&w=3840&q=100)
Will the US really impose 500% tariffs on India and China for trading with Russia?
US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks to the media, after a Senate GOP lunch, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, US, June 28, 2025. File Image/Reuters
United States is preparing to economically target not just on Russia — but also on countries that continue commercial engagement with Moscow.
A controversial bill currently advancing in the US Senate proposes punitive 500 per cent tariffs on imports from nations that maintain trade ties with Russia, with India and China identified as primary targets due to their extensive energy imports from the Kremlin.
What the bill proposes
The proposed bill, formally introduced in March, has been championed by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, and now boasts 84 co-sponsors, making it one of the most broadly supported sanction initiatives since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
'Big breakthrough here. So what does this bill do? If you're buying products from Russia and you're not helping Ukraine, then there's a 500 percent tariff on your products coming into the United States. India and China buy 70 percent of Putin's oil. They keep his war machine going,' Graham told ABC News in a Sunday interview.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The legislation targets imports into the United States from any country that continues purchasing Russian oil, gas, uranium, petrochemicals or related commodities, unless that country is demonstrably assisting Ukraine.
The goal, as per Graham, is to drain Russia's financial capacity to continue prosecuting the war and to pressure President Vladimir Putin into entering negotiations.
'My bill has 84 co-sponsors. It would allow the president to put tariffs on China, India, and other countries to stop them from supporting Vladimir Putin's war machine and get him to the table. For the first time yesterday, the president told me … I was playing golf with him. He says, 'It's time to move your bill,'' Graham added.
How Trump is involved
US President Donald Trump endorsed the measure, according to Graham. During a recent conversation between the two — described as taking place on a golf course —Trump encouraged the senator to advance the bill post the July congressional recess.
'I was playing with him (Trump). He says, 'It's time to move – move your bill. There's a waiver in the bill, Mr. President. You're in charge whether or not it's to be implemented.' But we're going to give President Trump a tool in the toolbox he doesn't have today. After the July break, we're going to pass a bill that will allow the president,' Graham said.
Though the administration has now shown willingness to move forward, the bill's journey has faced internal friction.
According to The Wall Street Journal, there had been White House attempts to weaken the bill earlier in the year by shifting its language — changing 'shall' to 'may' — to make the application of sanctions discretionary rather than mandatory.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The effort to introduce flexibility was seen as a way to protect strategic partnerships and avoid broader economic fallout, particularly with allies or nations like India that are also engaged with the US on multiple other diplomatic and trade fronts.
Reflecting this concern, Graham later proposed a carve-out for countries that are actively supporting Ukraine — an attempt to address European concerns and minimise the risk of sparking a US–EU trade conflict.
What's at stake for India
India is one of the largest consumers and importers of oil globally, sourcing around 88 per cent of its crude demand from overseas. Traditionally dependent on suppliers in West Asia, India began ramping up imports of discounted Russian oil in the aftermath of the Ukraine invasion.
This shift allowed Indian refiners to secure cheap crude, amid a reshuffling of global supply chains caused by Western sanctions on Russian energy.
In recent months, India's Russian crude imports have outpaced those from all West Asian suppliers combined.
As of May 2025, India was importing approximately 1.96 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude, with estimates for June 2025 pegged even higher at 2–2.2 million bpd, the most in two years.
The most recent spike was also linked to geopolitical developments, including Israel's attack on Iran, which created market instability and prompted Indian refiners to further diversify supply by leaning more heavily on Russian shipments.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As a result of this increased trade, India-Russia bilateral trade surged to an unprecedented $68.7 billion in FY 2024–25, up from just $10.1 billion pre-pandemic.
This dramatic rise, fuelled primarily by energy purchases and a rise in Indian exports to Russia, has led both countries to set an ambitious goal of $100 billion in total trade volume by 2030.
Data from energy tracking firm Kpler further indicates that of the 183 oil tankers recently sanctioned by the US, 75 had previously transported Russian crude to India.
