logo
Hezbollah threatens to resume firing missiles at Israel if it intensifies operations in Lebanon

Hezbollah threatens to resume firing missiles at Israel if it intensifies operations in Lebanon

Arab News2 hours ago
BEIRUT: The leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah warned Tuesday that if Israel intensifies its military operations against his group, the Iran-backed armed faction will resume firing missiles toward Israel.
Naim Kassem's comments came as Lebanon's Cabinet was meeting to discuss Hezbollah's disarmament. Beirut is under US pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel and was left gravely weakened, with many of its political and military leaders dead.
Since the war ended in November with a US-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have said the group will not discuss its disarmament until Israel withdraws from five hills it controls inside Lebanon and stops almost daily airstrikes that have killed or wounded hundreds of people, most of them Hezbollah members.
Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel's military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war.
Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for one attack on a disputed area along the border.
In a televised speech Tuesday, Kassem said Hezbollah rejects any timetable to hand over its weapons.
'Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend,' Kassem said. 'This defense will lead to the fall of missiles inside Israel.'
Since the war ended, Hezbollah has withdrawn most of its fighters and weapons from the area along the border with Israel south of the Litani river.
Last week, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reiterated calls for Hezbollah to give up its weapons, angering the group's leadership.
The ceasefire agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani river should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorized facilities starting with the area south of the river.
Hezbollah maintains the deal only covers the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the US say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon.
Kassem said Hezbollah rejects a government vote over its weapons, saying such a decision should be unanimously backed by all Lebanese.
'No one can deprive Lebanon of its force to protect its sovereignty,' Kassem said.
Hezbollah's weapons are a divisive issue among Lebanese, with some groups calling for its disarmament.
The Israel-Hezbollah war started a day after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack against Israel from Gaza. It left more than 4,000 people dead and caused damage worth $11 billion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German hesitation on Gaza could encourage atrocities, Israeli academics say
German hesitation on Gaza could encourage atrocities, Israeli academics say

Arab News

time2 minutes ago

  • Arab News

German hesitation on Gaza could encourage atrocities, Israeli academics say

BERLIN: More than 100 Israeli academics have warned in a letter that a failure by Germany to put pressure on Israel could lead to new atrocities in Gaza. 'Further hesitation on Germany's part threatens to enable new atrocities — and undermines the lessons learnt from its own history,' the academics wrote in the letter, addressed to senior Social Democrat (SPD) lawmakers Rolf Muetzenich and Adis Ahmetovic and seen by Reuters on Tuesday. On July 22, the two men, whose party is in the ruling coalition, had called for Germany to join an international coalition pushing for an immediate end to the war in Gaza, sanctions against Israel and a suspension of weapons deliveries. The German government — comprising the conservative CDU/CSU bloc and the SPD — has sharpened its criticism of Israel over the manmade humanitarian catastrophe visited on Gaza's 2 million people, but has yet to announce any major policy change. Israel denies having a policy of starvation in Gaza, and says the Hamas militant group, responsible for an operation that killed 1,200 people in Israel in October 2023 and took hundreds more hostage, could end the crisis by surrendering. Critics argue that Germany's response to the war has been overly cautious, mostly owing to an enduring sense of guilt for the Nazi Holocaust, weakening the West's collective ability to put pressure on Israel. 'If over 100 Israeli academics are calling for an immediate change of course ... then it's high time we took visible action,' Ahmetovic told the public broadcaster ARD. Britain, Canada and France have signalled their readiness to recognize a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territory at the United Nations General Assembly this September.

Witkoff and Trump discussed plans for US to increase role in aid to Gaza, Axios reports
Witkoff and Trump discussed plans for US to increase role in aid to Gaza, Axios reports

Arab News

time2 minutes ago

  • Arab News

Witkoff and Trump discussed plans for US to increase role in aid to Gaza, Axios reports

WASHINGTON: US special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Donald Trump discussed plans for Washington to significantly increase its role in providing humanitarian aid to Gaza, Axios reported on Tuesday, citing two US officials and an Israeli official. The report said the discussions took place in a meeting between Witkoff and Trump on Monday at the White House, adding Israel supported the increased US role. Axios cited a US official as saying the Trump administration will 'take over' management of the humanitarian effort in Gaza because Israel is not handling it adequately.

