Zero Mouse Blade : 21g Fingertip Optimized Mouse $169
Optimum provides an in-depth exploration of its Zero Mouse's innovative design. During which you'll discover how its feather-light construction enhances agility, why its ergonomic features cater specifically to fingertip-grip users, and how its advanced internal components deliver unparalleled responsiveness. From the UV-resistant shell that ensures durability to the high polling rate that guarantees real-time accuracy, every detail of this mouse is engineered for peak performance. But is it worth its premium price tag? By the end of this breakdown, you'll have a deeper understanding of what makes the Zero Mouse a standout choice for gamers who demand nothing less than perfection. Sometimes, the smallest details make the biggest difference. Zero Mouse: Gaming Revolution Ultra-Lightweight Mouse Engineering Sets a New Standard
The Zero Mouse Blade offers a new benchmark in weight optimization for gaming mice. Using advanced 3D printing techniques and lightweight materials, it achieves an impressive weight of 21-22 grams, with potential reductions to as low as 16-17 grams in future iterations. This feather-light design enhances agility, allowing for quicker movements and reduced fatigue during extended gaming sessions. Despite its minimal weight, the mouse maintains exceptional structural integrity, making sure it can withstand the rigors of intense gameplay. This balance between durability and weight is critical for gamers who prioritize both performance and reliability. Ergonomics Designed for Fingertip Grip
The Zero Mouse is tailored specifically for fingertip-grip users, offering an ergonomic design that enhances both control and comfort. Its shape and features are carefully crafted to support precise movements and reduce strain, even during prolonged use. Key ergonomic elements include: Strategically balanced grip points forming a stable triangle around the sensor for improved accuracy.
Concave contact points that increase surface area, making sure a secure and comfortable grip.
Sloped main triggers designed to align with natural wrist movements, minimizing strain and maximizing efficiency.
These features make the mouse feel like a natural extension of your hand, allowing effortless micro-adjustments and rapid reactions during gameplay. The design is particularly advantageous for competitive gamers who rely on split-second precision. Zero Mouse 21g Fingertip Optimized Mouse
Watch this video on YouTube.
Advance your skills in lightweight gaming mice by reading more of our detailed content. Innovative Reverse Trigger Mechanism
A standout feature of the Zero Mouse is its reverse trigger mechanism, which redefines the way clicks are executed. This design optimizes the click response at the back of the mouse, resulting in lighter and faster clicks. For fingertip-grip users, this translates to quicker reaction times and smoother execution of rapid actions. Whether you're engaging in fast-paced combat or executing complex maneuvers, the reverse trigger mechanism provides a tangible competitive advantage, making sure every click is both responsive and effortless. Durable and UV-Resistant Shell
The Zero Mouse's Blade shell is crafted from high-quality 3D-printed resin, weighing just 8 grams. Despite its lightweight construction, the material is engineered for durability, making sure the mouse can endure the demands of competitive gaming. To further enhance its usability, the shell is coated with a UV-resistant ultra-matte finish, which: Improves grip and control, even during intense and high-pressure gaming sessions.
Protects the surface from wear, maintaining its sleek appearance over time.
This combination of durability and functionality ensures that the Zero Mouse remains a reliable tool for gamers, even under the most demanding conditions. Precision Manufacturing and Consistency
The Zero Mouse is produced using state-of-the-art Formlabs resin printers, which enable intricate designs and consistent quality. These advanced manufacturing techniques address common 3D printing challenges, such as warping and material inconsistencies, making sure that each unit meets the highest standards. This commitment to precision manufacturing underscores the Zero Mouse's premium craftsmanship, delivering a product that is as reliable as it is innovative. High-Performance Internal Components
Beneath its sleek exterior, the Zero Mouse is powered by the Falcon module from Final Mouse, a high-performance system designed to meet the demands of competitive gaming. Key features of the internal components include: A high polling rate of up to 8,000 Hz, making sure low-latency responsiveness for real-time accuracy.
A lightweight circuit board that minimizes overall weight without compromising performance.
An efficient battery system that supports uninterrupted gameplay for extended periods.
