Parents confident they can save school after raising £1.3m
The money was donated in a matter of weeks after the shock announcement by the owners of St Clare's School in Porthcawl
St Clare's School, Porthcawl
Parents who send their children to a private school threatened with closure say they're confident they can save it after raising their target £1.3m to do so. The money was donated in a matter of weeks after the shock announcement by the owners of St Clare's School in Porthcawl that they were closing it.
Owners Cognita said the school was successful academically but "economic volatility" and "factors beyond our control" meant they would have to shut it at the end of the Christmas term this year.
In a letter to parents Cognita also blamed the falling local birth rate. They said projected pupil numbers for next academic year make the school "unsustainable". Sign up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here.
Parents determined to save the school disagree and say they now have a "viable" plan to keep the school open and hopefully in the same location. The building and grounds are owned by the Dalton family which leases them to Cognita, the group said.
Natasha Bray, who has two children at the school was speaking on behalf of the campaign to save St Clare's. She said: "We have raised £1.3m which is phenomenal. We have had amazing support from parents and the local community. We have set up a charitable trust and are continuing to explore options."
Helen Hier, head teacher of St Clare's School, Porthcawl
Article continues below
Talks are ongoing with Cognita as well as with Ffynone House, an independent school in Swansea which was also saved by parents. A trust the St Clare's Charitable Trust has been set up to run and manages the campaign funds and plan.
"Everyone is still hopeful but with the longer time some parents are getting anxious and some students are leaving. But there are stil a lot of children who want to stay if we can fins a solution," said Natasha.
"St Clare's is a fantastic school. It's more than a school, it's a family and a community. Everybody knows each other and children can be here from aged three to 18 so it's their whole young lives.
"We are doing everything we can to keep the school open and we are very confident we have everything we need to move forward."
In a statement on its website the Save St Clare's Trust said: "On Tuesday 6th May 2025, Cognita UK wrote to parents informing them that due to factors outside their control, they had begun a consultation with the staff about a proposal to close the school in December 2025.
"The announcment left parents reeling, some having only started with the school at the beginning of the term or academic year. The news was particularly upsetting for our Year 10 and Year 12 students, who will be left without support for GCSE and A-Level courses not due to be completed until May/June 2026."
St Clare's says on its website that it charges fees of between £2,000 and £6,000 a term for children aged from nursery to sixth form. The non-selective school, which is understood to have around 150 pupils, is run by education company Cognita UK, which operates a number of schools across the UK.
In her letter announcing the news from St Clare's to parents in May Nicola Lambros, general manager of Cognita, UK said the school would do everything it could to help them find alternative places at a local school for their children should the decision be taken to close. St Clare's has entered into negotiations with staff affected.
Ms Lambros said the decision was not a reflection of the school's academic success but of other factors.
Article continues below
Her letter added: "We recently carried out a full review of the school's sustainability in response to the rapidly-changing environment for independent schools. This included determining the demand for independent school places within the local catchment area both now and in the future.
"Sadly the review has concluded that factors outside our control, including the falling local birth rate and economic volatility mean our pupil numbers are projected to be at an unsustainable level next academic year."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
11 hours ago
- BBC News
New BANES bin times 'could cost businesses thousands'
Councillors have questioned why a change to bin collections, which could cost businesses thousands, was not been scrutinised before a decision was July, Bath and North East Somerset Council (BANES) cabinet member Mark Elliott signed off changes to the rules around the city centre evening business waste a result, the time shops are allowed to put their bins was moved to 18:00 BST, even though some businesses close at 17:00 to the council's own analysis, these businesses could now have to spend £3,089 a year in additional wages for someone to stick around to put the bins out. Charlie Dalton-Ball of family-run jewellers S. P. Green & Co in Bath, had warned the committee: "On paper this might seem achievable, but in reality it is entirely unworkable. "Our business is staffed from 10:00 BST until 17:30 BST which means there is now no legal window for us to place out our waste while the business is staffed."He told the Local Democracy Reporting Service he believed the decision was "undemocratic". At a council meeting on 29 July, which was the first time the decision had been discussed in front of a scrutiny panel, Midsomer Norton North, Independent councillor Shaun Hughes said: "This, I don't feel, has had the right level of scrutiny."Mr Elliott said he had only been responsible for the portfolio covering this area of council policy since May."I am very happy to commit to you, as the portfolio holder now, that I will attempt to bring things to scrutiny if they look like scrutiny is required or will be helpful," he added. In light of a "small response" to a previous consultation, Mr Elliot decided the change would instead be brought in as a pilot and run for 12 months. But Midsomer Norton North, Independent councillor Shaun Hughes said the council would "do a better job" through scrutiny of mitigating and problems before moving to a pilot.
