logo
Chatbots' new job: minding tots

Chatbots' new job: minding tots

Axios5 days ago
Young children who directly interact with chatbots face new developmental risks, pediatricians and psychologists warn.
Why it matters: Assessing the impacts early could help protect a new generation from becoming guinea pigs for tech we don't fully understand.
The big picture: Most kids under five aren't using voice-based AI yet. Young kids already see AI-generated content — but on its own, that isn't necessarily a new problem.
Low-quality images and videos commonly known as AI slop don't differ that much from the low end of mass-produced kids' media that's been around for decades.
The real concern is interaction with live AI, which can be both powerfully engaging and confusing at the same time.
Imagine "Blue's Clues," but the character answers in real time and adapts to a child's input.
Talking with AI could shape children's brain development and social connections in unknown ways.
Chatbot use — especially among young children — is still new. There are no long-term studies on its impact, but we do know a lot about how screen time and tech use affect child development.
The amount of time kids spend on devices is disrupting or arresting other important developmental milestones, Scott Kollins, psychologist and chief medical officer at family software company Aura, told Axios.
"We've seen that with older kids. And with kids between zero and five, their brains are developing faster, and they're hitting these super important social milestones more frequently."
Interacting with AI chatbots, Kollins warns, has "the potential to be even that much more disruptive" — but right now, "it is all conjecture in terms of this specific type of interaction."
What they're saying: Interaction with generative AI could "fundamentally change the human brain," says Dana Suskind, a pediatric physician and expert on early childhood and early language development.
Suskind says teenagers and adults are already forming relationships with AI companions. The same could happen with younger kids.
"The content and experience that kids are exposed to in early years isn't just sort of changing things the same way social media impacted adolescent brains," Suskind told Axios. "It is actually changing the foundational wiring of the human brain."
"Children naturally anthropomorphize," Suskind wrote in an email, "but with responsive AI, we're entering uncharted territory for how this might shape their developing sense of reality and relationships."
Between the lines: Some child development researchers worry that chatbots could reshape how children learn trust, empathy and connection.
A small study from 2024 showed that kids ages 3-6 were more likely to trust a robot than a human, even when that robot had proven to be less reliable than the human.
Trust is a particularly thorny problem for those who rely on AI, since many researchers argue that these tools might always be prone to making things up.
Chatbots also tell people what they want to hear.
They're trained to please, which means they're unlikely to say "no" — a word that small children need to learn to deal with.
"It changes the way that kids learn about the cadence and the natural progression of interaction with others," Kollins says. "That's a problem if [young kids] don't learn how responding in a certain way or broaching particular kinds of topics might be met with certain reactions."
The other side: AI can make up stories, answer questions or generate elaborate images at the whim of a creative child.
Many parents are already using chatbots to ease the stress of parenting, including helping to satisfy kids' boundless curiosity.
Amazon's smart home devices — now with Alexa+ boosted AI — come in styles aimed at the youngest users and promise that "kids can create unique stories they dream up with Alexa."
Some early studies show that when children engage in story-based dialogues with AI, rather than just listening passively, they learn more vocabulary and comprehend content better.
In some cases, researchers found these gains were comparable to those from human interactions.
Kollins says that as adults our responsibility to provide our young children with all the information and content that's meaningful or stimulating will be reduced, and that's not all bad.
"Why should [our children] rely just on this narrow sliver of what dad knows, versus the universe of content?" Kollins says.
Yes, but: AI interactions may crowd out important human interactions and activities for young children.
CNN tech reporter Samantha Murphy Kelly wrote in 2018 that because she used Amazon's voice assistant so often, "Alexa" was among the first four words her toddler understood.
Some scientists also worry that even if AI tools do benefit some kids, those gains could just deepen existing educational disparities.
"The one thing that makes us uniquely human," Kollins says, "whether it's for younger kids or even for older kids, is just the entire range of non-verbal communication... subtle facial expressions and body language... that you miss when you're in front of a screen."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The GENIUS Act is law. What's next for crypto?
The GENIUS Act is law. What's next for crypto?

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The GENIUS Act is law. What's next for crypto?