How India could be hit by tariff enforcement
Should the bill become law and the 500 per cent tariff clause be enforced, India could see heavy duties imposed on a wide spectrum of its exports to the US, one of its largest trading partners.
These include critical sectors such as pharmaceuticals, textiles, automotive components and IT services.
India has so far defended its energy strategy, stating that its trade practices align with national security and economic requirements. Officials in New Delhi have pointed out that their dealings are within legal boundaries and consistent with their broader policy interests.
Meanwhile, India and the United States are in the process of negotiating a bilateral trade deal, which could reduce existing tariffs and deepen commercial ties.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, the proposed sanctions bill, if enforced in its current form, could complicate these negotiations or offset any gains from the trade pact.
What this means for China & how Russia responded
Alongside India, China is the other principal buyer of Russian oil and gas, accounting for a large share of the 70 per cent of Russian oil exports that the US bill seeks to disrupt.
While China has a more diversified export profile and a larger domestic market, the imposition of tariffs could further strain US-China relations, which are already tense due to disputes over technology, security and geopolitical alignment.
Reacting to Graham's proposal, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Moscow was familiar with the senator's long-standing hostility toward Russia.
'The senator's views are well known to us, they are well known to the whole world. He belongs to a group of inveterate Russophobes. If it were up to him, these sanctions would have been imposed long ago,' Peskov stated.
He also questioned whether such a policy would have any meaningful impact on peace efforts in Ukraine: 'Would that have helped the (Ukraine) settlement (process)? That is a question that those who initiate such events should ask themselves.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Arun Maira: Dedication to the state's purpose is the key lesson we must learn from China
India is at a crossroads. Both the political Left and Right agree that the economy needs substantial reform, but disagree on the direction. The progressive Left wants more socialism with more liberal democracy; the conservative Right wants more free-market capitalism and seems willing to tolerate curbs on liberty. The Middle seems muddled. The 20th century was a test of competing economic ideologies—socialism versus capitalism; and competing forms of governance—liberal democracy versus authoritarianism. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, victory was declared for the Washington Consensus of free market capitalism and liberal democracy. India's reformers adopted the Washington formula in 1991. By and large, they gave up on socialism, abandoned industrial policies aimed at growing domestic industries and opened the Indian market for foreign companies without technology-transfer requirements. China did not yield. It stayed its socialist course with single-party governance and continued to build domestic industries. Also Read: Ajit Ranade: The success of 'Made in China 2025' alarmed the West The growth of China's economy is a miracle, economists say. In the 1980s, China and India's economies were comparable in size and per capita income. Now, China's per capita income and GDP are about five times India's. China's high-tech manufacturing sector has grown 48 times larger. The US, meanwhile, has grown alarmed with China's remarkable economic growth and industrial strength despite Beijing not following Washington's economic formula. That consensus has ended even in Washington, where ideological cracks have appeared with increasing inequality and unrest among workers in the US. The US is pressing India to come closer to it. India is wary. China shares a border with India that has seen the two armies skirmish. India must become self-reliant and stronger much faster than it has so far. Reforms must result in faster income growth among the Indian masses and stronger domestic industries. India's leaders should study China for lessons before pushing harder with economic reforms based on the West's failing model. Also Read: China began de-risking its economy well before Trump's trade fury US capitalism and Chinese socialism: Three recent books offer insights into how socialism and capitalism have been combined to achieve China's inclusive and fast growth. China's leaders are good learners, says German political economist Isabella M. Weber in How China Escaped Shock Therapy: The Market Reform Debate. Like Mahatma Gandhi, they kept their minds open, allowing ideas to come in from all directions without being blown off their feet. They listened to Western economists but applied only what suited China. Weber says, 'The famous Harvard development economist Dani Rodrik represents the economics profession more broadly when he answers his own question of whether 'anyone (can) name the (Western) economists or the piece of research that played an instrumental role in China's reforms" by claiming that 'economic research, at least as conventionally understood" did not play 'a significant role." Chinese economist Keyu Jin, a professor at the London School of Economics who grew up in China and experienced the Chinese system from within, explains how the Chinese socio-economic-political system works in