logo
Jailed Russian Dissidents Call For Mass Prisoner Release As Part Of Ukraine Peace Deal

Jailed Russian Dissidents Call For Mass Prisoner Release As Part Of Ukraine Peace Deal

NDTVa day ago
London:
Eleven jailed Russian dissidents have written to world leaders appealing for a mass release of Russian political prisoners and Ukrainian civilians held by Russia - some 10,000 people in total, they say - as part of any peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv.
In the letter, published via Reuters, the dissidents said that alongside prisoners of war, thousands of Ukrainian civilian "hostages" were being held by Russia, mostly in Russian-held areas of Ukraine.
Talks in May and June on ending Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine made no progress towards a ceasefire, despite a pledge by U.S. President Donald Trump to end the war, but the two sides have exchanged captured soldiers and war dead.
"We call on both sides of the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine to immediately conduct an exchange of prisoners of war and civilians according to the formula 'all for all', including Ukrainian civilian hostages," the letter said.
Among the signatories was Alexei Gorinov, 63, who in 2022 became the first person to go to prison under laws passed shortly after the Ukraine invasion that made it a crime to spread "false information" about the armed forces.
The youngest to sign was Darya Kozyreva, 19, who was sentenced in April to two years and eight months in prison for using graffiti and 19th-century poetry to protest against the war in Ukraine.
They placed themselves alongside thousands of Ukrainians who, according to human rights groups, have been detained by Russia, mostly in Russian-controlled regions of Ukraine.
"There are at least 10,000 of us - Russian political prisoners and Ukrainian civilian hostages. We are all punished for one thing - for taking a civic stance," they wrote. Moscow has not commented on the alleged figure.
The dissidents called for "the immediate and unconditional release of sick political prisoners who are dying in Russian prisons" in their statement, which was backed by a message from Russian Nobel Peace Prize winner Dmitry Muratov.
Muratov's message and the letter urged leaders in Russia, Ukraine, the European Union, the United States and elsewhere to act.
RUSSIA'S PEACE TERMS
At the peace talks in Istanbul last month, Russia handed Ukraine a memorandum proposing "a mutual amnesty of 'political prisoners' and release of detained civilians" as a possible condition for a ceasefire in the three-and-a-half-year conflict.
Asked about the status of the proposal and how many people it would cover, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday: "We don't publicly discuss the... content of the memorandum, which we haven't even discussed with the Ukrainian side yet. We believe that discussion through the media can only harm the process."
The proposal was part of a wider package of Russian demands that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy described as an ultimatum. They include a halt to all Ukrainian troop movements except for withdrawals, and end to call-ups, foreign weapons supplies and martial law as well as the holding of new presidential and parliamentary elections.
No date has yet been set for further talks.
Describing their experience, the dissidents wrote: "The concepts of justice and fairness are absent in Russia today; anyone who dares to think critically can end up behind bars."
Defendants in political cases had no chance of a fair hearing and were never acquitted, they said. Once in prison, their lives were in danger and they were at risk of denunciations from other inmates - something that led, in Gorinov's case, to an additional three-year sentence.
The other signatories were sociologist Boris Kagarlitsky, self-described anarchist Azat Miftakhov, poet Artem Kamardin and activists Anna Arkhipova, Vladimir Domnin, Dmitry Pchelintsev, Andrei Trofimov, Ilya Shakursky and Alexander Shestun.
The Kremlin says cases are a matter for the courts and the prison service and Russia needs to apply its laws firmly to deter what it sees as subversive, Western-backed activity.
Elena Filina, an exiled opposition politician who helped gather the signatures from inmates scattered across Russia's vast penal system, told Reuters the prisoners felt the peace talks may provide their last chance to be free.
"If peace agreements are signed without taking into account their amnesty, exchange or any other way of release, the window of opportunity will slam shut for a long time."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bangladeshi Islamist Leader Vows To Follow Taliban Model If Voted To Power: 'Will Introduce...'
Bangladeshi Islamist Leader Vows To Follow Taliban Model If Voted To Power: 'Will Introduce...'

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Bangladeshi Islamist Leader Vows To Follow Taliban Model If Voted To Power: 'Will Introduce...'

