Veterinarian Rana Preet Gill revives memories of the Ghadar movement in her new book
'I felt ashamed; I hail from Hoshiarpur, the same village as Bali in Punjab and hardly had any knowledge about the contribution of this Ghadar revolutionary,' she says.
After returning home, Rana Preet began researching and seamlessly it led her on a journey to write The Ghadar Movement: A Forgotten Struggle, published by Penguin Viking.
Several lesser-known revolutionaries of the Ghadar Movement find mention in the book, replete with rich anecdotes and in-depth research. 'I was intrigued by Ram Rakha, who went on a hunger strike and sacrificed his life. It aroused my curiosity about the Mandalay Conspiracy and I met many historians and gathered information. The research led me to the Ghadar Movement and the book was born out of my love for the martyrs. The library in Jalandhar, built by the Gadharites, is invaluable,' says Rana Preet.
There were few books on members of the Ghadar Party,including a few by Bhagat Singh. Rana Preet decided to make the stories accessible.
'A majority of the literature available is academic and out of bounds for common readers,' she says. Her experience of writing two novels earlier motivated her to attempt this complex subject. . It took Rana Preet five years to complete the manuscript.
The 38-chapter narrative, spanning 244 pages, is lucid, beginning with Bombay, Bengal, and Punjab under British Rule. It sets the tone with tales of bravery and transitions to the exodus of the Punjab peasantry to far-flung places including Burma, Malaya, Singapore, China, Iran, Egypt, and East Africa before exploring Canada and America. Stories about Sohan Singh Bhakna and Pandit Kanshi Ram are well constructed.
Rana Preet is at her best when writing about the revolutionaries in exile- Shyamaji Krishnavarma, who owned the India House at 9, Queen's Wood, Highgate; Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Madam Bhikaji Rustom Cama, Ramnath Puri, a bank clerk from Lahore; Taraknath Das, who went abroad to master the art of revolution; Guru Dutt Kumar, who operated from Canada; Pandurang Khankhoje and Abdul Hafiz Mohammed Barakatullah `Bhopali', who was proficient in Arabic, Persian, Urdu, Turkish, English, German and Japanese. Barakatullah travelled to England, America, Japan and was said to be a great advocate of Hindu-Muslim unity.
Rana Preet highlights the allure and appeal of studying abroad during those times. Jawala Singh Thatthiyan, a 'prosperous potato farmer' near California, was at the forefront, offering scholarships to meritorious students. The scholarships began in 1912 and provided a monthly stipend of $ 50 in addition to study materials and travel expenses.
The chapter on Lala Har Dayal, described as the Face of Ghadar, is one the most engaging. Inspired by the `Lion of Punjab', Lala Lajpat Rai, Lala Har Dayal left for England on a British Government scholarship in 1905 at the age of 21 and returned to India in 1908.
'After India attained independence, the Ghadar Party was officially disbanded. The premises on 5 Wood Street was handed over to the government of India marking the end of an era of revolution. But the spirit of Ghadar stayed alive. A living, breathing, formless, fiery spirit with a heart and soul,' says Rana Preet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Donald Trump wanted 90 trade deals in 90 days. How many has he cracked?
