BREAKING NEWS Cleveland Guardians risk Donald Trump fury with response to his call to return to 'Indians' name
Trump fired out messages on truth social aimed at the Guardians and Washington Commanders, threatening to block to NFL team's stadium move if they didn't return to their old 'Redskins' name.
But despite the President's demands, the baseball side will apparently be staying with their new name.
'I understand there are very different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago,' Guardians president Chris Antonetti said in a statement.
'But it's a decision we've made and we've gotten the opportunity to build the brand as the Guardians over the last four years and we're excited about the future that's in front of us.'
Cleveland announced in December 2020 that the team would drop its 'Indians' nickname, announcing the switch to 'Guardians' the following year.
The comments from Antonetti risk upsetting the President, given the passion with which he outlined his case.
'The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change,' Trump wrote on Truth Social.
'What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!'
Matt Dolan is actually no longer involved in the running of the Guardians franchise but was was twice a candidate in the Ohio Senate elections in 2022 and 2024, losing on both occasions.
After venting about the NFL team in DC, Trump had earlier said of the baseball team: 'Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen.
'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Adidas shares drop after sales miss expectations, flags $231 mln tariff cost
July 30(Reuters) - Adidas ( opens new tab shares fell 7.5% in early trade on Wednesday after the sportswear brand's second-quarter sales missed expectations and it warned that higher U.S. tariffs would add around 200 million euros ($231 million) to its costs in the second half. Highlighting the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's volatile trade policies, Adidas said uncertainty was holding it back from increasing its annual guidance despite reporting a stronger than expected second-quarter profit. "We still do not know what the final tariffs in the U.S. will be," CEO Bjorn Gulden said in a statement. Another unknown is the indirect impact on consumer demand if the tariffs cause "major inflation", he added. Net sales, adjusted for currency swings, rose 2.2% to 5.95 billion euros ($6.9 billion) in the quarter, lower than analysts' average estimate of 6.2 billion euros, according to data compiled by LSEG. The result will fuel fears that, after a run of very strong sales growth fuelled by its trending three-striped multicoloured Samba and Gazelle shoes, Adidas is losing momentum. "For investors to view this as a temporary setback, the company will need to deliver a reassuring message regarding the outlook for H2 and the early 2026 order book," UBS analyst Robert Krankowski said in a note to clients. The U.S. earlier this month announced a 20% levy on many Vietnamese exports and a 19% tariff on goods from Indonesia. Adidas' two biggest sourcing countries, Vietnam and Indonesia produced 27% and 19% of Adidas' products respectively as of 2024. Like many other sportswear companies, including Puma , Adidas has frontloaded product purchases into the U.S. to try to beat tariffs, driving its inventories up 16% to 5.26 billion euros at the end of June. Adidas is also having to contend with a stronger euro and weaker dollar, which hit sales by around 300 million euros in the quarter through June. Adidas' quarterly operating profit reached 546 million euros, ahead of analysts' expectations for 520 million. Its gross margin increased by 0.9 percentage points to 51.7% in the quarter, as reduced discounting and lower product and freight costs mitigated the impacts from currencies and tariffs. ($1 = 0.8651 euros)
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel has deliberately starved the people of Gaza. It couldn't have done it without the west's help
What have we done? As the UN-backed monitor declares that 'the worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip', this should have been the question ricocheting between the walls as Keir Starmer met Donald Trump this week. Israel's deliberate starvation of Gaza is, after all, a crime confessed to, designed and implemented in plain sight. Starmer has said the UK will recognise Palestinian statehood if Israel doesn't agree to a ceasefire and a two-state solution, but don't be beguiled: Palestinian national self-determination is an inalienable right, not a bargaining chip, and it's the most symbolic action he could take rather than, say, imposing sweeping sanctions and ending all arms sales. The hand-wringing of western politicians and media outlets will not feed Gaza's emaciated children, any more than it will absolve them of guilt. Israel's leaders have said, explicitly, repeatedly, from the very beginning, that they are deliberately starving Gaza's people. 'Man-made famine is not something that I've seen in my lifetime,' Martin Griffiths, the UN's former humanitarian chief, tells me. On 9 October 2023, Israel's then defence minister, Yoav Gallant, announced 'a complete siege on [Gaza]: no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel', justified on the grounds: 'We are fighting human animals and we act accordingly'. The next day, the Israeli general charged with humanitarian affairs in Gaza and the West Bank – Ghassan Alian – declared that the 'citizens of Gaza' were 'human beasts' who would suffer 'a total blockade on Gaza, no electricity, no water, just damage. You wanted hell, you will get hell.' The following week, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, promised 'we will not allow humanitarian assistance in the form of food and medicines from our territory to the Gaza Strip'. These statements were not reported at all by many western media outlets – or, if they were, it was in passing and with no explanation given about their objectively illegal intent. It's as though these statements were being uttered in a parallel universe, because if they were accurately covered with due prominence, then our media would have been forced to cover Israel's onslaught as a criminal enterprise, rather than a war of self-defence. Israel's western allies knew exactly what it was up to. In March 2024, our then foreign secretary, Lord Cameron, wrote a letter setting out many ruses used by Israel to block aid from entering Gaza, yet Britain took no action. In April 2024, two US government departments concluded that Israel was deliberately blocking aid, which legally required the administration to stop supplying weapons. This was overruled by Joe Biden's team. Later that year, that same administration