
(Almost) everything our governments have inherited since 2005
The word 'inherited' gets thrown around a lot in parliament. There are inherited 'messes', 'dire' situations, years of 'neglect' and a whole lot of 'crises' across essentially every major portfolio – and very rarely is anything the government claims to have inherited a good thing.
A search of government press releases since 2005 reveals National-led governments have more often pointed to 'inherited' situations than Labour-led ones, with former National MP and health minister Tony Ryall the biggest culprit. Health is easily the most complained about sector when it comes to issues bequeathed by governments' predecessors, followed by the economy, housing and education. While governments in their first term are more likely to highlight 'inherited' issues, governments in their second and even third term are not immune to the phenomenon.
While it can be a pretty annoying phrase to hear if you'd just like someone to own up to something, it's not hard to see where they're coming from – the bigger the mess you've been left, the harder it is to clean up. I may be a decent reporter, for example, yet I have inherited an industry on fire. But enough of that. Here's almost everything the government has inherited in the last 20 years, according to Beehive press releases.
Economy
'A country with its bank account run down and its credit card maxed out' – Nicola Willis (National), May 27, 2025
'A long period of economic decline' – Simeon Brown (National), March 26, 2025
A 'recession' – David Seymour (Act), February 14, 2025 and Christopher Luxon (National) May 15, 2024. Also Bill English (National), January 14, July 24, August 12 and October 18, 2009, April 27, 2012 and May 2 and 21, 2015; Simon Bridges (National), August 27, 2014; Gerry Brownlee (National), November 19, 2009 and July 19, 2014; and John Key (National), February 9, 2011.
'Structural deficit and a challenging set of circumstances' – Willis, May 9 and October 15, 2024
A 'dire fiscal situation' – Seymour, May 30, 2024
'High cost of living' – Louise Upston (National), March 28, 2024
'An unhappy mix of high inflation, high interest rates, a contracting economy, and rising unemployment' – Willis, February 15, 2024
A GDP that was looking bad but then the government changed it – Grant Robertson (Labour), March 8, 9, 12 and 17, 2020
'A stable economy but a country that had major challenges' – Jacinda Ardern (Labour), November 21, 2019
An economy 'based on excessive property speculation and high rates of immigration driving consumption-led growth' – David Parker (Labour), July 2, 2019
The 'laissez-faire neglect that nine years of a National government produced' – Winston Peters (NZ First), May 31, 2019
An 'inadequate status quo' from the 'English/Key governments' – Peters, May 8, 2018
An ACC scheme 'that had a $4.8bn hole' – Nikki Kaye (National), October 28, 2011 and April 2, May 12, September 22 and October 22, 2015
'An economy that was already in trouble' – Anne Tolley (National), September 30, 2009
A 'billion-dollar blowout' in ACC – Nick Smith (National), August 7, 2009
'Growing debt' – English, May 29, 2009
The 'regulatory wasteland that was the financial sector' in 1999 – Lianne Dalziel (Labour), September 25, 2008
The 'national embarrassment' of 'social breakdown, rising poverty, and growing inequality' – Michael Cullen (Labour), May 7, 2008
A 'legacy of poverty' – Steve Maharey (Labour), February 16, 2007
'An economy reaping the efficiency gains of the earlier structural adjustments' – Cullen, November 1, 2006
'An economic and social landscape that was very different to the one we have today' – David Benson-Pope (Labour), September 18, 2006
A 'regulatory regime that was failing to deliver on its promises of competitive prices and sensible investment decisions' – Cullen, August 17, 2006
Education
'A school property system bordering on a crisis' – Erica Stanford (National), February 26, 2024 and July 18, 2025
'A struggling system with a pipeline of underfunded school upgrades that were over scoped and couldn't be delivered' – Stanford, October 4, 2024
A 'significant teacher shortage' – Jan Tinetti (Labour), March 18 and 25, 2021, and Ardern, November 4, 2018
The long-term challenge of 'getting more young people to take up trades and work skills training' – Chris Hipkins (Labour), October 23, 2019
A 'decade of neglect' in funding classrooms – Ardern, July 5, 2019
'Low morale' among teachers – Hipkins, February 2, 2018
A 'world-class university system that is consistently high quality' – Paul Goldsmith (National), July 27, 2017
