Threat of internal enemies
After the Pahalgam attack, the common man stood behind the government in unity. In fact, people in the country are absolutely sure that Narendra Modi government will give a befitting reply to this attack. The reason being India retaliated to similar terrorist attacks in 2016 and 2019 by directly entering Pakistani territory. The common Indian is certain that Prime Minister Modi will take the right decision in terms of the country's security.
In 2008, Pakistani terrorists entered a city like Mumbai and killed hundreds of innocent Indians. The then ruling government of Congress led by Manmohan Singh did nothing but condemn Pakistan. Terrorists in Pahalgam first confirmed that the innocent civilians were Hindus and then killed them. This information was given by the relatives of the citizens who fell victim to this attack.
This underlined the fact that only Hindus were targeted. There is nothing more unfortunate than seasoned leader like Sharad Pawar and Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar playing politics over this. It has often seen that the entire nation stands firmly behind the central government in war and crisis like terrorist attacks. After the struggle for Bangladesh liberation started in 1971, the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi decided to support that struggle. At that time, Mrs Gandhi had a discussion with Atal Bihari Vajpayee. She gave him an idea of the situation. Back then, Atalji had clearly told Indiraji that 'Jana Sangh will give total support to the government's decision'.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee was aware that showing party differences in such a situation would have been an anti-national act. 'We will criticize the government's other policies in Parliament and on other platforms whenever necessary, but after Pakistan attacked India over the Bangladesh Liberation war, it is the duty of every patriotic citizen to stand behind the government', this was the sentiment behind Jana Sangh giving its total support to Indira Gandhi government. National interest is larger than the party interest that is the basic teaching of Jana Sangh and BJP workers. With this same sentiment, Deendayal Upadhyay had publicly assured during the 1965 Pakistan war that Jana Sangh is with Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri. Unfortunately, today's Congress leadership seems to lack a broad nationalist vision.
The Modi government had immediately called an all-party meeting to inform all opposition parties regarding the situation after the Pahalgam attack as well as the government's stand on it. Senior leader Sharad Pawar was the country's Defence Minister from 1991 to 1993. Having been active in national politics for many years, Pawar Saheb knows the role opposition parties should play in supporting the government in such situations. Pawar saheb met the relatives of the citizens who fell victim in the Pahalgam attack. Pawar saheb told the media that relatives of victims said that, 'terrorist killed citizens after asking the religion'.
However, Pawar saheb did not forget to add a remark that he does not know whether the terrorist actually did so. The question still remains that why a leader like Pawar saheb would try to say that Hindus were not targeted and killed. On the other hand, the Congress has proved once again that they have completely lost their mind.
A faceless photograph of Prime Minister Narendra Modi was published on Congress's official 'X' handle on the grounds of 'sar tan se juda'. Congress had criticised through this photograph that Prime Minister Modi disappeared after the terrorist attack. Prime Minister Modi cut short his foreign visit and returned to India after learning about the attack.
The Prime Minister held meetings at the airport itself without even going to his residence. Congress was probably expecting that the Prime Minister should have revealed these important discussions even during such a situation. Congress deleted its post on 'X' after severe criticism. Even in this situation Vijay Wadettiwar was babbling like a fool. He made a statement that, 'terrorists do not have so much time to kill citizens by asking their religion'.
There is a saying in Hindi, 'Ghar ka bhedi Lanka dhaye'. This means that anti-national people living in the country are more dangerous than external enemies. The statements of Congress leaders reminds one of this saying. Congress leadership has lost this sense that our statements should not harm the country, no matter what the circumstances are. It is the duty of the opposition parties to oppose the Bharatiya Janata Party in politics.
