Parent company of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and Tufts Health Plan, Point32Health, recognized as one of the most community-minded organizations in the country
CANTON, Mass., June 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The parent company of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and Tufts Health Plan, Point32Health, was named to Points of Light's The Civic 50 for the fifth time. The Civic 50 recognizes the top socially responsible organizations in the United States and showcases how leading companies are moving social impact and community into their practices, values and core business.
"Our colleagues' dedication to the people and communities we serve is evident across all aspects of our organization – from our Foundation community investments to colleague engagement in service and giving to business practices that prioritize people and their well-being," said Eileen Auen, executive chair of Point32Health. "We know that for our business to thrive, communities must also thrive. That's why community is central to our purpose to guide and empower healthier lives for everyone."
In 2024, Point32Health and the Point32Health Foundation gave nearly $14 million in grants, matching gifts, sponsorships, volunteer time, in-kind and other contributions to support nonprofit organizations in local communities. Colleagues volunteered 13,215 hours, valued by Independent Sector at more than $525,000.
"In an ever-evolving landscape, companies are looking to ensure that they can meet the needs of their communities, customers and stakeholders," said Jennifer Sirangelo, president and CEO, Points of Light. "Companies like Point32Health are leading the way in showing how social impact benefits their employees' well-being, strengthens the communities where they do business, and brings value and meaning to their work. Their efforts provide a model for others looking to bring the benefits of volunteering and social impact to their workforce and they're extremely deserving of this recognition."
Point32Health was one of only six New England-based companies named to the list.
The Civic 50 survey is administered by True Impact, and the results are analyzed by VeraWorks. The survey instrument consists of quantitative and multiple-choice questions that inform the scoring process. The Civic 50 is the only survey and ranking system that exclusively measures corporate community engagement.
To view the Points of Light report and see the full list of The Civic 50 2025 honorees, visit https://www.pointsoflight.org/press-releases/points-of-light-announces-2025-honorees-of-the-civic-50-and-releases-key-insights/
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/parent-company-of-harvard-pilgrim-health-care-and-tufts-health-plan-point32health-recognized-as-one-of-the-most-community-minded-organizations-in-the-country-302473561.html
SOURCE Point32Health
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Dave Portnoy calls out ‘morons' who think WNBA players shouldn't get more money
Dave Portnoy is fed up with those who believe WNBA players don't deserve a higher payday. In the wake of players wearing warmup shirts that said 'Pay Us What You Owe Us' at Saturday's All-Star Game, the Barstool Sports founder and owner made his stance clear with a lengthy post and subsequent video on X on Sunday. 'I don't know how anybody in the world with a brain, and maybe my brain is just bigger than most, can rationally say women don't deserve more money at this point,' Portnoy said in the video. Portnoy went on to reference how Caitlin Clark's rookie salary, $76,000, is less than what Barstool personalities Nicky Smokes and Ben Mintz make per year, calling the disparity 'insane.' As of the 2024 season, the WNBA's average salary was $147,745, according to DirecTV. Portnoy noted how some WNBA critics have referenced reports of the league losing tens of millions of dollars each year, but said the finances of the league are 'a mess, tied in with the NBA and purposely murky.' 3 Barstool Sports founder and owner Dave Portnoy thinks WNBA players deserve a pay raise. @stoolpresidente/X In October 2024, The Post reported the WNBA would be losing $40 million in the 2025 season. But, as Portnoy put it, the league is 'exploding.' 'Franchise values are exploding. Ticket sales, merch, tv rights all exploding. The players have an opt out in their CBA. Of course they took it. It's all about leverage in re-negotiations and for the 1st time in history of [the] league players have power,' Portnoy wrote. 3 Dave Portnoy attends a game between the Indiana Fever and the Connecticut Sun at TD Garden on July 15. NBAE via Getty Images The league agreed to an 11-year, $2.2 billion TV rights deal with Disney, Amazon Prime Video and NBCUniversal last summer, and TV ratings (up 23%), ticket sales (up 26%) and attendance (13%) are all surging halfway through the season, according to NPR. 'The players make virtually nothing while the entire league explodes,' Portnoy added. 'Of course they deserve more money.' Portnoy, who is one of Caitlin Clark's most vocal superfans, also refuted the notion that the league's recent success is unsustainable because it over-relies on Clark's star power. 'This league is so white hot right now, and I know everyone's going to say, 'Well, it's only Caitlin Clark, it's a one-person league,'' Portnoy said. 'Caitlin Clark was 100% the match that lit the fuse…but, Caitlin's not going anywhere. She's year two of a 15-year career.' 3 Fever star Caitlin Clark wearing a 'Pay Us What You Owe Us' shirt before the WNBA All-Star Game on July 19. Getty Images He added that other young stars like Angel Reese, Paige Bueckers and the soon-to-be pro JuJu Watkins mark a bright future for the league, too. Portnoy concluded by writing that if he could purchase a Boston-based WNBA franchise for $250 million, he 'would do it without blinking.' 'That's all you got to know about the WNBA finances,' he added.
Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
These are the common dangers Toronto ER doctors say kids should avoid: ‘The risk is simply not worth it'
A bike ride to the local pool. A perfectly executed plunge off the diving board. An evening spent in the backyard, locked in competition with the kids next door to see who boasts the best trampoline tricks. A day in the life of a child is all about balancing recreation and risk. And while many activities, like unsupervised swimming, are likely to already be on the minds of parents, others may come as a surprise. The Star spoke to some of Toronto's pediatric emergency medicine physicians about some of the fun but dangerous activities they advise against. Here are some of the biggest hazards to avoid to ensure kids stay safe. Pools and natural bodies of water, like lakes or oceans, are rife with risk, said Dr. Steve Lin, interim chief at St. Michael's Hospital Department of Medicine. 'Particularly ones that have no adult or lifeguard supervision,' Lin said in an interview. 'Those are always going to be an issue over and over.' Children must always wear certified lifejackets, said Dr. Natasha Collia, an emergency room doctor at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children. 'Not one of those ones that just goes around the neck — and no floaties around the arms, because those won't keep your child's head above water,' Collia said in an interview. Slips and trips, whether on the pool deck, beach or shore, also pose risk of head and neck injuries when playing near water. Kids clamber over an empty lifeguard station at Marie Curtis Park, near Lake Shore Boulevard and Brown's Line. 'Biking in general but more so biking without a helmet,' Lin said. While Ontario law requires anyone under 18 to don a helmet while biking, Lin said he still sees a significant number of head injuries sustained by kids riding without one. Parachute Canada, a Toronto-based non-profit aimed at reducing preventable injury, estimates brain injuries as the number one cause of serious injury and death for children on bicycles. Four of five brain injuries could be avoided by a properly fitted helmet, it says. Riders should avoid the roads and stick to bike lanes where possible, said Lin. 'That's another really big one.' There are few things Collia recommends against altogether, but trampolines are one of them. Most parents don't realize the dangers that come with the spring-loaded devices. According to Parachute, an average of more than 1,200 Canadians under 17 suffer injuries on backyard trampolines and at trampoline parks every year. 'The risk is simply not worth it,' she said. 'It really is one of those pieces of equipment that leads to any kind of injury. We're talking head, neck and extremities.' If parents opt to allow their children on the trampoline, Collia insists it should not be set up near any structures that they could bump into. Having more than one person jumping at the same time is also ill-advised. Collia said she often sees parents allowing their children on toboggans or sleds unprotected. 'I watch these kids go down a hill without a helmet and it's just like, 'what are you thinking?' ' she said. Even with a helmet, high speeds and a lack of control make toboggans and sleds a dangerous choice. 'We've seen an increase in kids getting creative — doing things like going down head first, belly down,' she said. 'Now your head's the first thing that's going to hit, or, if your belly is on the ground, you're considering chest and abdominal injuries.' Electric scooters may be prohibited in Toronto — and provincially for anyone under the age of 16 — but a growing number of kids are still using them to get around. Over the past five years, data from Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children shows a steady increase in the number of youth reporting to the emergency room following e-scooter crashes. Head injuries are some of the most common sustained by e-bike and e-scooter riders, said Collia, but they're not the only risk. 'I've had a scooter impaled into someone's chest,' she said. 'Or kids go over the handlebars and they get injuries to the abdomen, where they have bleeds due to spleen or liver injuries.' Collia recommends parents keep their young kids off ATVs as well, regardless of helmet use. 'Kids' bodies are just not built for things like this — I hate to say it, but they just fly.' Over the past five years, Torontohas seen a steady increase in the number of patients reporting While parents may already be aware that things like swimming pose risks to their children, Collia has a number of lesser-known activities that are dangerous for children. Inflatable bouncy castles, for example. Last year, Collia said she treated multiple children in the emergency room after an inflatable castle deflated and collapsed on a kids' birthday party. 'I don't even know why they exist,' Collia said. 'These things tip, they deflate, they collapse. 'Imagine, if that whole thing was on top of a child, how easy it will be for them to get trapped,' she added. Lawn mowers are another. The household device can be especially dangerous if you have multiple kids, Collia said. 'If an older one is using the equipment or learning how to use the equipment, it's very easy for a younger child to just get in the way or climb on it.' And maybe the least recognized? Shopping carts, said Collia. Oftentimes, people don't realize how unstable the carts are. 'All it takes is for them to reach or bend over the side and either the whole cart flips over or they fall out,' she said. 'Those are the big ones that I think parents need to really think about that they might not always.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Business Upturn