US President Donald Trump shocked many people twice – first by announcing tariffs on dozens of countries in April and then announcing a 90-day pause a week later. But now the July 9 deadline is approaching for nations to come to trade agreements with America. So, how many countries have signed trade deals with Trump? Which others are in progress? read more US President Donald Trump delivering remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington. Reuters US President Donald Trump shocked many in April when he announced the 'Liberation Day' tariffs on dozens of countries. Trump surprised many again when he, a week later, announced a 90-day pause on the tariffs in order to allow countries to negotiate bilateral trade deals. Trump had set a July 9 deadline for the nations to come to trade agreements with America. Top Trump officials had vowed to 'achieve 90 deals in 90 days'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But how many deals have actually materialised? Let's take a closer look: Done but… UK Despite his bluster, Trump has only managed to close a handful of deals – which critics have decried as small potatoes. The first is a pact with the United Kingdom signed last month. While Trump has touted this as a 'major trade deal', that would be greatly stretching the truth. This is in fact a 'mini-trade deal'. Trump has only signed an executive order reducing tariffs on certain British goods. This includes cutting a 25 per cent tariff on cars to 10 per cent for the first 100,000 vehicles. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump shake hands at the White House. File image/Reuters The tariffs on British steel and aluminium are yet to be finalised. Trump had also imposed tariffs on products made from steel and aluminium such as gym equipment, furniture and machinery. The countries are also yet to reach an agreement on tariffs on pharma. The UK has done away with a 20 per cent tariffs on US beef imports. It also allowed 1.4 billion litres of ethanol to be imported tariff-free. Ethanol shipments to the UK from the United States were earlier taxed at 19 per cent. China The second is a face-saving agreement with China. China and the US have also reached a limited agreement – mostly to try to take a step back from the escalating trade war. The two countries initially held talks in Geneva in May. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This came after China suspended exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets to the US in retaliation for Trump's tariffs. This allowed both countries to pause tariffs for 90 days while they tried to work out a larger deal. Trump in June claimed the United States had signed a deal with China but did not provide details. 'We just signed with China the other day,' Trump said at an event at the White House. China and the US have also reached a limited agreement – mostly to try to take a step back from the escalating trade war. A White House official claimed that the United States has reached an agreement with China on how to expedite rare earth shipments to the US during talks in London. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick too claimed the deal was 'signed and sealed'. However, he too did not provide any specific information. China merely said that the two countries have confirmed details on the framework of the Geneva trade talks. It said China would approve exports of controlled items but made no mention of rare earths. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Following the London talks, the teams from both sides have maintained close communication,' a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said. 'Recently, with approval, both sides further confirmed the details of the framework.' China 'will review and approve applications for the export control items that meet the requirements in accordance with the law', the statement said. Details about the deal remain scarce. It remains to be seen if the world's largest economies can hammer out a larger trade deal. Vietnam Trump also announced a trade deal with Vietnam on Thursday. Trump, taking to social media, claimed that under the 'Great Deal of Cooperation", the US would charge Vietnam 20 per cent on tariffs. The US would also levy a 40 per cent tariff on goods that pass through Vietnam – a process known as 'trans-shipping'. Vietnam, meanwhile, would have zero tariffs on US products. Vietnam under the deal would have zero tariffs on US products. Adam Sitkoff, executive director of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hanoi, told the BBC the deal puts Vietnam 'in a good position'. 'Companies that ship from [Vietnam] to the US are going to keep doing it', Siktoff added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, he said 'trans-shipping' is a 'a vague and often politicised term in trade enforcement' 'It's unclear how much illegal re-routing Vietnamese officials will even be able to catch, or how much exists', Sitkoff said. Work in progress India Trump and other top officials from both sides including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar have repeatedly expressed optimism that a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with India is close. Though the team from India led by chief negotiator Rajesh Aggarwal are huddled in intense discussions with US officials, key concerns remain. India, for example, wants to protect its dairy and agriculture industry. India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. File image/PTI For the unversed, India has never opened up its dairy industry to foreigners. The US, on the other hand, is desperate to open up a new market for its goods. Experts say that a UK-style limited trade deal is likely to be reached. Canada Negotiations between the US and Canada, which Trump has frequently dubbed the '51st state', temporarily broke down. This came after Trump in a huff claimed Canada's Digital Services Tax (DST) is a " direct and blatant attack' on the United States. 