Developers are now relying on AI tools more than ever, but confidence in them is dropping: Study
In Stack Overflow's latest annual survey of 49,000 developers, a whopping 80% said they now use AI tools as part of their workflow. But here's the surprising part: only 29% trust the accuracy of AI-generated code. That number used to be 40%.
This mismatch of high usage but low trust shows the complex relationship developers have with AI. 'AI-generated solutions that seem mostly correct but contain subtle flaws' are now the biggest frustration for developers, with 45% highlighting this issue. These near-correct answers can be much worse than clearly wrong ones, as they introduce bugs that are hard to spot, especially for younger or less experienced coders.
As a result, many developers are finding themselves spending more time debugging than they did before. It's not unusual for developers to turn to Stack Overflow after AI code fails them. In fact, more than a third said they visit the site because of problems caused by AI-generated code.
Some are even pushing back against casual AI coding. Around 72% of developers reject the idea of 'vibe coding ' or blindly pasting AI-suggested code into production. 'That 'close-but-not-quite' problem is here to stay,' the report notes. It's tied to how predictive text generation works, where tools guess what code should come next but don't always understand the logic behind it.
But even with all these flaws, most developers aren't giving up on AI tools. Many say they see clear benefits when the tools are used mindfully. Some companies even encourage their teams to use AI assistants.
Experts are now suggesting that developers should change how they think about these tools. Developers should treat AI like a 'sparring partner,' not a silent copilot. It's there to help challenge your thinking, not to replace it entirely. When used this way, AI can even help developers learn faster. It gives targeted help, explains unfamiliar concepts and complements traditional resources like documentation or Stack Overflow itself.
But as AI changes how developers seek support, even platforms like Stack Overflow are adjusting. 'Although we have seen a decline in traffic, in no way is it as dramatic as some would indicate,' said Jody Bailey, Stack Overflow's Chief Product and Technology Officer. 'That shift is causing Stack Overflow to critically reassess how it gauges success in the modern digital age,' they added.
AI isn't going anywhere in software development. But blind trust isn't the answer either. The smartest developers aren't those who skip the hard work but those who know when to ask AI for help and when to double-check everything it says.
(This article has been curated by Kaashvi Khubyani, who is an intern with The Indian Express.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
AI is listening to your meetings. Watch what you say.
Tiffany N. Lewis was worried she was being duped. A potential client had reached out about working with her digital marketing agency on a pro-bono basis, but his message went straight to spam. Then he blew off several scheduled meetings with Lewis. Was he a fraud? When the client asked her to meet again, Lewis added him to a call she was already on with her assistant. Before he joined, Lewis joked: 'Is he, like, a Nigerian prince?" Despite the scammy red flags, he turned out to be a legitimate person. Lewis was relieved—until she realized her new client had received a full summary of the call in his inbox, including her 'Nigerian prince" remark. She was running an AI notetaker the whole time. 'I was very lucky that the person I was working with had a good sense of humor," said Lewis, who lives in Stow, Ohio. AI is listening in on your work meetings—including the parts you don't want anyone to hear. Before attendees file in, or when one colleague asks another to hang back to discuss a separate matter, AI notetakers may pick up on the small talk and private discussions meant for a select audience, then blast direct quotes to everyone in the meeting. Nicole and Tim Delger run a Nashville branding firm called Studio Delger. After one business meeting late last year, the couple received a summary from Zoom's AI assistant that was decidedly not work-related. Zoom AI documented a private conversion between Nicole and Tim Delger, who run a branding firm. 'Studio discussed the possibility of getting sandwich ingredients from Publix," one bullet point said. Another key takeaway: 'Don't like soup." Their client never showed up to the meeting, and the studio had spent the time talking about what to make for lunch. 'That was the first time it had caught a private conversation," Nicole said. Fortunately the summary didn't go to the client. Andrea Serra, an account-strategy coordinator at a communications agency, has experienced this firsthand. In one transcript, an AI notetaker caught her describing her frustration with the new Whole Foods in her neighborhood; though she'd set her preferences so that notes go to the host only, she shared the email with two other people on the call for laughs. Another meeting recap featured bullets of her discussing almost burning down her kitchen trying to make a new sweet potato recipe. 'It'll be like all of our action steps, all the strategy we discussed during the meeting, and then randomly in there, something about our personal lives that we had talked about last week and wanted to catch up on this week as well," Serra said. 'Just one little sentence as a surprise in there." Though her boss, Debora Lima, had hoped the AI summaries would reduce work for the team, she's still waiting for the technology to improve. Meanwhile, she and her colleagues have embraced them as comic relief. As she was looking over notes from a meeting she recently hosted, she noticed the phrase 'hey cutie pie" in the transcript. Lima said there should be a companywide Slack channel to archive the funniest examples. Notetakers can do a variety of tasks from recording and transcribing calls, generating action items for teams and recapping what's already been said to anyone joining late. Many signal to attendees that a meeting is being recorded and transcribed. A demo of what Google's AI notetaker looks like during a meeting. Zoom's AI Companion, which generated more than 7.2 million meeting summaries by the end of January 2024, flashes a dialogue box at the top of the screen to let participants know when it's turned on. As long as it's active, an AI Companion diamond icon continues to flash in the top right hand corner of the meeting. People can also ask the host to stop using the AI companion. 'We want users to feel they're really in control," said Smita Hashim, chief product officer at Zoom. Google's AI notetaker functions similarly, where only meeting hosts or employees of the host organization have the ability to turn it on or off. When it's on, people will see a notification and hear an audio cue, and a blue pencil icon will appear in the top right corner. 