Iranians in Canada watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, center, gets into his car after attending a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP-Vahid Salemi
MONTREAL — Iranian-Canadians say they fear an escalation of violence in the Middle East after the United States carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites.
Nimâ Machouf, a member of a Montreal Iranian women's association, says family members in Iran are living 'from one bomb to another.'
The epidemiologist and former NDP candidate worries the strikes will only lead to more violence and hurt the people who are fighting to free themselves from Iran's repressive regime.
Kaveh Shahrooz, a lawyer and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, says many Iranians are worried about the impact the U.S. decision to join Israel's war on Iran could have on citizens.
But he says some opponents of the regime are celebrating the U.S. strike, happy to see Iran's nuclear program 'effectively dismantled.'
The interim president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs called eliminating Iran's nuclear program an 'essential step' toward a safer Middle East, and urged the Canadian government to stand strong against Iran.
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
35 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Interest in ‘elbows up' merchandise waning ahead of Canada Day, businesses say
When Rachael Coe decided to launch an 'elbows up' merchandise line at her store in Yarmouth, N.S., in March, she said it was an immediate bestseller. Within a week, Coe said her Timeless Memories shop had already made 400 sales. By the end of the first month, she had sold 2,500 products ranging from T-shirts to hoodies to car decals. Demand for items bearing Canada's rallying cry against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and annexation threats was so high that Coe launched a website to keep up with the surge. 'It was a response from all over Canada,' she said. 'We reached every single province then we started covering worldwide. Our 'elbows up' merch went everywhere.' Many Canadian businesses hopped on the patriotic trend that also saw Ontario Premier Doug Ford wearing a 'Canada is not for sale' ball cap ahead of a January meeting with Canada's premiers and prime minister. But Coe's sales started slowing down by May. And despite a slight boost ahead of Canada Day, she said the 'elbows up' line is now selling at similar rates to the classic red-and-white merchandise she sells every year around this time. Although business owners say they are selling more Canada-themed products this year leading up to July 1, many have also noted a decline in 'elbows up' merchandise sales. The rallying cry, initially embraced as a grassroots movement at the height of cross-border trade tensions and Trump's musings about making Canada the 51st state, has shifted to a more generic expression of Canadian pride amid continued tensions, retailers and experts say. Others note that the phrase 'elbows up' has increasingly been used in a partisan context, contributing to the marketing shift. Stephanie Tomlin, Toronto-based owner of the online business Shop Love Collective, said she saw an explosion in 'elbows up' merchandise sales in March, selling as many as 10 or 15 products per day. Similarly, her sales began to stagnate in May. Leading up to Canada Day, she said she's selling 'quite a bit more' merchandise compared with previous years, but that's due to interest in Canada-themed products across the board. 'I think the climate in Canada is a little bit more settled after the election and that … we feel like we will never be the 51st state,' Tomlin said, adding that Canadian patriotism is becoming less combative as annexation talks have died down. Howard Ramos, a professor of sociology at Western University, said 'elbows up' became 'more partisan than it used to be' when Prime Minister Mark Carney embraced the phrase in his election campaign ads in late March. 'It's just added to how the expression is dying down as a pan-Canadian claim,' he said. 'Now you see on social media, especially from Conservative handles, the use of 'elbows up' in a sarcastic way to criticize Mark Carney or Liberal policies.' Negative online comments about the 'elbows up' movement have discouraged Coe from promoting her products on Facebook. But when she's interacting with customers in her Yarmouth shop, she said the phrase isn't as divisive. 'It's not a political term, and it simply means that you're defending your country, and everyone should be defending our country, just like you would defend (against) a goal in hockey,' Coe said. Danielle McDonagh, owner of Vernon, B.C.-based Rowantree Clothing, said she stopped promoting her 'elbows up' merchandise on a large scale when she noticed the phrase being interpreted as an 'anti-Conservative' and 'boomer' movement. For McDonagh, increased concern about the political climate in the United States has also chipped away at the lightheartedness of the 'elbows up' movement. 'I think some of the levity is gone for me,' she said. While sales of her 'elbows up' products have dropped by about 90 per cent since hitting 1,000 in the first month, she said she continues to promote the merchandise in small batches at local markets in Vernon. Business owners say their customers continue to prioritize supporting the Canadian economy, as they are routinely answering questions about where their products are manufactured. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. And the push to buy Canadian isn't just coming from this side of the border. Coe said many American tourists arriving by ferry from Maine visit her shop in search of Canadian merchandise. '(Tourists) want to support us just as much as Canadians want to support us,' Coe said. McDonagh said her business sees similar interest from Americans. 'I'm shipping a lot of Canada-centric merchandise to the States, which I just love,' McDonagh said. 'People chat with me on my site and say … we're supporting you.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
