logo
Forget 'biological age' tests — longevity experts are using an $800 under-the-radar blood test to measure aging in real-time

Forget 'biological age' tests — longevity experts are using an $800 under-the-radar blood test to measure aging in real-time

Doctors and scientists are using a blood plasma test to study longevity.
The test measures proteins and can tell you about your organ health.
This field of proteomics could one day help detect diseases like cancer before they start.
Should you have that second cup of coffee? How about a little wine with dinner? And, is yogurt really your superfood?
Scientists are getting closer to offering consumers a blood test that could help people make daily decisions about how to eat, drink, and sleep that are more perfectly tailored to their unique biology.
The forthcoming tests could also help shape what are arguably far more important health decisions, assessing whether your brain is aging too fast, if your kidneys are OK, or if that supplement or drug you're taking is actually doing any good.
It's called an organ age test, more officially (and scientifically) known as "proteomics" — and it's the next hot " biological age" marker that researchers are arguing could be better than all the rest.
"If I could just get one clock right now, I'd want to get that clock, and I'd like to see it clinically available in older adults," cardiologist Eric Topol, author of the recent bestseller "Super Agers: An Evidence-Based Approach to Longevity," told Business Insider. Topol said armed with organ age test results, people could become more proactive stewards of their own health, before it's too late.
"When we have all these layers of data, it's a whole new day for preventing the disease," Topol said. "You see the relationship with women's hormones. You see the relationship with food and alcohol. You don't ever get that with genes."
A test like this isn't available to consumers just yet, but it's already being used by researchers at elite universities and high-end longevity clinics. They hope it can become a tool any doctor could use to assess patient health in the next few years.
A startup called Vero, which was spun out of some foundational proteomics research at Stanford University, is hoping to beta test a proteomics product for consumers this year.
"Knowing your oldest organ isn't the point; changing the trajectory is," Vero co-founder and CEO Paul Coletta told a crowd gathered at the Near Future Summit in Malibu, California, last month.
Coletta told Business Insider Vero's not interested in doing "wealthcare." The company plans to make its test available to consumers for around $200 a pop, at scale. Their draw only requires one vial of blood.
Why measuring proteins could be the key to better personalized medicine
The big promise of proteomics is that it could be a more precise real-time tool for tracking important but subtle changes that emerge inside each of us as we age.
Genetic testing can measure how our bodies are built, spotting vulnerabilities in a person's DNA that might predispose them to health issues. Standard clinical measurements like a person's weight, blood pressure, or cholesterol readings are a useful proxy for potential health issues.
Then there are the increasingly popular "biological age" tests available to consumers at home. Most of those look at "epigenetic changes" — how environmental factors affect our gene expression.
Proteomics does something different and new. It measures the product that our bodies make based on all those genetic and environmental inputs: proteins. It offers a live assessment of how your body is running, not just how it's programmed.
If validated in the next few years, these tests could become key in early disease detection and prevention. They could help influence all kinds of medical decisions, from big ones like "What drugs should I take?" to little ones like "How does my body respond to caffeine or alcohol?"
Elite longevity clinics already use proteomics
Some high-end longevity clinics are already forging ahead using proteomics to guide clinical recommendations, albeit cautiously.
Dr. Evelyne Bischof, a longevity physician who treats patients worldwide, said she uses proteomic information to guide some of the lifestyle interventions she recommends to her patients.
She may suggest a more polyphenol-rich diet to someone who seems to have high inflammation and neuroinflammation based on proteomic test results, or may even suggest they do a little more cognitive training, based on what proteomics says about how their brain is aging.
Dr. Andrea Maier, a professor of medicine and functional aging at the National University of Singapore, told BI she uses this measurement all the time in her longevity clinics. For her, it's just a research tool, but if the results of her ongoing studies are decent, she hopes to be able to use it clinically in a few years' time.
"We want to know what kind of 'ageotype' a person is, so what type of aging personality are you, not from a mental perspective, but from a physical perspective," Maier said. "It's really discovery at this moment in time, and at the edge of being clinically meaningful."
"Once we have that validated tool, we will just add it to our routine testing and we can just tick the box and say, 'I also want to know if this person is a cardiac ager, or a brain ager, or a muscle ager' because now we have a sensitive parameter — protein — which can be added," Maier said.
The two big-name proteomics tests are Olink and SOMAscan. For now, their high-end screening costs around $400-$800 per patient.
"I'm losing lots of money at the moment because of proteomics for clinical research!" Maier said.
Proteomics could soon help predict who's most likely to get certain cancers, fast-tracking both prevention and treatment
Top aging researchers at Stanford and Harvard are pushing the field forward, racing to publish more novel insights about the human proteome.
The latest findings from Harvard aging researcher Vadim Gladyshev's lab, published earlier this year, suggest that as we age, each person may even stand to benefit from a slightly different antiaging grocery list.
To research this idea, Gladyshev looked at proteins in the blood of more than 50,000 people in the UK, all participants in the UK Biobank who are being regularly tested and studied to learn more about their long-term health. He tracked their daily habits and self-reported routines like diet, occupation, and prescriptions, comparing those details to how each patient's organs were aging.
He discovered some surprising connections. Yogurt eating, generally speaking, tended to be associated with better intestinal aging but had relatively no benefit to the arteries. White wine drinking, on the other hand, seemed to potentially confer some small benefit to the arteries while wreaking havoc on the gut.
​​"The main point is that people age in different ways in different organs, and therefore we need to find personalized interventions that would fit that particular person," Gladyshev told BI. "Through measuring proteins, you assess the age of different organs and you say, 'OK, this person is old in this artery.'"
For now, there's too much noise in the data to do more. Dr. Pal Pacher, a senior investigator at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism who studies organ aging and injuries, told BI that proteomics is simply not ready for clinical use yet. There's just too much noise in the data.
But he imagines a future where a more sophisticated protein clock could help link up which people may be most vulnerable to diseases like early cancer, kidney disease, and more. (A California-based proteomics company called Seer announced last weekend that it is partnering with Korea University to study whether proteomics can help more quickly diagnose cancer in young people in their 20s and 30s.)
"How beautiful could it be in the future?" Maier said. "Instead of three hours of clinical investigation, I would have a tool which guides me much, much better, with more validity towards interventions."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Would you pay $2,500 a year to scan your entire body for hidden diseases?
Would you pay $2,500 a year to scan your entire body for hidden diseases?

