Proposed SNAP asset limit increase hits roadblock as DHS takes action on 2023 law
Two Arkansas lawmakers expressed frustration Thursday that their efforts to allow food stamp recipients to save more of their income were delayed.
Arkansas is one of 13 states with an asset limit for SNAP recipients. Assets include cash on hand and in the bank, savings certificates and stocks and bonds, among other things.
Sen. Jonathan Dismang, R-Searcy, attempted in 2023 to raise the asset limit from $2,250 to $6,000 for Arkansans to qualify for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. He and Rep. Jon Eubanks, R-Paris, are cosponsoring a bill this year with the same provision, and House Bill 1915 would also require the asset limit to be adjusted for inflation every two years.
HB 1915 did not receive a vote Thursday after members of the House Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee said they wanted clarity about how much the change would cost the state.
SNAP is entirely federally-funded with the exception of administrative costs, Department of Human Services Secretary Kristi Putnam said. Even so, Putnam said she opposed new changes to the SNAP asset limit while the state has not yet seen the impact of Act 675, the final version of Dismang's 2023 bill.
Act 675 kept the $2,250 asset limit — which the federal government increased to $3,000 last year — but authorized a USDA waiver request to allow exemptions for individual families with more assets. Those families would have a new asset limit of $5,500 and remain enrolled in SNAP as long as they receive an exemption within a year of exceeding the current limit, and they would only be allowed one exemption every five years. HB 1915 would repeal this provision and replace it with the $6,000 asset limit.
Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed Act 675 after it had been amended twice. The original version would have raised the SNAP asset limit to $12,500, but Sanders said she opposed 'expanding welfare,' even after Dismang reduced the proposed limit to $6,000.
Advocates for child well-being call for removal of barriers to Arkansas SNAP participation
Earlier on Thursday, the Arkansas Legislative Council's Executive Subcommittee approved an emergency rule to amend DHS' SNAP Certification Manual with the requirements put forth in Act 675.
When asked why the policy took two years to enact, Putnam told the subcommittee that DHS 'made it more complicated than it needed to be.'
Act 675 and the new emergency rule allow families who qualify for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program to also qualify for SNAP. Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families expressed support for this policy change in a January report that called for the state to remove barriers to SNAP qualification and enrollment.
DHS Division of County Operations Director Mary Franklin told lawmakers in January that enacting Act 675 did not require a USDA waiver as stated in the law, but the department needed to ensure it had the funding to enact the policy.
Dismang said at the time that he was 'disappointed' that Act 675 had not been implemented at all in two years. He repeated this statement in an interview Thursday.
Eubanks similarly expressed disappointment with the lack of action on HB 1915. He told the Public Health committee that he had been under the impression DHS was neutral on the bill.
'How long are we supposed to wait?' Eubanks said. 'I believe we need to move forward on this.'
Republican Reps. Jeremy Wooldridge of Marmaduke and Cameron Cooper of Romance said they were sympathetic to the intent of HB 1915 but wanted to know the fiscal impact of the bill before voting on it.
Putnam said DHS will examine income trends and try to project how many people will remain on SNAP longer under a $6,000 asset limit.
She said DHS will have the fiscal impact report ready by Monday, and committee vice chair Wooldridge said members will vote on the bill Tuesday.
The bill would have to advance with no roadblocks or amendments in order to reach Sanders' desk by the end of the legislative session on April 16, Dismang said.
He also said potential fiscal impact should not be an issue, not only because SNAP is federally funded but also because allowing SNAP recipients to collect more assets while enrolled in the program 'should eliminate some of the turnover that may be occurring right now, so there may actually be a decrease in the demand that's getting placed on DHS.'
'I sure wish they were as diligent running impact [statements] on this as they are with some other bills that have run through the session,' Dismang said.
If HB 1915 does not clear the Legislature by April 16, Dismang said he is willing to try again in 2027, but there might be some ways to address the asset limit 'that do not require legislation' in the meantime.
In addition to Putnam, Opportunity Arkansas CEO Nicholas Horton spoke against HB 1915, saying it would keep low-income people reliant on government aid.
Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Advocacy Director Lance Whitney disputed Horton's statements while speaking in favor of HB 1915. He said most SNAP beneficiaries are only enrolled in the program for 18 to 22 months on average.
