Pro-Palestine March for Humanity could shut down the Sydney Harbour Bridge to send 'powerful' message to the world
The Palestine Action Group Sydney said in a statement on Sunday that it has informed NSW Police of its intention to hold a 'March for Humanity' across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday to "save Gaza".
"We call on everyone, every individual and every organisation, who cannot bear to do nothing in the face of this atrocity, to join with us," the statement reads.
"As Australia's most iconic symbol, a mass march across the Harbour Bridge will send a powerful message to the world, to Gaza, to Israel, and to our own Government, that we are determined to stand up for humanity."
The statement drew comparisons to the 2023 WorldPride March event, which closed the Harbour Bridge so 50,000 people - including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - could march across.
Palestine Action Group Sydney said the bridge "can certainly be closed to stop a genocide".
"That same year (2023) saw the bridge closed for several hours to shoot a scene for a Ryan Gosling film. It can certainly be closed to stop a genocide," it wrote.
The group further called on the NSW Government to facilitate the March for Humanity.
The protest due to take place this coming weekend could set the stage for confrontations with police.
Major traffic disruptions may also be on the cards if roads are closed for protestors to march across the bridge.
The Palestine Action Group Sydney said it lodged a Form 1 notifying NSW Police of its intentions.
While NSW protestors do not require formal approval from police to hold a legal rally after the filing of a Form 1, police can oppose it through the court system.
The group said protesters planned on meeting at Lang Park, near Wynyard station, at 1pm before marching to the bridge.
"We appeal to organisations and high profile individuals to please sign on and endorse this March for Humanity," the statement continues.
"Let's do this! "Save Gaza! Free Palestine!"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Why police couldn't stop the Harbour Bridge protest
Sam Hawley: It was a protest the New South Wales government and police tried to stop but couldn't. In the end, more than 100,000 protesters were permitted to walk across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, demanding an end to the war in Gaza. But should we be concerned that organisers had to fight for the right to hold the rally in the first place? Today, Associate Professor in Law at the University of South Australia, Sarah Moulds, on why it's becoming harder to protest. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. News report: It was the protest that brought Sydney to a standstill. Thousands marching across the Harbour Bridge. Despite the rain that come from all over the city and beyond. Protester: The starving children of Gaza cannot wait another day. End the violence. Protester: There's too many deaths of young children, too much starvation. Protester: It's a sign of the turning tide of the of the opinion in this country. And it's a sign that people aren't going to put up with it anymore. Sam Hawley: Sarah, when a pro-Palestinian group first proposed this march across the Harbour Bridge in Sydney about a week before it was to take place, the government and police were not happy, were they? Sarah Moulds: No, they were looking for a way to stop the protest or to see whether the protest could happen in a different place. Sam Hawley: Yeah. So the New South Wales Police Acting Deputy Commissioner, Peter McKenna, he was saying that he was concerned about public safety and the disruption to motorists. Assistant Commissioner Peter McKenna, NSW Police: We understand there is some angst at the moment about what's happening overseas. We understand and are sympathetic to that. But the New South Wales Police decision around this has to be first and foremost about public and police safety. We will not be facilitating that protest. Sam Hawley: Chris Minns, the New South Wales Premier, he opposed the protest, saying he could not allow Sydney to descend into chaos. Chris Minns, NSW Premier: To close down the Harbour Bridge, which has happened maybe two or three times in a decade, is a logistical and communications Everest. It's incredibly difficult to do. And I understand that some people say, look, it's easy to shut down the bridge. It's not easy. Sam Hawley: Were they reasonable arguments at that time? Sarah Moulds: I think they were reasonable arguments. But one of the things that's important to hold in mind is this concept that we have a common law right to communicate about political matters in Australia that comes from our constitution. And the concept of the right of peaceful assembly is something we've signed up to at the international level. So while I think the arguments around safety, inconvenience and disruption are really powerful, particularly with something of this scale in this place, on the other side of the ledger, if you like, are these important principles that Australians also consider to be fundamental in our democracy? Sam Hawley: All right. Well, around this time, the protesters were predicting