
Bid to change Russell's name to Kororāreka declined
The New Zealand Geographic Board has announced the proposal to change the name of the Northland town Russell to its original Māori one has been declined.
The board publicly consulted on the proposal from the Kororāreka Marae Society to officially name Russell Kororāreka in 2023.
The decision was made by Minister for Land Information Chris Penk, as part of of his overseeing place naming.
In September 2021 the Kororāreka Marae Society lodged a name-change application with the New Zealand Geographic Board, which considered three options: An outright change to Kororāreka, the dual name Kororāreka/Russell, or the alternative names option, where both names have equal standing.
A report from December 2022 showed the board's preferred option was for an outright change from Russell to Kororāreka. However, minutes from the board's June 2023 meeting, released under the Official Information Act, show the board asked the minister for land information at that time, Damien O'Connor, to make the final determination.
Name-change decisions are sometimes referred to the minister if they are especially contentious.
A decision was expected in 2023 but O'Connor had not made up his mind when Labour was voted out of office in the general election later that year.
The responsibility then passed to National's Chris Penk, Land Information Minister in the new government.
In late 2024 Penk released a number of decisions - both for and against name changes - but Kororāreka/Russell was not among them.
Kororāreka Marae Society chair Deb Rewiri, who has campaigned since 2021, told RNZ the decision was "sorely disappointing".
"It dismays me because I don't understand why, when the majority of submissions they had in front of them were for it."
"Even the ones that were opposed to it were literally saying they didn't mind the name being there but they just wanted a dual-name, rather than Kororāreka on its own."
Rewiri said she spoke with the board, before the decision was made public, and it did not give a reason as to why the decision was made.
Speaking to RNZ last year, Rewiri was optimistic the change would go ahead, because it was part of a tide of traditional names returning around the country.
For example, she cited the Whangārei suburb of Kamo, which had recently reverted to its previous name of Te Kamo - even though most submissions called for the status quo.
Arguments cited against an outright name change include that Russell is well known as a tourist destination under that name; that Kororāreka is too long and difficult to pronounce; and the cost of changing signage, business cards, postal addresses and the like.
Rewiri said Russell was the only town in Northland not known by its original Māori name, and people seemed to manage with the region's other place names.
(Broadwood, in North Hokianga, is another locality officially known by its English name, but with a population of 130, it's moot whether it can be called a town.)
The name Kororāreka was already widely used in the town, Deb Rewiri said. Photo: RNZ
Whatever the government's decision, Rewiri said Kororāreka was already in widespread use, with many businesses already displaying on their signs and people writing Kororāreka/Russell on their correspondence.
Kororāreka was also inscribed on the waharoa [gateway] welcoming visitors to the town, she said.
How did Russell get its name?
Heritage New Zealand Northland manager Bill Edwards earlier told RNZ there was a curious twist in the tale of how Russell got its name.
While many people thought of Russell as the first capital of New Zealand, the Russell of then was not the Russell of now.
New Zealand's first capital was established at what was now known as Ōkiato, about 8km south of present-day Russell, where the car ferry from Ōpua docked.
That Russell was named after Lord John Russell, a British politician who never set foot in New Zealand.
In 1841 the nation's capital moved to Auckland, and a year later the original Russell was destroyed by fire and faded into obscurity.
At that time the name Kororāreka was used by Māori and Pākehā alike for the bustling whaling port north of the original Russell.
In 1844, however, two years after the original Russell burnt down, Governor Robert FitzRoy officially designated Kororāreka as "part of the township of Russell".
The name came from the Port of Russell, which was used to refer to the wider waters around Kororāreka.
As for the origin of the name Kororāreka, Rewiri said it came from the words kororā, or little blue penguin, and reka, meaning sweet or delicious.
"What I've been told is that one of our chiefs, he was ailing. And so the soup of the kororā was brought to him. And so he said, 'kororā reka', or 'how sweet is that kororā broth'."
The minutes from the June 2023 Geographic Board meeting stated that both Russell and Kororāreka had a unique place in New Zealand history, and both names were well-known to many New Zealanders.
"Although a substantial number of submitters object to an outright change, quite a number support alternative or dual names.
"This indicates that they don't want Russell dropped but also support Kororāreka being restored, and this demonstrates fairly strong support for Kororāreka to be recognised somehow," the minutes stated.
"The option of having Kororāreka and Russell as alternative official names would allow both names to be used in much the same way that the board had done for the North Island and South Island - Te Ika-a-Māui and Te Wai Pounamu."
"This might also provide for a natural transition to the original Māori name over time, although this could not be guaranteed. It would also address Whangārei District Council's concerns about the cost of transitioning."
The minutes stated there were similar numbers of public submissions for and against the proposal. Two "very abusive" submissions had been removed from consideration.
