Human rights group loses legal challenge over exports of jet parts to Israel
Al-Haq took legal action against the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) over its decision to continue licensing exports of components for F-35 fighter jets, telling a hearing in May that it was unlawful and 'gives rise to a significant risk of facilitating crime'.
In September last year, the Government suspended export licences for weapons and military equipment following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law in the conflict.
But an exemption was made for some licences related to parts for F-35s, which are part of an international defence programme.
The DBT defended the challenge, with its barristers telling a four-day hearing in London that the carve-out is 'consistent with the rules of international law'.
In a 72-page ruling on Monday, Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn dismissed the legal challenge.
The senior judges said that 'the conduct of international relations' is a matter for the executive, rather than the courts, and that it would be unnecessary to decide whether there was a 'significant risk' that the carve-out could facilitate crimes.
They added: 'The grave risk to life in the ongoing military operations in the Gaza Strip is not created by the F-35 carve-out, and would not be removed by suspension of the export from the UK of F-35 parts into the F-35 programme.'
The High Court was previously told that the decision to 'carve out' licences related to F-35 components followed advice from Defence Secretary John Healey, who said a suspension would impact the 'whole F-35 programme' and have a 'profound impact on international peace and security'.
The F-35 programme is an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets, with the UK contributing components for both assembly lines and an international pool.
Israel is not one of the 'partner nations' of the programme, the court heard, but is a customer and can order new F-35 aircraft and draw on a pool for spare parts.
The two judges later said they agreed with barristers for the DBT, who said it was not possible for the UK to 'unilaterally' ensure that UK-made parts did not reach Israel.
Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn said: 'In short, the Secretary of State reasonably concluded that there was no realistic possibility of persuading all other partner nations that F-35 exports to Israel should be suspended.'
'Accordingly he was faced with the blunt choice of accepting the F-35 carve-out or withdrawing from the F-35 Programme and accepting all the defence and diplomatic consequences which would ensue,' they added.
The two judges also said the case was about a 'much more focused issue' than the carve-out itself.
They continued: 'That issue is whether it is open to the court to rule that the UK must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration which is reasonably regarded by the responsible ministers as vital to the defence of the UK and to international peace and security, because of the prospect that some UK manufactured components will or may ultimately be supplied to Israel, and may be used in the commission of a serious violation of international humanitarian law in the conflict in Gaza.
'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Lisa Nandy hits out at BBC leadership over Glastonbury live stream
The Culture Secretary said 'several' editorial failures 'becomes a problem of leadership', during a statement to the Commons on Monday. It came after rapper Bobby Vylan led crowds at the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of 'free, free Palestine' and 'death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)' on Saturday. Bobby Vylan performing at Glastonbury Festival (Ben Birchall/PA) Ms Nandy said the Government is 'exasperated' with the 'lack of account from the leadership', as MPs from across the chamber called for accountability. In a statement on the BBC and Glastonbury, she said 'problems with broadcasts' at the festival 'should have been foreseeable'. Labour MP Peter Prinsley (Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket) said: 'How are Jews such as myself, in this country, to be reassured about the editorial processes of the BBC? And who on Earth will be held accountable for this error?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He makes an extremely important point about accountability, and that is something that is not lost on me as the Secretary of State, and something that I've impressed upon the BBC leadership as well. 'When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership.' Conservative former minister John Glen said: 'I think we all in this place understand the fine editorial judgments that the BBC and their staff have to make, but this is of a completely different order, and when people are losing faith in the great institutions of this country, could I urge the Secretary of State, in her follow-up conversations that … the BBC actually identified accountability to individuals?' He added: 'Somebody didn't follow that guidance, and I think the country expects people to be held individually to account for why they fail to do their job properly.' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think people do expect people to be held to account for the way that they do their jobs, be that on the front line or at senior levels. It's a point that I've made to the BBC. 'They will have heard what he said and what (Mr Prinsley) said as well about accountability, and it's a point that I will continue to press.' Jim Allister, TUV MP for North Antrim, described the live stream as 'an appalling pro-terrorist broadcast', adding: 'The BBC deliberately chose not to cut the broadcast, perhaps therefore it's time for Government to consider cutting the licence fee?' Ms Nandy replied: 'He will know that this Government supports the BBC. We believe it is an important institution. 'That is why we are so disappointed that this has happened, why we have been so exasperated with the lack of account from the leadership, not just about this, but about a previous Gaza documentary and a number of other issues as well. 'The BBC is one of the most important institutions in our country, and that is the reason why it is held to the highest of standards.' Conservative MP Dame Caroline Dinenage, who chairs the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said: 'I wonder if the Secretary of State could say what explanation the BBC has given for why this live stream wasn't cut? 'Now it can't be for lack of staff on the ground. They took a reported 400 people to Glastonbury at the weekend. What were they all doing?' Ms Nandy replied: 'I think she's right to raise the question of what the number of staff who were present at the Glastonbury Festival, or working on the broadcast, were doing. 'But I do think this also raises very, very serious questions at the highest levels of the BBC about the operational oversight and the way in which editorial standards are understood and reflected in the decisions that are made by individual staff.' Shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew called for an independent inquiry, claiming the BBC 'has repeatedly failed to call out antisemitic rhetoric, when it emerges under the guise of political commentary, and has faced serious allegations of minimising attacks on Jewish communities'. Ms Nandy replied: 'What I want to see from the BBC, and I know he shares this, is rapid action to make sure this cannot happen again.' She also claimed an Independent MP was 'aligning himself with antisemites'. Ayoub Khan, MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, had accused the Government of 'hypocrisy' because it did not make a statement when Israeli football fans 'were chanting 'death to all Arabs'' in November last year. Ms Nandy said she 'could not disagree more', adding: 'I think every member of this House will utterly condemn chants of 'death to all Arabs' – it's disgusting and disgraceful.' She continued: 'The reason I have brought a statement to the House today is because our national broadcaster, which is funded by the licence fee, which is paid by the public in this country, has broadcast something that is deeply, deeply offensive to a community in this country, that has made many, many people feel and may actually have made them unsafe. 'Can I just say to him that as a longstanding supporter of justice for the Palestinians, he does nothing for the Palestinian cause by aligning himself with antisemites.' In a point of order, Mr Khan said: 'At no stage have I said in my question or statement that I was aligning myself to anyone at that Glastonbury event.'
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Project to reinterpret slave trader statues in London launched
Plaques have been unveiled on the statues of slave traders in London which reveal the 'enormous wrongdoings' of the men as part of a new project to reinterpret them. The City of London Corporation has launched Revealing The City's Past, its project to reinterpret the statues of slave traders former lord mayor William Beckford and former MP Sir John Cass. It reflects a commitment to historical accountability by the City Corporation for its role in the transatlantic trade in enslaved African people, the City Corporation said. At the City Corporation's Guildhall headquarters, plaques unveiled on Monday and fixed to the Beckford and Cass statues, acknowledge and condemn the men's role in the transatlantic trade in enslaved African people, the City Corporation said. The project's steering group, including Culture&, Creative Arts Social Consultancy, and the City Corporation, worked with the City Corporation's staff and local residents, and consulted inter-generational and accessibility panels to enable content from a range of different perspectives. Featuring texts by artist and heritage professional, Rachael Minott, the plaques are accompanied by poems from John Agard and Courtney Conrad. The project's digital platform offers visitors and online audiences a deeper exploration of the City's historic ties to slavery, the City Corporation added. The project's content brings Caribbean diaspora voices to the forefront and encourages reflection on how the legacy of enslavement continues to shape shared spaces, the City Corporation said. William Beckford was a two-time lord mayor of London in the late 1700s who accrued wealth from plantations in Jamaica and held African slaves. Sir John Cass was a 17th and 18th century merchant, MP and philanthropist who also profited from the slave trade. In January 2021, the City Corporation's primary decision-making body, the Court of Common Council, voted to remove the statues. However, after the then government later introduced its Retain and Explain policy, advising that public memorials should remain in place with added historical context, the City Corporation reconsidered. The Court of Common Council voted to keep the statues and develop the Revealing The City's Past project in response. Policy chairman of the City of London Corporation, Chris Hayward, said: 'This project has brought together many talented people, most importantly, voices from the Caribbean diaspora who have historically been excluded from the narrative on Beckford and Cass's legacy and wealth. We are deeply grateful for their expertise, creativity, and insight. 