However, everyone must be careful that expressing the opposition should not lean towards anti-nationalism. Congress has forgotten the national interest while opposing the BJP. Karnataka Chief Minister and senior Congress leader Siddaramaiah has publicly taken a stand of war with Pakistan over Pahalgam attack. There is absolutely no doubt that Pakistan's secret supporters in India are the biggest threat for the country.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Yunus's Bangladesh has become a Pakistani client state
Bangladesh and Pakistan have agreed to implement visa-free travel for each other's diplomats and official passport holders—an unprecedented policy shift that marks the most explicit sign yet of Dhaka's growing closeness to Islamabad read more In a move that has raised alarm across Bharat, Bangladesh and Pakistan have agreed to implement visa-free travel for each other's diplomats and official passport holders. This policy shift marks the most explicit sign yet of Dhaka's growing closeness to Islamabad, following the sudden and opaque ouster of Sheikh Hasina in August 2024. Framed officially as a gesture of 'Muslim brotherhood' and 'regional solidarity', this development has far deeper—and darker—implications, especially for Bharat. To those familiar with Bangladesh's liberation struggle, the deal reeks of strategic capitulation and ideological drift. After all, this is the same Pakistan whose military committed unspeakable atrocities in 1971, the very trauma that gave birth to Bangladesh. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The symbolism is unmistakable: Post-Hasina Bangladesh is behaving like a Pakistani client state, seduced back into the orbit of the regime it broke free from five decades ago. And this isn't without precedent. Mujib's Dangerous Playbook What we are witnessing today echoes a disheartening chapter in Bangladesh's formative years. Just two years after leading a bloody struggle for independence, 'Bangabandhu' Sheikh Mujibur Rahman began realigning with Islamabad—a move that stunned Dhaka and Delhi alike. In 1974, Mujib gave a state welcome to Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, offering him more honours than were extended to Bharat's President, VV Giri, who had visited Dhaka only days earlier. President Giri's reception was deliberately subdued—overshadowed by preparations for Bhutto's visit—leaving even Bangladeshis puzzled. This contrast wasn't merely accidental. It was a shift in the ideological direction of the state. Mujib's fiery Bengali nationalism began to give way to pan-Islamic overtones. Post-independence, his speeches, once invoking unity among Bengalis, started leaning heavily on Bangladesh's Muslim identity. The man who had once declared, 'I am a human being first, then a Bengali, and then a Muslim,' had reversed that order—signalling a fundamental redefinition of the country's soul. The Aeroplane That Said It All Nothing illustrated Mujib's post-liberation hypocrisy better than the aircraft controversy surrounding his return from Pakistani captivity. Bharat had fought a brutal war and negotiated his release. It had even arranged its own aircraft to fly him home. Yet Mujib chose a British Royal Air Force (RAF) Comet instead. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The British celebrated it as a diplomatic coup, with Rae Britten, the British deputy high commissioner in Dhaka, terming it a 'considerable prestige'. New Delhi was deeply slighted. The row exposed Mujib's desire to downplay Bharat's foundational role in Bangladesh's freedom—and to elevate the West and Islamic powers as future allies. The disregard didn't stop there. At a strategically important railway bridge inauguration shortly afterward—an infrastructure project executed in record time by Bharat's engineers with liberal assistance from New Delhi—Mujib thanked the British for financial support but made no mention of its neighbouring country. He then left by helicopter, inviting only British High Commissioner Sir Arthur Gold aboard. Subimal Dutt, Bharat's distinguished former foreign secretary and ambassador, was left to travel back in a crowded, non-VIP carriage, without food or official courtesy. Author Manash Ghosh, who was then reporting from Dhaka for The Statesman, writes about Subimal Dutt's plight in Mujib's Blunders, one of the best books to come out in recent times. 'No food or water was served to him during the four-hour return journey. He (Dutt) was seen frequently dozing off and his head falling and resting on the shoulders of his co-passengers, who repeatedly woke him up, and he with folded hands sought their forgiveness. 'I go to bed early, hence the problem,' he had gone on to explain embarrassingly,' Ghosh adds. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Mujib's actions were seen as a calculated distancing from Bharat. After all, Subimal Dutt had played a great role in the reconstruction of Bangladesh post-liberation. Today's visa-free agreement with Pakistan carries the same symbolic weight—a statement of ideological realignment. The Return of US-Pakistan Influence Since Sheikh Hasina's ouster, Bangladesh's new administration has moved swiftly to rehabilitate pro-Pakistani forces, many of them linked historically to Jamaat-e-Islami and other Islamist outfits banned by the previous dispensation. While this is being spun as 'democratic pluralism', it is, in reality, a deliberate erasure of the 1971 war consensus that built Bangladesh as a secular, pluralistic republic. The rollback has been quietly orchestrated by Washington, which had long viewed Hasina as an obstacle to its Indo-Pacific strategy. Her refusal to lease St Martin's Island for a US naval base in the Bay of Bengal infuriated American policymakers. Enter Donald Lu, a US State Department official with a dubious reputation for regime change, and Ambassador Peter Haas, whose fingerprints are all over Dhaka's recent political recalibration. Just as the CIA played a silent role in the events leading to Mujib's assassination in 1975, today's developments bear the mark of Washington-Islamabad collusion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lessons from Mujib's Fall History offers a chilling warning. Mujib's appeasement of Pakistan and alienation of Bharat didn't save him—they isolated him. And now Mohammed Yunus, the economist-turned-administrator propped up by Western and Pakistani interests, is repeating the same fatal mistakes. Yunus weaponised anti-Bharat rhetoric, aided by the Pakistani ISI and the American deep state, to unseat Hasina. But nearly a year later, his administration is floundering amid economic chaos and rising insecurity. Minorities are being terrorised. And the middle class is losing hope amid a declining economy and rising joblessness. Having nothing to show, Yunus is now resorting to Islamist appeasement: invoking jihadist nostalgia, deepening ties with Islamabad, and empowering religious extremists. But as Mujib's downfall proves, this path leads to disaster. Sooner or later, he too will be consumed by the very fire he has ignited. Conclusion Bangladesh stands at a perilous juncture. It can choose ideological amnesia—forgetting war crimes, surrendering to foreign meddling, and embracing Islamist reactionism. Or, it can choose memory, justice, and sovereignty, rooted in the blood sacrifice of 1971 and anchored by Bharat's principled friendship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The choice now lies with the people of Bangladesh. They must confront the Islamist virus that re-emerges with intermittent regularity. This ideology returned for the first time just a couple of years after independence. And now, half a century later, it once again threatens to devour the republic from within. One hopes this is only a passing cloud. If not, Bangladesh risks walking the path to perdition—abandoning its secular foundations, its democratic promise, and the very spirit of its liberation war. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Balancing strengths-sensitivities': India secures safeguards for key sectors in UK FTA; import access to be phased
Representative image (TOI) Only around one fourth of the UK's exports by value will receive immediate duty-free access to the Indian market, with most sensitive sectors remaining safeguarded, the government said on Friday, according to ET. Commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal, addressing the media, explained that product-specific rules of origin have been established. These include value-addition requirements designed to prevent transshipment and block third-country goods from benefiting under the deal. India has protected several sensitive sectors under the trade deal, including dairy, cereals, millets, pulses, vegetables, and high-value products such as gold, jewellery, lab-grown diamonds, and certain essential oils. Key exclusions also cover critical energy fuels, marine vessels, used clothing, important polymers and their monofilaments, smartphones, and optical fibres, reported ET. For strategically important goods, especially those where domestic manufacturing is being strengthened under the 'Make in India' and production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes, tariff concessions will be phased in gradually over five, seven, or ten years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Historic Figures Who Were Actually Photographed Gloriousa Undo India and the UK signed the comprehensive economic and trade agreement (CETA) on July 24, following years of discussions and negotiations. Barthwal noted that this agreement stands apart from India's previous free trade deals, as it reflects the country's evolution into a more mature economy. He added that India is now engaging in areas previously untouched in past trade agreements, marking its shift toward developed nation status. Working between strengths and sensitivities The agreement strikes a balance between "sensitivities and strengths," the official said, reported ET. 'We wanted to shed the label of 'tariff king,' and FTAs are a way to achieve that,' said commerce secretary Barthwal. 'FTAs bring a lot of certainty and predictability to businesses which this UK FTA will ensure. FTAs are give and take and when we build a narrative, we are sensitive that it's not one-sided.' Barthwal also mentioned past comments by US President Donald Trump, who had called India a "tariff king," and referenced ongoing negotiations with both the US and the European Union, as quoted by ET. 