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Would you pay $2,500 a year to scan your entire body for hidden diseases?

Doctors have been arguing over the utility of preventive full-body MRI scans for decades. In 2004, it became a central plot point on an episode of the TV show "Scrubs." "I am considering offering full-body scans here at Sacred Heart. What do you think?" Dr. Bob Kelso, chief of medicine at the hospital in fictional San DiFrangeles, asks. "I think showing perfectly healthy people every harmless imperfection in their body just to scare them into taking invasive and often pointless tests is an unholy sin," Dr. Perry Cox responds, echoing a sentiment many real doctors have toward high-end preventive scans. It's been more than 20 years since that Scrubs episode first aired, and yet real doctors are no closer to settling their big debate about full-body MRIs. Preventive full-body MRIs are now used in high-end longevity clinics and are available through a growing suite of direct-to-consumer offerings. Prices range from $2,500 or more for a one-hour scan to new AI-assisted offerings that cost $500 and only take about 20 minutes. Stars and longevity fiends, including Kim Kardashian, tout these scans on social media, and everyday patients share real success stories, gripping testimonials of lifesaving insights they've gleaned from scanning their entire bodies for signs of danger. Genetic sequencing pioneer Craig Venter previously told Business Insider that he diagnosed his own prostate cancer "that was about to metastasize" with a high-end MRI "after being told by the best medical system that I didn't have prostate cancer." Full-body MRIs can detect cancer early. But they can also have you parting with thousands of dollars, scheduling numerous follow up appointments to chase little dots on your scans, and in the end revealing nothing. A full-body MRI is like a security camera for your innards The promise of a full-body MRI is that it can uncover dangerous things happening inside you that aren't bad enough — yet — to get picked up on other tests. Danielle Hoeg is a perfect example of how this can work. A non-smoker in her early 40s and mom of three, she told Business Insider she decided to do a Prenuvo scan after some "wonky" blood work was taken at her doctor's office, which suggested something might be wrong. She signed up for a $2,500 Prenuvo scan (not covered by insurance), which took about an hour. The scan highlighted a few things: some moderate spinal degeneration and a lingering sinus infection. It also flagged a "minor" white cloud on her lung, an "indeterminate lesion" that "appears at low risk of becoming problematic," her Prenuvo report found. A blood test for lung cancer came back negative, but a CT scan her doctor ordered showed that, sure enough, that lung spot was likely cancer. She eventually had a stage 1 tumor removed, just three months after her Prenuvo scan. Hoeg was in shock. She was a 43-year-old, healthy non-smoker with lung cancer. How could this be? "I'm not out there smoking, asking for lung cancer, I'm not working in a coal mine," she told Business Insider. Since she caught this cancer early, she didn't have to undergo any aggressive radiation or chemotherapy treatments. She tells everyone she can about her experience with Prenuvo. "I have a little bit less lung, I have some scars, but I'm OK, and I'm here, and I'm with my kids, and swimming and running," she said. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Emi Gal, founder of Prenuvo competitor Ezra, recently acquired by Function Health, says this is exactly what full-body scans are meant for. They're helping find cancer that either can't be screened for or won't get picked up on regular screening tests because it's not big enough yet. "My mother passed away from cancer because she found cancer late," Gal told BI. "I've dedicated my career and my life really to helping everyone in the world detect cancer early." The scans can also pick up back and spine problems, aneurysms, liver disease, and cysts. Inevitably, they will also flag many things as worrisome that people don't need to worry about at all, like benign scar tissue or inflammation lingering from a recent illness or injury. The scan can't tell you definitively, "hey, this is trouble." It just shows you when something's there. Are ultrasounds the real untapped medical tool of the future? As the fictional Dr. Cox presciently said on Scrubs, "If you get this scan, the next year of your life is going to be a series of endless tests." Prenuvo says that nearly half of its patients "find something to keep an eye on," but doctors want to know: Are they saving lives? For now, you won't