These advanced components work in harmony to deliver the speed, precision, and reliability that gamers require to excel in competitive environments. Fingertip Grip: Enhancing Precision and Mobility
The Zero Mouse is specifically designed to maximize the benefits of a fingertip grip, a style favored by gamers who prioritize precision and mobility. This grip style allows for effortless micro-adjustments, allowing players to make quick and accurate movements with minimal effort. The mouse's design mimics the sensation of aiming with an empty hand, creating a natural and intuitive experience. This unique approach enhances accuracy and responsiveness, making the Zero Mouse an ideal choice for fast-paced gaming scenarios where split-second decisions can determine the outcome. Premium Pricing for Exceptional Quality
Priced at £127 or $169, the Zero Mouse represents a premium investment in gaming performance. Its cost reflects the use of advanced materials, precision manufacturing, and meticulous assembly, all of which contribute to its exceptional quality. Unlike budget alternatives, the Zero Mouse prioritizes innovation, durability, and user experience, making sure that gamers receive a product designed to meet the highest standards. For those seeking a competitive edge, the Zero Mouse offers unparalleled value, combining innovative technology with ergonomic excellence. A New Standard in Gaming Peripherals
The Zero Mouse redefines what a gaming mouse can achieve, setting a new standard for performance, design, and innovation. Its ultra-lightweight construction, fingertip-optimized ergonomics, and high-performance components make it a standout choice for competitive gamers. By prioritizing precision, comfort, and durability, the Zero Mouse delivers a gaming experience that is both reliable and fantastic. Whether you're competing at the highest level or refining your skills, this mouse is designed to help you perform at your best.
Media Credit: optimum Filed Under: Design News, Gaming News, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Human-level AI is not inevitable. We have the power to change course
'Technology happens because it is possible,' OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, told the New York Times in 2019, consciously paraphrasing Robert Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb. Altman captures a Silicon Valley mantra: technology marches forward inexorably. Another widespread techie conviction is that the first human-level AI – also known as artificial general intelligence (AGI) – will lead to one of two futures: a post-scarcity techno-utopia or the annihilation of humanity. For countless other species, the arrival of humans spelled doom. We weren't tougher, faster or stronger – just smarter and better coordinated. In many cases, extinction was an accidental byproduct of some other goal we had. A true AGI would amount to creating a new species, which might quickly outsmart or outnumber us. It could see humanity as a minor obstacle, like an anthill in the way of a planned hydroelectric dam, or a resource to exploit, like the billions of animals confined in factory farms. Altman, along with the heads of the other top AI labs, believes that AI-driven extinction is a real possibility (joining hundreds of leading AI researchers and prominent figures). Given all this, it's natural to ask: should we really try to build a technology that may kill us all if it goes wrong? Perhaps the most common reply says: AGI is inevitable. It's just too useful not to build. After all, AGI would be the ultimate technology – what a colleague of Alan Turing called 'the last invention that man need ever make'. Besides, the reasoning goes within AI labs, if we don't, someone else will do it – less responsibly, of course. A new ideology out of Silicon Valley, effective accelerationism (e/acc), claims that AGI's inevitability is a consequence of the second law of thermodynamics and that its engine is 'technocapital'. The e/acc manifesto asserts: 'This engine cannot be stopped. The ratchet of progress only ever turns in one direction. Going back is not an option.' For Altman and e/accs, technology takes on a mystical quality – the march of invention is treated as a fact of nature. But it's not. Technology is the product of deliberate human choices, motivated by myriad powerful forces. We have the agency to shape those forces, and history shows that we've done it before. No technology is inevitable, not even something as tempting as AGI. Some AI worriers like to point out the times humanity resisted and restrained valuable technologies. Fearing novel risks, biologists initially banned and then successfully regulated experiments on recombinant DNA in the 1970s. No human has been reproduced via cloning, even though it's been technically possible for over a decade, and the only scientist to genetically engineer humans was imprisoned for his efforts. Nuclear power can provide consistent, carbon-free energy, but vivid fears of catastrophe have motivated stifling regulations and outright bans. And if Altman were more familiar with the history of the Manhattan Project, he might realize that the creation of nuclear weapons in 1945 was actually a highly contingent and unlikely outcome, motivated by a mistaken belief that the Germans were ahead in a 'race' for the bomb. Philip Zelikow, the historian who led the 9/11 Commission, said: 'I think had the United States not built an atomic bomb during the Second World War, it's actually not clear to me when or possibly even if an atomic bomb ever is built.' It's now hard to imagine a world without nuclear weapons. But in a little-known episode, then president Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev nearly agreed to ditch all their bombs (a misunderstanding over the 'Star Wars' satellite defense system dashed these hopes). Even though the dream of full disarmament remains just that, nuke counts are less than 20% of their 1986 peak, thanks largely to international