Why out of town location is perfect for Elgin business cashing in on town's housing boom
She believes having out of town premises on Southfield Drive has had major benefits for her firm with free parking, an ever-growing population on the doorstep and nearby businesses for customers.
In 2017, she bought the lunch stop with a business partner after more than 30 years in the flooring industry.
Later down the line, she took over full ownership. The premises can hold up to 50 people.
Claire said: 'Prior to the cafe, I worked in the flooring industry.
'When the opportunity came about to buy The Deli it was to try something completely different and I have really enjoyed it.
'I think it is really good being out of town with the businesses and doctors nearby.
'We get a lot of trade from other businesses and homes at lunchtime.
'The free parking helps too and we are really lucky to have many people walking in by for coffees, cookies and sandwiches.'
In recent years, hundreds of homes have been built in the south of Elgin with thousands more still in the pipeline.
Claire added: 'It is great for our businesses, with more people moving to Elgin.
'However I do feel it puts pressure on the NHS as well obviously.
'Some people say that nobody wants to live in Elgin, however there are so many new houses getting built.
She added: 'I get people coming in who have just moved here and say they love it here.
'Meanwhile, people often come back after visiting too.
'I think we do take the place for granted because we have always been here and it is lovely to stay here.'
Claire also holds private events inside The Deli which brings extra income for the business.
She said: 'This year my outside catering has been really busy.
'We are closed on Sundays and private events are often held in it then like baby showers, birthday parties and other things.
'We have an alcohol licence as well which opens up different opportunities.
'It is just so great to have a different income stream too.'
Meanwhile, she is thinking about getting a catering van to attend events like Highland Games and to provide more space than her car.
She said: 'We could get a van because we are doing so much outside catering and there is an opportunity with it.
'It would great to go to the different markets and also promote The Deli shop too which would be good too.
'We will wait and see but it certainly been something popular that many businesses are doing.'
She also praised her staff and manager Kirsten Hendry for making the Deli a friendly and inviting place for people.
The Deli is open 9am to 4pm from Monday to Saturday every week. All meals are made to order from fresh and locally sourced produce.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Competition watchdog to probe takeover of NHS landlord Assura
The UK competition watchdog has launched an investigation into the proposed takeover of NHS landlord Assura. Last month, rival healthcare property firm PHP (Primary Health Properties) put forward a fourth takeover offer for Assura worth £1.79 billion following a lengthy bidding war. PHP had previously laid down a £1.68 billion bid in May but was outbid by a rival suitor, with a consortium led by US private equity firm KKR valuing the business at £1.7 billion. Bosses at Assura backed the £1.79 billion deal, suggesting the increased scale of the combined business would benefit shareholders of both companies. On Friday, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it has now launched a 'phase one' investigation into the deal. It said the companies and others potentially impacted by the deal have two weeks to provide submissions regarding the move. The regulator said it is looking at whether the takeover 'may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition' in the healthcare sector. Following submissions, the regulator will then decide whether the deal needs to go to a more thorough phase two probe. PHP's rival bidder KKR had cautioned that the deal, which is combining the two largest UK healthcare real estate firms, could attract scrutiny from the CMA. Assura owns more than 600 buildings, including doctors' surgeries, with a portfolio valued at around £3.1 billion. It has about 80 members of staff.