A 'school property portfolio with an average age of 40 years' with 'leaky buildings' and 'poor maintenance' – Kaye, July 16, 2016, and April 6 and May 26, 2017
An 'expensive and bloated system with serious deficiencies' – Steven Joyce (National), March 5, 2014
A sector that had 'seen lots of cuts and a bit of tinkering', yet 'no focus on how we move our system' – Hekia Parata (National), November 29 and December 9, 2013
Health
'A health system in a state of turmoil' – Simeon Brown (National), March 7, 2025
'A health system facing a significant number of challenges following major reform' – Shane Reti (National), March 7, 2024
'A neglected and underfunded mental health system' and 'seriously aging mental health facilities not fit for purpose' – Ayesha Verrall (Labour), May 25 and August 21, 2023
A 'mess' – Andrew Little (Labour), May 20 and October 26, 2022, and Tony Ryall (National), December 16, 2008 and June 30, 2011
Systems and services 'under serious pressure from years of neglect and underinvestment' – Peeni Henare (Labour), September 1, 2022, and Little, June 14, 2022
An 'underfunded and narrowly targeted' healthy homes initiative – Verrall, October 3, 2022
Poor record keeping – Little, August 24, 2022
A 'major catch-up job' – Little, May 20, 2021
'Underinvestment in core hospital facilities' – David Clark (Labour), January 29, 2020
'A health and disability system that had been woefully underfunded and neglected' – David Clark, October 29, 2019
The 'long-term challenge' of underpaid hospital staff – David Clark, October 6 and 8, 2019
'Earthquake-prone hospitals, asbestos, leaky roofs and buildings that have simply come to the end of their useful life' – Robertson, May 30, 2019
A 'catalogue of building issues at hospitals around the country' – David Clark, April 30, 2019
DHB deficits – David Clark, August 1, 2018, and Ryall, June 15 and 28, September 8 and November 18, 2009 and November 19, 2010
'Long-standing drinking water issues' and 'nine years of neglect' on drinking water standards – David Clark, July 5, 2018
A 'decade of deficits' and 'failing status quo' – Ryall, June 22 and October 25, 2013 and April 1, 2014
The 'workforce problem' and 'crisis' and 'shortages' – Ryall, February 27, March 31, October 16 and 19 and December 4, 2009, March 13, April 10 and June 12, 2010, June 11, 2011 and April 18, 2013, and Coleman, October 15, 2009
Lessening influence from clinicians on patient outcomes – Ryall, August 3 and 8, September 16 and 18 and October 24, 2009 and December 7, 2012
A system 'bloated with targets, priorities, objectives, indicators and measures', some of which were 'well-meaning but unrealistic' – Ryall, September 27, 2011
A 'system on track to financial crisis' – Coleman, May 21, 2011, and Ryall, October 20, 2010
'A lot of problems here in Dunedin' but specifically the hospital which had been 'neglected for many years' – Ryall, June 4, 2010
'Mounting public concern about poor care in rest homes' – Ryall, June 3, 2010
A public health system not equipped to deal with 'significant financial and clinical challenges' – Ryall, October 22 and 24 and November 5, 2009
'Disjointed and uncoordinated resources' – Ryall, August 7, 2009
A system 'overburdened' with too many targets – Ryall, May 8, 2009
Delays in waiting lists – Ryall, December 22, 2008, January 30 and February 26, 2009
'High costs' in primary care – David Cunliffe (Labour), September 12, 2008
'Gutted health system' – Pete Hodgson (Labour), July 2, 2007
A system that 'favoured Americanisation' – Hodgson, July 22, 2006
Housing
'A complicated legal landscape' – Chris Bishop, National, June 18, 2025
'A huge emergency housing problem which grew from a few families using it for short periods of time into a situation where three thousand families are living in motels for months at a time' – Bishop, March 6, 2024
'Crisis' – Megan Woods (Labour), September 30, 2020, May 13, June 14, August 5, September 28, October 19, 2021, April 28, May 19, July 19, August 12 and November 17, 2022, April 26 and 28, May 4 and 8, October 6, 2023, as well as David Parker, October 16, 2019, October 19, 2021, and Kris Faafoi (Labour), November 17, 2019, February 17 and August 5, 2020, and Ardern, February 12 and October 15, 2019
'The intergenerational taonga of public housing' – Woods, May 24, 2023
'Issues' – Woods, October 23, 2019
'Neglected infrastructure, including rundown hospitals, roads that had been announced but not paid for, overcrowded classrooms and a state housing shortage' – Robertson, May 20, 2021 and November 20 and December 11, 2019
'Poor-quality' state homes – Key, June 29, 2013
'Disintegrating social housing' – Phil Heatley (National), August 5, 2010
'Depleted' state housing stock – Maryan Street (Labour), July 23, 2008