Bitcoin (BTC-USD), ether (ETH-USD), and other crypto stocks are on the rise after President Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law. Axios crypto reporter Brady Dale outlines what's next for the industry now that the first major crypto regulation is officially in the books. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and crypto-related stocks are on the move higher this morning, days after President Trump signed the Genius Act into law, making the first major piece of crypto regulation. Here with more on where crypto goes next is Brady Dale, Axios crypto reporter. So, that was the sort of landmark, Brady, that uh people in the industry pointed to the first big legislative win for them. Um I think there are a lot of questions now about what that unleashes. Like what happens now in terms of tangible products, changes to the industry? What are you watching most closely? Yeah, you know, the thing I'm most interested in is if consumers actually start to adopt stable coins. It's tough to get people to adopt new ways of payments here in the US. But if they do, you know, it could be really good for uh small businesses, retail, which all have a very narrow margin. Stable coins give them a way to have a digital version of actual cash we keep in our pocket. And you know the reason cash is nice for retailers is because it doesn't come with those interchange fees that credit cards have. Well, stable coins will be pretty much the same. And so, uh I think we'll see merchants starting to urge people to adopt stable coins, but who knows if they do. Well, and I mean, don't we have a digital version of cash already, which is just cash, right? Like Venmo and things, you know. There are ways obviously to transact online without credit cards. I guess just not that many. Um so, would this in theory make all of that easier? Yeah, it would make it all it would make it all easier, it would make it all faster, you don't have to have a third party involved. And you know, zooming out from that, um you know, Venmo doesn't work internationally. Um you can't pay people abroad with it. So there's a bunch of other, you know, more boring in the weeds sort of businessy things that we'll see folks use stable coins for. But in terms of like just the average person on the street, the thing I'm curious about is if, you know, normal American consumers start to use it. Um and what are we seeing in terms of the industry sort of preparing for that or trying to push that uh forward? Well, I mean the industry the crypto industry itself has been all in on stable coins for a long time. You know, a lot of them call it the first killer app of blockchains. Uh I think the thing that I'm curious about is, you know, the industry is going to try to own this space. You know, Circle, Tether, they're going to try to be the um, you know, the the Microsoft and Apples of the stable coins future. But uh the thing is, a bunch of the big banks like Bank of America, City, all of them are also talking about getting into the stable coin game. And of course, they have a lot more access to a lot more people, uh more immediately, and they're more trusted names. And so, uh I think it's not so much what the industry does, the existing blockchain industry as it is, like the the banking industry. How do they get into it? Related Videos Crypto on Wall Street: How eth 'unlocks' crypto narrative Sign in to access your portfolio

Exclusive: SLC leads nation for AI romance
Exclusive: SLC leads nation for AI romance

Axios

time20 hours ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: SLC leads nation for AI romance

1 in 3 SLC singles in a new Match survey have used AI in their quest for love, per data shared exclusively with Axios. The big picture: Salt Lake tied with Denver for the largest share of respondents who turned to a bot in their dating life — either for direct companionship or help using a dating app. That's according to the nationwide " Singles in America" study, which surveyed over 5,000 people ages 18 to 98 this year. The latest: This is the first year that the dating platform surveyed singles nationwide about using AI for companionship, Michael Kaye, communications director at Match Group, tells Axios. That's because of a surge in AI use in dating (333%) from last year, he adds. By the numbers: 33% of single SLC respondents had "interacted with an AI companion," which Match defines as someone who's chatting with a bot for romantic or emotional intimacy or using AI to help them craft their dating profile or send messages. Between the lines: Although the data doesn't distinguish between deliberately bonding with AI versus seeking its writing help — both are avenues for the artificial to touch the heart. Other users may not know they're crushing on someone for wit, earnestness or vulnerability generated by a machine. The other side: Dating has pitted first impressions against brutal reality since the beginning of time. What we're watching: Whether humans can live up to the expectations set by the bots that helped them get a foot in the door.

How AI could bring back American exceptionalism
How AI could bring back American exceptionalism

Axios

time21 hours ago

  • Axios

How AI could bring back American exceptionalism

Investors are flocking to Europe, not for vacation, but for returns. But without the market power of artificial intelligence companies, they may have to quickly come back to America. Why it matters: Much of Europe's outperformance this year stems from a weakening dollar, not stronger fundamentals. Without the AI boom that is fueling the resurgence in U.S. stocks, the old world may struggle to keep up. What they're saying: " People want to be in the U.S. markets in the AI trade," Stuart Kaiser, head of U.S. equity strategy at Citi, told Axios. "It's a market you have to be involved in." Zoom out: The American stock market has outpaced gains in global equities for the last 15-plus years. Europe saw a 17.9% total return in U.S. dollar terms in the first half of 2025, but just 8.8% in local currencies, according to Vanguard. That gap signals the rally was largely driven by currencies and requires a catch-up on fundamentals to continue driving its growth. By the numbers: Nvidia alone is worth an amount equal to 14% of the total U.S. GDP, according to Robert Ruggirello, chief investment officer of Brave Eagle Wealth Management. "Not owning it is…painful," he wrote in a note. Of note: The European index was outperforming the S&P 500 for most of 2025 until recently. S&P 500 tech stocks are now outperforming both the broader U.S. and European markets. Zoom in: U.S. firms are embracing AI at scale. Europe is behind. European firms lag U.S. peers by 45% to 75% on AI adoption, according to McKinsey research last fall. Over the past 50 years, the U.S. has created 241 companies worth over $10 billion from scratch, while Europe has created just 14, Andrew McAfee of MIT told the Wall Street Journal. Between the lines: The slower AI momentum in Europe reflects regulatory pressure, higher corporate taxes, and fragmented markets, barriers the U.S. lacks. Even European AI successes often funnel into U.S. markets: DeepMind, the British AI firm behind Gemini, sold to Alphabet in 2014. Reality check: Strategists still see growth opportunities in Europe and beyond, given fiscal stimulus and potentially better economic growth. Trends like the shift to global assets can "last a lot longer than you think," Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at the Carson Group, told Axios. We're only about seven months into this rotation. The bottom line: AI is powering the American stock market. If you're seeking diversification, that may be hard to find in the U.S. indices.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store