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Keir Starmer told me he'd met every challenge. But things look bad right now
Will Keir Starmer allow himself to celebrate his first anniversary as prime minister this weekend? Or will he be taking a long, hard look in the mirror and asking himself what went wrong?That is what is in my mind as he greets me in the Terracotta Room on the first floor of 10 Downing Street for a long-planned conversation about his first 12 months in office, this looks surprisingly relaxed, given that his chancellor, Rachel Reeves, had been in tears sitting behind him in the Commons just hours earlier. That triggered fevered speculation about how long she would last in the job, moving markets to sell the pound and increase the cost of that is the impression he wants to convey to me as he shares a story about his photo opportunity with Formula One cars parked outside his front door - the most famous door in the is determined that the problems of recent weeks - and boy there's been a long list of those - will not overshadow the achievements he believes deserve just as much attention."We have done some fantastic things," he tells me, "really driven down the waiting lists in the NHS, really done loads of improvements in schools and stuff that we can do for children - whether that's rolling out school uniform projects, whether it's school meals, breakfast clubs, you name it - and also [brought in] a huge amount of investment into the country. And of course we've been busy getting three trade deals."It's clear that, given the chance, his list would go on. And yet, I point out, there is another long list - of things he's recently admitted to getting the last year, he's said hiring Sue Gray - Starmer's former chief of staff who left Downing Street in October - was wrong. He's also held his hands up about plans to end winter fuel payments, about rejecting a national grooming gang inquiry, and cutting benefits for disabled people. That's not even the full list, yet it's quite a number of things that he's admitting to being a prime minister thinks I've rather crudely summarised his personal reflections on what he might have done better. He challenges the idea, which is prevalent in Westminster, that changing your mind represents weakness, or a "humiliating U-turn".Listen: The inside story of Starmer's stormy first yearInDepth: Why Sir Keir's political honeymoon was so short-livedThis is the fourth time we've sat down for an extended and personal conversation for my Political Thinking podcast."You know this from getting to know me," he says. "I'm not one of these ideological thinkers, where ideology dictates what I do. I'm a pragmatist. You can badge these things as U-turns - it's common sense to me."If someone says to me, 'here's some more information and I really think it's the right thing to do', I'm the kind of person that says, 'well in which case, let's do it'."There is, though, no doubt that scrapping so much of his welfare reforms was a U-turn - a costly and humiliating one. Starmer and his chancellor have not only lost authority and face, they've lost £5bn in planned savings, something that will have to be paid for somehow, through extra borrowing, lower spending or, most likely, higher taxes."I take responsibility," he says, "we didn't get the process right". But somehow he implies that it might have been someone other than the leader of the Labour Party's responsibility to persuade Labour MPs to back his plans. He doesn't spell out what he means by getting the process right and, perhaps more importantly, he dodges my attempts to get him to spell out clearly what story he's trying to tell the country about Labour be on the side of disabled people and people like his own mother, who had a crippling disease that meant she eventually had to have a leg amputated? Or should they adopt her unwillingness to be written off, which he described to me the last time we spoke? When told by her doctors that she wouldn't walk again she refused to listen. Wounded by the events of the past week, Starmer refuses to even address that choice. But surely, I suggest to him, the nation doesn't just want a problem-solver, or a chief executive of UK plc? Voters surely want a leader who has a story to tell?Starmer clearly knew this question - or a variation of it - was coming. I've pushed him on it every time we've spoken at length. "It's about a passion, if that's the right word," he says. "But certainly a determination to change the lives of millions of working people and, in particular, to tackle this question of fairness.""It's almost like a social contract," he adds, "that people are getting back what they're putting in, that there is a fairer environment for them that supports them and respects them."That's a bit long to sew on to an election banner, to chant in the streets, or write in a post on X, but it is a theme. He is a self-proclaimed pragmatist who doesn't want there to be something that can be labelled as "Starmerism", but at least we can now say that his guiding principle is fairness. In truth, what matters more than anything else to him is not losing, something he tells me he hates, whether in politics or on the five-a-side pitch playing football regularly with his mates - as he still does and has done for decades.I tell him people think he is losing now - some say he is the most unpopular prime minister since records began. He reacts with the defiance of a man whose football-playing friend recently described him as a "hard bastard". A man who served in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet and then had him thrown out of the party; who stood to be leader on promises to keep much of Corbyn's agenda before tearing up those promises to win power; and someone who hired then fired Sue Gray as his first Downing Street chief of staff. "Every challenge that's been put in front of me I've risen to, met it, and we're going to continue in the same vein," he says.I end our conversation by reminding him what they say about failing football managers who have "lost the dressing room". Has he lost the Labour Party dressing room? His reply is emphatic."Absolutely not," he says. "The Labour dressing room, the PLP, is proud as hell of what we've done, and their frustration - my frustration - is that sometimes the other stuff, welfare would be an example, can obscure us being able to get that out there."Almost as an afterthought he adds: "I'm a hard-enough bastard to find out who it was who said that, so that I can have a discussion with him." Knowing Starmer I suspect he's much more likely to deliver a crunching tackle on the pitch than a quiet word off the prime minister's message is clear to me: Don't count me out, however bad it looks now. To pretty much everyone other than him it currently does look bad. Very bad.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
UK politics live: Rachel Reeves says she was ‘clearly upset' but it was her job to support government at PMQs
Rachel Reeves has appeared in public with Sir Keir Starmer a day after breaking down in tears alongside the prime minister in the Commons. The pair were both at the launch of the government's 10-year plan for the NHS in London. Speaking to broadcasters following following the launch, Ms Reeves declined to give the reason behind her tears. 'Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that,' the chancellor said. 'My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government and that's what I tried to do. 'I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that.' She appeared to reject suggestions that her tears at PMQs were related to a conversation with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle or another member of government. Welfare reform has been postponed, but it isn't going away Welfare reform has been postponed, but it isn't going away Editorial: Labour's overhaul of the benefits system failed because it was clearly a raid by the Treasury looking for savings at speed. The government should produce a Beveridge report for the 21st century – or risk a future, right-wing government taking up the challenge Holly Evans4 July 2025 05:00 Rachel Reeves's brave face cannot mask the challenges she now faces If there were any doubts about Sir Keir Starmer 's plans for Rachel Reeves, the prime minister and his chancellor have gone all out to try and put them to bed. A day after she sat crying through Prime Minister's Questions on live television, the chancellor sat smiling and cheering through the prime minister 's speech outlining a 10-year plan for the NHS. For his part, Sir Keir shouted 'wahey' as Ms Reeves got to her speech to lay the financial framework for the plan. Reeves's brave face cannot mask the challenges she now faces The chancellor has come out fighting after her teary PMQs moment... but much tougher challenges now await Holly Evans4 July 2025 04:00 For crying out loud: Are you ready for the 'politics of pain' about to hit us? Keir Starmer promised that the last Budget would be 'painful'. In a speech in the Downing Street garden in August, two months earlier, he tried to manage expectations, saying that the state of the public finances was 'worse than we ever imagined', and asked people to 'accept short-term pain for long-term good'. It was a forlorn hope. Far from 'accepting' the pain, public opinion turned against the government further after Rachel Reeves announced £25bn a year of tax increases, rising to £40bn a year by the end of this parliament. Business leaders reacted particularly badly to the rise in employers' national insurance contributions, causing the chancellor to over-correct when she addressed the CBI the following month. She told representatives that she was 'not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes'. Read the full analysis from John Rentoul here: For crying out loud: are you ready for the 'politics of pain' about to hit us? I once accused the PM and his chancellor of being too gloomy, writes John Rentoul. Turns out they were not gloomy enough – and they'll have to lead the nation through another vale of tears Holly Evans4 July 2025 03:00 Which tax rises could Rachel Reeves introduce to pay for the £5bn welfare U-turn? This week's embarrassing climbdown on welfare saw the government's benefits reforms gutted almost entirely, while savings from the bill were slashed from £5bn to nothing. In the wake of the U-turn, there are now growing questions over how the government will raise the money to fill the black hole in the public finances. Ministers have already squeezed significant savings out of their departments in cuts that were unveiled at last month's spending review, meaning there is now a mounting expectation that the chancellor will be forced to raise taxes instead. Which tax rises could Rachel Reeves introduce to pay for the £5bn welfare U-turn? Labour's pledge not to raise taxes on 'working people' leaves the chancellor with a limited number of workable options to fill the £5bn hole in the public finances left by this week's welfare climbdown Holly Evans4 July 2025 02:00 Ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana to set up new party with Jeremy Corbyn A former Labour MP has