
SA's electricity price is soaring: Why protests are often the only way for people to be heard
Millions of unemployed South Africans, many of whom survive on a Social Relief of Distress Grant government grant of R370 (about US$21) per month, are not able to pay for electricity and still afford food and shelter.
In the working class community of Thembisa in South Africa's industrial heartland of Gauteng, the local government recently tried to make all families pay a fixed monthly fee of R126 (US$7) for electricity.
But the residents could not afford this and in late July, occupied roads and shut down the area.
Within a day, the mayor scrapped the electricity fee.
Luke Sinwell, a scholar of popular history and grassroots mobilisation in South Africa, explains how protests might just be the only way for working class South Africans to make their voices heard.
Is electricity affordable in South Africa?
No. Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation.
It is also crucial to view electricity prices in a socio-economic context.
For example, the cost of electricity needs to be assessed relative to the disposable income of the household buying it.
Low-income families spend up to twenty percent of their household income on energy, making electricity very unaffordable.
ALSO READ: Thembisa protest raises risk of national unrest
About half of all South African households (approximately 15 million people) don't have nearly enough food to eat.
This means that the heads of impoverished or working class households (mostly women of Colour) are forced to decide between putting ideally nutritious food on the table and lighting their houses at night.
They're forced to choose between using energy for heating to keep warm during winter or ensuring that their limited fresh food supplies stay cold so that they do not spoil.
I'm part of a group of researchers who use the term energy racism to describe the systemic oppression that prevents Black working class people from accessing the electricity they need to survive and prosper.
South Africans have been protesting for decades about high electricity prices. Why hasn't the problem been solved?
There are weaknesses in South Africa's democratic process.
Municipalities (local government) responses to the concerns and demands of communities tend to be shortsighted and inadequate.
Currently, the major political parties in South Africa focus mainly on obtaining consensus at the polls through elections every five years.
The South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, is overseeing a 'National Dialogue' which he claims will allow the voices of ordinary people to be heard in the corridors of power.
It's been designed to appear as an inclusive and democratic process.
However, based on my previous research, I believe that hidden beneath the surface, government has largely already decided the agenda and a set of policies that the dialogue will recommend.
The South African government is continuing to rely on market-oriented, neoliberal policies which serve profit at the expense of the working class.
READ MORE: Experts warn of unintended consequences of giving in to Thembisa demands
This guarantees that electricity prices will remain extremely high. It also means that the government will continue to lack interest in proactively engaging those very communities about the cost of electricity.
It is useful to remember what happened in September 2011 in Thembisa.
About 2 000 residents went to the streets to protest against electricity cuts.
Schools were closed, at least 100 residents arrested for public violence, and rubber bullets fired at protestors by police.
When the residents of Thembisa shut down their area again recently, the mayor, undoubtedly aware of this history, wanted to avoid a similar situation.
This gave residents an advantage – they were aware that protests would jolt the authorities into a favourable response.
This means that when local government does not take the initiative to discuss important matters like the price of electricity with residents, communities will inevitably create their own formations through which to mobilise and influence local politics and beyond.
How effective are protests against high prices of basic services?
Protests are often an immediate response to desperate communities faced with an acute economic crisis.
The recent protest in Thembisa is also part of a broader trend of protests and collective action around the lack of electricity in townships and informal settlements in other parts of Gauteng.
For example, my research over six years in the informal settlement of Thembelihle in the south west of Johannesburg, found that people burned to death in their shacks because local government had failed to provide electricity.
Residents had no alternative but to rely on imbawula (a homemade brazier).
This was coal and wood in an oven or tin connected to a makeshift pipe to let smoke out. Many shacks caught fire as a result.
They negotiated with authorities for more than 10 years.
READ MORE: Traffic delays after residents shut down Thembisa over electricity tariff hike [VIDEO]
Still, Thembelihle residents had no effective way to access the levers of decision-making authority which could electrify their homes.
So they accessed power on their own terms, forcing authorities to the negotiating table using protest.
Following a three-week occupation in 2015, the government conceded to the basic demands to formally electrify a relatively small piece of land where they lived.