Faizul Karim vowed to model Bangladesh's governance on Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, sparking backlash from Awami League. Mufti Syed Muhammad Faizul Karim, leader of the Islamist group Jamaat–Char Monai and chief of Islami Andolan Bangladesh, declared that if his party forms the next government, it will model Bangladesh's governance on Taliban-controlled Afghanistan and implement nationwide Sharia law. In an interview, Karim said, 'If government is formed by winning the national election, the Islamic Movement Bangladesh will introduce Sharia law in the country." 'The current governance system of Afghanistan will be followed," he added. Karim went on to assert that his party's interpretation of Islamic governance would also draw elements from Iran, as he said, 'If needed, we will follow Iran's model too. We will take what is good from anywhere in the world- America, England, Russia- as long as it does not contradict Sharia." The remarks sparked sharp backlash from Bangladesh's ruling Awami League, which accused the Jamaat–Char Monai alliance of openly laying out a blueprint for transforming the secular democracy into a religious state governed by rigid Islamic law. Calling the interview 'chilling", the Awami League issued a statement warning of a coordinated agenda by Islamist factions to dismantle democratic norms, enforce religious codes and suppress women's and minority rights. The party pointed to a rise in sectarian violence, including attacks on Hindu temples, disruptions of religious ceremonies and increasing threats against women. It blamed the Yunus-led interim government for failing to curb what it called 'unchecked extremism" since Sheikh Hasina's removal from office in August last year. Karim, however, remained unapologetic about his vision, asserting, 'We are not talking about violence. We are talking about a system based on the Quran and Hadith. And if the people vote for it, then it is their choice." He also claimed that his party would not immediately dismantle the current state apparatus, saying, 'We will implement Sharia law step by step. What does not conflict with Islam- we will keep. What does- we will change." First Published: July 04, 2025, 21:17 IST

Trump hated his Colorado portrait — the new one just dropped and people are losing it online
Trump hated his Colorado portrait — the new one just dropped and people are losing it online

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump hated his Colorado portrait — the new one just dropped and people are losing it online

Donald Trump was not a fan of the portrait of himself that hangs in Colorado's State Capitol, and he made sure everyone knew. After years of complaints, the artwork has finally been replaced. However, if the goal was to create a more accurate likeness, public reaction indicates that the jury is still out. Why was Donald Trump unhappy with the first portrait? After Donald Trump complained that his portrait in the Colorado State Capitol was "distorted," lawmakers replaced it with a new one. The new portrait, painted by Vanessa Horabuena and donated by the White House, is eliciting laughs and memes online, with some claiming it is just as bizarre as the previous one. Who painted the older version? Legislators in Colorado learned of this earlier this year when Trump complained that a portrait of himself on display in the state capitol for almost six years was "purposefully distorted." Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:-:- Loaded : 0% 0:00:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - -:-:- 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo The portrait's painter, Sarah Boardman, claimed to have "completed the portrait accurately, without 'purposeful distortion,' political bias, or any attempt to caricature the subject, actual or implied," but her views were dismissed, as per a report by BuzzFeed. It appears that the lawmakers' complaints were successful because they promptly declared that Boardman's portrait would be taken down and replaced with one that more closely matched the president's preferences. Live Events How are people reacting online? With the beard and purported "guyliner" removed, Trump's previous portrait made him look like JD Vance, but the new one makes him look like Keith Morrison from NBC Dateline. Since art is subjective, many people's opinions of the new portrait varied. ALSO READ: Orlando Bloom desperate to win Katy Perry back after split, insider reveals One wrote on X, 'The new Trump portrait is beautiful.' 🗣 Trump happy with his new portrait The Colorado State Capitol replaced the painting he whined was 'distorted' with a new one. So… which one looks more distorted to you? — brane mijatovic (@brane_mija64426) July 1, 2025 A terrible portrait replaced by a cartoon. Trump's 'Worst' Portrait Ever Replaced With One Donated by White House — ken benson Shah of Greater Idaho🤠🏁 (@borntoraisehogs) July 2, 2025 Another user tweeted, 'Trump happy with his new portrait The Colorado State Capitol replaced the painting he whined was 'distorted' with a new one. So… which one looks more distorted to you?' Another one mocked on X, 'The Colorado State Capitol replaced Trump's another terrible Trump portrait. Bold choice.' The Colorado State Capitol replaced Trump's another terrible Trump portrait. Bold choice. — Gabe Sanchez (@iamgabesanchez) July 2, 2025 The new Trump portrait is beautiful. — Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) July 1, 2025 FAQs Why was Donald Trump's previous portrait replaced in Colorado? Donald Trump claimed that the first portrait made him appear distorted. Despite the artist's denial of bias, state lawmakers removed it and replaced it with a more suitable version. What are people saying about Donald Trump's new portrait? Online reactions have been mixed and hilarious. Some say it resembles Dateline's Keith Morrison, while others joke that it's just another bad Trump portrait. Regardless, it's gone viral.