find major medical boards or cancer advocacy organizations recommending full-body MRIs. There isn't the hard evidence they'd need to back up a medical recommendation. "Your end goal is saving years of life, helping people live longer," Dr. Samir Abboud, the chief of emergency radiology at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, told BI. If annual scans are overkill, our annual check-ups are often not enough. Independent reviews consistently show that yearly health checks have little to no effect on preventing deadly diseases. Dr. Tim Arling, who runs a concierge medicine practice focused on longevity, says he only occasionally recommends full-body MRIs to his patients. What he's started doing more often is spending a few extra minutes waving a little medical wand over parts of a patient's body as a preliminary scan for trouble. He's using a portable ultrasound machine, the same device doctors use to look at a fetus as it's developing in utero. The technique is common in Japan, where doctors often glide ultrasound wands over a person's thyroid, as an initial screen for cancer. In addition to the thyroid gland, Arling sometimes glides his ultrasound over a patient's liver, kidneys, or aorta, "as a little extension of the physical exam." "If I see something, I'll have a discussion with the patient, we'll decide if we want to do something in real time," he said. The move costs nothing extra to the patient and takes just a few extra minutes. Critically, it also includes the doctor in the discussion from the get-go. Hoeg's stage 1 cancer was graded as a "minor" finding by Prenuvo. If Abboud, who's both a doctor and a friend, hadn't said she should get it looked at ASAP, would she have known to take the finding so seriously? Arling said he went through a "very bizarre three-week period" last year where he ended up flagging a case of early-stage liver cancer, plus another case of early-stage kidney cancer using ultrasounds. "If primary care is trying to catch things earlier, the question comes down to how can we do it in a way that doesn't necessarily add a whole bunch of extra cost or a whole bunch of extra waste?" Maybe "we can start just sort of waving wands over people and getting a little more information," he said. How to decide if you should get a full-body scan: 5 questions to ask For some people, doctors are already in agreement that full-body cancer scans are a good thing. If you have a rare condition called Li-Fraumeni syndrome, which puts you at greater risk of developing all sorts of cancer, annual full-body scans are a go-to, and they're covered by insurance. For everybody else, the jury — a jury full of practicing physicians — is still out. If you're interested in a full-body scan, Dr. Arling recommends weighing a few key factors: 1. What's your family history? You might want to consider a full-body MRI if you've got a family history of cancer. But that scan should be in addition to other recommended cancer screenings you're already doing, Arling said: "paps, mammos, PSAs, colonoscopies, the standard stuff." Another option is a cancer blood test like Galleri. It costs $950. 2. What's your medical anxiety level? If you are anxious about medical care or testing, full-body scans may not be for you. "If you already have that health-anxious person, I'm not super enthusiastic about recommending this test, because they're going to find something," Arling said. 3. What's your level of concern? On the other hand, full-body scans are good at "looking for trouble," Arling said. "If you're really trying to find the thing, not rule out the thing, then the MRI is going to have better data. It has higher sensitivity," he said. It'll be more sensitive than a Galleri test, for example. 4. What's your budget? Is this the best use of a few hundred to a few thousand bucks of your cash? Might you derive more health benefits from putting those dollars into things we know will improve healthy aging, like more exercise, some personal training, better nutrition, or less stress (a nice vacation, perhaps?) "If it gets people being healthy, great, but if it's just a thing that rich people do to flaunt that they're healthier than you, it doesn't quite achieve the goal," Arling said. 5. Is there metal in your body? Finally, full-body MRIs may not be for you if you have metal in your body (sorry). That's because they work by harnessing the power of magnets. There's no harmful radiation involved, but you generally can't wear anything metal, inside or out. (Discuss this with your doctor, though — many surgical implants are designed to be MRI-safe). "A typical three tesla MRI is 60,000 times the strength of the magnetic pull of Earth," Gal said.

