logo
Nassau County Exec Bruce Blakeman rakes in $2M for campaign in an ominous sign for Democratic challenger

Nassau County Exec Bruce Blakeman rakes in $2M for campaign in an ominous sign for Democratic challenger

New York Posta day ago
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman tripled his campaign war chest in a year — and raised nearly $1.5 million more than his election opponent in the first half of 2025.
The Republican pulled in just under $2 million from PACs, corporations, unions and individual donors between Jan. 15 and July 15, according to the most recent campaign filings — while Democrat Seth Koslow only brought in $433,535.
Blakeman ended the first six months with a whopping $3.3 million on hand while Koslow — a county legislator and attorney from Merrick — had $389,855 on hand, the filings showed.
Advertisement
3 Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman's campaign has raised $2 million so far this year.
Michael McWeeney
'I'm proud to have earned overwhelming support from hardworking taxpayers, law enforcement, trade unions, and local employers who stand behind my record of holding the line on taxes and keeping Nassau the safest county in America,' Blakeman told The Post.
The county executive raked in nearly 700 individual donations, with about 40 of them over $10,000 apiece, the filings showed. This includes $50,000 each from insurance executive and CEO of The Whitmore Group, James Metzger as well as relatives of Bolla Oil CEO Harvinder Singh, according to the records.
Advertisement
Blakeman also took in $25,000 each from two major Republican donors in the nursing home industry — Kenneth Gaul of Port Jefferson and Benjamin Landa of Cold Spring Hills — the same amount as the estate of Lawrence Herbert, the late inventor of the Pantone color system, according to the filings.
Blakeman was boosted by donations of $12,000 from the Nassau PBA, $7,000 from the correction officers' union, $2,500 from the Detectives' Association, and $2,000 from the superior officers' union, the filings showed.
3 Blakeman's Democratic opponent Seth Koslow speaking at a 'Nassau not for sale' rally on July 17, 2025.
Brigitte Stelzer
Koslow bashed Blakeman for taking money from law firms that have active contracts with Nassau. Attorneys with the firm Abrams Fensterman — including Frank Carone, the former chief of staff to New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and his wife — donated $25,000, according to the records.
Advertisement
'If you're doing business with the county, odds are you're cutting checks to Bruce, too,' Koslow said Thursday outside of the county exec's office for a rally, where he placed a 'for sale' sign on his door and accused the incumbent of corruption.
'Bruce Blakeman didn't raise over $2 million by accident, he did it by auctioning off county contracts like they were concert tickets. If you're a vendor doing business with Nassau, odds are you're cutting checks to Bruce too.'
3 Blakeman has raised about $1.5 million more than Koslow this year.
Brigitte Stelzer
But Blakeman fired back and called Koslow's run against him a 'failing campaign aided by criminal attorneys and radical NYC politicians that want to defund the police and raise taxes.'
Advertisement
Koslow reported almost 100 more individual donors than Blakeman — though in much smaller amounts.
His backers include $15,000 from state and county Democratic boss Jay Jacobs, $10,000 from Port Washington trader and philanthropist Eric Knight and $8,500 from the New Suburbia PAC, which backs progressive suburban candidates.
The election is Nov. 4.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thune stuck between Trump's demands, members' recess plans
Thune stuck between Trump's demands, members' recess plans

Axios

time18 minutes ago

  • Axios

Thune stuck between Trump's demands, members' recess plans

Senate Majority Leader John Thune is stuck between the public, painful demands from President Trump to cancel the August recess and the pleas of members to let them go home. Why it matters: For senators, the summer recess is next to holy. For the president, confirming his nominees is simply more important. "We're thinking about it," Thune told Axios on Monday about Trump's call to cancel all — or part — of the August break. "We want to get as many noms through the pipeline as we can," he said. But still, August is August. "People are accustomed to going back," Thune said. "This is the time of year when they go back and interact with their constituents and talk about some of the things that we've gotten done." "I do not believe we need to cancel the August recess," Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( said Monday. "Please wipe that suggestion off of your DNA." Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) vehemently defended the extended break: "You get us for the rest of the year back here, but there's got to be some time when we can actually be addressing the needs of our constituents back home." Driving the news: After Trump's weekend post on Truth Social, leadership has made clear to senators that fiddling with the August recess is on the table. Thune has talked to Trump about the president's goals and told reporters he met with the president on Monday. The intrigue: If Thune moves forward with August votes, there is always the risk of attendance challenges. The Senate requires a minimum of 51 senators for a quorum— and it only takes one Democrat to force a quorum call. With just a three-seat margin, Republicans are "only as strong as our four weakest links," as one senior aide put it. What we're hearing: The Senate is buzzing about what Thune will do, according to conversations with senators and staffers. Senators are likely to put on a brave face and say publicly that they are willing to do whatever it takes to accomplish Trump's agenda. But trust us, both sides want to go home. It's more than a vacation from D.C.: Many pack their schedules with official international travel and fundraisers. They also know they need to sell Trump's "big, beautiful bill" to constituents who aren't convinced of its merits. Zoom in: The Senate's schedule has already been relatively brutal — fewer and shorter recess weeks than usual, late-night votes, occasional working Fridays, four all-nighter vote-a-ramas, and 94 confirmed administration officials. With Republicans relying on party-line votes to move forward, Democrats' only leverage has been to make progress as miserable as possible. Trump is "the first president in history that hasn't had a nom adopted by this point in his presidency either by unanimous consent or voice — not a single one," Thune told reporters on Monday. What we're watching: A threat of canceling August recess could also be a negotiation tool to convince Democrats to give them a break on lower-level nominees who ordinarily would have an easier time getting confirmed.

