The Earth's oceans used to be green — and could one day turn purple, scientists say
Nearly three fourths of Earth is covered by oceans, making the planet look like a pale blue dot from space. But Japanese researchers have made a compelling case that Earth's oceans were once green, in a study published in Nature.
The reason Earth's oceans may have looked different in the ancient past is to do with their chemistry and the evolution of photosynthesis. As a geology undergraduate student, I was taught about the importance of a type of rock deposit known as the banded iron formation in recording the planet's history.
Banded iron formations were deposited in the Archean and Paleoproterozoic eons, roughly between 3.8 and 1.8 billion years ago. Life back then was confined to one cell organisms in the oceans. The continents were a barren landscape of grey, brown and black rocks and sediments.
Rain falling on continental rocks dissolved iron which was then carried to the oceans by rivers. Other sources of iron were volcanoes on the ocean floor. This iron will become important later.
The Archaean eon was a time when Earth's atmosphere and ocean were devoid of gaseous oxygen, but also when the first organisms to generate energy from sunlight evolved. These organisms used anaerobic photosynthesis, meaning they can do photosynthesis in the absence of oxygen.
It triggered important changes as a byproduct of anaerobic photosynthesis is oxygen gas. Oxygen gas bound to iron in seawater. Oxygen only existed as a gas in the atmosphere once the seawater iron could neutralize no more oxygen.
Eventually, early photosynthesis led to the "great oxidation event", a major ecological turning point that made complex life on Earth possible. It marked the transition from a largely oxygen free Earth to one with large amounts of oxygen in the ocean and atmosphere.
The "bands" of different colors in banded iron formations record this shift with an alternation between deposits of iron deposited in the absence of oxygen and red oxidized iron.
The recent paper's case for green oceans in the Archaean eon starts with an observation: waters around the Japanese volcanic island of Iwo Jima have a greenish hue linked to a form of oxidized iron - Fe(III). Blue-green algae thrive in the green waters surrounding the island.
Despite their name, blue-green algae are primitive bacteria and not true algae. In the Archaean eon, the ancestors of modern blue-green algae evolved alongside other bacteria that use ferrous iron instead of water as the source of electrons for photosynthesis. This points to high levels of iron in the ocean.
Photosynthetic organisms use pigments (mostly chlorophyll) in their cells to transform CO₂ into sugars using the energy of the sun. Chlorophyll gives plants their green color. Blue-green algae are peculiar because they carry the common chlorophyll pigment, but also a second pigment called phycoerythrobilin (PEB).
In their paper, the researchers found that genetically engineered modern blue-green algae with PEB grow better in green waters. Although chlorophyll is great for photosynthesis in the spectra of light visible to us, PEB seems to be superior in green-light conditions.
Before the rise of photosynthesis and oxygen, Earth's oceans contained dissolved reduced iron (iron deposited in the absence of oxygen). Oxygen released by the rise of photosynthesis in the Archean eon then led to oxidized iron in seawater. The paper's computer simulations also found oxygen released by early photosynthesis led to a high enough concentration of oxidized iron particles to turn the surface water green.
Once all iron in the ocean was oxidized, free oxygen (0₂) existed in Earth's oceans and atmosphere. So a major implication of the study is that pale-green dot worlds viewed from space are good candidate planets to harbour early photosynthetic life.
Related: A mysterious 'black hole' in Pacific Ocean that sparked wild rumors online
The changes in ocean chemistry were gradual. The Archaean period lasted 1.5 billion years. This is more than half of Earth's history. By comparison, the entire history of the rise and evolution of complex life represents about an eighth of Earth's history.
Almost certainly, the color of the oceans changed gradually during this period and potentially oscillated. This could explain why blue-green algae evolved both forms of photosynthetic pigments. Chlorophyll is best for white light which is the type of sunlight we have today. Taking advantage of green and white light would have been an evolutionary advantage.
The lesson from the recent Japanese paper is that the color of our oceans are linked to water chemistry and the influence of life. We can imagine different ocean colors without borrowing too much from science fiction.
Purple oceans would be possible on Earth if the levels of sulphur were high. This could be linked to intense volcanic activity and low oxygen content in the atmosphere, which would lead to the dominance of purple sulphur bacteria.
Red oceans are also theoretically possible under intense tropical climates when red oxidized iron forms from the decay of rocks on the land and is carried to the oceans by rivers or winds. Or if a type of algae linked to "red tides" came to dominate the surface oceans.
These red algae are common in areas with intense concentration of fertilizer such as nitrogen. In the modern oceans, this tends to happen in coastline close to sewers.
RELATED STORIES
—Picturesque plankton paint peculiar patterns in Patagonia
—Logic-defying 'bottom blooms' could sustain hidden ecosystems in Arctic and Antarctica
—Billion-year-old green algae is an ancestor of all plants on Earth
As our sun ages, it will first become brighter leading to increased surface evaporation and intense UV light. This may favor purple sulphur bacteria living in deep waters without oxygen.
It will lead to more purple, brown, or green hues in coastal or stratified areas, with less deep blue color in water as phytoplankton decline. Eventually, oceans will evaporate completely as the sun expands to encompass the orbit of Earth.