that around 50,000 people would turn up. So that's about a week before it actually happened. And the matter then went before the New South Wales Supreme Court and Judge Belinda Rigg, who would make the ultimate decision about whether or not this protest could happen on the Harbour Bridge. And she did that on Saturday morning. What did she say? Sarah Moulds: In the reasons that were shared from the justice of the New South Wales Supreme Court, it's clear that that common law concept of peaceful assembly was an important consideration. So was the principle that just because something might be inconvenient or disruptive might not be enough to say it should be prohibited under the law. And also there was information to suggest that people were going to do this anyway. And so that was something that needed to be considered alongside the safety information that the police were putting before the court. Sam Hawley: And Justice Rigg, she noted that the march at this location on the Harbour Bridge was motivated by the belief that the horror and urgency of the situation in Gaza demands an urgent and extraordinary response from the people of the world. She also noted that it is in the nature of peaceful protests to cause disruption to others. Sarah Moulds: That's right. That was clear from the ruling that that concept of inconvenience and disruption is inherently connected to the idea of protest and communicating on a matter of political importance to the people of Australia. Sam Hawley: All right. So the judgment meant, of course, that the protest could go ahead and that the protesters would have immunity from being charged with what offences? Sarah Moulds: Yes. So the immunity is quite limited. So the ruling meant that somebody was not going to be charged with an offence relating to unlawful assembly, of obstructing a person, vehicle or public place. But it was conditional on the fact that the protesters stayed within the boundaries of the assembly that was described in this form one that was before the court. So the protest organisers had to put all that information together, share that with the police and the court. And if the communities involved stayed within the scope of that plan, they would be immune from those minor offences that I just described. However, it would not extend to somebody being prosecuted or charged with a violent offence. And the police retain powers to make orders with respect to individuals and ask them to do things or ask them to change what they're doing. And a failure to comply with those kind of orders made by police could also potentially result in liability. So important immunity, but also limited. Sam Hawley: Well, Sarah, as we said before, initially, the protest organisers thought that it attracted around 50,000 people. In the end, more than 100,000 people showed up despite the terrible weather. It was pouring with rain. That's huge, isn't it? Just put that into perspective. Have we seen such a large protest like this before? Sarah Moulds: I'm sure we have back in history, but in recent years, particularly in the years since these legal processes for handling process have been involved in this way. This is a very, very significant number of people. And I think that speaks to the significance of the issue that people were protesting about on the bridge, as well as the challenge faced by police and other authorities in facilitating this type of event to happen safely. So, yeah, throughout history, we've had really big protests before in Australia. But definitely in recent years, the numbers of this one are really significant. Sam Hawley: The acting assistant commissioner, Adam Johnson, he described the situation on the bridge as intense and one of the most perilous he's ever been involved in. Acting Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson, NSW Police: I can honestly say in my 35 years of policing, that was a perilous situation. I've never seen a more perilous situation. I was honestly worried that we were going to have a a major incident with a potential loss of life. Sam Hawley: But it was peaceful, wasn't it? Sarah Moulds: I think one thing to keep in mind on the legal side of it is that the reason we have this process of being able to put forward an application detailing a public assembly and then have the opportunity for the police to respond and ultimately the courts is to try and make sure that this can happen safely, that we get the right balance between freedom of speech and association and our right to communicate on political matters and safety. And so I think that it is really important to continue to encourage organisers of community events and public assemblies to put that information in the application and give the authorities time to respond. It was clear from the ruling in this case that this was important to get right. If there was a prohibition, there was a risk that people would protest anyway and then you would lose that opportunity to create safety or have control over what might happen in and around the protest. With the oversight of the court, you can do this in a safe way. And it appears that it did have a safe result in this particular case, which is pretty