'We put a lot of care into making sure meeting participants know exactly if and when AI tools in Meet are being used," said Awaneesh Verma, senior director of product management and real time communications at Google Workspace. The automatic summaries can be informative and timesaving, or unintentionally hilarious. Kelsey Ogletree, chief executive of a tech platform for media professionals, received a Zoom AI summary titled 'Monty's Messy Morning," describing how her dog, Monty, ate leftover food on the counter and threw up in the house. It went on to say that 'Kelsey was disgusted by the incident and considered washing Monty's head with Dawn dish soap." It was a conversation between her and her husband, who's also her business partner. (And Monty is a cat, not a dog.) John Barentine, an astronomer and consultant in Tucson, Ariz., doesn't use AI notetakers but has been on plenty of calls with them. He was most recently surprised by the AI summary of one call that was sent to him, summarizing the small talk at the beginning of the call. It said: 'John Barentine humorously notes that there is a lethal dose of water for humans." Barentine said he was discussing the devastating Texas floods with a client; the AI had completely misunderstood the context. He says he's now more likely to use the private chat feature in meetings instead of saying something aloud while AI is listening. 'At least I know that if I make a remark to somebody privately for now, that's not being swept up by the AI notetaker," he said. Write to Ann-Marie Alcántara at
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
The CEO shuffle: Massive disruption prompts global hunt for agile, adaptive leadership
The global economic scenario is unraveling at breakneck speed, with artificial intelligence (AI) and tariff wars its most visible drivers. From boardrooms in Mumbai to Cincinnati, companies are reckoning with what US politician Donald Rumsfeld once called the 'unknown unknowns". One clear sign of this reckoning is the sudden, sometimes opaque leadership changes at companies. Take Procter & Gamble (P&G) and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), both of which just announced unexpected changes at the top. At P&G, chief operating officer Shailesh Jejurikar was named as the new CEO while at JLR Adrian Mardell will step down after a controversial makeover of the brand went down badly. India, too, hasn't been immune to the need for fresh leaders. Last week, Rohit Jawa stepped down as CEO of Hindustan Unilever (HUL) after just two years in the job. Since the beginning of this year, there have been similar leadership transitions at companies ranging from DMart to Page Industries. These moves aren't just routine corporate reshuffles, but a response to huge disruptions in the way business has been done for decades. Indeed, leadership changes at such bastions of corporate continuity like HUL suggest that business models which served well for decades may no longer suffice. And while AI and the Trump tariffs are in the spotlight, the forces at work are broader and more complex. Look no further than developments at Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), India's largest IT services company and among the country's biggest employers, which recently announced what may be its largest layoff exercise to date. The last time a Tata Group company initiated job cuts of this scale was in the 1990s, when Tata Steel, then the conglomerate's flagship, slashed a third of its workforce under its new leader Ratan Tata. It was a move that marked a fundamental pivot away from the steel company's past and toward a tech-enabled, globally competitive model of making steel. TCS, the group's crown jewel for the last two decades, appears to be navigating a similar inflection point. The company's CEO K. Krithivasan has been quite explicit in clarifying that the shake-up is not primarily due to AI, but to seismic changes in client expectations and the global delivery landscape. In other words, these are not reactions to short-term turbulence. They are structural responses to a market that is altering in ways even the most advanced forecasting models failed to predict. A key element of this flux is changing consumer behaviour which has become markedly more complex, and, in many cases, more frugal. Companies such as Nestle, ITC, and HUL in India have, for over two years, cautioned about softening demand, especially in their lower-priced segments. But while most companies still maintain that it is a blip, there is reason to believe that this may be the new normal. India's markets, often assumed to be bottomless reservoirs of demand for multinationals, are showing signs of maturity and saturation. Maruti Suzuki chairman R.C. Bhargava recently made a striking observation, lamenting that the penetration of passenger cars in India has plateaued, despite rising income levels. Airport lounges in Delhi and Mumbai may be teeming but two traditional bellwethers of middle-class aspiration, housing and automobiles, are flashing warning lights, suggesting that consumer confidence is wavering. Wage stagnation, an acknowledged problem for some years, is compounded by the anxiety of job losses. Thus, the layoffs at TCS signal that other IT companies will soon follow suit. Across industries, from IT to banking, the spectre of redundancy has returned, this time not as a cyclical correction but as a recalibration of the number of people actually required in the emerging AI economy. The playbook that once ensured growth is in urgent need of a rewrite and, increasingly, companies are seeking new leaders to do the writing. In October last year, a McKinsey study on the changing face of leadership concluded that today's most effective leaders are those willing to embrace a 'generational shift". That means breaking away from hierarchical, matrixed organizations and building flatter, faster, and more agile operating models. That, ultimately, may explain the abrupt leadership resets at many companies as they seek to reimagine leadership in a world where yesterday's business assumptions no longer hold with a fundamental transformation in consumer behaviour, cost structures, talent models, and technological change. Only companies that accept this as a foundational shift and not a passing squall will survive and thrive. Those that don't may find that even the best CEO cannot steer a company anchored to the past.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
AI helps Big Tech score big numbers
Each company in the big technology pack—including Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon—surpassed market expectations with stellar performance in the April-June quarter. Himanshi Lohchab brings out what stood out. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The April-June quarter of 2025 proved stellar for the big technology pack: Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon, with each company surpassing market expectations. Alphabet's revenue showed that AI-led search is boosting earnings instead of outperformed estimates due to AI-powered ad optimisation and Zuckerberg's aggressive vision for personal Azure cloud surpassed $75 billion in annual run rate for the first time, zooming the stock to $4 trillion valuation – a feat achieved hitherto by AI hardware titan capital spending across these firms ranges between $331 billion and $377 billion, and consumes up to 40% of sales and 80% of operating cash flow at some companies.