Inside Trump's ‘Big beautiful bill': Tax cuts for the rich, medicaid and meals cut for poor Americans
Inside Trump's ‘Big beautiful bill': Tax cuts for the rich, medicaid and meals cut for poor Americans

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Inside Trump's ‘Big beautiful bill': Tax cuts for the rich, medicaid and meals cut for poor Americans

Debt burden to fall hardest on America's youth Medicaid faces historic rollback Experts warn of over 51,000 deaths and closed clinics Live Events Poor families and food aid hit hard Green energy sector braces for big cuts Students face heavier loan burden Billionaires gain as tax code tilts Republican rifts widen before final house showdown (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Donald Trump's flagship tax and spending package has scraped through the US Senate after a tense overnight session, with Vice-President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. As news reached Trump during his Florida Everglades visit, the president shrugged off doubts. 'It's a great bill,' he said. 'There is something for everyone.' But behind the scenes, some Republicans remain from the Congressional Budget Office show the bill adds about $3 trillion to national debt in a decade. Interest payments alone could surge between $600 and $700 billion a year. That means today's young Americans are likely to bear the weight through higher taxes and deep cuts to schools, housing, and roads. Ron Bonjean, a Republican strategist, put it bluntly: 'They're going to have to sell this to the American people, because most people, most voters, are just becoming aware of this.'Medicaid — America's health lifeline for millions — is on the chopping block. The Senate plan carves out over $1 trillion in cuts, which could strip cover from nearly 12 million low-income people. Senator Susan Collins said, 'My vote against this bill stems primarily from the harmful impact it will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural healthcare providers like our hospitals and nursing homes.'Senator Thom Tillis asked, 'What do I tell 663,000 people in two years, three years, when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there anymore?'Researchers from Yale, Harvard and Penn estimate more than 51,000 extra deaths each year could follow the cuts. Nursing home rules would be delayed by a decade, risking another 13,000 lives yearly. 'Each year, the legislation would kill 51,000 Americans,' Yale's study found. Hospitals, rural clinics and care homes could close as states slash budgets to rules force adults to work 80 hours monthly to keep food stamps unless they have a young child. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program faces a $300 billion cut. Millions of children risk losing free school meals. Veterans, homeless people and foster youth must also meet tougher rules. Many states will have to pick up the extra and solar farms face fresh penalties unless they follow strict sourcing rules from 2027. But with China dominating green supply chains, many firms say the targets are impossible. Funds for home-energy upgrades, electric vehicles and even tax breaks for bicycle commuters would vanish under Trump's bill scraps billions in support for university loans. Average borrowers could pay an extra $2,929 a year. Nurses, doctors and teachers hoping for debt relief might see their forgiveness programmes vanish, trapping them in debt for decades. Meanwhile, Trump's promise to cut taxes on Social Security payments is missing. His 'no tax on tips' pledge only applies through a narrow loophole — experts say the rich may game the wealthy, the bill locks in Trump's first-term tax breaks and adds new ones. The richest 0.1 per cent stand to pocket $296,160 a year. The bottom fifth of households? Just $160. Elon Musk slammed it on X: 'All I'm asking is that we don't bankrupt America.' Trump shot back, threatening to cut subsidies to Musk's businesses and even mused about deporting him: 'We'll take a look.'Trump now faces a narrow path in the House. Several Republicans want changes. Marlin Stutzman wrote: 'The changes the Senate made to the House passed Beautiful Bill, including unacceptable increases to the national debt and the deficit, are going to make passage in the House difficult.'Speaker Mike Johnson remains defiant. 'My objective and my responsibility is to get that bill over the line,' he said. But Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer offered a warning: 'On the Republican side, when the bill passed, there was a bit of sombreness that I don't think was expected. And that's because they knew deep in their hearts how bad this bill is for them, their states and the Republican party.'For now, Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' teeters on a knife-edge. The deadline: July 4.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store