sent a public letter detailing Israeli aid obstructions, but Tel Aviv correctly calculated this was political posturing during the presidential election, largely ignored the demands and suffered no consequences for doing so. Israel has perpetrated the biggest slaughter of aid workers in history, killing more than 400 by the spring. It waged a relentless war against Gaza's main humanitarian agency – Unrwa, the UN's Palestinian refugee agency – and banned it from the occupied territories last October. Its military killed police officers charged with escorting aid and preventing looting. It's not just the blocking of aid from entering. Israel's onslaught has left nearly all agricultural land unusable, as well as damaging 80% of cropland. Nearly all livestock and most plant life is dead. Gaza's port and fishing vehicles have been destroyed, and Palestinians defying Israel's ban on fishing face slaughter. The massacre of starving Palestinians looking for aid has been a consistent theme. In February 2024, more than a hundred civilians waiting for flour were butchered by the Israeli military, yet – as been the case throughout the genocide – media outlets treated its denials, deflections and lies as credible claims. A detailed investigation by CNN weeks later concluded what should always have been obvious – the Israeli military was to blame – but by then attention had moved elsewhere. In March this year, Israel imposed a total siege, and replaced the UN's effective aid system with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, whose 'distribution sites' are dystopian killing fields. As the UN-backed IPC notes, that aid is not only far too little, but it is often unusable because Israel has left Palestinians without cooking gas and clean water to prepare it. More than a thousand civilians have been butchered trying to access this aid. As aid agencies have noted, the GHF is designed to coax a starved population to the south, so they can be confined in what the former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert described as a 'concentration camp', before being deported. Despite Israel's obvious, transparent, shameless guilt, its lies are indulged by western politicians and media outlets. On Monday, Donald Trump repeated that 'a lot of the food is stolen' by Hamas. This lie has been contradicted by Cindy McCain, director of the World Food Programme, and widow to the hawkishly pro-Israel late Republican senator John McCain. An internal US government analysis found no proof, and Israeli officials have briefed that their military reached the same conclusion. Perversely, it is criminal gangs backed by Israel – which Netanyahu's own former deputy noted are linked to Islamic State – that are stealing aid. The international criminal court's arrest warrants, issued eight months ago, centred on Israel's deliberate starvation for a reason: the evidence is overwhelming. Yet even if Gaza were suddenly flooded with aid, many Palestinians would die because their bodies have been irreversibly ravaged by hunger. And that is not even on the agenda. The 73 trucks allowed in on Monday were forced to take an unsafe route, and then looted. Our own prime minister has been promoting airdrops of aid. These are pinpricks, badly targeted and have killed Palestinians when they've fallen on their heads. All they really achieve is cover for Israel, to pretend it is doing something, deflecting from its deliberate mass starvation. But what else should we expect from Starmer, who backed Israel's right to impose a siege on Gaza at the beginning of the genocide, then tried to gaslight us into believing he hadn't? What have we done? If western elites had any shame, this question would be robbing them of sleep. And the answer would be straightforward. You facilitated the mass starvation of an entire people. You knew what was happening, because of a deluge of evidence for 21 months, and because the perpetrator – your friend – repeatedly boasted to the world about its crime. Alas, the architects of this abomination will not hold themselves to account. That will be left to history – and the courts. Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Oil rally pauses as markets weigh Trump's ultimatum to Russia
NEW DELHI, July 30 (Reuters) - Oil prices took a breather in Asian trade on Wednesday after the previous session's spike of more than 3%, as investors awaited developments from U.S. President Donald Trump's tighter deadline for Russia to end the war in Ukraine. Most-active Brent crude futures rose 1 cent, or 0.01%, to $71.69 a barrel by 0633 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude fell 2 cents, or 0.03%, to $69.19 a barrel. The Brent crude September contract expiring on Wednesday was up 5 cents at $72.56 per barrel. Both contracts had settled on Tuesday at their highest since June 20. On Tuesday, Trump said he would start imposing measures on Russia, such as secondary tariffs of 100% on trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war within 10 to 12 days, moving up from an earlier 50-day deadline. "The $4 to $5 per barrel of supply-risk premium injected in recent days can be expected to be sustained, unless Putin makes a conciliatory move," said Vandana Hari, founder of oil market analysis provider Vanda Insights. The United States had warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, it could face huge tariffs if it kept buying, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a news conference in Stockholm, where the U.S. was holding trade talks with the EU. JP Morgan analysts said in a note that while China was not likely to comply with U.S. sanctions, India has signalled it would do so, putting at risk 2.3 million barrels per day of Russian oil exports. The United States and the European Union averted a trade war with a deal for 15% U.S. tariffs on European imports, easing concerns about the impact of trade tensions on economic growth and offering support to oil prices. In Venezuela, foreign partners of state oil company PDVSA are still waiting for U.S. authorisation to operate in the sanctioned country after talks last week, which could return some supply to the market, so easing pressure for prices to rise. "The oil market is keeping an eye on the U.S. trade deals and talks, and on the Fed, but those are marginal influences on sentiment," Hari added. Despite President Donald Trump's objections, the U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady at its policy meeting later on Wednesday. On Tuesday, the International Monetary Fund raised global growth forecasts slightly for 2025 and 2026, but warned the world economy faced major risks, such as a rebound in tariff rates, geopolitical tension and larger fiscal deficits.