A state housing 'mess' – Chris Carter (Labour), May 12, 2007
Immigration
Under the header 'WHAT I INHERITED': 'An immigration system that was clearly under incredible pressure' – Stanford, August 16, 2024
Under the header 'Immigration under the previous government': the 'very poor state' of the sector – Coleman, May 7, 2011
A single immigration fraud officer despite National's nine years in power – Cunliffe, July 28, October 12 and 17, 2007
Infrastructure
A 'dire state of government books' (in reference to the need to access private capital to fund infrastructure) – Simon Court (Act), August 29, 2024
A 'real mess' and 'big series of challenges' – Bishop, March 21 and June 14, 2024
A 'deficit' – Michael Wood (Labour), June 1, 2022, Robertson, May 19, 2022, Phil Twyford (Labour), September 17, 2020 and Cullen, August 13, 2008
'Years of underinvestment' – Robertson, October 9, 2019
A 'glaring deficit in infrastructure planning, management and funding' – Shane Jones (NZ First), August 1, 2019
Social development
A 'tough labour market' – Louise Upston (National), January 23, 2025
'Welfare dependency' and the welfare system at large – Upston, February 22 and April 30, 2024
A 'homelessness crisis' – Marama Davidson (Greens), March 26, 2021, and Ardern, February 13, 2020
'A welfare state that showed no sign of diminishing despite having enjoyed a decade of favourable economic conditions and strong employment' – Paula Bennett (National), March 31, 2010
A 'deeply fractured' society where 'many had little hope of success' – Maharey, May 18, 2007
A 'bitter, divided, inward-looking country' – Cullen, May 6, 2007
Transport
A 'significant backlog of road maintenance across the country' – Brown, June 6, July 19 and October 4, 2024
'A transport system in need of investment, without the appropriate funding tools to pay for it' – Brown, August 29, 2024
'Road maintenance crisis' – Parker, July 16, August 17, 2023
'Messes' from Transmission Gully – Wood, April 20, 2021
An Auckland Transport Alignment Project plan with a '$9.7bn funding gap' – Robertson, June 28, 2018
A 'widening gap between what needs to be spent, for instance, on public transport and roads, and what has been set aside by the previous government' – Ardern, November 8, 2017
The cost of upgrading KiwiRail – Ryall, June 28, 2012
A 'huge infrastructure deficit' – Helen Clark, May 16, 2009
A final word
'I try not to go on too much about the mess [former energy minister] Max Bradford created. It's my job to fix it up, not complain about what this government inherited' – Hodgson, June 21, 2002
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Labour's Chris Hipkins questions MMP system, seeks balance in power
'But, I differ a bit from the current Government in the sense that while I respect the important constituencies the smaller parties represent, and I also respect that we compete with them for votes too, I don't think under MMP the smaller parties should call all of the shots. 'I still think the bigger parties have a mandate to reflect the view of a much larger section of the electorate, and so I do think under MMP you need to keep proportionality in mind. 'Yes, there should be some concessions and some trade-offs to the other parties to form a government. But that doesn't mean that you should be doing things that you specifically told the electorate before the election that you weren't going to do. 'The Treaty Principles Bill is a good example. The Regulatory Standards Bill. Some of these things that no one knew they were voting for at the last election, and now they're being inflicted on them. I don't think that's the spirit of MMP or democracy,' he said. Talk of introducing a Capital Gains Tax has been the bugbear of successive governments. In the 2010s, Sir John Key ruled out a CGT while the then-Labour leader Phil Goff made it the centrepiece of his party's tax policy. Fast-forward to Dame Jacinda Ardern ruling out ever implementing one while she was Prime Minister. Enter, Hipkins, who carried the message through the 2023 election. Luxon's then the one to 'rule it out' while he's in rule. When it comes to Election 2026, Hipkins said Labour will have a 'different tax policy' to the one they had at the last election. He stopped short of confirming whether that means the reintroduction of a CGT, but did say he'll announce it by the end of the year. 'Because I think it is important, that is a big policy area. People want to know where they stand. 