extraordinary. Not many places around the world could have a protest of 90,000 people and result in safety for everybody. So that's something pretty significant as well. Sam Hawley: So, Sarah, we know protesting is a democratic right, but as you've mentioned, it has become harder to protest in Australia. There are more barriers now than ever before, right? Sarah Moulds: Yeah, that's correct. So we've made a commitment at the international level to protect everybody's right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. But what we don't have is anything clear in our constitution or in any other piece of legislation saying we have a right to protest in Australia. Instead, we have this implied constitutional freedom to communicate on political matters in our representative democracy. But what you definitely can have and what we see in a number of states in Australia are laws that prohibit any disruptive action on the streets, any disruptive action on the roads or around businesses or workplaces. So in South Australia, for example, we've got offences for obstructing public place. In Queensland and New South Wales, they've got offences for attaching yourself to roads or major thoroughfares. In Tasmania, we had laws around logging areas, prohibiting people from protesting there. One of the things that's obvious is that these laws are different in different places, and it's quite complex and confusing for people to know what they are. And that's why we see people having to get legal advice and barristers to help them work this out. So if we were able to get together and streamline these processes across Australia so it was clear about how important it is to value peaceful assembly, but also how important it is to put people on notice about what things are going to look like so we can do this safely. I think that would be great. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, police have said they can't allow a protest like this to happen again. Assistant Commissioner Peter McKenna, NSW Police: So this operation, from our point of view, was a success in that no one was hurt. No people were hurt. No police were hurt. But gee whiz, I wouldn't like to try and do this every Sunday at that short notice. There's a reason we need time to plan these things out. And I think going forward into the future, that has to be taken into consideration. Sam Hawley: And the Premier, Chris Minns, says the government will look at whether that Supreme Court judgment actually sets a precedent. Chris Minns, NSW Premier: I have to examine all of this. I'm not ruling anything out. And I think most reasonable people would expect that, yes, you do have from time to time massive demonstrations, even if it's on the bridge. But knocking it out every week is just it's not something that we can consider forever. Sarah Moulds: Well, I think that at the moment, the summary offences process that was followed in this case, it gives discretion for police commissioners to make decisions, and it gives discretion for the courts to make decisions. If the New South Wales Parliament attempted to pass a different law about protest, they've done this in other areas or use different powers, then ultimately it might go to the High Court to see whether the Parliament has unduly infringed that constitutional freedom. So I think there are tweaks that the Parliament could make to the process of applying for authorisation for protests. But they'd have to be careful because there's a tipping point where the High Court would say you are now prohibiting that implied freedom of political communication. And that's such an important concept of a representative democracy that we can communicate about things that we feel passionately about as voters and citizens in the country. Sam Hawley: The point, of course, of a protest, Sarah, is to bring about change. Do you think this will do that in any way, given the magnitude of it? Sarah Moulds: Well, I think Australia's ability to influence what's happening on the ground in the Middle East is limited. However, we have a powerful voice in international forums and in forums with our allies. And so I think that action like this empowers and emboldens our political leaders to do things like look to international forums, international law, humanitarian law, and say Australian people support those concepts of dignity and human rights and that they can then go and express that position on the world stage. So I think the protesters would feel that they've done something historic in organising this event, sent a message across the world about what the people of Australia think, supported the elected representatives who are articulating their perspective on the world stage. And I think we should also be proud of our police and authorities, as I said, that have been able to organise a protest like this is probably an excellent sign of a healthy democracy that we can facilitate this kind of democratic expression in this way. Sam Hawley: Sarah Moulds is an associate professor in law at the University of South Australia. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead and Cinnamon Nippard. Audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.