"I hate it": Redistricting arms race gives lawmakers heartburn
"I hate it": Redistricting arms race gives lawmakers heartburn

Axios

time18 minutes ago

  • Axios

"I hate it": Redistricting arms race gives lawmakers heartburn

House members are watching with growing discomfort as Democrats in California and other blue states consider joining Texas Republicans in pursuing mid-decade redistricting to gain an advantage in the 2026 midterms. Why it matters: It threatens, as one Democratic lawmaker put it, a "race to the bottom" that will encourage both sides to test the limits of gerrymandering and further fan the partisan flames engulfing the country. But with President Trump bearing down on Texas Republicans to change their maps and California Democrats wanting to respond in political self-defense, members of both parties feel they have little choice. Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) told Axios of his state's possible redistricting: "How I feel is terribly conflicted. I hate it. I really worry about a race to the bottom on something that I consider pretty despicable." "But I understand why the governor and others are considering it. The only reason it would even be possible is what Texas and others are doing just stinks so badly that it's pissing people in California off." State of play: Texas Republicans began a special session Monday, which Gov. Greg Abbott said would include an attempt to redraw the state's U.S. House districts. Redistricting is normally only done after the decennial census — most recently in 2020 — or in response to a court order. However, Trump has put pressure on Republicans to undertake the unusual effort in the hopes of creating as many as five new GOP-leaning seats. Republicans in Ohio are also looking to redraw districts to try to unseat several Democrats. In response, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has threatened to try to revisit his state's districts to create more Democratic-leaning seats. What we're hearing: Democrats may not stop at California, and are eyeing other blue states, including New York, New Jersey, Minnesota and Washington, senior House Democrats told Axios. Democrats are "definitely looking into what's going on and trying to level the playing field," said one House Democrat. "It's crazy what's happening in Texas." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) told reporters Thursday: "It's all options on the table at this moment." Even though California has a constitutionally mandated independent redistricting commission, several House Democrats from the state told Axios they are confident Newsom could find a legal pathway. What they're saying: While lawmakers have largely stuck by their parties' plans as a necessary evil in an increasingly existential political environment, others expressed trepidation at the escalating brinksmanship. "We're only supposed to be redistricting every 10 years," said Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.). "At some point, the partisanship gets too much. ... I just think it goes too far." A House Democrat from California, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Axios: "It's a difficult conversation, because we're literally doing it to gerrymander — everything that we stood against, and the reason we created the independent redistricting commission." "If we do it," the lawmaker added, "let's be very upfront and transparent about it. Don't leave it to an independent commission. Everybody knows what we're doing." Yes, but: Other relative moderates in both parties said they are more than comfortable with mid-decade redistricting, pointing to the other side's actions as justification. "It's not only Texas," Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas), whose own seat could be threatened by the redistricting plan, said, noting Newsom's comments. Gonzales added that Trump is a "political genius" and that "if we can pull off squeezing five more seats out of Texas, that's a game changer." Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) said if Republicans are "going to stoop to midterm redistricting to politically advantage the party, I think it's certainly something that should be on the table." The bottom line: Even Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), an arch-centrist who represents the reddest district of any House Democrat, declined to condemn potential redistricting in California — but he did warn Republicans against what is known as a dummymander.

Senate Democrats face crossroads in anti-Trump strategy
Senate Democrats face crossroads in anti-Trump strategy

Axios

time18 minutes ago

  • Axios

Senate Democrats face crossroads in anti-Trump strategy

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) will consult with his caucus Tuesday before deciding whether Democrats will go scorched earth against their Republican colleagues during this year's appropriations process. Why it matters: Top Democrats have hinted the party may not play ball with the GOP on the funding proceedings, risking a government shutdown at the end of September. It would be a defiant act of revenge for a minority party that's seething with anger over everything from reconciliation to rescissions. But Democrats have been reluctant to play the shutdown card in the past — and many are on record saying it's irresponsible. Zoom out: This week will present an early test case for this fall's appropriations showdown. GOP leaders plan to bring the MilCon-VA funding bill to the floor for a vote. They'll need Democratic support to move forward and at least seven Democratic votes to break a filibuster. The bill passed committee 26-3, and Schumer said Monday it has "significant reversals to DOGE's horrible cuts." The Senate version of the bill is a higher spending level than the House version, a plus for Democrats. It's possible Democrats support a procedural vote for the measure, under the pretense they aren't guaranteed to support its passage or further appropriations bills. Zoom in: Schumer didn't tip his hand during a speech on the Senate floor Monday. Instead, he unloaded on Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Republicans as being "obedient" to President Trump. "If Leader Thune wants to talk about bipartisanship, he should focus on keeping his side of the street clean first," Schumer said. Schumer last week warned Thune against pursuing additional rescission packages, saying the GOP would be risking a government shutdown. What we're hearing: Clear hints from the White House — and outright promises from House leadership — that they are planning more rescissions are further inflaming Senate Democrats. Trump's Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought raised the temperature last week when he suggested the government funding process should be "less bipartisan." Democrats were outraged by those comments and the attitude behind them — and they put their GOP colleagues on notice. "My Republican colleagues should understand that Russ Vought does not respect their constitutional power over federal spending," Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said last week. The bottom line: Democrats are angry with how Trump and Thune have rolled them all year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store