Wales Online
14-07-2025
- Wales Online
Big differences in how Welsh councils are dealing with climate change revealed in report
Big differences in how Welsh councils are dealing with climate change revealed in report Some are making big strides towards a net zero future, says the report, while others less so Energy-saving homes under construction in Swansea (Image: South Wales Evening Post ) A new report has revealed stark differences in how Welsh councils are responding to the issue of climate change, with some making significant strides toward net zero, and others falling behind. The findings come from the Council Climate Action Scorecards 2025, which analysed every local authority in Wales between July, 2024, and March, 2025. Councils were assessed across a wide range of climate-related categories, including buildings and heating, transport, planning and land use, biodiversity, governance, and finance. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Swansea Council emerged as the best-performing authority in Wales, with a score of 48%. It was praised for its work on energy-efficient housing and investment in renewable technologies. Its 'Homes as Power Stations' programme, which uses solar panels, heat pumps, and battery storage to cut household emissions, was highlighted as an example of real-world progress. Monmouthshire County Council came a close second with a score of 46%, with its best-performing category being waste reduction and food, scoring an impressive 93%. Article continues below The report is the work of Climate Emergency UK, an independent not-for-profit group that monitors and assesses how councils are acting on their climate promises. The organisation was set up to push for greater transparency and accountability in local climate action, using over 90 questions to evaluate how councils were progressing on cutting emissions, implementing sustainable transport, retrofitting homes, and involving local communities in the climate conversation. The capital city, Cardiff, scored an overall 42%, with its strongest-performing category also being waste reduction, at 72%. Cardiff Council is actively working towards becoming a net-zero city by 2030, focusing on reducing carbon emissions from both its operations and the wider city. The council's 'One Planet Cardiff' strategy, launched in 2020, outlines a vision for a carbon-neutral future and includes specific targets for the council to achieve carbon neutrality in its activities by 2030. At the other end of the table, Merthyr Tydfil was the worst-performing council in Wales, scoring just 23%. The report found limited evidence of serious climate action across most categories, with major gaps in transport, housing retrofit, and public involvement. Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council was the second-lowest performer, with an overall score of 29%. Rhondda Cynon Taf and Neath Port Talbot both received a score of just 5% in the transport category — the lowest in Wales. The report said this reflected limited publicly available information on current strategies to reduce transport emissions. It added that this might be due to a focus on other priority areas or the early stages of planning for longer-term transport improvements. While both councils had made progress in certain aspects of their climate work, the low score suggested that further development in active travel infrastructure, public transport planning, and low-emission transport initiatives could help strengthen their overall approach in future assessments, said the report. Wales as a whole averaged 36% across all councils, slightly lower than the average scores in England and Scotland. The report concluded that while a few councils were showing leadership, many were still struggling to turn their climate declarations into meaningful progress. Climate Emergency UK said stronger government support, clearer targets, and increased public pressure were all needed if councils were to meet their commitments and help Wales transition to a greener future. Article continues below
Wales Online
12-07-2025
- Wales Online
Couple unable to sell 20-room home next to Welsh canal which keeps leaking
Couple unable to sell 20-room home next to Welsh canal which keeps leaking Charles and Patricia Lester say the value of their home has fallen by nearly £500,000 but even then they can't sell up Patricia and Charles Lester of Llanfoist House, Abergavenny, who can't sell their home because the canal beside them leaks (Image: John Myers ) A couple living at the bottom of a steep incline say they've been unable to sell their home for years because the adjacent canal leaks into their land. Charles and Patricia Lester have lived at Llanfoist House beside the Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal since 1973. The house which they bought then for £9,000 lies at the base of a very high and steep canal bank 70ft below the canal towpath. They say they have suffered multiple landslides since due to water seeping through the canal banks with the most recent being within the last decade. 'Not that we were aware of the significance of any of this at the time we bought the property,' Mr Lester told WalesOnline. 'Especially as the canal had no record of leaks or collapses in its previous history. But we very quickly realised there was a constant flow of water from the canal bank. 'Our unlined pond was kept full all through the driest periods with leaks from the canal and many leaks into all the neighbours' gardens including our own. At the time we had no idea or warning of the potential danger as would be required these days to be in the estate agent's details. 