Sweden investigates suspected sabotage of Baltic Sea telecoms cable
The Baltic Sea region is on alert and the NATO alliance has boosted its presence after a series of power cable, telecom and gas pipeline outages since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Most have been caused by civilian ships dragging their anchors.
Finnish telecom operator Cinia said on Friday that it had detected minor damage on its C-Lion1 undersea fibre-optic link connecting Finland and Germany but that there was no impact on the cable's functionality.
Swedish police were investigating the matter because the breach had occurred in Sweden's economic zone, police spokesperson Mathias Rutegard told Reuters.
"The preliminary investigation relates to suspected sabotage," Rutegard said.
It is the third time in recent months that Cinia's C-Lion1 cable was damaged, after it was completely severed in November and December last year.
The Swedish coastguard said it had sent a vessel to help investigate the incident off the island of Gotland.
Sweden's prosecution authority said it was not involved in the investigation of the cable breach.
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said the government was being briefed and that damage to any undersea infrastructure was particularly concerning amid the current security situation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cedar News
9 hours ago
- Cedar News
Pakistan Shoots Down Indian Rafale with Chinese PL-15 Missile in Intelligence Blunder
Pakistan Shoots Down Indian Rafale with Chinese PL-15 Missile in Intelligence Blunder In a stunning development on May 7, Pakistan shot down an Indian Rafale fighter jet using a Chinese-made PL-15 long-range missile, according to intelligence sources cited by Reuters. The incident is being described as a significant intelligence lapse by the Indian Air Force (IAF), which reportedly underestimated the actual range of the PL-15 missile system. Intelligence Failure Leads to Loss of Rafale Jet Sources within the defense community confirmed that the IAF did not expect the PL-15 — a long-range air-to-air missile developed by China — to reach and engage targets at such a distance. This critical miscalculation allowed Pakistan's Air Force to successfully engage and shoot down the Indian Rafale during an aerial encounter over contested airspace. The PL-15 missile, equipped with an active radar seeker and advanced guidance systems, has a reported range exceeding 200 kilometers, giving Pakistan a considerable edge in beyond-visual-range (BVR) combat scenarios. Rising Tensions Between Nuclear Rivals The shooting down of the Rafale comes amid heightened military tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. India's acquisition of the French-built Rafale jets in recent years was seen as a strategic move to gain superiority in the air, especially along the western border. However, this latest loss has sparked questions over the Indian defense establishment's intelligence capabilities and its ability to anticipate the evolving nature of regional threats. Implications for Indian Defense Strategy This incident marks a severe blow to the Indian military's modernization narrative. The downing of a Rafale by a PL-15 missile not only undermines India's aerial dominance but also signals the increasing effectiveness of Pakistan-China military cooperation. Indian officials have not issued an official statement yet, but defense analysts expect a reevaluation of operational tactics, missile countermeasures, and electronic warfare capabilities in response to this unexpected escalation.
LBCI
9 hours ago
- LBCI
Ukraine's military says it struck Russia's Ryazan oil refinery
Ukraine's military said on Saturday that it had struck Russia's Ryazan oil refinery, causing a fire on its territory. In a statement on Telegram, the Unmanned Systems Forces also said they had hit the Annanefteprodukt oil storage facility in Voronezh region. Reuters
Ya Libnan
17 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Trump is burning bridges with allies, not 'Making America Great Again'
Trump Is Burning Bridges With Allies, Not Making America Great Again By Vlad Green, Op-Ed History has a way of repeating itself—especially when its painful lessons are ignored. Today, President Donald Trump is once again using tariffs as a weapon, punishing nations for political disagreements and attempting to strong-arm trade concessions with threats instead of negotiations. His approach may resonate with a narrow base at home, but it is fracturing long-standing alliances abroad and putting America's global leadership at risk. As he wraps himself in the flag of economic nationalism, Trump forgets—or ignores—that tariffs have consistently backfired throughout American history. One of the first cautionary tales comes from President William McKinley, a staunch protectionist who, in the 1890s, championed high tariffs as a tool to shield American industries. But as the economic and diplomatic backlash grew, McKinley began to regret his position. Before his assassination in 1901, he had changed course, calling for greater international cooperation and freer trade, recognizing that economic isolationism would only harm American prosperity. McKinley's lesson went unheeded three decades later when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 plunged the world into economic chaos. Enacted just months after the 1929 stock market crash, the tariffs raised duties on over 20,000 imported goods and prompted retaliatory measures from U.S. trading partners. Instead of protecting American jobs, it worsened the Great Depression, slashed global trade, and deepened the suffering of millions. Fast forward to today, and we're seeing history dangerously echo itself. President Trump has turned tariffs into tools of intimidation. With no coherent trade strategy, he threatens Mexico one day, slaps tariffs on Europe the next, and targets Canada—America's closest neighbor and trusted ally—as if it were a rival state. He boasts about 'winning' trade wars, but the reality is rising costs for American consumers, unstable global markets, and fraying relationships with the very nations that stood by the U.S. through thick and thin. It's not just the economic consequences that are alarming. Trump's brand of economic nationalism is wrapped in authoritarian tactics. He surrounds himself with loyalists, fires anyone who questions his decisions, and demands obedience over debate. This is not how a democracy operates. This is not how a civilized world leader behaves. Instead, America under Trump increasingly resembles a transactional bully, not a principled partner. The irony is that Trump claims to be making America great again—yet he is isolating it from the very world order it once led and helped build. From NATO to the World Trade Organization, America's credibility is shrinking as allies question whether they can count on Washington. What started as a promise to bring back manufacturing jobs is morphing into a full-blown foreign policy disaster. The tragedy is avoidable. America doesn't need to abandon its economic interests to remain a global leader. But it must stop using tariffs as threats and allies as bargaining chips. It must return to smart diplomacy, to building coalitions rather than burning bridges, and to leading not through fear, but by example. The world is watching. And history is watching too. The question is not just what Trump will do next—but what price America will ultimately pay for choosing confrontation over cooperation.