A sizeable amount of R323 million would electrify 7000 homes.
The politics of a community struggle which had once been criminalised and excluded from the halls of power was now enshrined in policy.
What does the recent Thembisa electricity price protest tell us?
It demonstrates that the most effective way for people to get the government to implement pro-poor decisions is not by voting or attending national dialogues hosted by presidents and parliamentarians.
It is by organising in communities and engaging in mass actions which force those in power to concede to the people's demands.
The recent protest also tells us that impoverished and working class residents cannot and should not be forced to pay more than they can afford for basic services.
READ MORE: Land invaders erecting shacks dispersed with rubber bullets and stun grenades near Makhanda
The municipality held Integrated Development Plan and budget meetings with residents a few months before the protests where they revealed the new electricity prices.
But these meetings did not seem to acknowledge that the people of Thembisa could not afford to pay.
The mayoral decision to suspend the new electricity charges in Thembisa demonstrates that when basic services fail communities, protests work.
They also just might be the only reliable means by which ordinary people can access the levers of government policy.
This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
36 minutes ago
- IOL News
News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on August 4, 2025
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has expressed its support for the newly established Ad Hoc Committee in the South African National Assembly, tasked with investigating serious allegations of corruption, criminal syndicate infiltration, and political interference within the country's law enforcement agencies. Good evening, IOL News family! It's Monday, August 4, 2025, and it's time for a wrap of the biggest headlines making waves in South Africa and beyond. Don't forget to join the IOL WhatsApp Channel to stay in tune, informed, and in the know. EFF welcomes Parliamentary Committee to investigate corruption and infiltration in law enforcement The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has expressed its support for the newly established Ad Hoc Committee in the South African National Assembly, tasked with investigating serious allegations of corruption, criminal syndicate infiltration, and political interference within the country's law enforcement agencies. To read on, click here. Ramaphosa admits SA is reeling from US tariffs, but insists it is not alone President Cyril Ramaphosa has conceded that South Africa is grappling with the United States' decision to impose a 30% tariff on local imports, but insists the country is not alone in facing mounting global trade challenges. To read on, click here. JMPD officer sentenced to six years for car crash that claimed three lives A Johannesburg Metro Police Department (JMP) police officer has been sentenced to six years in prison for three counts of culpable homicide by the Lenasia Magistrate Court. To read on, click here. MK Party condemns ConCourt's dismissal of court challenge against Ramaphosa The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party has voiced its strong condemnation of the Constitutional Court's recent decision to dismiss a critical challenge against President Cyril Ramaphosa's actions, asserting that the judiciary has failed to hold the head of state accountable for what the party describes as 'flagrant constitutional violations.' To read on, click here. Do you owe SARS? Easy ways to check your tax debt in 2025 Tax season is still in full swing, and while many South Africans are expecting refunds, others may be shocked to discover they owe the South African Revenue Service (SARS) some money. To read on, click here. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News

IOL News
36 minutes ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa says South Africa will engage US over new tariffs as trade challenges loom
President Cyril Ramaphosa reiterated that South Africa's trade relations with the US have historically been complementary in nature. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers Banele Ginidza President Cyril Ramaphosa has underscored the country's commitment to maintaining market access in the face of the United States' recent decision to impose a 30% tariff on South African imports. This significant shift in trade policy highlights the urgency for South Africa to navigate increasingly turbulent international trade waters and adapt its export strategies. In his latest newsletter on Monday, Ramaphosa articulated a dual approach: not only will the government engage with the US to ensure mutually beneficial trade relations, but it will also accelerate the diversification of its export markets by boosting intra-African trade. Recognising the US as South Africa's third-largest trading partner, Ramaphosa acknowledged the measure's potential to disrupt industries heavily dependent on exports to the US, thereby affecting thousands of jobs and the country's fiscal stability. "Our foremost priority is protecting our export industries. As government, we have been engaging the United States to enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations. All channels of communication remain open to engage with the US," Ramaphosa said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Last month, US President Donald Trump said the sweeping tariffs will apply to 'any and all South African products sent into the United States,' and were being imposed outside of any sectoral trade deals. In a letter dated July 7, Trump said the move was 'necessary to correct the many years of South Africa's Tariff, and Non Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers,' blaming Pretoria for what he called 'unsustainable Trade Deficits against the United States.' However, Ramaphosa reiterated that South Africa's trade relations with the US have historically been complementary in nature. He said South African exports did not compete with US producers and did not pose a threat to US industry. "Largely, our exports are inputs into US industries and therefore support the United States' industrial base. South Africa is also the biggest investor from the African continent into the US, with 22 of our companies investing in a number of sectors including, mining, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and the food chain," he said. "South African imports ultimately benefit US consumers in terms of both choice and cost. By way of example, citrus production is counter-seasonal and does not pose a threat to US production. "Furthermore, production by US companies has been on the decline for a number of years as yhe US sector grapples with low yields, citrus greening disease, and other factors unrelated to competition from imports. Imports from South Africa, the world's second largest citrus exporter, have filled a gap and contributed to stable supply and prices for US consumers."

