Israel-Iran war highlights Asia's dependence on Middle East oil, and slow progress on clean energy
HANOI, Vietnam (AP) — Asia's dependence on Middle East oil and gas — and its relatively slow shift to clean energy — make it vulnerable to disruptions in shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic weakness highlighted by the war between Israel and Iran.
Iran sits on the strait, which handles about 20% of shipments of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas, or LNG. Four countries — China, India, Japan and South Korea — account for 75% of those imports.
Japan and South Korea face the highest risk, according to analysis by the research group Zero Carbon Analytics, followed by India and China. All have been slow to scale up use of renewable energy.
In 2023, renewables made up just 9% of South Korea's power mix — well below the 33% average among other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. In the same year, Japan relied more heavily on fossil fuels than any other country in the Group of Seven, or G7.
A truce in the 12-day Israel-Iran war appeared to be holding, reducing the potential for trouble for now. But experts say the only way to counter lingering uncertainty is to scale back reliance on imported fossil fuels and accelerate Asia's shift to clean, domestic energy sources.
'These are very real risks that countries should be alive to — and should be thinking about in terms of their energy and economic security,' said Murray Worthy, a research analyst at Zero Carbon Analytics.
Japan and South Korea are vulnerable
China and India are the biggest buyers of oil and LNG passing through the potential chokepoint at the Strait of Hormuz, but Japan and South Korea are more vulnerable.
Japan depends on imported fossil fuels for 87% of its total energy use and South Korea imports 81%. China relies on only 20% and India 35%, according to Ember, an independent global energy think tank that promotes clean energy.
'When you bring that together — the share of energy coming through the strait and how much oil and gas they rely on — that's where you see Japan really rise to the top in terms of vulnerability,' said Worthy.
Three-quarters of Japan's oil imports and more than 70% of South Korea's oil imports — along with a fifth of its LNG — pass through the strait, said Sam Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Both countries have focused more on diversifying fossil fuel sources than on shifting to clean energy.
Japan still plans to get 30-40% of its energy from fossil fuels by 2040. It's building new LNG plants and replacing old ones. South Korea plans to get 25.1% of its electricity from LNG by 2030, down from 28% today, and reduce it further to 10.6% by 2038.
To meet their 2050 targets for net-zero carbon emissions, both countries must dramatically ramp up use of solar and wind power. That means adding about 9 gigawatts of solar power each year through 2030, according to the thinktank Agora Energiewende. Japan also needs an extra 5 gigawatts of wind annually, and South Korea about 6 gigawatts.
Japan's energy policies are inconsistent. It still subsidizes gasoline and diesel, aims to increase its LNG imports and supports oil and gas projects overseas. Offshore wind is hampered by regulatory barriers. Japan has climate goals, but hasn't set firm deadlines for cutting power industry emissions.
'Has Japan done enough? No, they haven't. And what they do is not really the best,' said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy, citing Japan's program to increase use of hydrogen fuel made from natural gas.
South Korea's low electricity rates hinder the profitability of solar and wind projects, discouraging investment, a 'key factor' limiting renewables, said Kwanghee Yeom of Agora Energiewende. He said fair pricing, stronger policy support and other reforms would help speed up adoption of clean energy.
China and India have done more — but gaps remain
China and India have moved to shield themselves from shocks from changing global energy prices or trade disruptions.
China led global growth in wind and solar in 2024, with generating capacity rising 45% and 18%, respectively. It has also boosted domestic gas output even as its reserves have dwindled.
By making more electricity at home from clean sources and producing more gas domestically, China has managed to reduce imports of LNG, though it still is the world's largest oil importer, with about half of the more than 11 million barrels per day that it brings in coming from the Middle East. Russia and Malaysia are other major suppliers.
India relies heavily on coal and aims to boost coal production by around 42% from now to 2030. But its use of renewables is growing faster, with 30 additional gigawatts of clean power coming online last year, enough to power nearly 18 million Indian homes.
By diversifying its suppliers with more imports from the U.S., Russia and other countries in the Middle East, it has somewhat reduced its risk, said Vibhuti Garg of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
'But India still needs a huge push on renewables if it wants to be truly energy secure,' she said.
Risks for the rest of Asia
A blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could affect other Asian countries, and building up their renewable power generating capacity will be a 'crucial hedge' against the volatility intrinsic to importing oil and gas, said Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis
Southeast Asia has become a net oil importer as demand in Malaysia and Indonesia has outstripped supplies, according to the ASEAN Centre for Energy in Jakarta, Indonesia. The 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations still exports more LNG than it imports due to production by Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Myanmar. But rising demand means the region will become a net LNG importer by 2032, according to consulting firm Wood Mackenzie.
