about is how we better prepare children and young people for a world saturated with technology. 'Hard-and-fast bans don't have much weight of evidence behind them to support them. But we do know that talking to kids, developing their digital literacy and resiliency skills, developing their communication skills and support networks - these are things which will lead to more sustainable long-term outcomes.' The Department for Science Innovation and Technology has been contacted for comment. Children as young as two are using social media, research from charity Barnardo's has suggested. Internet companies are being pushed to do more to combat harmful content online but parents can also take steps to alter how their children use the web. Here are some suggestions of how parents can help their children. Both iOS and Google offer features that enable parents to filter content and set time limits on apps. For iOS devices, such as an iPhone or iPad, you can make use of the Screen Time feature to block certain apps, content types or functions. On iOS, this can be done by going to settings and selecting Screen Time. For Android, you can install the Family Link app from the Google Play Store. Talk to your children Many charities, including the NSPCC, say talking to children about their online activity is vital to keep them safe. Its website features a number of tips on how to start a conversation with children about using social media and the wider internet, including having parents visit sites with their children to learn about them together and discussing how to stay safe online and act responsibly. There are tools available for parents to learn more about how social media platforms operate. Net Aware, a website run in partnership by the NSPCC and O2, offers information about social media sites, including age requirement guidance. The World Health Organisation recommends parents should limit young children to 60 minutes of screen time every day. The guidelines, published in April, suggest children aged between two and five are restricted to an hour of daily sedentary screen time.