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa handed an MK Party ultimatum over his handling of the police minister saga
MK Party president Jacob Zuma says the country cannot afford two ministers in one portfolio. Image: Independent Media IN ACCUSING accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of of violating his oath of office and failing to uphold the Constitution, the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) said South African taxpayers cannot afford to pay for two ministers in one portfolio. This was after Ramaphosa placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave and appointed Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister. In light of their assertions, the MKP's leader, Jacob Zuma, gave Ramaphosa until 10am on Friday to resign. In a letter sent yesterday, Zuma said he will take action against Ramaphosa if he failed to adhere to the demand. Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya confirmed receipt of the letter. 'The legal team will deal with that letter,' he said. The letter penned by KMNS attorneys, Zuma's representatives, came after the Constitutional Court dismissed the MKP's application, last week, to have a direct access to challenge Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on a leave, appointing Cachalia and establishing a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the corruption allegations in the SAPS and judiciary. 'Various reasons have been offered in respect of the decisions which were impugned by our client and uMkhonto weSizwe Party in the Constitutional Court which found that it lacked exclusive jurisdiction and/or has no basis to grant the requested direct access. "As a result, our client has or sought urgent advice on possibly taking the relevant dispute(s) to the High Court and/or any other appropriate forum. It is assumed that you stand by the reasons previously given for the decisions announced on 13 July 2025,' read the letter. The MKP's spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, said: ' The judges did not want to take a decision knowing exactly that the MK Party has a strong case. By placing Mchunu on leave of absence and appointing Cachalia as an acting police minister, the country is having two ministers of police. Both ministers are acting.' Zuma, who said he was a concerned citizen, a voter and a former President, also demanded the date and time when Ramaphosa decided to place Mchunu on leave of absence and the decision to appoint Cachalia as acting police minister, as well as their current positions. 'When exactly (date and time) was your decision to place Minister Mchunu on leave of absence taken? When exactly (date and time ) was your decision to appoint Professor Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police (was) taken, communicated to him and to the public? 'What exactly is a 'Minister Designate', from a constitutional point of view? Immediately after the swearing-in ceremony (i.e. from around 9:30am on 1 August 2025), what was the exact correct description of Professor Cachalia? Was he a minister, acting minister or minister designate? What is the present, correct, full and official description of Mr. Senzo Mchunu? If the answers are the same, for how long is it envisaged that South Africa will have and pay for two Ministers of Police at the same time?' Zuma asks in the letter. He also wanted to know Ramaphosa's reasons for not dismissing Mchunu based on the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police boss Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, that Mchunu had ties to criminal gangs and meddled in police investigations into politically motivated murders. He said irrespective of the answers Ramaphosa might give, his conduct to place Mchunu on leave and appoint Cachalia remain illegal, irrational and unconstitutional. 'Due to the obvious urgency and importance of the issues raised above, these demands must be fulfilled immediately but by no later than 10h00 on Friday, August 8, 2025, failing which all our client's rights are reserved, including the right to urgently approach the courts for appropriate relief, without any further notice to you.' [email protected]