'The more recent legislation about declaring such things as subsidence or flood potential has made it impossible for us to sell this large house enabling us to move to a more manageable and comfortable property in our old age.' For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here. Their mansion is at the bottom of a steep bank which runs below the canal towpath. The canal can be seen in the image on close inspection (Image: John Myers ) Article continues below It comes after the Canal and River Trust (CRT), which is charged with maintenance of canals and rivers across the UK, said the Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal was suffering from a severe water shortage and may have to close. It has led to the Lesters asking where the water is going and claiming the issue is a huge one for homeowners living beside the canal which runs from Brecon to Cwmbran. In an interview with WalesOnline Mr Lester asked: 'Why has the canal never run out of water before? Why are we talking about this now?' Due to the leaks the value of their property has diminished from £1.2m to £750,000. But they're unable to sell it anyway because no-one will touch it once they see the issues the house potentially faces with potential subsidence and integrity of the land around the canal. Former world-renowned dressmakers Mr and Mrs Lester, aged 84 and 83 and who live in the 20-room property which they can no longer properly look after, believe CRT is partly to blame for the leaky canal. They claim the canal has been poorly maintained ever since the first and worst landslide in 1975 which they say almost killed them. The landslide of 1975 as taken by Mr Lester (Image: Charles Lester ) Recalling what happened then Mr Lester said: 'I came home at lunchtime from work and there were great jets coming from the bottom of the bank. Trish and I were standing in front of the bank and 20,000 tonnes of water came straight at us. 'You don't run when something like that comes towards you. You can't. You just pray. "Luckily our lives were saved because the trees came roots-first and hit the stone wall and created a sort of dam which diverted the water and the rocks, boulders, and debris sideways. 'What had happened was the canal had become derelict in the sixties and was closed. In the sixties boating enthusiasts got together and asked British Waterways as it was then if the canal could be opened back up for tourism and leisure and British Waterways agreed to it. 'When the canal was opened originally in 1799 it would have been clay-lined with puddling clay which was very effective and didn't leak. But in reopening the canal to boaters in the modern world British Waterways dredged the canal deeper. 'They did it to make it appropriate for the propellers and engines of the boats but in doing so they took much of the clay-lining out. What you've got now is just continuous leaks all across the network. 'We could not afford any legal support and we were walked all over by British Waterways. We lost our gas main and our sewers were very badly damaged but British Waterways refused to do anything to restore it nor were we offered any compensation. We had to replace and restore our home ourselves.' The Lesters say their horizontal fence shows the land is not stable which they say is caused by the leaky canal (Image: Charles Lester ) CRT took over from the now-disbanded British Waterways in 2012. Mr Lester continued: 'CRT seems to think that they can just dig holes to enlarge the canal but the land is very porous and water soaks away very easily. "Half a mile downstream from Llangattock is a prime example where they greatly enlarged the canal to form a marina yet one can see large amounts of water coming under the towpath into the field." Mrs Lester said: 'After the canal bank collapsed here in 1975 British Waterways dug the canal deeper and steepened the bank. The bank was also concreted but that didn't stop the leaks and we've had issues ever since. Parts of the bank are damp.' She claimed: 'When you have boats drawn by horse that is a very different thing to now with the engines and propellers and it just doesn't work anymore. It really is a case of shoddy engineering and bad maintenance.' The most recent landslide in 2014 caused the Lesters' fence to move several metres down the bank and become almost horizontal. The couple say the danger is that the bank is so steep that it is beyond what is called the safe angle of repose [it rises 23 metres from the garden at an angle of almost 45 degrees] and with the movement it became hazardous because of large stones and debris continually falling down. 'I still feel apprehensive about that body of water,' Mrs Lester said. 'It's horrible. Every time you hear a crack of a branch you fear it's another landslide. 'They've got sensors along the canal now monitoring any movement of the canal and towpath . It makes you think: 'What is going on that we don't know about?' We often hear trees come down at times of calm weather - classic examples of trees coming down because the ground is damp and soft from leaks. It's terrifying.' CRT has installed sensors across the waterway to monitor any movement in the soil on either side of the waterway and has worked to install a deeply anchored metal mesh wiring across parts of the steep banks beside the canal to try to ensure debris doesn't slip down the banks. A huge mesh cage has been installed over the bank beside the Lesters' home. The mesh was installed in 2018 but vegetation has now grown over it in many places and the Lesters claim parts of the mesh has rotted. 