logo
Prison service boss says it should lose prosecution immunity

Prison service boss says it should lose prosecution immunity

Yahoo02-04-2025

The head of Scotland's jails has told the families of two young people who took their own lives in prison that she believes crown immunity should be abolished.
Theresa Medhurst said the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) should face the possibility of criminal prosecution over deaths in custody.
Ms Medhurst made the comment during a meeting with the families of Katie Allan and William Brown, also known as William Lindsay, who both died by suicide at Polmont Young Offender's Institution in 2018.
Under the law, the Crown, which includes the Scottish Prison Service, cannot be held criminally responsible for deaths in custody.
The Scottish government said it has pursued a change in the law, but that it would require UK government approval.
Last year a fatal accident inquiry (FAI) into the deaths of Katie Allan, 21, and William Brown, 16, made 25 recommendations, which were accepted by the SPS and Scottish government.
The families' lawyer, Aamer Anwar, said the meeting on Wednesday with Ms Medhurst had been "robust and painful".
Safety action plan accepted after suicides at Polmont
Catalogue of failures led to young prisoner deaths
However, he said it was important Ms Medhurst had agreed crown immunity for the prison service should be "abolished".
In 2022, the Crown Office found a breach of the Health and Safety Act at the jail "materially contributed" to the deaths, but it was unable to act as the SPS was protected by the Crown immunity principle.
Mr Anwar said the families would seek a meeting with prime minister Sir Keir Starmer to further push for a change in the law.
He said: "When you have a situation where the SPS agrees with the lifting of Crown immunity, when the Scottish government and every opposition party in the Scottish Parliament agrees with the lifting of Crown immunity, the question really is now for the UK government to deliver on that.
He added: "The next stage for the families, and for a number of other families we act for, is for a meeting with Keir Starmer and the justice minister, because they carry the power to do this.
"There is clearly unity right across Scotland, from all the institutions as well as the family, to remove Crown immunity. It's unacceptable."
Crown immunity is a legal principle which states that legislation does not normally apply to the state.
Effectively, it means the state, including government and official bodies, such as the prison service, and sometimes its employees or agents, can be protected from being charged with criminal offences created by statute.
For example, if a person dies while in custody at a jail, the Crown could not be held criminally responsible for their death.
It does not shield them from civil liability, such as the case brought by the family of Allan Marshall, who died after being restrained by up to 17 prison officers at HMP Edinburgh in 2010.
In Scotland, Crown immunity may not always protect prison officers or officials – for example if they are caught using, possessing or giving a "personal communication device," such as a mobile phone, to a prisoner.
A provision of the Health and Safety at Work Act also states, regardless of whether Crown Immunity applies, an individual can be prosecuted if they cause a breach.
Campaigners have long challenged the law, arguing that the public and private sectors do not operate on a level playing field.
Ms Allan's mother, Linda, said the meeting was "very positive," adding it was the "beginning of a dialogue" with the SPS.
She said: "For the first time we didn't feel demonised by the prison service, but we felt listened to, and we found that very restorative."
Speaking after the meeting, Ms Medhurst said: "This was just an opportunity to meet personally with the families, to offer our apologies for their loss, the tragic loss of Katie and William, and to apologise for the failures of the past.
"And to ensure that they understand we are committed and determined to not only action the recommendations that we have accepted in full, but to ensure that there is systemic change across the organisation, which will be impactful and lasting."
The families met the Scottish government's justice secretary, Angela Constance, at Holyrood ahead of a statement to parliament last week.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice said: "The Lord Chancellor has received the letter from the Scottish cabinet secretary for justice and home affairs and will respond in due course."
A Scottish government spokesperson added: "The Scottish government will continue to pursue the lifting of the SPS corporate Crown immunity under reserved health and safety law with the UK government.
"All of the recommendations in his determination of the FAI into the deaths at Polmont YOI of Katie and William have been accepted and the work on these is being delivered at pace with progress closely monitored."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crown stays murder charge relating to 2024 Regina homicide
Crown stays murder charge relating to 2024 Regina homicide

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Crown stays murder charge relating to 2024 Regina homicide

