logo
Under pressure, U.S. companies back off DEI pay metrics

Under pressure, U.S. companies back off DEI pay metrics

Reuters13 hours ago
July 9 (Reuters) - The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. This column is part of the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter, which you can sign up for here.
Tying U.S. executives' pay to corporate diversity metrics was all the rage for a few years. But that's no longer the case as companies respond to pressure from conservative activists and U.S. President Donald Trump's administration, a new review found.
Compensation consulting firm Farient Advisors found the share of S&P 500 companies who said they used diversity, equity and inclusion measures in their executive compensation plans fell to 22%, according to proxy statements filed this year. The figure was 52% last year and hit a peak of 57% in 2023.
Brian Bueno, Farient's Sustainability Practice Leader, said the decline reflected the pressure companies have faced from conservative activists who say the practices encourage discrimination. He expects more companies will follow as executives worry about their exposure to government pressure if they are seen as embracing diversity measures.
Many have an eye on Trump's executive orders like one encouraging the private sector to "end illegal DEI discrimination and preferences, opens new tab," Bueno said.
Among corporate executives, Bueno said, "We know of cases where they decided the (pay) measure created too much legal risk and stopped using it."
In other cases, companies may still consider diversity but measure it with different terms, he said. Leaders at those companies "found a way to modify their language to avoid it looking like a DEI measure," he said.
Even when used, diversity incentives typically account for no more than a few percentage points of the total pay of S&P 500 CEOs. Their median pay reached a record $16.8 million in 2024. The metrics gained popularity as companies looked to respond to a national conversation about race in the U.S. after the murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, at the hands of police in 2020.
Cessna business jet maker Textron (TXT.N), opens new tab said in last year's proxy statement that "hiring diversity" metrics were used to set 5% of executives' annual incentive compensation. But Textron said it would shift to an ESG metric that, according to this year's proxy statement, tracked "progress related to safety, sustainability and an engaged, high-performance workforce." A Textron spokesperson declined to comment further.
One company still using diversity targets for compensation this year was Verizon. (VZ.N), opens new tab It said in an April 7 filing that, "As a large, multinational company with a broad customer and employee base, we know that our operations are strengthened when we have diverse perspectives and experiences reflected in our workforce and business partners."
But in May, Verizon said it would end the targets and other diversity efforts, as it sought a merger approval from the Federal Communications Commission. "Verizon recognizes that some DEI policies and practices could be associated with discrimination," said Verizon chief legal officer Vandana Venkatesh at the time. A Verizon representative declined further comment.
Another company changing its compensation terms is Mastercard (MA.N), opens new tab, which said that starting this year, it would no longer use a modifier tied in part to gender pay parity. The change "reflects the significant progress that has been made since 2021 in the areas of greenhouse gas emissions, financial inclusion and gender pay parity," Mastercard said in an April filing. A representative declined further comment.
Mastercard had faced a shareholder resolution calling for it to consider eliminating the pay goals, filed by the conservative activist group National Legal and Policy Center. It called Mastercard's initiative "discriminatory." Citing the change, Mastercard won regulatory permission, opens new tab to skip a vote on the item.
Luke Perlot, an associate director for the Center, praised the shift and said next year his group will press companies on whether they actually drop DEI efforts. "We think some companies are just changing the name," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starbucks unveils its ‘secret menu' and a $25k drink contest
Starbucks unveils its ‘secret menu' and a $25k drink contest

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starbucks unveils its ‘secret menu' and a $25k drink contest

Starbucks has officially embraced its popular 'secret menu ' by making it accessible through the 'offers' tab on its mobile app. The app currently features four specific custom drink combinations, including 'Cookies on top' and 'Dragonfruit glow-up,' with new options to be regularly added. Starbucks is hosting a 'Secret menu ' contest from July 14 to July 20, inviting customers and employees to submit their own drink customizations. Four finalists will have their drinks featured on the secret menu from August 18 to 25 and receive a $5,000 prize, with the overall winner getting an additional $25,000. This initiative follows the introduction of several new summer menu items and plans for renovations at 1,000 stores to encourage customers to visit in person.

The Guardian view on Europe's Trump challenge: Brussels must hold its nerve and think big
The Guardian view on Europe's Trump challenge: Brussels must hold its nerve and think big

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on Europe's Trump challenge: Brussels must hold its nerve and think big

As the world has grown used to Donald Trump delivering aggressive ultimatums that are then revised or watered down, the shock-and-awe effect of a presidential edict on Truth Social has somewhat diminished. On Saturday, Mr Trump unexpectedly announced that the United States would hit the European Union with swingeing tariffs on goods of 30% from 1 August. That certainly prompted urgent weekend discussions in Brussels, Paris and Berlin. But for now, the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, is placing all countermeasures on hold, in the hope that what the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, described as 'reasonable solutions' can be found. Given the stakes, betting on the success of a softly, softly approach to trade negotiations remains sensible. Mr Trump's previous imposition of 25% tariffs on European carmakers (on top of the pre-existing 2.5% rate) has already panicked German manufacturers in particular. But the president's attempts to further batter Europe into economic submission, risking a trade war with an ally and threatening an annual €1.7tn worth of commercial activity, would be likely to trigger another market backlash if taken to the brink. The last time that happened, following 'liberation day' in April, Mr Trump blinked. As the ante is upped once more, it is also – rightly – a European concern that outright confrontation over trade could sour talks with the White House in relation to Ukraine. Mr Trump's pledge on Monday to send Patriot missiles to Ukraine, along with a broader weapons deal to be financed by Europe, appeared to confirm the wisdom of the EU's cautious approach as the president's unedifying bromance with Vladimir Putin sours. Nevertheless, in an era when business as usual is highly unlikely to return, the latest salvo on tariffs has again underlined the need for the EU to deepen its economic resilience and independence. Sadly, on that score a sufficient sense of urgency is still missing. In September, it will be a year since the publication of Mario Draghi's report on EU competitiveness, in which the former president of the European Central Bank called for a level of annual investment equivalent to three times that delivered by the postwar Marshall plan. Since then, the second coming of Mr Trump has added to an already formidable cocktail of challenges, including the need to revive stalling economies, fund the green transition and increase spending on defence and security. Yet Ms von der Leyen, who commissioned Mr Draghi's report, has failed to follow it up with anything like the fiscal ambition called for by its author. Instead, by rowing back on some green measures, and courting the populist right on issues such as migration, she has antagonised progressives in the centrist coalition that re-elected her for a second term. The EU needs to think bigger and more boldly. On Wednesday, the European Commission will unveil its proposed EU budget for 2028-34. Echoing Mr Draghi's vision, Spain unsuccessfully lobbied for it to be doubled to more than €2tn, with much of the increase to be financed through common borrowing. Such a step-change would have allowed the kind of spending that could safeguard the European social model at a time of transition, and of economic and environmental instability. The commission, heavily influenced by more fiscally conservative member states, will offer something far more cautious. With more turbulence undoubtedly to come, it is unlikely to be enough. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store