Shifting narrative: Why more Israelis are using the G-word
Shifting narrative: Why more Israelis are using the G-word

Arab News

time2 minutes ago

  • Arab News

Shifting narrative: Why more Israelis are using the G-word

To what extent is the accusation that Israel has been perpetrating a genocide in Gaza bedding in and becoming a more mainstream part of the narrative? Perhaps more intriguingly, to what extent is this question being debated in Israel itself? As ever, it was the Palestinians themselves who were among the first to sound the genocide 'alarm bell.' But they are not in charge of the narrative, and lack the permission to narrate their own suffering. As the lawyer for South Africa, Blinne Ni Ghralaigh, said at the International Court of Justice in the Hague in 2024, this is 'the first genocide in history where its victims are broadcasting their own destruction in real time in the desperate, so far vain hope that the world might do something.' Israeli officials do not face this test when portraying their own suffering. They do not have to wait for others to attest to it. With this major caveat, there are shifts internationally and within Israel. This was brought into sharp focus last week when the Israeli author David Grossman announced that he now saw Israel's assault as a genocide, saying: 'I ask myself, how did we get here?' This came after two leading Israeli human rights organizations, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel, joined the ranks of those bodies who have made this determination, namely that Israel is committing acts in Gaza 'with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,' in this case the Palestinians. These were the first two Israeli bodies to make this call, albeit almost 22 months into the process of genocide. But that shows a degree of ruthless research and debate that took place before making the judgment. It is never easy for citizens from a state perpetrating genocide to admit to this crime. It is shameful. Those making the accusation will feel the coldest of shoulders, even downright loathing, from fellow countrymen. That is why hitherto the word genocide has largely been uttered only in private in Israel. Yet it may be the start of the undermining of the national Israeli consensus that permits genocide. Within Israel, for obvious historical reasons, genocide is a highly sensitive term. Israel came into being in the aftermath of the Holocaust, arguably the most devastating genocide in modern history, industrial in scale, and brutally deliberate in intent. Palestinians have been demonized and dehumanized. Chris Doyle B'Tselem's report was titled 'Our genocide is happening now.' It was unequivocal in tone: 'Israel is taking coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip.' Two of the report's points stand out. First, that the genocide is built on the system of apartheid and Jewish supremacy Israel has applied over the territories it controls. This is a long-term practice. Second, the process of genocide is being perpetrated currently in Gaza, but could soon spread to other areas under Israel's control. The two organizations join the major international human rights agencies Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International in making this accusation, as well as an increasing number of humanitarian aid agencies, such as Doctors Without Borders and Oxfam, that also have warned of the need to protect Palestinians from the risk of genocide. The number of Israeli genocide scholars who deem Israel's actions in Gaza to be genocidal is growing. Omer Bartov has been in the forefront, having declared genocide one month after Israel launched its attacks on Gaza. Raz Segal, an associate professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Stockton University, described it as a 'textbook case of genocide' in October 2023. Amos Goldberg, a Holocaust studies professor from Israel, has used the G-word. Then, in May 2025, Israeli scholar Shmuel Lederman wrote that 'the second half of 2024 is the point at which a consensus formed among genocide scholars, as well as the human rights organizations community, that this is a genocide. Those who perhaps still had doubts — I estimate they dissipated following Israel's actions since the breaking of the ceasefire.' These reports give extra credibility to those in the international arena demanding action to halt the genocide, and also to stop it spreading elsewhere, such as the West Bank. Initially those referring to genocide — even in the immediate aftermath of the ICJ ordering of provisional measures in January 2024 — were hammered. The push-back was fierce. The overwhelming drive within Israel has been in favor of the war and all measures seen as necessary, including starvation. Palestinians have been demonized and dehumanized, and violence against them has been a staple part of mainstream discourse. Internationally, many politicians, commentators, and reporters still refer to a war or conflict in Gaza. They still refer to two sides, as if there are two sides in a genocide. Such terms are long past their sell-by date. The erasure and extinction of Palestinian life in Gaza is on track. Action cannot wait until the ICJ delivers its verdict, which may take some time. By that point, the Palestinian people will have suffered irreparable harm from this genocide. • Chris Doyle is director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding in London. X: @Doylech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store