agreements. These choices weren't made in a vacuum. Reagan was a staunch opponent of disarmament before the millions-strong Nuclear Freeze movement got to him. In 1983, he commented to his secretary of state : 'If things get hotter and hotter and arms control remains an issue, maybe I should go see [Soviet leader Yuri] Andropov and propose eliminating all nuclear weapons.' There are extremely strong economic incentives to keep burning fossil fuels, but climate advocacy has pried open the Overton window and significantly accelerated our decarbonization efforts. In April 2019, the young climate group Extinction Rebellion (XR) brought London to a halt, demanding the UK target net-zero carbon emissions by 2025. Their controversial civil disobedience prompted parliament to declare a climate emergency and the Labour party to adopt a 2030 target to decarbonize the UK's electricity production. The Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign was lesser-known but wildly effective. In just its first five years, the campaign helped shutter more than one-third of US coal plants. Thanks primarily to its move from coal, US per capita carbon emissions are now lower than they were in 1913. In many ways, the challenge of regulating efforts to build AGI is much smaller than that of decarbonizing. Eighty-two percent of global energy production comes from fossil fuels. Energy is what makes civilization work, but we're not dependent on a hypothetical AGI to make the world go round. Further, slowing and guiding the development of future systems doesn't mean we'd need to stop using existing systems or developing specialist AIs to tackle important problems in medicine, climate and elsewhere. It's obvious why so many capitalists are AI enthusiasts: they foresee a technology that can achieve their long-time dream of cutting workers out of the loop (and the balance sheet). But governments are not profit maximizers. Sure, they care about economic growth, but they also care about things like employment, social stability, market concentration, and, occasionally, democracy. It's far less clear how AGI would affect these domains overall. Governments aren't prepared for a world where most people are technologically unemployed. Capitalists often get what they want, particularly in recent decades, and the boundless pursuit of profit may undermine any regulatory effort to slow the speed of AI development. But capitalists don't always get what they want. At a bar in San Francisco in February, a longtime OpenAI safety researcher pronounced to a group that the e/accs shouldn't be worried about the 'extreme' AI safety people, because they'll never have power. The boosters should actually be afraid of AOC and Senator Josh Hawley because they 'can really fuck things up for you'. Assuming humans stick around for many millennia, there's no way to know we won't eventually build AGI. But this isn't really what the inevitabilists are saying. Instead, the message tends to be: AGI is imminent. Resistance is futile. But whether we build AGI in five, 20 or 100 years really matters. And the timeline is far more in our control than the boosters will admit. Deep down, I suspect many of them realize this, which is why they spend so much effort trying to convince others that there's no point in trying. Besides, if you think AGI is inevitable, why bother convincing anybody? We actually had the computing power required to train GPT-2 more than a decade before OpenAI actually did it, but people didn't know whether it was worth doing. But right now, the top AI labs are locked in such a fierce race that they aren't implementing all the precautions that even their own safety teams want. (One OpenAI employee announced recently that he quit 'due to losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI'.) There's a 'safety tax' that labs can't afford to pay if they hope to stay competitive; testing slows product releases and consumes company resources. Governments, on the other hand, aren't subject to the same financial pressures. An inevitabilist tech entrepreneur recently said regulating AI development is impossible 'unless you control every line of written code'. That might be true if anyone could spin up an AGI on their laptop. But it turns out that building advanced, general AI models requires enormous arrays of supercomputers, with chips produced by an absurdly monopolistic industry. Because of this, many AI safety advocates see 'compute governance' as a promising approach. Governments could compel cloud computing providers to halt next generation training runs that don't comply with established guardrails. Far from locking out upstarts or requiring Orwellian levels of surveillance, thresholds could be chosen to only affect players who can afford to spend more than $100m on a single training run. Governments do have to worry about international competition and the risk of unilateral disarmament, so to speak. But international treaties can be negotiated to widely share the benefits from cutting-edge AI systems while ensuring that labs aren't blindly scaling up systems they don't understand. And while the world may feel fractious, rival nations have cooperated to surprising degrees. The Montreal Protocol fixed the ozone layer by banning chlorofluorocarbons. Most of the world has agreed to ethically motivated bans on militarily useful weapons, such as biological and chemical weapons, blinding laser weapons, and 'weather warfare'. In the 1960s and 70s, many analysts feared that every country that could build nukes, would. But most of the world's roughly three-dozen nuclear programs were abandoned. This wasn't the result of happenstance, but rather the creation of a global nonproliferation norm through deliberate statecraft, like the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty. On the few occasions when Americans were asked if they wanted superhuman AI, large majorities said 'no'. Opposition to AI has grown as the technology has become more prevalent. When people argue that AGI is inevitable, what they're really saying is that the popular will shouldn't matter. The boosters see the masses as provincial neo-Luddites who don't know what's good for them. That's why inevitability holds such rhetorical allure for them; it lets them avoid making their real argument, which they know is a loser in the court of public opinion. The draw of AGI is strong. But the risks involved are potentially civilization-ending. A civilization-scale effort is needed to compel the necessary powers to resist it. Technology happens because people make it happen. We can choose otherwise. Garrison Lovely is a freelance journalist