At geological timescales nothing is permanent and changes in the color of our oceans are therefore inevitable.
This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Revealed: The number of steps you need to improve your life expectancy
Walking 7,000 steps a day is the sweet spot for preventing many chronic diseases that can lead to an early death, a major study has shown. While the goal of 10,000 daily steps has become firmly established in the public consciousness, an international team of researchers found even a modest amount of walking brings major benefits. British scientists said it finally 'debunked the myth' of 10,000 steps and should encourage people to try and hit the lower target. The major review of 57 studies involving 160,000 adults, which was published in The Lancet, concluded that for most conditions health benefits tended to level off beyond 7,000 steps. Hitting 7,000 steps a day was found to reduce all-cause-mortality by 47 per cent, cardiovascular disease by 25 per cent, cancer by six per cent, diabetes by 14 per cent, dementia by 38 per cent and depression by 22 per cent. Health benefits were also apparent from 4,000 steps when compared to 'inactive' people who walked just 2,000, the study led by the University of Sydney found. Every extra 1,000 steps brought better outcomes, researchers found. Commenting on the study, Steven Harridge, professor of human and applied physiology at King's College London, said: 'Humans are designed to be physically active – our evolutionary heritage as hunter gatherers. 'There has been debate about the amount of activity an individual should be doing with 10,000 steps as a generalised target, not well evidenced. 'This paper shows that 7,000 steps is sufficient for reducing the risk for most diseases covered, and 10, 000 steps does not confer much additional benefit.' According to World Health Organisation data, insufficient physical activity is the fourth most frequent cause of death in the world, with 3.2 million deaths a year related to physical inactivity. Many health organisations recommend hitting 10,000 steps a day, although there is little evidence for the target, which is believed to have arisen from a Japanese marketing campaign in the 1960s. In the run-up to the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, the company Yamasa sought to capitalise on the sudden interest in fitness, so designed the world's first wearable step-counter. They called it the Manpo-kei, or '10,000-step meter'. The company appears to have chosen the figure at random, as a fun goal, but it has stuck ever since. The new paper found that for heart disease, walking more than 7,000 steps was beneficial, but for most conditions there was little gain from putting in more said it was still unclear why walking brings such striking benefits but said it is likely to increase cardiorespiratory fitness, which is known to be positively associated with better health and all-cause mortality outcomes. Commenting on the research, Dr Daniel Bailey, an expert in sedentary behaviour and health at Brunel University of London, said the 7,000 steps target was more achievable for many people than 10,000 steps. 'Just adding more steps from your starting point can have important benefits for health,' he said. 'This study adds to existing evidence by showing that the more steps people do, the less their risk of developing different health conditions. 'The finding that doing 5,000-7,000 steps per day is beneficial, is an important addition to the literature which helps to debunk the myth that 10,000 steps per day should be the target for optimal health.' The Alzheimer's Society also welcomed the study saying it demonstrated that inactivity is a major risk factor for dementia. Dr Richard Oakley, associate director of research and innovation at the charity said: 'It adds to the evidence that what's good for the heart is good for the head.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Where Newly Found ‘Ammonite' Is In Solar System — And Why It Matters
getty Where is 'Ammonite,' the new world discovered in the solar system? Is Ammonite a planet? No. It's a "sednoid," an object about 137-236 miles (220-380 kilometers) in diameter that has a highly eccentric orbit, similar to that of the dwarf planet Sedna, one of the most distant objects in the solar system science knows of. Nicknamed Ammonite — a kind of fossil — the sednoid discovery 2023 KQ14 is forcing astronomers to rethink theories about how the solar system formed. Here's everything you need to know about where Ammonite is and how it fits into the pantheon of the solar system. Forbes Meet 'Ammonite' — A New World Just Found In The Solar System How Ammonite Was Discovered It may be an exciting find, but Ammonite is not a bright, easy-to-find object. Unlike distant exoplanets, most of which are seen when they transit their star, a relatively small object in the outer solar system that reflects very little sunlight is dim. So, so dim. It's comparable to a magnitude 24 object, which is impossible to see with all but the most powerful professional telescopes' wide-field imaging cameras. Which is precisely what happened earlier this month. Ammonite was detected — as a faint dot in long-exposure images — from near the summit of Mauna Kea on Hawaii's Big Island, first by Japanese astronomers using the Subaru Telescope's Hyper Suprime-Cam in Hawaii, then with the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope's MegaCam to map its orbit. Where Is Ammonite? Ammonite is a trans-Neptunian object, a designation derived from its discovery beyond the orbits of Neptune and Pluto in a region of the outer solar system that astronomers know relatively little about. Ammonite was first detected about 71 astronomical units (an AU is the average distance between Earth and the sun — 93 million miles/150 million kilometers) from the sun, from where it may take as long as 10,000 years to complete one orbit of the sun. This region lies beyond the Kuiper Belt and may be located within the area considered to transition into the inner Oort Cloud. The Oort Cloud is a sphere around the solar system that's thought to be home to billions of objects, including comets. Forbes Complete Guide To 'Ammonite,' The Solar System's Latest Member Meet The Sednoids As well as being a TNO, Ammonite is a sednoid — and only the fourth ever discovered. The archetype is Sedna, a dwarf planet with a diameter of 620 miles (1,000 kilometers), whose elliptical orbit takes it within 76 au, but as far as 937 au. For context, Neptune orbits 30 au from the sun and Pluto between 30 and 50 au. There are two other sednoids. 