'The enormous wrongdoings of Beckford and Cass are laid bare by this project, leaving no doubt about the contempt in which these two men should be held. 'Against the wishes of many, these statues remain. 'Here at Guildhall, two slave traders still stand but we do not stand with them. 'We are fully committed to race equity and to making our spaces safe and welcoming for all.' Chairman of the City of London Corporation's culture, heritage, and libraries committee, Brendan Barns, said: 'These statues represent prejudice, cruelty, and greed. 'It cannot be denied that the City's links to slavery are a stain on our history, and we should never attempt to erase or gloss over the past. 'With the installation of these plaques and the creation of a wealth of online resources, we are taking positive action to educate current and future generations about this evil form of commerce.' Chief executive officer and artistic director of Culture&, Dr Errol Francis, said: 'Culture&'s involvement in this project to 'retain and explain' the statues in the City of London's Guildhall has called upon a wide range of our skills as well as our lived experience as people with ancestral links to the atrocities associated with the legacy of William Beckford and Sir John Cass. 'We have helped convene the inter-generational advisory panel, choose designers, commission poets, work on the editing of historical texts, and more still. 'We hope that this work will go some way towards explaining how London's merchants and politicians were involved in profiteering from the enslavement of Africans. 'We are aware of the historical importance of this work, from which we hope that the learning will inform the future policy and practice around contested heritage.'
The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Five savvy ways to help you plan ahead and put cash aside for the festive period
SIX months of the year have passed and it's time to look ahead and start saving. Put aside a little cash now to plan ahead for the festive period and life will be a lot easier come December. BUDGET BOOST: Work out your Christmas costs for gifts, food and booze, then divide it by 25 — the approximate number of weeks until Christmas — to see how much you need to put aside each week. So if you need to save £500, save £20 per week. Sell a few items on an auction site each month and save the cash and that's your festive period sorted. NO-SPEND DAYS: Pick one weekday to spend nothing. Pack lunches, walk to work, skip the takeaway coffee. Save £15 each no-spend day until November 1 and that's £270 towards the cost of Christmas. AUTOMATE IT: Use banking apps to squirrel away money. Try Monzo Round-Ups or NatWest's Digital Regular Saver to start stashing away spare change. With 175 days until December 22 — the last Monday before Christmas — 50p per day means £87.50 saved. FOOD SHOP: Asda's Christmas Savings Card is a helpful way to save. Sign up now or add a little every time you buy groceries and get a bonus amount in November depending on your balance. If you save £5 per week until November, that would be £90 put aside by November 1. Find out more at BANK BONANZA: To make extra cash, switch banks. Open the new TSB Spend & Save account and you get £100, then for up to six months earn £15 cashback when you make at least 20 card payments per month, with further incentives in December. See All prices on page correct at time of going to press. Deals and offers subject to availability. Save £10k in 5 Months: Milly's Box Challenge Revealed! Deal of the day GET your summer wardrobe sorted at A five-pack of Bench T-shirts, with a recommended retail price of £99.99, is £24.99. Cheap treat GIVE your home the scent of cherries with a Glade candle, usually £4, now £1.29 at Home Bargains. Top swap STEP into summer in a pair of Athena Dr Martens sandals, £100 from or pick up a similar style at Next, for £38. Shop & save SIP on a glass of Villa Maria Blush Sauvignon with lots of ice. It's the perfect summer drink. A bottle was £9.98, now £7.96 at Asda. Hot right now GET up to 70 per cent off toys and games at – it's the perfect time to stock up on birthday or even Christmas pressies. PLAY NOW TO WIN £200 JOIN thousands of readers taking part in The Sun Raffle. Every month we're giving away £100 to 250 lucky readers - whether you're saving up or just in need of some extra cash, The Sun could have you covered. Every Sun Savers code entered equals one Raffle ticket. The more codes you enter, the more tickets you'll earn and the more chance you will have of winning!