Speaking to RNZ after the decision was made public, Rewiri said she would continue pressing the government to change the town's name.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
an hour ago
- The Spinoff
Nope, no way, we haven't already zoned for enough housing in Auckland
Critics are saying the government is bullying Auckland Council into allowing unnecessary new housing intensification. They fail to mention that dense housing remains banned in the places where it makes the most sense. Christine Fletcher's voice took on a tinge of exasperation as she explained her thoughts on housing development to Ingrid Hipkiss last week. The Auckland councillor insisted she wasn't a zealot. She just wanted a good, lengthy, potentially infinite process of deliberation. 'I'm not opposed to intensification,' she said. 'I'm very much in favour of it, because it should be along our transport routes, but this is being done with indecent haste and really needs to be thought through.' Her moderate stance might have been a surprise to those who attended Auckland Council's planning committee meeting in November 2021, where Fletcher likened legislation aimed at making the council allow for housing intensification to 'gang rape '. Now here she was on RNZ's Morning Report on Thursday to talk about a column she'd penned for the Herald with Troy Churton, an Ōrākei local board member best known for complaining about the police Eagle helicopter 169 times in eight months and also comparing development to rape. They were opposing the government's updated housing legislation, which will force the council to allow for hundreds of thousands of new homes and businesses, primarily around train stations and rapid busways. The column eschews comparisons between desperately needed housing and violent sexual assault to argue the new legislation is unnecessary and harmful to Auckland's character and community spirit. It's riddled with statistics, which might make it seem factual and dispassionate. The council, it explains, has already zoned for 900,000 new homes through its Unitary Plan. That sounds impressive, but these sorts of numbers can be deceiving. Technically the entire world's population could fit in a square box with 1km-long sides in the middle of Manhattan. Build The Cube, urbanists like to say. Their more serious point is that planners could just zone for The Cube and say they've released enough housing capacity for the next few millennia. Auckland has its own version of The Cube. Fletcher and Churton are right that its Unitary Plan allows for thousands of new houses, but they fail to mention that most of them are in far-flung and slightly dystopian places like Milldale, Millwater, or even Howick. Development is cut off in many of the most accessible, desirable and wealthy parts of the isthmus. The Unitary Plan locks 41% of all land within 5km of the city centre under so-called 'character protections' designed to preserve the city's heavily renovated and eye-wateringly expensive villas in amber. In some suburbs, like Grey Lynn central and Ponsonby west, dense housing is banned on more than 90% of the land. Despite councillors like Fletcher raising the prospect of sprawl into places with inadequate infrastructure if they're forced to allow for intensification, the most meaningful restrictions on development in Auckland right now are in places with good access to jobs, where pipes, roading networks and busy public transport routes are already in place. Auckland's planners and politicians like to keep this sort of stuff under wraps. They talk about the 'compact city', pretending the Unitary Plan upzoned primarily around town centres and public transit. An elaborate system has been set up to maintain the ruse. When planners send councillors reports on development patterns, they use a flattering 1,500-metre walking catchment, meaning anything within 1,500m of the rapid transit network, to determine which homes have been built in the places that make the most sense. That measure has the upside of taking in huge amounts of the city, meaning lots of development that isn't that well-connected gets tractor-beamed into the council's self-aggrandising statistics. Lately though, the government has been asking the council to please stop taking the piss and actually allowing dense housing near the new train stations and rail lines it's spent billions of dollars upgrading. Housing minister Chris Bishop has demanded that councillors like Fletcher allow at least 15-storey developments around stations like Kingsland and Maungawhau. Faced with the distressing prospect of actually following through on its compact city goals, the council has decided that outside of the city centre, the walking catchment for rapid transit is actually 800m. Even with that reduction in place, Fletcher, Churton and their supporters still aren't happy. They worry about an 'oversupply' of housing and make shows of concern about a collapse of our 'suburban and cultural diversity'. But if the government is able to force Auckland Council to zone for an abundance of new housing, the most noticeable change to the city will be that its wealthiest, most well-connected suburbs are no longer an exclusive enclave for Fletcher, whose property holdings are so valuable she once famously told her colleagues she pays $5,000 per month in rates, or her similarly well-to-do constituents. That's not a collapse of its cultural diversity. It's an expansion. It's not creating an oversupply of housing. It's finally allowing it to be built in the places where people want to live. Underneath all this apparent altruistic concern for the fabric of the city, you can hear the faint but unmistakable sound of a familiar refrain: not in my backyard.


NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: Despite Donald Trump's tariffs, we continue to produce world-class meat, dairy and wine
So, in summary and even factoring in US state sales taxes, in totality, New Zealand is only marginally disadvantaged. Further mitigating factors both in favour of the American consumer and the New Zealand exporter is the ongoing strength of the US dollar and Donald Trump's recent big, beautiful tax bill, which will pass significant tax relief and buying power into the hands of millions of American consumers. Also front of mind should be that other countries and direct New Zealand competitors are facing similar, if not greater, tariff increases than New Zealand. Given we continue to produce world-class meat, dairy and wine products, it's unlikely, after a period of adjustment, that price increases at the retail level will have any meaningful impact on American consumers. Bruce Eliott, St Heliers. Voting changes People are criticising the Government for closing voting enrolments two weeks before the election. If you don't want to vote, that is fine. However, if you do, but can't be bothered to put in a small amount of effort to enrol over two weeks before an election, the problem isn't the system, it's you. If you want to vote, make an effort. Mark Young, Ōrewa. Electoral requirements If it is a legal requirement to be enrolled on the electoral roll, as stated by the Government on national television Q&A programme yesterday, why are all those on a benefit or Superannuation or in public services jobs not being checked by either employers or Winz? Who is responsible for checking that all New Zealanders are enrolled and are therefore not in breach of the law? Or does this Government not care about the 'dropkicks' or those who have been removed from the Māori roll? What happens to those who turn 18 on or near polling day? If the enrolment time is shortened, how will NZ Post guarantee that all New Zealanders are enrolled in time, and also the many thousands of Kiwi who have moved to Australia this past year who are still New Zealand citizens? Where is the democratic right for all New Zealanders? It behoves every Kiwi eligible to vote and all parliamentary parties to check the electoral roll in 2026 to make a concerted effort to gather those who are in breach of the law. Marie Kaire, Whangārei. Credit card fees So, the Government is banning credit card fees, whoop de do. Not all retailers charged extra anyway and the ones that did will recover them in some other covert way instead. A waste of Government time and energy all round. A.J. Petersen, Kawerau. Lions v Australia In a dead rubber, Australia won one test against the British and Irish Lions which, in spite of rugby's prevailing conflicting laws, held a passing interest. The game again was an eight-man-a-side wrestling contest with hardly any flowing seven-man backline plays. The tries scored were due only to individual opportunism, rather than teamwork. Once again, rugby was ... the loser. Larry Mitchell, Rothesay Bay. Jami-Lee Ross' political return Former National MP Jami-Lee Ross has said he is aiming for a political comeback, and will run for a seat on the Howick local board in the Flat Bush subdivision. No doubt he has weighed up the pros and cons of this move, but given the way the final chapters of his previous time in politics played out in the media, I'd suggest it would probably be best to give it a miss. He would open himself up for scrutiny, old controversies will be brought up, and his new venture, running an escort agency, will no doubt be 'grist for the mill' for his opponents. The message in Kenny Rogers' song The Gambler says it best: 'You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em, know when to walk away and know when to run...' Lorraine Kidd, Warkworth.


Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Land Reforms Aim To End Stalled Development In Papua New Guinea
Article – RNZ New legislation introduced by PNG's Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso would reform six land-related laws and which he says are essential., RNZ Pacific Senior Journalist Reforms to land laws in Papua New Guinea should ensure that landowners have more control over their land. New legislation introduced by the country's Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso would reform six land-related laws. Rosso says the changes are essential to securing the country's future and safeguarding the rights of landowners. Prime Minister James Marape commended Rosso for spearheading the reforms. 'Land is our people's greatest inheritance-our playground, our home, our heritage. Every Papua New Guinean is connected to a piece of land somewhere in this country. We must protect it,' Marape told parliament. RNZ Pacific spoke with its PNG correspondent Scott Waide about the government's motivations for the changes. (This transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity.) Scott Waide: The Lands Department has been, for want of a better word, terminally ill, for many years. It has had legislation that dates back to the colonial era. Papua New Guinea has moved on [and] moved forward with a lot of things. But the [land] legislations have been a hindering mechanism for any form of large scale development, like farming [and] real estate development. Those laws have been a hindrance to much of that development, and also the mobilisation of customary land. Previously, with the old laws, customary landowners could not adequately mobilise and get loans to develop their land, because the laws [and banks] did not recognise customary land ownership, and the accompanying attempts to allow for that development of customary land. It has posed a lot of complications in terms of mining development, logging [and] farming. The changes that have been introduced allow for both protection of customary landowners and the possibility of them venturing into large scale businesses. Don Wiseman: It has being brought in by the Deputy Prime Minister John Rosso. What specifically is he going to do? You have outlined the issues that have existed over land for a long time, but are they going to be overcome with this new legislation? SW: Yes, many of the problems that have existed for many, many years – from a very, very old system, a manual system, when the rest of the world is operating digitally. We have had instances where they have been dual titles issued, issued titles over land that have gone missing, because people are reproducing those titles manually. There is an electronic system that has been introduced as well within the Lands Department, and that is meant to reduce the instances of corruption that have long existed. A lot of the reforms have happened very quietly within the Lands Department. The other reforms that complement the development of housing, which is a big need in Papua New Guinea, support the development of customary land as well. So customary land owners can partner with government or with private organisations and develop housing, cheap housing for other Papua New Guineans. DW: Prime Minister James Marape says this will save the land that is still held, but it is clearly not going to undo a lot of the mistakes from the past, and they have been so many of those, particularly to do with the forestry and so on. SW: Yes, that is a an issue that I have spoken to a few land experts as well around. And that is going to be a huge challenge to undo all of that. The other side to it is that there are customary landowners who also sell their own land for cash. The legislations that have been put in place, in the some of the policies have actually banned the sale of customary land to individual parties as well. So, it offers some level of protection for customary land owners. There needs to be a lot of awareness as well for customary landowners to understand how the law benefits them, and that is going to also take a while.