2012 VP113, found in 2012 and nicknamed "Biden" for its "VP" abbreviation, is 280 miles (450 kilometers) in diameter. 541132 Leleākūhonua, discovered in 2015, is 140 miles (220 kilometers) in diameter and orbits between 65 and a whopping 2,114 au. All of the sednoids — including Ammonite — were found close to their perihelion — their closest point to the sun on their wildly eccentric elliptical orbits. It follows that there are likely others out there that are too distant and too dim for even the largest telescopes to find. Forbes The Perseid Meteor Shower Begins Thursday night — Here's When To See It At Its Best Why Sednoids Are Important Ammonite's orbit is helping astronomers understand what the solar system looked like billions of years ago — and what else might be lurking out there. The presence of a population of objects with "detached" orbits that take them far away from the sun — as opposed to the relative order found in the inner solar system — hints at a chaotic past or present shaped by forces other than the eight major planets. The theory that the sednoids are being gravitationally impacted by an unseen massive object is the basis of the Planet Nine thesis. The thinking is that the sednoids must have such orbits for a reason. If Planet Nine does exist, it's thought to be over 400 au from the sun, and about five to 10 times Earth's mass. In May, scientists in Taiwan, searching for a ninth planet in the solar system, found hints in archival images. However, not only has Planet Nine not been found, but Ammonite's discovery may suggest that it isn't there. Ammonite's orbit does not align with those of the other three sednoids' weird orbits, which weakens the Planet Nine thesis — and hints at different explanations for the sednoids: MORE FOR YOU There is a ninth planet, but it's incredibly remote. A ninth planet did exist, but was ejected from the solar system long ago. A star passed close to the solar system, exerting a gravitational effect on the sednoids. Either way, the discovery of Ammonite reminds us that the solar system doesn't end with Pluto, but morphs into a vast disc populated by the leftovers of the dawn of the solar system — a region we all look right through every time we look up at the night sky. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.


Gizmodo
7 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Adorable Triassic Reptile Used its Freaky Back Fin to Communicate
Technological advancements have brought us many things. For paleontologists, it's introduced the ability to probe softer material—skin, feathers, scales, and hair—found on fossilized creatures. And that's resulting in some strange new findings about long-extinct animals, showing us that they're even weirder than we imagined. A paper published today in Nature offers a re-analysis of a fossilized Mirasaura grauvogeli, a 247-million-year-old reptile whose defining feature is a feather-like structure jutting out from its back. The popular conception of these features is that the appendages were feathers, but the new study argues this isn't the case. Rather, it's an unusual type of skin that stretched out like a fan from the reptile's back, the researchers argue. Further research is needed, but the study authors believe this fan likely served as a communication tool among the creatures. These structures preserved pigment-carrying particles called melanosomes that are more bird-like than reptilian. But the curious thing about these appendages is that they were neither feathers nor scales. They're 'distinctly corrugated'—much like cardboard—and were likely malleable to some extent, the researchers report in the study. 'This evidence reveals that vertebrate skin has evolutionary possibilities that are weirder than might be easily imagined,' Richard Prum, an evolutionary biologist at Yale University who wasn't involved in the new work, wrote in a commentary for Nature. 'Mirasaura teaches us that a feather is only one of the many wondrous things that reptiles evolved to grow out of their skin.' For the analysis, a team of paleontologists at Stuttgart's State Museum of Natural History, Germany, revisited an old fossil of Mirasaura discovered in 1939 and acquired by the museum in 2019. Researchers were in the dark about what the fossil even was—in fact, the team behind the new study was the one that identified the creature for the first time. Similarly, paleontologists weren't able to fully understand Mirasaura's close relative, Longisquama insignis, which also featured long, feather-like structures on its back. At the time, scientists weren't sure what to make of it at all, partly because the Longisquama fossil wasn't well preserved. For the new work, however, the team reconstructed the skeletal anatomy of the two creatures, finding it highly likely that Mirasaura and Longisquama were both part of the drepanosaur family, a strange group of reptiles from the Triassic era (between 201 million and 252 million years ago), sometimes referred to as 'monkey lizards.' And these drepanosaurs are as strange as they come: long, bird-like skulls, bodies like chameleons, and an anatomy that suggests they lived in trees. Should the new work be verified, it means that drepanosaurs may have sported elaborate, helical structures that extended out from their backs, like Mirasaura and Longisquama. When studying the past, paleontologists use their best judgment to infer physical features based on the empirical evidence. So it's even wilder that, using such careful and sophisticated methods, scientists essentially found a reptilian version of Transformers. At the same time, such 'rediscoveries' of older fossils uncover amazing insights from the past—which is why we look forward to them each time.