'In New Zealand, I think we've placed far too much emphasis on buying and selling houses amongst ourselves, pushing up the price so that potentially a whole generation of homeowners is being shut out of the housing market,' he said. Chris Hipkins and Christopher Luxon during a leaders' debate in 2023 and they will already be planning for another battle in 2026. Photo / TVNZ The Labour Party is yet to release any policy announcements for next year's election, but Hipkins said that's for good reason. He wants to make sure they'll be able to deliver on promises made. 'I think one of the valid criticisms of us last time we were in opposition was that we had some really good ideas, but we hadn't worked through the details of exactly how would we do that. Then, when we got into government, we found that some of the things that we'd said we were going to do, very well intentioned, we didn't have a clear plan for how we would do it. 'I think the same thing has happened to this Government. They've made promises with no plan on how they're actually going to do it, and I don't want to be in that position,' he said. In May, Act Party leader and Deputy Prime Minister, David Seymour, referred to Hipkins as 'poo Midas'. It was after NZ First leader Winston Peters 'permanently' ruled out working with Hipkins in any future government coalition. 'This guy's got the opposite of the Midas touch. I think they call him a 'poo Midas',' Seymour said. Hipkins said he's all for a bit of humour in politics, a 'little bit of a sledge' now and then, where it's funny. But the latest jabs from those at the top don't have him laughing. 'They're not very funny, and they're also not very good at it. So, I think they should just stick to actually doing what people ask them to do, you know, New Zealanders wanted them to fix the cost of living crisis,' he said. Listen to the full episode to hear more from Chris Hipkins about the possibility of free dental and whether we should 'tax the rich'. The Front Page is a daily news podcast from the New Zealand Herald, available to listen to every weekday from 5am. The podcast is presented by Chelsea Daniels, an Auckland-based journalist with a background in world news and crime/justice reporting who joined NZME in 2016. You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Cr chided over digs about mayor
A councillor who labelled the Dunedin mayor a "buffoon" and "a baby Trump" has been called an embarrassment to city governance. The remarks come after Mayor Jules Radich suggested, in the wake of singer Ed Sheeran not coming to Dunedin, the city should launch a "Dunedin Sounds" festival. Mr Radich suggested Dunedin Sounds could be an event Sheeran might one day headline along with other international artists, including Taylor Swift. Cr Steve Walker took to social media to criticise Mr Radich's thinking. "It's a reminder of what a complete buffoon this guy is, he's literally rambling on like a baby Trump. "He did this pre the last local election and enough of you fell for it." Cr Brent Weatherall said Cr Walker's "nasty style" on social media did him no favours. "He would be better to invest in a pair of six-inch platforms if he wants to be noticed, and stick to issues important to himself if he wants to be taken seriously by voters opposed to disrespectful personal attacks on the mayor." Cr Bill Acklin said Cr Walker's behaviour was unacceptable and he accused the Labour-endorsed councillor of being disruptive through the term. "I find Cr Walker to be an embarrassment to the governance of this city," Cr Acklin said. "I would like to think that the party who endorse him would also be ashamed of his unprofessional antics." Southern Labour electorate committee chairwoman Ruth Chapman said the party continued to have confidence in Cr Walker as a candidate for a council seat. Cr Walker stood by his position. "In essence, [Mr Radich] can't just bleat out any nonsense about Taylor Swift et al, with no robust background work to understand how mechanically it would all work. "There's never been a vision or masterplan under Radich, just plucked-out-of-the-air nonsense. "Jules isn't a bad or nasty guy — he just isn't capable of the job voters picked him to do." Mr Radich did not want to engage with Cr Walker's comments. "Cr Walker persists in name calling and such behaviour says a lot more about him than his targets." Mayoral candidate Andrew Simms said Cr Walker's comments crossed a line. "I have seen this and many other similar comments from Cr Walker which communicate a deep disrespect for the current mayor and a deep-seated resentment of previous decisions made by Mayor Radich. "While Cr Walker may not respect Mayor Radich as a person, he should have respect for the office of the mayor. "It is entirely possible to express disapproval in the performance of the current