Use of renewable energy is not keeping up with rising demand and production of oil and gas is faltering as older fields run dry.
The International Energy Agency has warned that ASEAN's oil import costs could rise from $130 billion in 2024 to over $200 billion by 2050 if stronger clean energy policies are not enacted.
'Clean energy is not just an imperative for the climate — it's an imperative for national energy security,' said Reynolds.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nike stock price: Why shares are rising despite the shoe giant's revenue decline and serious tariff warning
Shares in Nike, Inc. (NYSE: NKE) are trading much higher this morning after the company announced its Q4 2025 results. Yet those results saw Nike post some of its worst earnings in a while, along with a warning that President Trump's tariffs would cost the company $1 billion in the near term. He was buried in a mushroom casket. Soon he'll be part of the soil CEO of an $11 billion builder empire warns that these housing markets face a short-term oversupply Lifting the veil on the critical—and oft-times overlooked—factors driving AI growth Here's what you need to know about Nike's latest earnings and why the stock is up. Yesterday, the iconic shoemaker announced its Q4 2025 and full-year fiscal 2025 earnings. The results weren't great. For fiscal 2025, Nike reported full-year revenues of $46.3 billion—a 10% decline from fiscal 2024. The company's Q4 2025 revenues totaled $11.1 billion—down 12% from the same quarter a year earlier. The company also posted an earnings per share of 14 cents for its Q4. That EPS was down significantly from the 99 cents the company posted in the same quarter a year earlier. However, perhaps most alarming was the fact that Nike confirmed it would take a $1 billion hit in its current 2026 fiscal year due to the tariffs imposed by President Trump on countries worldwide. The two countries where Nike makes a significant amount of its goods are China and Vietnam. Earlier this year, Trump placed a 46% tariff on goods manufactured in Vietnam and a triple-digit rate on goods made in China. He later reduced both rates, temporarily, to 10% and 30% respectively. Still, Nike chief financial officer Matt Friend said on Nike's earnings call that the tariffs currently in place will result in a 'new and meaningful' cost to Nike, notes CNBC, adding that the company estimates that 'a gross incremental cost increase to Nike of approximately $1 billion.' You would think that Nike's warning of up to $1 billion in tariff-related costs and its pretty dismal Q4 results would send the stock down, not up. But NKE stock is currently up, and significantly, as of the time of the writing. In premarket trading, NKE shares are currently up over 10% to $68.85. There are a few likely reasons for this. First is that, while Nike's Q4 wasn't anything to write home about, the company actually came in above most Wall Street estimates. Analysts had expected Nike to have a pretty poor quarter already, and indeed, as noted by CNBC, Nike had previously said its Q4 would be the low point of its turnaround. This turnaround involves Nike's pivot to return its focus to athletes and shift away from its recent history of trying to cater to the wider 'lifestyle' segment of the population. The turnaround was initiated after Nike brought in a new CEO, Elliott Hill, last October. For its Q4, analysts had been expecting revenue of $10.72 billion and an EPS of 13 cents. So though Nike's Q4 results were disappointing, especially compared to earlier quarters, its actual revenue of $11.1 billion and adjusted EPS of 14 cents came in above expectations—something investors typically reward. But another reason the stock is likely rising in premarket trading is also related to that $1 billion hit Nike is expecting. Though the company says it expects the 10-figure hit this financial year, CFO Matt Friend also said Nike expects to 'fully mitigate' Trump's tariff costs over time. Nike will mitigate these tariff costs by using a three-pronged approach: adjusting its supply chain sources getting its suppliers to absorb some of the costs raising prices on U.S consumers later this year Despite Nike's 10% price surge this morning, shares in the company are still down significantly for the year. As of yesterday's close, Nike shares were sitting at $62.54—down more than 17% for the year. However, that was still significantly above its April lows of nearly $52 per share after President Trump unleashed his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on the world. Over the past 12 months, Nike's shares were down more than 33% as of yesterday's close. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Beijing confirms that it has signed a trade agreement with the US
The US and China have now signed a trade agreement, said China's Ministry of Commerce on Friday, bringing the two economies further into alignment after the threat of a major trade war. A released statement said that China would continue to approve export permits of controlled items, and that the US would "cancel a series of restrictive measures taken against China accordingly". The statement comes after US President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House late on Thursday that the two nations had reached an agreement. 'We just signed with China yesterday,' he said, offering no further details. Initial talks in Geneva in early May led both China and the US to postpone massive tariff hikes that were threatening to freeze much of the trade between the two countries. Later talks in London set a framework for negotiations, and the deal mentioned by Trump appeared to formalise that agreement. China announced earlier this week that it was speeding up export approvals of rare earths, materials used in high-tech products such as electric vehicles. Beijing's limits on exports of rare earths have been a key point of contention. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said on Thursday that Beijing was accelerating a review of export license applications for rare earths and had approved "a certain number of compliant applications." Related Trump says US has reached a trade deal with China US Steel buyout gives Trump a new power: What about future presidents? Export controls of the minerals apparently eclipsed tariffs in the latest round of trade negotiations between Beijing and Washington after China imposed permitting requirements on seven rare earth elements in April, threatening to disrupt production of cars, robots, wind turbines and other high-tech products in the US and around the world. The agreement struck in May in Geneva called for both sides to scale back punitive tariff hikes imposed as Trump escalated his trade war and sharply raised import duties. Some higher tariffs, such as those imposed by Washington related to the trade in fentanyl, as well as duties on aluminium and steel, remain in place. The rapidly shifting policies are taking a toll on both of the world's two largest economies. The US economy contracted at a 0.5% annual pace from January through March, partly because imports surged as companies and households rushed to buy foreign goods before Trump could impose tariffs on them. In China, factory profits sank more than 9% from a year earlier in May, with automakers suffering a large share of that drop. They fell more than 1% year-on-year in January to May. Trump and other US officials have indicated they expect to reach trade deals with many other countries, including India. "We're going to have deal after deal after deal," Lutnick said.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 5 Most Interesting Analyst Questions From Kulicke and Soffa's Q1 Earnings Call
Kulicke and Soffa's first quarter results fell short of Wall Street's expectations, with both revenue and adjusted earnings missing analyst estimates. The market responded negatively, reflecting investor concerns about ongoing volatility in the company's core semiconductor equipment markets. Management attributed the underperformance to customer hesitation in capital equipment spending, particularly in Southeast Asia's automotive and industrial sectors, a trend they linked to global trade uncertainty. CEO Fusen Chen described the quarter as impacted by 'hesitation and a more defensive capacity planning approach,' noting that the company's restructuring efforts, including the discontinuation of its electronics assembly equipment business, contributed to near-term margin pressure. Is now the time to buy KLIC? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $162 million vs analyst estimates of $165.1 million (5.9% year-on-year decline, 1.9% miss) Adjusted EPS: -$0.52 vs analyst estimates of $0.19 (significant miss) Adjusted EBITDA: -$22.37 million vs analyst estimates of $8.85 million (-13.8% margin, significant miss) Revenue Guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $145 million at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $188.8 million Adjusted EPS guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $0.05 at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $0.35 Operating Margin: -52.3%, up from -61.1% in the same quarter last year Inventory Days Outstanding: 171, down from 213 in the previous quarter Market Capitalization: $1.84 billion While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Krish Sankar (TD Cowen) asked about the drivers of the pronounced slowdown in Southeast Asia and whether the weakness was concentrated in general semiconductors or auto/industrial sectors. CEO Fusen Chen explained the majority of the sequential revenue decline was due to automotive uncertainty in Southeast Asia, but noted improved utilization in China and Taiwan. Tom Diffely (D.A. Davidson) inquired about the revenue run rate and profitability of the discontinued EA business. CFO Lester Wong clarified that EA contributed $25–30 million in annual revenue with modest gross profit and operating expenses, and provided details on expected wind-down costs. Charles Shi (Needham & Co.) questioned the regional divergence in order activity and the specifics of the company's fluxless thermo-compression bonding (TCB) capacity. Chen emphasized that capacity constraints in fluxless TCB are being addressed and that current growth targets remain intact. Craig Ellis (B. Riley Securities) asked whether elevated utilization rates could lead to a demand pull-forward, impacting future quarters. Wong replied that customers remain cautious due to tariff uncertainty, and the company does not expect a subsequent drop in utilization rates. Dave Duley (Steelhead Securities) sought clarification on utilization rates and the company's exposure to future DRAM opportunities. Wong noted utilization in China and Taiwan exceeds 80%, while Chen outlined plans to increase exposure to DRAM and high-bandwidth memory markets in 2026. In the coming quarters, the StockStory team will closely monitor (1) the pace at which elevated utilization rates in China and Taiwan lead to new capacity purchases as trade policy uncertainty resolves, (2) the progress and customer adoption of recently launched advanced packaging products such as ATPremier MEM Plus and Sonotrode-enabled pin welding systems, and (3) the company's execution on winding down the electronics assembly equipment business and managing associated costs. Additionally, we will watch for signs of renewed order activity in Southeast Asia's automotive and industrial markets as macro conditions evolve. Kulicke and Soffa currently trades at $37.14, up from $31.74 just before the earnings. In the wake of this quarter, is it a buy or sell? See for yourself in our full research report (it's free). The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025. While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.