'We are hereby terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump wrote on social media. 'We will let Canada know the tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven-day period.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The talks are slated to be restarted after Canada announced it was scrapping the tax on US firms. This revenue, which Canada generates from its digital users, would have impacted companies such as Google, Amazon, Meta and Apple. The talks are slated to be restarted after Canada announced it was scrapping the tax on US firms. 'Rescinding the digital services tax will allow the negotiations of a new economic and security relationship with the United States to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians,' Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said in a statement. Canada says its expects to reach a deal with the US by July 21. Japan US officials including Trump had expressed optimism that a trade deal could be quickly and easily be reached with Japan. Indeed, Japan, an ally of the United States was one of the first countries to open negotiations with Trump on a possible trade deal. However, talks between the two countries seem to have hit a wall over automobiles – a key Japanese export on which the US has imposed a 25 per cent tariff. Trump is now also threatening a tariff on Japanese rice. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Japan, an ally of the United States was one of the first countries to open negotiations with Trump on a possible trade deal. 'I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our rice, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' Trump wrote on social media. 'We'll just be sending them a letter, and we love having them as a Trading Partner for many years to come.' He also falsely claimed that Japan does not buy both products from the United States. Japan, in fact, bought $298 million worth of rice and around 16,000 cars from the US. However, no deal with Tokyo appears imminent. Trump himself did not sound optimistic earlier this week. 'We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure if we're gonna make a deal, I doubt it, with Japan,' Trump said. 'They and others are so spoiled from having ripped us off for 30, 40 years that it's really hard for them to make a deal.' Japan earlier this week said talks are on. Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki was quoted as saying, 'Japan will continue to engage vigorously in sincere and honest discussions toward the realization of an agreement that will benefit both Japan and the United States.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How much will America have to pay for Trump's tariffs? Analysis shows Trump's tariffs will cost US employers a healthy chunk of change. The study by JPMorganChase Institute puts the price tag at $82.3 billion This would impact companies whose annual revenue is between $10 million and $1 billion – which employ nearly a third of private sector US workers. President Donald Trump talks to workers as he tours US teel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant. File image/AP This is even worse if the original tariffs Trump had announced had remained in place. In that instance, the companies would have faced an additional burden of $187.6 billion. This would equate to shelling out around $2,000 extra per employee – or around three per cent of their payroll. Employers won't be the only ones suffering. Another study from Goldman Sachs said companies will pass on at least 60 per cent of their tariff costs to the consumer. Trump's theatrics growing stale? To many people, Trump's theatrics on tariffs are growing stale. Some, in fact, say they had expected Trump to reach these broad frameworks with countries and then brand them as trade deals. 'I would expect the White House will announce some number of frameworks that it's going to call trade deals, but do not meet anyone's ordinary understanding of that term,' Tim Meyer, a professor at Duke University law school who specialises in international trade, told Bloomberg. Others say countries are already beginning to look away from the United States. Kristina Fong, an economic affairs researcher at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, said China will be the first port of call for many nations. 'It's a very slow burn kind of momentum, but that's always been, I think, the underlying case,' Fong told Time Magazine Meanwhile, Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is massively unpopular with the public. Polls from multiple organisations show the bill receiving net disapproval ratings ranging from minus 19 per cent to minus 29 per cent. Elon Musk and Donald Trump have been going at it over the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Reuters CNN's senior data analyst Harry Enten said the public thingks the bill is 'awful and horrible'. Enten said the more people learn about it, the more they hate it. Meanwhile, Trump's poll numbers are said to be sinking. A new poll shows Trump's approval and disapproval ratings are at 40 and 56 per cent respectively. This comes as an expert from Harvard said that data shows that young men aged 18 to 29 are starting to turn on Trump. These developments make sense given the fact that Trump, in fact, is hampered by one simple fact – he has no authority to sign off on major trade deals. That power, along with the purse strings, lies in the hands of US Congress – which seems to have abandoned its authority completely in the era of Trump. It remains to be seen if Trump can turn things around at this point.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves broke down in Parliament and what it means for PM Keir Starmer