California clean energy push exemplified by Stanford professor's zero net energy home
California clean energy push exemplified by Stanford professor's zero net energy home

CBS News

time13 hours ago

  • CBS News

California clean energy push exemplified by Stanford professor's zero net energy home

Clean, renewable energy is powering California to levels never seen before, and a Stanford professor's home is the blueprint for the near future. Last month, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the Golden State had reached a historic milestone. According to the latest data, in 2023, the state was powered by two-thirds clean energy. A leading climate scientist not only believes the state is heading in the right direction, but he also practices what he preaches. Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, lives in a two-story, 3,200 square-foot home with large picture windows that to any passerby might appear prohibitively expensive to heat and cool. But, it's not. "To run it, it costs nothing. I have not paid an electric bill in eight years," Jacobson said. Jacobson built from scratch what's called a "zero net energy house." It's all-electric with no gas on the property. The home generates as much energy as it consumes, and all the energy generated is clean and renewable, with no polluting fossil fuels. "My whole goal of my career has been to understand and solve large-scale air pollution and climate problems through clean renewable energy systems," Jacobson said. The house is a light steel frame structure with airtight insulation. On the roof are solar panels. In the garage, he installed a home battery system. "I'm generating my electricity with solar on the roof, and that solar generates during the day, peaks at about noon, and there's a lot of excess," Jacobson said. "I mean, I use a lot less energy than I produce, and so that energy first gets stored in batteries. And then that excess beyond that gets sent to the grid." As for California's electric grid, it's undergoing a major transition to clean, renewable sources. According to California ISO, since 2021, about 25,000 megawatts of renewables have been added to the supply. That's enough to power nearly a quarter-million homes. Jacobson's research shows that, so far this year, California has run on 100% wind, water, and solar for 164 of 209 days and for an average of 4.8 hours a day. "So, wind, water and solar this year has supplied 57.4% of all of California's electricity," added Jacobson. "And that's an increase from about 53% last year, and 48% the previous year." Those calculations, as well as Cal ISO's data, don't include private homes equipped with solar and battery systems. "These are sufficient to provide electricity for my home from solar for 24 hours a day for most of the year," said Jacobson, as he gestured to his garage Powerwall. Jacobson also drives electric vehicles. In addition, he uses energy-efficient electrical devices. "Electricity is the future for everything. It's much more efficient. It's cleaner and it's cheaper, and it does far less damage to the environment than gas or other types of fossil fuels," he said. Among his devices: an induction stove which uses 60% less energy than gas, and a heat pump that transfers heat between the indoors and outdoors. Jacobson's heat pump uses a ductless "mini split" model that uses 75% less energy than a gas heater because, as he explained, it doesn't create the heat. The pump simply moves it around. As for hot water, the home uses a heat pump electric water heater. The temperature was set at 129 degrees Fahrenheit. "It's got plenty of water for showers, and it reheats pretty rapidly," he said. Jacobson received a 30% federal tax credit and a state subsidy when he installed his system. He has generated about 120% of what he has used on average and sold the extra 20% back to the grid under the net metering program. He is also studying his home and collecting data to use in a class that he teaches. He has also published the data in a textbook with the goal of informing others about a combustion-free future.

