Tom Girardi's son-in-law pleads guilty in Chicago case, lawyer says
Lira pleaded guilty to one criminal contempt charge before U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland in Chicago, his lawyer Damon Cheronis told Reuters. Prosecutors are dropping the remaining charges, and sentencing has been set for October, Cheronis said.
Federal prosecutors in Chicago had accused Lira, Girardi and Christopher Kamon, the former chief financial officer of their law firm Girardi Keese, of misappropriating more than $3 million in client funds owed to families of the victims of the 2018 Boeing 737 MAX Lion Air Flight 610 crash in Indonesia. The crash killed all 189 onboard.
Lira had initially pleaded not guilty to charges of wire fraud, criminal contempt, and making false statements to a judge in connection with the Lion Air case. A trial is set for July 2025.
"As stated in the plea agreement, Mr. Lira continually asked Mr. Girardi to pay these clients their rightful settlement money pursuant to the court order, however Girardi did not," Cheronis said in a statement. "Mr. Lira was also subject to that court order."
Lira's guilty plea comes two days after Girardi was sentenced to more than seven years in prison by a federal judge in Los Angeles after a jury convicted him on similar charges. Cheronis said Lira's plea change were not related to Girardi's sentencing.
Cheronis said the plea agreement did not assert any acts of fraud on Lira's part.
A spokesperson for the Chicago U.S. Attorney's Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Rowland last month dismissed the Chicago charges against Girardi, after prosecutors sought their dismissal in light of the then-pending California sentencing.
Kamon pleaded guilty to counts of wire fraud and was sentenced to more than 10 years in prison in the California case. He has agreed to plead guilty to the Lion Air charges at a hearing in Chicago federal court scheduled for next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
California village outraged over plans for plot of coastal land
A breathtaking California village has been left outraged after a 'crown jewel' plot of coastal land hit the market for $6.95 million - making residents feel they might never get to bask in its glory. The Albion Headlands - an iconic 84 acres of crashing waves , raw bluffs and hills off the Mendocino Coast - is now up for sale, giving its prospective buyer a chance to not just own it, but subdivide it into 16 residential parcels. The private beauty spot has long been known as a staple in Albion - about 15 miles outside of Fort Bragg - that has majestic and calming views. But now, if a wealthy buyer swoops in to take the land, locals fear they might never get to enjoy it for themselves. For Chris Skyhawk, a longtime Mendocino Coast resident, the view alone takes his breath away and gives him a feeling 'you can just feel in your soul when you sit up there and just get real quiet and look,' he told SFGATE. For him, redeveloping the Albion Highlands 'is about as popular as offshore oil drilling.' Despite Skyhawk's views, Justin Nadeau, the broker representing the listing, said he has made conservation a major point in the sale - so much so that he contacted the Mendocino Land Trust, local tribal leaders and a private contact he thinks would help protect the sacred land. 'The first party, Mendocino Land Trust, stepped up right away and they've made this public,' he told the outlet. 'My intentions of this is not just, "Hey let's get this great listing and sell off this beautiful chunk of land,' you know, to make a bunch of money",' Nadeau continued. In fact, Conrad Kramer, executive director of the Mendocino Land Trust, said the non-profit is actively trying to purchase the land so they can be the ones to give the community what it wants. 'Some very rich person or developer could still swoop in and grab it,' Kramer said. 'We think that that won't happen right away, and I'm knocking on wood here.' The land trust was founded in 1976 and helps protect thousands of acres of land along California's North Coast. Although the group usually helps out through conservation easements, Kramer said they have decided to throw all their eggs in one basket for the highlands. Kramer and the rest of the non-profit believe that purchasing the land is the only way it can be made open to the public. Unfortunately, there is only so much money they can offer. 'We have to get an appraisal done and we can't pay more than that appraised value,' Kramer explained. Personally, he believes the current asking price is 'considerably over the actual value,' so if the seller does not accept their number 'we might be out of luck.' 'We think that they'll come in and maybe cover half of the price of this property. And then the rest will have to come from somewhere else,' he added. Donations for the cause have already been made by the group's supporters, Kramer said, adding that they haven't launched an official campaign for it. In response to Skyhawk's comment on how the land sale was marketed, Nadeau clarified what he meant by the term 'reimagining.' 