The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism. She explains why Western economic models, which strip out cultural and social forces from economics, cannot comprehend how China works—or even how Western economies work. She makes visible the 'invisible hand' that free-market economists cannot explain. She explains why the Chinese government keeps financial markets and the private sector reined in to ensure the market produces welfare for all, especially poorer and least powerful citizens. She says, 'The number of financial crises in China is exactly zero. It is also an oddity (from a Western perspective) that despite the nation's preternatural economic growth, its stock market has been one of the worst performing in the world." Also Read: Chinese history shows how a closed economy could squander a nation's greatness The Chinese government has added citizen satisfaction and environmental sustainability to GDP as a measure of its own performance (and of local governments). Though private firms grew nine-fold in China from 2000 to 2019 (their number now exceeds the US's by far), 'A more striking fact," says Lin, 'is that private owners with state connections owned about a third of the capital registered by these companies, showing how pervasive equity linkages between state and private businesses have become in China's corporate sector." While the government has reduced the number of state-owned enterprises and pushed the remainder to add profits to their social objectives, it also demands that private firms comply with societal needs. Large, private, property and tech firms that strayed from the socialist path have been cut down. Three distinctive features of China's governance: The purpose of the state, throughout China's long history from imperial times to the Communist era, has been the welfare of citizens. The best emperor was seen as one who provides the most welfare to all citizens, not one who wins the most wars. The leadership of the Communist Party has continued this role, says Chinese political scientist Zheng Yongnian in The Chinese Communist Party as Organizational Emperor: Culture, Reproduction, and Transformation. Jin explains further (in The New China Playbook) how the ruling party's commitment to this role has shaped Beijing's socio-economic policies, resulting in widespread support for the party even among the young. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check The governance of China is highly decentralized. Local communities are given freedom to craft solutions suited to their needs; the performance of local party officials is measured by the satisfaction of their communities with progress. Chinese leaders and economists are 'systems thinkers.' They see the economy as only a component of a complex social system. For them, the purpose of economic growth is the production of societal well-being, especially for less powerful people. Whenever the economy begins to fail this purpose, reforms are made to bring it back to its socialist moorings. India must not slavishly follow Western models. Nor can India be China. India must find its own way to create a more equitable society. The author is a former member of the erstwhile Planning Commission and the author of 'Reimagining India's Economy: The Road to a More Equitable Society'.


Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Crackdown against Birkenstock ‘fakes': Delhi HC orders factory inspections in India after footwear brand files lawsuit
Officers, upon the Delhi High Court order, recently inspected small-scale factories in Delhi and Agra to seize suspected counterfeit Birkenstock sandals. The intellectual property enforcement action followed a lawsuit filed by the German footwear brand in the high court, reported news agency Reuters. Birkenstock's complaint stated that an internal investigation had found lookalike products being manufactured in rural areas around Agra and sold locally as well as exported abroad. In May, Birkenstock filed an infringement lawsuit in the Delhi HC against four footwear traders, four factories, and two unnamed individuals. On May 26, Justice Saurabh Banerjee of the Delhi High Court issued a confidential order, later made public on the court's website, authorising swift legal action. The judge appointed 10 local lawyers as court commissioners to visit the suspect locations. They were directed to 'seize, pack and seal the infringing products.' The order also included photographs submitted by Birkenstock showing alleged counterfeit sandals and packaging carrying its branding. 'There is all likelihood of the public getting deceived,' Justice Banerjee wrote in his order. 'The differences, hardly if any, are not something which can be discernable to the naked eyes.' He noted that the samples 'seem like a cheap knock off' of genuine Birkenstock footwear. The inspections have since been completed, and confidential reports were submitted to the judge, said three people familiar with the matter, as per Reuters. The next hearing is scheduled for October 6. The case adds to a growing list of high-profile intellectual property battles in India's footwear sector. Earlier this month, Crocs secured the court's nod to proceed with a long-pending infringement case. Meanwhile, Prada came under criticism for promoting sandals similar to Indian ethnic footwear without initially crediting the country's cultural contribution. Earlier this year, the Birkenstock faced a legal setback in Germany when a court ruled that its sandals did not qualify as art and were therefore not protected by copyright.


Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Congress backs PM Modi's BRICS stand, vows firm fight against terrorism
New Delhi: Backing Prime Minister Narendra Modi's firm stance on terrorism at the BRICS Summit, senior Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP Pramod Tiwari on Monday expressed his complete faith that India will fight terrorism with full resolve and determination. His remarks came in response to PM Modi's statement at the global summit, where he called terrorism 'the most serious challenge facing humanity' and emphasised that condemning terrorism must be a matter of principle, not convenience. Speaking to IANS, Pramod Tiwari supported the Prime Minister, stating, 'At the BRICS Summit, voices should have been more vocal against terrorism. The platform should also raise social, economic, and global concerns of its member nations. India has consistently spoken for global peace and justice. "I have full faith that our country will fight terrorism with unwavering determination. I wish those responsible for the recent attack in Pahalgam had been caught — it would have revealed who trained and supported them. Such information is crucial and would have commanded greater respect globally.' Tiwari also took a swipe at US President Donald Trump, who recently lashed out at the BRICS alliance and warned of an 'additional 10 per cent tariff' on countries aligning with what he termed 'anti-American policies.' 'BRICS is for protecting nations who are in it. President Trump had previously issued similar warnings during his visit to India. At that time, Prime Minister Modi should not have laughed or responded lightly. He should have stood firm and reminded Trump that BRICS works on its own principles and is committed to its founding objectives,' said Tiwari. The Congress leader criticised the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. On Sunday, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar stated that extensive consultations had been held with political parties and acknowledged that 'no one was satisfied' with the current status of the electoral rolls. Reacting to the development, Tiwari said, 'We are not satisfied with the Election Commission of India's response. The documents required for voter list revision are unnecessarily complicated and impractical. If the process is designed to make it difficult for traditional voters who are against the BJP, Scheduled Castes, Backward Classes, and minority voters, to remain on the rolls, then this raises serious questions about the Election Commission's intent. If the ECI wants to remove them.' He added that while some groups have approached the Supreme Court, others are considering forming 'people's courts' to ensure fairness. 'The Congress has always upheld the voter's right to participate in democracy. We will continue to stand by that principle and ensure that all necessary documentation is provided,' he asserted. Tiwari also took aim at the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in Bihar, particularly targeting Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) leader Chirag Paswan. During a political rally in Saran district on Sunday, Chirag announced that he would contest the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections and urged his party workers to prepare for all 243 constituencies in alliance with the BJP and JD(U). Mocking the move, Tiwari remarked, 'The NDA in Bihar is a sinking ship. Chirag Paswan, despite being the son of a respected leader like Ram Vilas Paswan, is trying to stay afloat in turbulent political waters. If he's contesting all 243 seats, it means internal cracks have widened and many alliance members are already looking for the exit door ahead of elections.' He continued, 'It's clear that NDA leaders are aware they are going to lose many seats. Their desperation is evident. While they are forming the central government, they are losing their grip on the state. This creates confusion among their own allies.' In the 2020 Bihar Assembly elections, Chirag Paswan's LJP had contested 137 seats but managed to win only one, Matihani. Despite this, Chirag currently holds a Lok Sabha seat and serves as a Cabinet Minister in the BJP-led central government, which includes JD(U) and Telugu Desam Party (TDP) as key allies.