6 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors That Class Action Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against Vestis, Reckitt, and Tempus and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Litigation Partner Brandon Walker Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Vestis (VSTS), Reckitt (RBGLY), or Tempus (TEM) To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or acquired securities in any of the above companies during their class period and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Bragar Eagel & Squire partner Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore directly at (212) 355-4648 NEW YORK, July 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, reminds investors that class actions have been commenced on behalf of stockholders of Vestis Corporation (NYSE:VSTS), Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (OTC:RBGLY), and Tempus AI, Inc. (NASDAQ: TEM). Stockholders have until the deadlines below to petition the court to serve as lead plaintiff. Additional information about each case can be found at the link provided. Vestis Corporation (NYSE:VSTS) Class Period: May 2, 2024 – May 6, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 8, 2025 According to the complaint, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Vestis' ability to grow its business; notably that Vestis would be unable to execute on planned strategic initiatives to drive purported improvements to the customer experience and its onboarding efforts in order to drive new customer growth, increased customer retention, and increased revenue from existing customers. On May 7, 2025, Vestis announced its financial results for the second quarter of fiscal 2025, withdrew its revenue and growth guidance for the full fiscal year 2025, and provided guidance for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 that fell significantly below market expectations. The Company attributed its poor results partially to 'lost business in excess of new business,' but primarily on 'lower adds over stops, which is how we describe volume changes with our existing customers.' The Company attributed its decision to pull full-year guidance and provide disappointing third quarter targets to the 'increasingly uncertain macro environment.' Following this news, the price of Vestis' common stock declined dramatically. From a closing market price of $8.71 per share on May 6, 2025, Vestis' stock price fell to $5.44 per share on May 7, 2025, a decline of about 37.54% in the span of just a single day For more information on the Vestis class action go to: Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (OTC:RBGLY) Class Period: January 13, 2021 – July 28, 2024 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 4, 2025 Reckitt is a United Kingdom-based, global consumer goods company. To date, over 500 state and federal products liability lawsuits have been filed against Reckitt and its competitor, Abbott Laboratories ('Abbott'), claiming that they failed to adequately warn that premature infants consuming cow milk-based formulas, such as Reckitt's Enfamil and Abbott's Similac, have an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis ('NEC'), a life-threatening intestinal disease that affects premature or low birth weight infants. The Class Action alleges that, during the Class Period, Defendants made misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company's business, financial condition, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to warn investors and consumers: (1) that preterm infants were at an increased risk of developing NEC by consuming Reckitt's cow's milk-based formula, Enfamil; (2) of the attendant impact on Reckitt's sales of Enfamil and Reckitt's exposure to legal claims; and (3) as a result of the above, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. For more information on the Reckitt Bensicker class action go to: Tempus AI, Inc. (NASDAQ: TEM) Class Period: August 6, 2024, and May 27, 2025 Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 11, 2025 According to the complaint, defendants failed to disclose: (1) Tempus inflated the value of contract agreements, many of which were with related parties, included non-binding opt-ins and/or were self-funded; (2) the credibility and substance of the joint venture with SoftBank was at risk because it gave the appearance of 'round-tripping' capital to create revenue for Tempus; (3) Tempus-acquired Ambry had a business model based on aggressive and potentially unethical billing practices that risked scrutiny and unsustainability; (4) AstraZeneca had reduced its financial commitments to Tempus through a questionable 'pass-through payment' via a joint agreement between it, the Company and Pathos AI; and (5) the foregoing issues revealed weakness in core operations and revenue prospects. The complaint alleges that on May 28, 2025, Spruce Point Capital Management, LLC issued a report on Tempus that raised numerous red flags over Tempus' management, operations and financial reporting. The Spruce Point Report scrutinized Tempus on an array of issues, including: (1) defendant Eric Lefkofsky and his associates have a history cashing out of companies before public shareholders incur losses or lackluster returns; (2) Tempus' actual AI capabilities are overstated; (3) board members and other executives have been associated with troubled companies that restated financial results; (4) signs of aggressive accounting and financial reporting; (4) issues with the AstraZeneca and Pathos AI deal that merit scrutiny; and (5) the Company's recent financial guidance reveals weakness in core operations. On this news, the price of Tempus common stock fell $12.67 per share, or 19.23%, from a closing price of $65.87 per share on May 27, 2025, to a closing price of $53.20 per share on May 28, 2025. For more information on the Elevance class action go to: About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, Walker, Esq. Marion Passmore, Esq.(212) 355-4648 [email protected]