National Post
39 minutes ago
- National Post
Raymond J. de Souza: It's time to end the 'endless war' talk
President Donald Trump was positively exultant over the '12 Day War' in Iran. After being badly outwitted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and maneuvered into a war that the United States had sought to avoid for more than twenty years, Trump decided that it was his achievement all along. Article content An important achievement it was, and Netanyahu — often criticized in this space — deserves the credit that he is magnanimously sharing with Trump. After 46 years of spreading misery and mayhem, no tears are being shed for the mullahs in Tehran and their arc of mercenary proxies in the region. Article content Article content The Americans were in Iran for less than twelve hours of the twelve days. They could have taken a more leisurely approach if they wished, the Israelis having cleared Iranian airspace of any potential incoming fire. After the stealth bombers did their business, the air force could have put on an aerobatic show. If it were a NATO exercise, the Snowbirds could have made an appearance. With defense spending set to rise to 5 per cent of GDP, the Snowbirds may well become ubiquitous. Article content Article content The reason for the '12 Day War' branding exercise — Trump's commemorative crypto coin may soon be issued — is to answer the part of his MAGA coalition that in the name of opposing 'endless wars' seems to oppose all military action. Article content The folly of the folks who oppose 'endless wars' — does anyone support them? — is that they have misdiagnosed the problem, which is not that the wars are 'endless.' It is that the aftermath has no proper end in mind. War is usually the easier part; it is the post-war part that can be much more difficult. Article content Consider that last month, amidst celebrations of the 80th anniversary of VE day, no one lamented that American forces are still in Europe. Had in 1946 — the year Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Donald Trump were born — someone predicted that the president would command dozens of military installations in Germany even four score years later, it might have been considered that an 'endless war' was afoot. Article content Article content The Korean War began 75 years ago this week. American forces are still there. Are Germany and South Korea not better off than Vietnam, which American forces departed from fifty years ago? Article content The reason that Trump is more exultant than Netanyahu is because the latter has a longer attention span, and also a better sense of history. Israel has won swift victories before. It won one in Gaza in 1967. But if there is no effective plan after the victory, a short war can give rise to endless turmoil. See also Lebanon 1982. Article content The spectre of Afghanistan and Iraq is the perfervid cry of the 'endless war' folks. Yet, in both cases the intensive war phase was relatively short. Bush landed on the USS Abraham Lincoln in May 2003 to declare 'major combat operations' in Iraq concluded. The fiasco that followed was not because the war was too long, but that the commitment to the aftermath was too short.
National Post
39 minutes ago
- National Post
Letters: Give war a chance
Re: ' At Times, War Is The Answer,' Anthony Koch, June 25. The National Post is a consistent source of thoughtful journalism, but Anthony Koch's recent commentary stood out as particularly compelling. It should be required reading for all Canadians — especially our political leaders and younger generations like millennials and gen Z. Article content I would respectfully add one point to the powerful assertion that, 'Negotiation is not what ends conflict. Victory is.' When dealing with Islamist extremist groups such as the Iranian regime, Hezbollah, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, victory cannot be partial or symbolic. These actors will not abandon their stated goals: the destruction of Israel and the destabilization of the West. Article content Article content Article content As Mosab Hassan Yousef — known as the 'Son of Hamas' — has said, even if one Hamas terrorist were left alive in the rubble of Gaza, he would rise and declare victory. So the question remains: does the West have the resolve to achieve true victory? Article content Article content Marc Friedman, Thornhill, Ont. Article content It is one thing to say that self-defence is justified in international relations; it is another to say that 'war is the answer.' One cannot help but think that Anthony Koch has never experienced the true horrors of war — of loved ones being killed, of deprivation, disease and chaos. People who say 'war is the answer' should immediately be given the opportunity to go to a war-torn area and live there until the war is over. One must be prepared to fight, but that does not mean that might is right. Patrick McKitrick, Burnaby, B.C. Article content While I agree with Anthony Koch's op-ed piece in the main, he overuses ideological examples, arguing that freedom and tyranny are always incompatible at the international level and that no amount of diplomacy can help. Article content For example, he argues that, 'The American Revolution did not occur because the colonists failed to write one more petition to the Crown. It occurred because liberty and imperial dominion could not share a continent.' Article content In fact, the Dominion of Canada and the assorted British colonies that preceded it did share the continent with the United States peacefully for some time after the U.S. came into existence, thanks to perpetual diplomacy, with the notable exception of the War of 1812. What's more, if the Whigs, and not Tories, had been running Britain in 1776, the revolutionary war might have been avoided though negotiation. Article content And while appeasement, as Koch points out, did encourage Hitler to start the Second World War, rampant nationalism and military enthusiasm throughout liberal democratic Europe did not deter German aggression in the First World War.