'We are currently looking at seniors, veterans and households who are looking for the ladder to get out of the hole… to get out of these safety net programs, but they need to have the rungs on the ladder to reach that,' Whitney said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Dozens gather at Boston Medical Center to protest Trump''s ‘Big Beautiful Bill,' cuts to Medicaid
Donald Trump's tax bill, which he signed into law on July 4, will strip about $186 billion from SNAP and close to $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next decade, the Globe Advertisement The bill could strip healthcare coverage from some 250,000 Massachusetts residents, Governor Maura Healey Advertisement Republicans frame the bill as a way to target Medicaid fraud and save money. It would require states to 'We're here to expose the harm of this big, bad bill that will transfer wealth from working people to wealthy people,' said Marlishia Aho, the regional communications director for 1199SEIU. Franswa Jean-Enard, a personal care attendant for his mom and a member of the union, said he's anxious his mom could be stripped of her healthcare benefits 'at any time' because of the cuts even though he has 'all the paperwork to justify her need for it.' She has several conditions, including advanced arthritis, and relies on Medicaid for 'all her care,' including physical therapy and medication. Jean-Enard said it was important for him to protest because even if he isn't ultimately affected, he doesn't want other people to lose access to life-saving treatment. 'Back home in Haiti, there's a saying — when your friend's or neighbor's beard is on fire, put yours in order — which means when something is happening to your neighbor, it could happen to you,' he said. The state requiring more frequent eligibility checks would also be a burden, as Jean-Enard said the paperwork for his mom's Medicaid is already time-consuming and can take months to process. 'I'm hoping it doesn't get to that, but I'm hoping with the help of the union, what we're doing and organizing, we can push back,' he said. Advertisement Jean-Enard said he understands the government wants to streamline spending, but that it shouldn't come at the expense of healthcare. 'Every single PCA is doing crucial work,' he said, adding that his mom's needs will only grow with time. Janice Guzman, also a PCA for her mom, was cut from 'That's why I'm here, fighting back,' Guzman said. 'My mom needs my assistance 24/7 — and I don't get paid for 24/7 — but it's helping me pay my bills. Right now, it's like, what am I going to do?' Others at the protest, like 70-year-old Fe Guidry, a PCA in New Bedford, said they're worried about cuts to SNAP, which Guidry said SNAP 'really helps' her purchase healthy food. 'We're fighting for the benefits that we have,' she said. Emily Spatz can be reached at

Epoch Times
4 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Washington State Sues to Prevent Trump Admin From Accessing Food Aid Immigration Data
Washington state is suing financial services company Fidelity Information Services (FIS) to prevent it from sharing food aid data with the federal government, according to a July 24 lawsuit filed with the State of Washington Thurston County Superior Court. The Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) administers the federally funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and state-funded Food Assistance Program (FAP).


New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Feds move to deport 82-year-old convicted IRA terrorist after decades in the United States
A convicted terrorist and boss of the Irish Republican Army in North America may finally be getting booted from the United States. Gabriel Megahey, 82, lived in New York for decades but a June 20 letter from the US Department of Homeland Security warned his 'parole' was being terminated, nearly 30 years after he and other IRA members were given dispensation to stay in the country. 'Do not attempt to unlawfully remain in the United States — the federal government will find you. Please depart the United States immediately,' reads the one-page letter, which Megahey shared with the Irish Echo. Advertisement The Belfast native was convicted in 1983 in Brooklyn Federal Court for conspiring to buy missiles to shoot down British helicopters amid the violent clashes in Northern Ireland known as 'The Troubles.' Gabriel Megahey was convicted in 1983 of conspiring to buy weapons to shoot down British helicopters. Gabriel Megahey /Facebook At the time, federal authorities considered Megahey 'the officer commanding (OC) of America and Canada' for the IRA, he told PBS's Frontline. The married father of six served five years in federal prison for conspiracy and arms shipments. Advertisement Megahey, known by the nickname 'Skinny Legs,' was convicted with three others, with then U.S. Attorney John Dearie describing him at the time as 'the most culpable of these defendants,' and the group as a whole as 'a network of men who sought to use this country as a base of terrorist activities,' according to reports. 'No one wants peace more than us,' Megahey, who first settled in Jackson Heights, Queens in 1975, insisted at the sentencing hearing. He was released from prison in 1988 — but never deported. Advertisement Megahey and four other IRA members were then allowed to remain in the country as part of the Good Friday Agreement, the historic April 1998 accords which ended decades of violence in Ireland between those who wanted to remain part of the United Kingdom and those who didn't. Now the grandfather of 14 and great-grandfather of five, who records show moved to Delaware in 2019, is reeling after DHS warned he would be fined and criminally prosecuted if he stays in the United States. Now 82, Megahey is facing deportation decades after he served his sentence. Gabriel Megahey /Facebook 'DHS is terminating your parole,' according to the one-page letter, which Megahey shared with the Irish Echo. 'Do not attempt to unlawfully remain in the United States — the federal government will find you. Please depart the United States immediately.' Advertisement Megahey, who relies on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to pay for expensive medicine necessary to treat a heart ailment, also faces the loss of his benefits. 'It would cost me $4,000 to $5,000 a month to pay for it on my own,' he told Straus News. 'I can't afford that. I'll have to go home.' DHS and Megahey declined comment.