Scientists Say Your Body Starts Aging Faster After 50—but Not All Parts at Once
Scientists Say Your Body Starts Aging Faster After 50—but Not All Parts at Once

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Scientists Say Your Body Starts Aging Faster After 50—but Not All Parts at Once

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Aging doesn't occur uniformly throughout our lives, but accelerates during certain periods. A new study from scientists at the Chinese Academy of Sciences found 48 disease-related proteins increase throughout the body at around the age of 50. This correlates with previous studies that found that human aging accelerated around the ages of 44 and the early 60s. As soon as we're born, we start aging, but scientists are quickly learning that not all aging is exactly the same. A new study, led by a team of scientists at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and published in the journal Cell, details how humans experience accelerated aging after the the age of 50. The study identified that certain tissues (i.e. blood vessels) experience this aging faster than others, and the scientists also identified the proteins responsible for this accelerated process. 'Based on aging-associated protein changes, we developed tissue-specific proteomic age clocks and characterized organ-level aging trajectories,' the authors write. 'Temporal analysis revealed an aging inflection around age 50, with blood vessels being a tissue that ages early and is markedly susceptible to aging.' In the study, scientists collected tissue samples across the body's major organ systems from 76 individuals of Chinese ancestry—aged 14 to 68—who all died from accidental brain injury. The tissues showed that certain organs aged at different rates. The adrenal gland—one of the body's hormone factories—showed accelerated aging at around the age of 30, and also saw an increase in 48 disease-related proteins as tissue samples trended older. The scientists also spotted large changes in protein levels around the ages of 45 and 55. One of the biggest shifts was in the aorta, and scientists suspect that blood vessels carry these age-accelerating molecules throughout the body. This isn't the first study to surmise that aging isn't quite as linear as we once thought. Last year, a study from Stanford University similarly confirmed that humans largely experience a period of accelerated aging at around 44 and the early 60s, which Stanford University's Michael Snyder, a professor of genetics and the study's senior author, surmised at the time could be related to aging. Speaking with Nature about this new study, Snyder says that the findings largely align with his own scientific conclusions. 'It fits the idea that your hormonal and metabolic control are a big deal. That is where some of the most profound shifts occur as people age,' Snyder said. 'We're like a car. Some parts wear out faster.' Understanding what those parts are will help human mechanics (AKA doctors) to keep things under the hood running for longer. As scientists continue exploring the mechanics of aging, findings will likely converge and begin tell the story of how the body more generally experiences aging throughout a lifetime. 'Together, our findings lay the groundwork for a systems-level understanding of human aging through the lens of proteins,' the authors write. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store