'It looks like the mesh you see sometimes on the side of motorways,' Mrs Lester said. Parts of the outside of the canal bank across the network have now been covered in this steel mesh wire to prevent further issues but the Lesters say they still haven't received assurances their home is safe (Image: Charles Lester ) Further issues arrived for the Lesters when they realised they were 'trapped' in the property unable to sell. They said because they legally have to declare the issues beside their home and, they claim, CRT has refused to provide any formal assurances that the house is safe with a written certificate, no-one will buy the property. In 2016 the couple accepted an offer from a potential buyer of £825,000 but the sale fell through over safety fears. 'I'd built our retirement home in west Wales and we had to sell it because no-one will buy Llanfoist House from us,' Mr Lester said. 'That's when we decided to take CRT to court. We have a legal arm on our insurance policy which covered legal costs up to £100,000. We used that to take CRT to court but we got through the lot and basically ran out of time and money. "We were hoping for some kind of compensation and a certificate to say the work that has been done by CRT makes our home safe. That would allow us to sell the house. But they won't provide us with any assurances. We're now in a position where we've had multiple offers withdrawn and we're stuck here.' A spokesman for CRT said: 'The canal is an engineering marvel from the industrial age that attracts visitors from around the globe. Our charity works to keep it open and navigable for people to enjoy and for the benefit of wildlife. "We're constantly carrying out maintenance and repairs including monitoring for leaks or movement in the canal's embankments. All canals have a demand for water to stay open and navigable. "Every time a boat passes through a lock on the Mon & Brec, it takes water downstream to where it eventually will flow into the River Usk. Evaporation and transpiration can also see canals lose as much as an inch of water on hot summer days while an underlying 'sweetening flow' is always needed to support ecology and avoid canals turning stagnant.' The Lesters say the value of their property has diminished from £1.2m to £750,000 (Image: John Myers ) On Wednesday campaigners for the canal protested outside the Senedd calling for water levels to be 'safeguarded' before the canal becomes unusable for boats and the public. Senedd members added their voices to a 14,000-strong chorus of calls for urgent action to avert a 'catastrophic' drying out of the canal. CRT relies on water abstraction to supply the canal, with up to 90% coming from the River Usk, and held exemptions until 2018 when regulations on licensing changed. Natural Resources Wales (NRW) oversees licensing, limiting the volume of water that can be abstracted on environmental grounds to protect special areas of conservation. James Evans, the Tory Senedd member for Brecon and Radnorshire, similarly warned the canal is on the brink of closure due to NRW's "unworkable" decisions. Mr Evans said water levels significantly fell within two weeks of the licence coming into force in March with CRT making clear it cannot afford to spend £1m a year buying water. CRT says it can no longer afford the water abstraction licence to take water from the River Usk to replace the water the canal is losing while in the Senedd on Wednesday Labour's Carolyn Thomas also told members: 'The licence from NRW allows a lower level of extraction than has historically been allowed. 'Within 10 days of these regulations coming into force earlier this year there was a problem. [CRT] have calculated that if the licence water restrictions had been in force in the last 20 years the canal would only have been open for four summers. It also means money is not available for vital maintenance… to ensure the canal remains navigable and leaks get fixed.' This week the future of the canal was discussed in the Senedd but campaigners say they don't have any further answers (Image: John Myers ) Huw Irranca-Davies, the deputy first minister and a former UK minister responsible for canals, told the Senedd responsibility is shared between Wales and Westminster on the issue of water abstraction. He said: 'If there was an easy answer we'd have done it already. "It isn't an easy answer. What this will require is bringing people around the table together. It's not one or the other: we need to find the solutions for the canal while also protecting the ecological status of the Usk.' Mark Flood, member of the the Preserve and Protect the Mon and Brec (PPMB) campaign group who lives aboard his boat on the canal, said: "It's encouraging that, after nearly five months, the Welsh Government has acknowledged the need to actively engage in finding a long-term solution to the canal's water supply issues. I'm hopeful that the upcoming meeting between the government and key stakeholders will lead to meaningful progress. Article continues below "But having heard the deputy first minister's response I'm not convinced that he recognises how urgent it is to find a solution that safeguards the canal so that my home and canal businesses will survive. Like many who live and work on the canal I won't feel truly secure until a permanent solution is agreed and implemented without delay."
