
DGCA puts operations at Delhi, Mumbai airports under lens; finds many gaps
NEW DELHI: The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) on Tuesday said that it has started a special safety review of the country's airports to strengthen aviation safety and has started comprehensive surveillance at several major airports, including Delhi and Mumbai airports. Flights parked on the runway at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, in Mumbai on June 13 (PTI)
The exercise was conducted by two teams of the joint director general (JDG) of DGCA during the night and early morning hours at the airports. Officials said similar reviews would also be conducted at Hyderabad and Kolkata airports.
The aviation regulator said that the findings recorded by the team during the surveillance had been communicated to the operators for taking corrective action within seven days.
The review is in process, a DGCA official said, adding that findings during the surveillance revealed multiple cases where reported defects reappeared many times on aircraft, indicating ineffective monitoring and inadequate rectification action on repeated defects.
'The surveillance covered multiple critical areas such as flight operations, airworthiness, ramp safety, air traffic control (ATC), communication, navigation and surveillance (CNS) systems, and pre-flight medical evaluations. Throughout the surveillance, ground activities and aircraft movements were closely monitored to check compliance with regulatory requirements and to identify weak areas for improvement,' a statement by the DGCA read.
DGCA said that the surveillance also found faults with the working of AMEs (aircraft maintenance engineering).
'At places, AMEs were not attending to snag rectification; defect reports generated by the aircraft system were not found recorded in the technical logbook; several life vests were not properly secured beneath their designated seats; the corrosion-resistant tape on the right-hand side winglet's lower blade was found to be damaged,' the statement said.
'Ground handling equipment such as baggage trolleys were found unserviceable; line maintenance stores and tool control procedures were not followed,' a statement issued by the DGCA said.
DGCA also found that during the maintenance of aircraft, the work order was not followed.
'The unserviceable thrust reverser system and Flap Slat Lever (device used by pilots to extend or retract the flaps and slats on an aircraft's wings during takeoff and landing) were not locked; during maintenance, safety precautions were not taken by AMEs (aircraft maintenance engineers) as per the AMM (aircraft maintenance manual),' the statement read.
At one airport, DGCA said the centre line marking of the runway had also faded.
'The rapid exit taxiway and green centre light were not unidirectional; the obstruction limitation data has not been updated for the last three years and no survey has been performed despite many new constructions around the vicinity of the aerodrome; a number of vehicles in the ramp area were found without speed governors. These vehicles were withdrawn by cancelling their AVP (aircraft verification procedure) and the drivers' ADP (airport driver permit) were suspended.'
The enhanced surveillance also revealed that a simulator was checked and found not to match the aircraft configuration, and the software was not updated to the current version.
'A domestic flight of a scheduled carrier was held up due to worn tyres and it was released only after the required rectification was carried out,' the DGCA stated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
6 hours ago
- News18
Man Held At Mumbai Airport For Smuggling 16 Exotic Snakes Hidden in Chocolate Boxes
Last Updated: Customs at Mumbai airport caught a man smuggling 16 exotic snakes from Thailand. The snakes were hidden in pouches among chocolates. Customs officials at Mumbai's Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport have apprehended a man trying to smuggle 16 exotic snakes from Thailand. The accused, identified as Goodman Linford Leo, a Tamil Nadu resident, was caught red-handed by Mumbai Airport Customs on June 27. Officials got suspicious due to Leo's uncanny movement, and his check-in baggage was scanned. Upon scanning, the airport officials found five Albino Honduran milk snakes, two garter snakes, two Kenyan sand boas, a coastal banded California king snake, five rhinoceros rat snakes and an albino rat snake. Wildlife Crime Control Bureau identified the snakes that were concealed in 15 white pouches and camouflaged among chocolates. Notably, this is the third such seizure this month. Earlier this month, Mumbai Customs officials at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (CSMIA) held a passenger attempting to smuggle 52 live reptiles. This passenger arrived from Bangkok on Thai Airways flight TG317. He was flagged by the officials due to unusual behaviour and intelligence. Upon scanning his baggage, the officials were shocked to find 52 live reptiles. Among them were three Spider-Tailed Horned Vipers, a rare desert snake species. The officers also found five Asian Leaf Turtles, a species native to Southeast Asia and frequently targeted in the exotic pet trade. Additionally, 44 Indonesian Pit Vipers were also found. Customs officers informed the concerned authorities. The Spider-Tailed Horned Viper and Asian Leaf Turtle are listed under Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and Schedule IV of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. The passenger was arrested under relevant sections of the Customs Act, 1962. Another reptile smuggling racket was busted at Biju Patnaik International Airport in Bhubaneswar. Customs officials seized a variety of exotic species, including Californian king snakes, monitor lizards, chameleons and tortoises from a man who was on his way to Chennai from Hong Kong. First Published: June 30, 2025, 13:10 IST


The Hindu
21 hours ago
- The Hindu
Airlines not reporting unruly behaviour of passengers, says DGCA
The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has said that airline operators either substantially delayed reporting to it incidents of passenger misconduct or unruly behaviour or not reported them at all. Pointing to increasing number of cases where passengers' rage or unruly behaviour posed a threat to the safety of the flight, other passengers and crew, the aviation regulator reiterated its earlier instructions that such incidents should be reported within 12 hours via email to the Chief of Flight Safety/Director Cabin Safety (In-flight services) and a detailed information be submitted to the DGCA within 24 hours of landing of the flight. The DGCA said the norms are applicable to all scheduled and non-scheduled operators and other operators who carried cabin crew on board an aircraft. The aviation watchdog had in its earlier circulars reminded pilots, cabin crew and director of In-flight services of their responsibilities under the Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) on dealing with unruly passengers. The latest advisory comes against the backdrop of several instances of unruly behaviour of passengers under the influence of alcoholic beverages, scuffle among passengers after heated arguments, sexual harassment of women passengers on board and even incidents with a potential to compromise the safety of aircraft operations. Going by the provisions of CAR, there are three categories of unruly behaviour: Level-1 refers to behaviour that is verbally unruly, and calls for debarment up to 3 months; Level-2 indicates physical unruliness and can lead to the passenger being debarred from flying for up to 6 months; and Level-3 relates to life-threatening behaviour where the debarment would be for at least two years. Besides legal action against cognisable offences reported in flights by respective law-enforcing agencies, guidelines were issued in 2017, which stated that complaints of unruly behaviour would be examined by an internal committee. It would take a decision on the matter within 30 days and also specify the duration of ban on the unruly passenger. During the period of pendency of such inquiry, the concerned airline may impose a ban on the passenger. For every subsequent offence, the ban would be twice the period of previous ban.


Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Was the Air India crash deliberate? Sabotage theory ignites probe, Indian minister breaks silence
Published on Jun 29, 2025 09:28 PM IST Two weeks after the tragic AI171 crash, India's civil aviation ministry has dropped a bombshell. Minister of State Murlidhar Mohol confirmed sabotage is among the angles being probed. CCTV footage, ATC logs, and the black box are now under intense review. 260 people died in the crash after the plane plunged into a building. The DGCA found no faults in other Dreamliners. Could this be more than a rare accident?