The Australian
5 hours ago
- The Australian
Anthony Albanese to announce $31m mobile TAFE centres during visit to the 2025 Garma Festival
Anthony Albanese will promise mobile TAFE centres to train Indigenous students in remote communities, with the Prime Minister set to make the announcement when he attends the Garma Festival in remote Arnhem Land this weekend. The $31m commitment, to be delivered alongside state and territory governments, will allow teachers to travel Australia using utes and trailers to train students in construction, mining, agriculture, carpentry, plumbing and community work, to ensure Indigenous people don't have to leave their communities to access that training. 'So that instead of communities relying on drive-in, drive-out workers to build and maintain the new homes we are delivering … locals get that training,' he is expected to say on Saturday. 'And instead of people having to move away from home to prepare for a career in mining or agriculture, construction or the care economy, we will bring skills and jobs to communities. 'Hands-on training, on country.' Anthony Albanese attending the Garma Festival in northeast Arnhem Land in 2024. Picture: Yothu Yindi Foundation/Nina Franova via NewsWire Labor will also promise $75m to help resource-strapped native title holders negotiate land use deals, to 'secure better deals, drive faster approvals and deliver a real and lasting economic legacy for communities. 'We must end the stalemate that arises when native title organisations with little in the way of back of house, or legal and commercial expertise, are expected to negotiate with multinational firms,' he will say. 'This is the tone and the standard we want this partnership to set, from the very start – pragmatic action that brings economic development, ownership and equity to communities. 'Not doubling-up on advice, or getting in the way of processes that are working.' In what will be his fourth time attending the large-scale event as Prime Minister, Mr Albanese will say that Labor's second term of government will be focused on 'delivery', with the government shifting focus to boosting economic empowerment among Indigenous Australians following the failure of the Voice referendum. It also coincides with this week's release of the Closing the Gap report which revealed Australia was only on track to meet four out of 19 targets, with efforts to reduce rates of Indigenous adult imprisonment, suicide rates and removing children in out-of-home care, and bring them in line with non-Indigenous peoples worsening. Australia was, however, expected to reach its targets to boost Indigenous preschool enrolments, employment and two land rights goals. Although Mr Albanese is expected to concede that there is 'more to do,' he will urge that 'closing the gap is a challenge all of us must meet' and took aim at the 'culture wars' instigated by the Coalition. This follows a successful motion at the WA Liberal Party state conference, which was supported by high-profile Liberal senator Michaelia Cash, and called for Welcome to Country ceremonies to be banned at official events. Mr Albanese will use his speech at Garma to call for an end to the culture wars saying they 'are a dry gully'. Picture: Yothu Yindi Foundation/Leicolhn McKellar via NewsWire Instead Mr Albanese will call on people to push back against people who 'choose the cheap politics of division over the patient work of lasting change or who seek to turn the grace and generosity of a welcome to country into a political weapon'. 'Culture wars are a dry gully. They offer us nothing, they lead us nowhere,' he will say. 'The way forward is to invest in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, trust in their aspirations and draw from their knowledge because when we lay these strong foundations together, there is no limit to what we can build.' New Liberal leader Sussan Ley will not attend the Garma Festival. Instead, shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser – who stood down from the front bench in 2023 because of his support of the Voice – will represent the Coalition. Ms Ley will, instead, travel to the Kimberley in Western Australia for a four-day listening tour with Indigenous communities and organisations. The Opposition Leader will also be joined by Coalition spokeswoman for Indigenous Australians Kerrynne Liddle and WA MP for Durack Melissa Price. Ms Ley said Mr Albanese had a 'personal obligation' to use his appearance at the Garma Festival to detail his government's plan to closing the gap. 'It is not good enough to just give speeches at festivals, we need to see his plan,' she said. 'Since the Voice Anthony Albanese has stepped back from Indigenous issues, that is not good enough. He led the referendum process, a process which was unsuccessful. So what is his path forward?' The four-day event, which started on Friday, will be the 25th anniversary of the Garma festival, which celebrates Yolngu culture – the name of Aboriginal peoples who inhabit northeastern Arnhem Land. The theme of this year's festival is 'rom ga waŋa wataŋu', or 'the law of the land, standing firm'. Read related topics: Anthony Albanese Jessica Wang NewsWire Federal Politics Reporter Jessica Wang is a federal politics reporter for NewsWire based in the Canberra Press Gallery. She previously covered NSW state politics for the Wire and has also worked at and Mamamia covering breaking news, entertainment, and lifestyle. @imjesswang_ Jessica Wang
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘They wouldn't survive an hour in Iran': Protesters shamed for supporting Iranian regimes
Israel Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel discusses the pro-Palestine protests on Sydney's Harbour Bridge on Sunday. 'These are people who are not ashamed, embarrassed, from walking with a full-on picture of the ayatollah, the Iranian terrorist regime,' Ms Haskel told Sky News host Sharri Markson. 'Many of these people wouldn't have survived even an hour in Iran. 'To have a demonstration like that, with so much support to terrorist organisations and terrorist regimes, it's absolutely shameful.'