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Nasdaq, S&P hit record levels as megacaps rise ahead of tech earnings
July 21 (Reuters) - The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq reached new record highs on Monday, bolstered by gains in megacaps as investors geared up for the week's major tech earnings, while the prospects of fresh trade deals also boosted sentiment. At 11:21 a.m. ET, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab gained 34.97 points, or 0.56%, to 6,331.90 and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab gained 147.24 points, or 0.71%, to 21,042.87. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab rose 201.87 points, or 0.46%, to 44,544.76, just 1.28% shy of its all-time high. Verizon (VZ.N), opens new tab gained 4.1% after boosting its annual profit forecast. The stock also drove up the communications sector (.SPLRCL), opens new tab, which emerged as the top gainer among other sectors. Most big-tech names moved higher, pushing the S&P's information technology sector (.SPLRCT), opens new tab up 0.6% to hit an all-time high. The spotlight was on Google-parent Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and electric-vehicle maker Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab, whose results this week will kick off the "Magnificent Seven" earnings parade, and could set the tone for Wall Street. Shares of Alphabet rose 2.1%, while Tesla dipped 0.2%. Both stocks have lagged their peers so far this year, with Tesla down 18.5% year to date and Alphabet slipping 0.2%. "It is going to be interesting to see the Tesla and Google reports," because those two are kind of "underachievers in the Mag 7 this year," said Mike Dickson, head of research at Horizon Investments. "We're going to need these earnings reports to just really knock it out of the park if we want to see this little leg of the rally continue." Despite U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 tariff deadline, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab and the Nasdaq (.IXIC), opens new tab reached new heights recently as investors believed that the economic fallout from tariffs might not be as dire as once feared. Trump has threatened to slap 30% tariffs on imports from Mexico and the EU, and sent letters to other trading partners, including Canada, Japan and Brazil, setting blanket tariff rates ranging from 20% to 50%. Investors were expecting some progress in trade talks after U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Sunday expressed confidence over striking a trade deal with the European Union. However, EU diplomats said the 27-member bloc is exploring a broader set of possible counter-measures against the United States, as hopes for a breakthrough deal with Washington dwindled. On the economic data front, investors will keep a close eye on jobless claims figures and the July business activity report, expected on Thursday. They will also closely analyze Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's remarks on Tuesday for any clues on the central bank's next move, especially after last week's mixed inflation signals. Traders have largely ruled out a July rate cut, and are now pegging the odds at about 56% for a September reduction, according to CME Group's FedWatch tool. Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 3.02-to-1 ratio on the NYSE, and by a 2.58-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 15 new 52-week highs and 5 new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 73 new highs and 34 new lows.
Finextra
2 hours ago
- Finextra
Nasdaq Verafin unveils agentic AI AML workers
Nasdaq's anti-financial crime unit Verafin has launched a suite of agentic AI digital workers built to help banks with anti-money laundering compliance by automating low-value, high-volume processes. 1 According to a Nasdaq Verafin survey of more than 200 industry professionals, 75% have increased their investment in headcount over the prior year to improve financial crime prevention efforts. However, nearly half report a lack of adequate resources and technology to meet the regulatory burden. With the ability to independently analyse, document, and decision end-to-end processes, the company claims that its new digital workers enable banks to reallocate resources to more sophisticated investigations and outcomes-focused activities. Currently in beta ahead of a roll out later this year, the first of the digital workers will focus on two of the most resource-intensive areas of compliance - sanctions screening and enhanced due diligence reviews. The sanctions screening agent will help with dispositioning, documenting, and actioning false positive alerts, while escalating true matches for further review by bank investigators. The enhanced due diligence analyst will automate banks' periodic review process, actioning low-risk cases that do not require further investigation, offering significant efficiency gains for banks. Rob Norris, SVP, head of product, Nasdaq Verafin, says: 'Our Agentic AI Workforce will transform the way banks of all sizes approach AML compliance, delivering a step change in efficiency gains that allows compliance teams to shift efforts and focus on the important work of tackling serious financial crimes such as human trafficking, drug trafficking, and other facets of organized crime.'