It's not often you see politicians crying in public, certainly not on the floor of the House of Commons. But on Tuesday, UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves was seen wiping away tears during Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs), triggering a media and political firestorm. The dramatic scenes quickly became a talking point online, with critics and supporters weighing in. More tangibly, the British pound dropped by 1 per cent against the dollar amid speculation over Reeves' future. At the centre of the PMQs session was Prime Minister Keir Starmer's sudden U-turn on a central plank of its welfare reform bill, a move forced by a rebellion from nearly 50 Labour MPs. The reversal wiped out a multibillion-pound surplus and blew a £5 billion hole in Reeves' budget calculations, raising concerns she may have to hike taxes, something she has long resisted. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch seized on the chaos, suggesting Reeves was being used as a 'human shield' for Starmer's blunders. Badenoch also needled the visibly shaken Chancellor, saying she looked 'absolutely miserable', and questioned whether she would survive politically until the next election. Starmer refused to directly affirm Reeves' position, replying instead that Badenoch 'certainly won't' be in government, prompting further jabs and speculation. Rachel Reeves appeared to be crying on the Labour frontbench today. Sir Keir Starmer refused to guarantee her future as Chancellor during Prime Minister's Questions.#Politics #PMQ #Labour — Channel 5 News (@5_News) July 2, 2025 While Reeves' team chalked up the tears to a 'personal matter,' others speculated about a potential row with Starmer or Speaker Lindsay Hoyle, who reportedly chastised Reeves three times earlier for giving overly long answers. At one point during Treasury questions, Hoyle interrupted her again and she responded curtly, 'Oh, alright then.' Moments later, she was seen tearing up and clasping her sister MP Ellie Reeves' hand as the session ended. Reeves' office has refused to comment on the cause, citing privacy. The financial markets didn't wait for context. Sterling dipped 1 per cent against the dollar, ending a strong run. Bond yields jumped, echoing the panic of October 2022 when Liz Truss's mini-budget caused market chaos and led to her resignation. In the aftermath, Starmer backed Reeves, telling BBC Radio 4 she was doing 'an excellent job' and would remain in her position 'for a very long time to come.' 'This has nothing to do with politics,' he said. 'It was a personal matter for her, and I'm not going to intrude on her privacy.' Downing Street reinforced that message, insisting 'the chancellor is going nowhere.' (With Inputs from AP and Reuters)
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
British committed genocide against Aboriginal Australians inquiry
The indigenous population of the state of Victoria suffered near-complete physical destruction at the hands of colonists, a report has said British colonisers committed "genocide" against the Aboriginal people in the Australian state of Victoria after arriving in the area in the early 1830s, a commission investigating injustices against the indigenous population has said. The colonization of Victoria, Australia's second smallest state, located in the southeast of the country, took place between 1834 and 1851. During that period, its indigenous population suffered "near-complete physical destruction," falling from around 60,000 to 15,000, according to a report released on Tuesday by the Yoorrook Justice Commission. The crimes by the British in Victoria included "mass killings, disease, sexual violence, exclusion, linguicide [the death of languages], cultural erasure, environmental degradation, child removal, absorption and assimilation," it said. "This was genocide," the commission ruled after holding more than two months of public hearings and listening to accounts by over 1,300 Aboriginals. The report suggested some 100 recommendations in order to "redress" harm caused to the Aboriginals by "invasion and occupation," including paying reparations and granting Victoria's First Peoples' Assembly decision-making powers. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said in a statement that she welcomed the report and that her government would consider its findings. "Victoria's truth-telling process is a historic opportunity to hear the stories of our past that have been buried - these are stories that all Victorians need to hear," Allan stated. The head of the Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organization (VACCHO), Jill Gallagher, told ABC that "we do not blame anyone alive today for these atrocities," but stressed "it is the responsibility of those of us alive today to accept that truth." The Yoorrook Justice Commission was established in 2021, becoming the first of its kind in Australia. Similar formal "truth-telling" inquiries are currently taking place in other states. The Australian Museum said previously there were at least 270 massacres carried out by colonists against Aboriginal Australians between the late 18th and early 20th century "as part of a state-sanctioned and organized attempts to eradicate First Nations people." READ MORE: Brits fail to fix stranded F-35 stealth fighter in India media Due to those actions, the indigenous population in Australia declined from an estimated 1-1.5 million to less than 100,000 by the early 1900s, according to the museum. (