announced her intention to co-lead the formation of a new political party with Jeremy Corbyn, the ex-Labour leader. Zarah Sultana, whose Labour whip was suspended last year, confirmed her resignation from Sir Keir Starmer 's party. In a statement posted on X, Ms Sultana, who represents Coventry South, stated the initiative would also involve "other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country". Ex-Labour MP Zara Sultana to set up new party with Jeremy Corbyn The independent MP lost the Labour whip last year when she voted to abolish the two-child benefit cap Holly Evans4 July 2025 01:00 Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her The trouble with Kemi Badenoch is that if she sees someone lying on the ground, she can't resist the temptation to kick them. She lacks empathy, to put it politely. There she was at Prime Minister's Questions, facing an open goal for a change, and attacking the prime minister, who, even three days later, can look after himself. Then she spots the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, her lip quivering, seemingly on the brink of crying. Straight in goes the Badenoch boot – she said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and described her as Starmer's 'human shield'. After Starmer failed to confirm Reeves in post for the rest of the parliament – a tall order for any appointee – Badenoch piled on the punishment: 'How awful for the chancellor that he did not confirm she would be in post.' Badenoch's lack of empathy over Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her Neither her party nor the public seems to like the Badenoch style, writes Sean O'Grady. Her tasteless lack of empathy for the chancellor is indicative of a leadership marked by arrogant dismissiveness Holly Evans4 July 2025 00:00 The markets have spoken – and it is they, not the prime minister, that saved Rachel Reeves The markets have delivered their verdict. They want Rachel Reeves, and no one else will do. If the chancellor needed saving, they've done the job, boosting her political clout in the process. The events of the last 24 hours have been quite remarkable, almost on a level with the Truss mini-Budget, when the City's appalled reaction resulted in the near collapse of several big pension funds, and ultimately led to the end of a premiership before a now-infamous lettuce had rotted. The tearful expression on the face of a visibly upset Reeves, and a less than ringing endorsement from a prime minister who had previously said she would be in place for the full parliament, triggered a panic, with some of the biggest movements in UK government bond prices recorded since the 'Trussterf***' Budget. The markets have spoken – and it is they, not the PM, that saved Rachel Reeves In its response to the chancellor's possible resignation, in the face of market jitters the City has made it clear that she is Labour's only candidate for No 11, says James Moore – and any attempt to replace her could prove very expensive for the country Holly Evans3 July 2025 23:00 Labour respond to Zarah Sultana resignation Responding to Ms Sultana's statement, a Labour spokesperson said: 'In just 12 months, this Labour government has boosted wages, delivered an extra four million NHS appointments, opened 750 free breakfast clubs, secured three trade deals and four interest rate cuts lowering mortgage payments for millions. 'Only Labour can deliver the change needed to renew Britain.' Holly Evans3 July 2025 22:28 MP Zarah Sultana resigns from the Labour Party MP Zarah Sultana has said that she is resigning from the Labour Party to 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with Jeremy Corbyn. Ms Sultana, who has sat in the Commons as an independent MP since she had the Labour whip withdrawn last year, represents the Coventry South constituency. She said in a statement posted on X that she was 'resigning from the Labour Party'. 'Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country.' She said that 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper' and the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. She added: 'A year ago I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and list 400,000 children out of poverty. I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. Now, the Government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much.' She urged people to 'join us'. Holly Evans3 July 2025 21:33 MP likens Government to flat-earthers over refusal to compensate Waspi women Sir Keir Starmer's Government has been likened to flat-earthers by one of its own MPs, over its refusal to compensate women affected by state pension age changes. Labour's Rebecca Long Bailey said the arguments against compensation for the 1950s-born women are 'bizarre' and akin to those made by people who believe the Earth is flat. The Government last December ruled out a compensation package for women born in the 1950s, whose state pension age was raised so it would be equal with men. This is despite Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves being among the senior ministers to support the Waspi campaign when Labour was in opposition. A report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) had recommended the UK Government pay compensation to women born in the 1950s whose state pension age was raised so it would be equal with men. The watchdog also said the women should be paid up to £2,950 each, a package with a potential total cost of £10.5 billion to the public purse, as poor communication meant they had lost out on the chance to plan their retirement finances. Holly Evans