'When I talk about reimagining the future of the Albion Headlands, I'm actually talking about reimagining it in a way for the public to be there and use it. 'The current imagination of the property is houses and condos,' he explained. The realtor said he also took time to speak with locals who have lived in the area for about five to six decades. As he did so, he quickly noticed a pattern between them all - that 'they've never actually been out there [the highlands].' According to him, the listing has sparked frustrations about the lack of open space and public ownership. Because the Albion Headlands is considered private land, those who access it are technically trespassing, Tom Wodetzki, another longtime resident, told the outlet. 'Albion is about the only community on the coast that doesn't have its own headlands proper,' the environmental advocate said, pointing to other nearby towns - Little River, Mendocino, Fort Bragg, and Cleone - that all have public headland trails. 'People have not been able to go up there without trespassing,' Wodetzki said. Because of the land's restrictions, he thinks it's 'extra important for locals to get our way [that] we can go watch the sunset from the headlands.' Although Nadeau wants the land to be sold to someone who will put the interest of the community before their own, he said there is still a chance it could be snagged and built on, leaving it private. 'If a private individual decides, "Hey, I'm going to buy the property and I'm going to build a single house," the property is then basically lost to the public forever,' he said.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
AI firms ‘unprepared' for dangers of building human-level systems, report warns
Artificial intelligence companies are 'fundamentally unprepared' for the consequences of creating systems with human-level intellectual performance, according to a leading AI safety group. The Future of Life Institute (FLI) said none of the firms on its AI safety index scored higher than a D for 'existential safety planning'. One of the five reviewers of the FLI's report said that, despite aiming to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI), none of the companies scrutinised had 'anything like a coherent, actionable plan' to ensure the systems remained safe and controllable. AGI refers to a theoretical stage of AI development at which a system is capable of matching a human in carrying out any intellectual task. OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, has said its mission is to ensure AGI 'benefits all of humanity'. Safety campaigners have warned that AGI could pose an existential threat by evading human control and triggering a catastrophic event. The FLI's report said: 'The industry is fundamentally unprepared for its own stated goals. Companies claim they will achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI) within the decade, yet none scored above D in existential safety planning.' The index evaluates seven AI developers – Google DeepMind, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI and China's Zhipu AI and DeepSeek – across six areas including 'current harms' and 'existential safety'. Anthropic received the highest overall safety score with a C+, followed by OpenAI with a C and Google DeepMind with a C-. The FLI is a US-based non-profit that campaigns for safer use of cutting-edge technology and is able to operate independently due to an 'unconditional' donation from crypto entrepreneur Vitalik Buterin. SaferAI, another safety-focused non-profit, also released a report on Thursday warning that advanced AI companies have 'weak to very weak risk management practices' and labelled their current approach 'unacceptable'. The FLI safety grades were assigned and reviewed by a panel of AI experts, including British computer scientist Stuart Russell, and Sneha Revanur, founder of AI regulation campaign group Encode Justice. Max Tegmark, a co-founder of FLI and a professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it was 'pretty jarring' that cutting-edge AI firms were aiming to build super-intelligent systems without publishing plans to deal with the consequences. He said: 'It's as if someone is building a gigantic nuclear power plant in New York City and it is going to open next week – but there is no plan to prevent it having a meltdown.' Tegmark said the technology was continuing to outpace expectations, citing a previously held belief that experts would have decades to address the challenges of AGI. 'Now the companies themselves are saying it's a few years away,' he said. He added that progress in AI capabilities had been 'remarkable' since the global AI summit in Paris in February, with new models such as xAI's Grok 4, Google's Gemini 2.5, and its video generator Veo3, all showing improvements on their forebears. A Google DeepMind spokesperson said the reports did not take into account 'all of Google DeepMind's AI safety efforts'. They added: 'Our comprehensive approach to AI safety and security extends well beyond what's captured.' OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Zhipu AI and DeepSeek have also been approached for comment.
Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Reversing US immigration set to grab market attention
LONDON, July 17 (Reuters) - While markets have been obsessed with U.S. tariffs since April, they may gradually shift focus to an arguably bigger economic issue: worker shortages from halted immigration and rising deportations. Financial markets continue to be swayed by the Trump administration's often erratic tariff announcements, which is understandable given that these policies can affect the inflation outlook and the interest rate calculus. But tariffs aren't moving markets like they did three months ago, and that's partly because cause-and-effect is proving hard to nail down. A case in point is this week's forensic examination of June inflation reports for any sign of tariff 'passthrough' to prices. Some price categories did rise, supporting the argument that tariffs will prove inflationary, but the overall reading remains broadly in line with expectations, due to falling energy prices and other factors. This puts the Federal Reserve in a tough spot, with inflation still above its 2% target and uncertainty about whether any price rises will be persistent or just 'one-offs'. The picture remains as clear as mud and may take many months to clear up. On the other hand, the potential impact of President Donald Trump's other signature policy, clamping down on undocumented immigration, is getting easier to forecast. Economists widely expected the administration to curb new immigration, as inflows were already slowing sharply before the election. But what has surprised many is the speed and scale of deportations as well as the unprecedented spending planned to ramp up these efforts in Trump's recent fiscal bill. Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said it will terminate deportation protections for thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans living in the United States. That will end Temporary Protected Status (TPS), as of September, for some 72,000 Hondurans and 4,000 Nicaraguans who have had access to this legal categorization since 1999. The administration has already moved to end TPS for 348,000 Venezuelans and 521,000 Haitians, as well as thousands from Afghanistan and Cameroon. JPMorgan economists Joseph Lupton, Michael Feroli and Abiel Reinhart reckon the immigration surge that flattered the country's growth in recent years will now go into reverse, with these latest policy changes expected to cause roughly 1.1 million workers to lose their legal status. The resulting loss of labor, about 0.8% of total employment, creates serious downside risk to U.S. GDP growth in the second half of this year, they suggest. And the rising number of detentions makes it less likely that the 'informal economy' will be able to pick up the slack. Indeed, the loss of legal status could remove some 117,000 workers per month from the economy this quarter, rising to a monthly decrease of 150,000 in the final quarter. "In our year-ahead outlook, we assumed that immigration would grind to a halt but that outright deportations would not pose a material threat," the JPMorgan team wrote. "This view is being challenged given the coming large losses in labor supply from recently immigrated workers." Apollo chief economist Torsten Slok chimed in earlier this week, pointing out that if 3,000 unauthorized migrants are deported every day, the labor force will decline by 1 million this year. That drop, he wrote, would cut the labor force participation rate by 0.4 percentage points, slashing the unemployment rate as well as job growth and increasing wage inflation, especially in sectors such as construction, agriculture, leisure and hospitality. "In short, deportations are a stagflationary impulse to the economy, resulting in lower employment growth and higher wage inflation," Slok wrote. One American Enterprise Institute paper, opens new tab he cited said the changes could actually result in net migration outflows and reduce GDP growth by 0.3–0.4 percentage points this year, with monthly payroll growth near zero or negative in the next few years. Last month, Barclays also flagged the potential evaporation of payroll growth over the next 18 months, based on the dramatic changes in migration and the rapidly ageing American-born workforce. Much like tariffs, the immigration changes have yet to register a material impact on economic activity, with the deadlines for many of the status cutoffs still a few months away. But unlike the hazy understanding of the effect tariffs will have on inflation and growth, it's becoming crystal clear how the administration's migration policies will impact worker availability. Markets will thus likely shift their focus considerably in the coming months. (Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn. Plus, sign up for my weekday newsletter, Morning Bid U.S.)