mayor and uphold some dignity and respect at the same time. "In my view, such exchanges only serve to further undermine the community's respect for this current council at every level." Cr Carmen Houlahan, who is also running for mayor, said Cr Walker's comments were in the atmosphere of an election campaign. "We are in an election. Have you seen some of the abuse we are getting? "Sadly, 'buffoon' is kind compared to some of the unacceptable comments from some in the public." Cr Houlahan said criticism of the council as dysfunctional was wide of the mark. "This term we have worked hard with a huge workload, with government changes to legislation around Three Waters, the hospital campaign ... Most of the time we have all worked well together. "We have differing views at times — that is democracy." Cr David Benson-Pope said: "My view of the mayor appeared in your publication as the front-page lead when I stated 'he has none of the skills required for the job'." — Additional reporting Grant Miller


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Business case flawed: Brooking
The release of a "flawed" business case means more information is needed before Labour decides whether it would dump the planned Waikato Medical School, a Dunedin MP says. Last Monday, Health Minister Simeon Brown announced Cabinet had approved $82.85 million in government funding to build the country's third medical school at the University of Waikato — the institution was expected to contribute more than $150m to the project. Dunedin MP Rachel Brooking, of Labour, said she was "very sceptical" about figures used by the government to make its decision. The project's detailed business case was made public on Friday evening, part of a document dump which revealed the cost of producing GPs at the graduate-entry Waikato medical school would be $50 million a year cheaper than at the existing medical schools at Otago and Auckland universities. "The business case has really been written with an outcome in mind and not traversed all of the options, and that's just bad decision-making," Ms Brooking said. "It's bad way to make use of taxpayers' money, and it seems that in general, this all will cost more." She said the "flawed" business case would have consequences for the Otago Medical School: "those are difficult to predict exactly". However, Labour had "no plans at the moment" to dump the medical school, Ms Brooking said. "The issue is that we don't think the business case is credible. "So we'll keep asking questions about that and try and make any assessments on good information when we're in a position to do so." Taieri MP Ingrid Leary said "the so-called business case is really just a public relations document, given the outlandish assumptions and comparators". In a statement last Monday, Mr Brown said the project was an innovative model "that supports our focus on strengthening primary care, making it easier for people to see their doctor — helping Kiwis stay well and out of hospital". Waikato University would begin construction on new teaching facilities later this year. A full cost-benefit analysis was presented to Cabinet before any proposal was finalised, as part of the National-Act New Zealand coalition agreement, he said. Green MP Francisco Hernandez said the government's cost-benefit analysis used to "ram through" the Waikato Medical School made assumptions revealing the "lack of objectivity". Mr Hernandez said the document "falsely assumed" Otago and Auckland universities could not have negotiated a four-year rural graduate programme similar to Waikato University's proposal. "This assumption enables the government to claim that Waikato University will train medical students 'cheaper' because Waikato is assumed to have a four-year programme," he said. The government had also assumed Waikato University was more likely to produce GPs "even though Otago and Auckland could have also done a rural graduate programme". "Fundamentally, these flawed assumptions stem from the government's failure to run a transparent tender process from the start," Mr Hernandez said. "Rather than putting out an open tender to every university in New Zealand, they gave Waikato University a sweetheart deal." He called for the government to "be up front and honest about the actual costs" of the project and release the full agreement with Waikato University with all relevant advice. "The government's failure to rule out further handouts or to release the actual agreement raises questions on whether there were further sweetheart deals negotiated behind closed doors in the agreement that might end up with the taxpayer bailing out Waikato University."