'Detailed talks are happening in the EU FTA. Talks with the US are going on, it will fructify,' he said. Barthwal said the India-UK partnership is rooted in fair play, equity, and mutual benefit. 'We protected our sensitivities and they protected theirs. This FTA has been a balance of sensitivities and strengths,' he stated. Calling it a complex and comprehensive agreement, Barthwal added, 'our defensive interests have been taken care of.' He noted that while the UK may take under a year to ratify the CETA, India will use that time to build the capacity of its exporters and educate them on how to leverage the deal. The government is also working with state governments and export promotion councils to assess how they will be affected. 'We are doing granular studies,' he said. India and the UK have agreed to negotiate mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) to facilitate the movement of professionals such as nurses, accountants and architects to Britain. 'Non-tariff barriers will be eased, and regulatory systems and MRAs would be improved,' Barthwal said, reported ET. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Court grants bail to man accused in kidnapping case involving Vikas Yadav
New Delhi, A Delhi court has granted bail to a co-accused in the extortion and kidnapping case involving Vikas Yadav, a former Indian government official charged by the US authorities for his alleged role in a foiled plot to assassinate Sikh separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun on American soil. Court grants bail to man accused in kidnapping case involving Vikas Yadav Additional Sessions Judge Saurabh Partap Singh Laler, who was hearing the bail plea of Jalaluddin alias Sameer, said that there was undisputed evidence of the complainant and the accused travelling together to Thailand, merely three weeks after registration of the FIR on January 6, 2024, creating a prima facie doubt. In its order dated July 23, the court noted that the complainant, Raj Kumar Walia, alleged that he was kidnapped, assaulted, and robbed by co-accused Vikas Yadav and Abdullah Khan on December 17, 2023, where Yadav claimed to be acting on behalf of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang. "The complainant stated that he was forced to make a video call to the applicant/accused , who was purportedly based in Dubai, demanding hawala payments. The complainant was allegedly injected with a substance, beaten, and robbed of valuables, including cash, jewellery, and cheques," the court noted. It noted that the Delhi Police's special cell then registered an FIR invoking charges of kidnapping for ransom, attempt to murder, criminal intimidation, robbery, criminal conspiracy, and violations under the Arms Act. The court noted that Yadav and Khan were arrested earlier and certain recoveries were made at their instance, but Jalaluddin was arrested on July 1 this year for his alleged role in the criminal conspiracy. Jalauddin's counsel told the court that his client and Walia travelled to Thailand on the same day on January 6, 2024, shortly after the FIR was lodged on December 17, 2023, and this fact was not disclosed by the complainant to the Investigating Officer or the court at any stage. After examining the relevant passport pages, the court said, "The passport entries unequivocally confirm that both the complainant and the applicant arrived at Thailand on January 6, 2024. "The complainant's passport shows his arrival in Thailand on that date, and the applicant's passport and flight tickets corroborate the same." It said that while the photographs of Jalaluddin and Walia together, along with WhatsApp communications, were disputed by the complainant by alleging manipulation, the passport details were "undisputed and form objective evidence." The court said that despite repeated queries, Walia failed to explain the simultaneous travel to Thailand. It said Jaluddin's role was primarily conspiratorial, no recoveries had been effected from him, the investigation regarding him was complete, he had no prior criminal record, and he also assured compliance with court conditions. "However, the pivotal factor tilting the balance in favour of bail is the undisputed fact of the post-FIR travel to Thailand by both the complainant and the applicant. This occurrence, merely three weeks after the FIR, raises serious questions about the complainant's conduct and the credibility of his allegations," the court said. It said Walia was duty-bound to disclose this material fact to the IO and the court, as it directly impacted the prosecution's case. "His failure to do so, coupled with the lack of any plausible explanation despite court queries, suggests possible suppression of facts. While the disputed photographs and communications require forensic verification at trial, the passport evidence alone creates a prima facie doubt regarding the complainant's version, sufficient to justify bail at this stage," the court said. It granted him bail on furnishing a bail bond and two surety bonds of ₹1 lakh each and subject to several other conditions, including not tampering with evidence, not contacting the complainant and cooperating for expeditious disposal of the case. A chargesheet has already been filed against Jalauddin, and the matter has been fixed for further proceedings on August 25. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