The Crown has stayed a charge of second-degree murder brought in relation to the December 2024 death of Latavia Kay. Jerek Dorian Tyler Favel first appeared in court to face the charge on Jan. 7. A document on the court file dated June 16 indicates the Crown's decision to stop prosecution. A stay of proceedings is technically different than the withdrawal of a charge. As stated in federal government literature, 'a withdrawal of charges means that the prosecution can never bring those charges back, but with a stay of proceedings, charges can be revived within a year. However, the stay means that for now, Favel no longer faces the charge. In an email to the Leader-Post, a spokesperson for the Saskatchewan Ministry of Justice wrote that in order to pursue a case, a prosecutor must be satisfied that there is a reasonable likelihood of conviction and that it is in the public interest. 'After careful consideration, it was determined this case no longer met the prosecution standard. Given this assessment, the prosecutor directed a stay of proceedings,' the email states. Why would a prosecutor drop a criminal charge? Man charged with murder in Regina's fifth homicide of 2024 Kay was the person police said they found Dec. 3 — laying on the ground at the 1400 Block of Argyle Street — having sustained what appeared to officers to be gunshot wounds. Police received the report around 5:30 a.m. and provided first aid until EMS arrived. She was transported to hospital, but died on Dec. 6. At the time, her death was considered Regina's fifth homicide of 2024. At that time, police released an overhead map showing the area where Kay was found and surrounding blocks, and asked residents and businesses for security camera footage from between the evening of Dec. 2 and the early morning hours of Dec. 3. At Favel's first court appearance, Legal Aid Saskatchewan lawyer Tony Orlowski told Judge Michelle Brass that the case was 'unusual,' but he did not elaborate on the record. An online obituary for Kay described her as a person who had a mind of her own, even as a child. It stated she taught and cared for her siblings, who looked up to her. 'She was positive, happy, encouraging and loving; she always wanted the best for her family and friends,' said the obituary. People leaving online comments described Kay as a 'beautiful person.' The obituary also described her as responsible, hardworking, careful with money, and generous. 'She was taken too soon,' it said, 'and she will be lovingly remembered and desperately missed by all who knew her.' bharder@ The Regina Leader-Post has created an Afternoon Headlines newsletter that can be delivered daily to your inbox so you are up to date with the most vital news of the day. Click here to subscribe. With some online platforms blocking access to the journalism upon which you depend, our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed. Click here to subscribe.

Hamilton police board defer Charter oversight motion, draft policy to governance committee
Hamilton police board defer Charter oversight motion, draft policy to governance committee

Hamilton Spectator

timea day ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Hamilton police board defer Charter oversight motion, draft policy to governance committee

A Hamilton police board motion that called for greater oversight of officer-involved Charter rights violations has been pushed to a later date. The motion brought forward by civilian member Anjali Menezes was initially left undiscussed when no other board member seconded it at a meeting on May 29. On Thursday, it was back on the agenda after Coun. Cameron Kroetsch — who returned from a 15-month conduct suspension — pledged to second it. Coun. Cameron Kroetsch But also on the agenda was a draft policy, developed by the board, that aimed to clearly identify Hamilton police's responsibilities related to the reporting of Charter rights breaches. 'Rather than spending a long time here trying to go between these two documents and suggest amendments on the floor, it would be more appropriate for the governance committee to bring back one item,' Kroetsch said at the tail-end of an unusually long meeting that spanned over four hours. Members voted unanimously to defer both the motion and draft policy to the board's governance committee. Once reviewed, the committee will consolidate the two documents into one agenda item for the board to consider. A meeting date for the committee wasn't set. At the crux of Menezes's motion was heightened tracking and reporting of Charter rights violations . More specifically, it asked police to provide the board with a list of cases where charges were dropped or evidence excluded due to Charter breaches, an account of how police became aware of those violations and what discipline or training followed. There have been multiple court proceedings in recent years centred on Hamilton officers violating the Charter of Rights and Freedoms while making arrests — including three since 2024. About a week after Menezes' motion went undiscussed, the board issued a news release touting its Charter oversight. In it, the board claimed Hamilton police 'already produce a comprehensive annual report' covering both substantiated and unsubstantiated Charter violations, communicate proactively about breaches and have increased overall training (including for Charter-related issues) more than 700 per cent since 2021. The release came up at Thursday's meeting as a consent item. Two people opposed it: Menezes and Kroetsch. Besides asking chair Don Robertson who wrote the release — he said it was board executive director Kirsten Stevenson — Menezes pointed to a 'disconnect' between the release and subsequent Charter draft policy recommendation. 'The release says the service already has a robust reporting policy and the recommendation report seems to (suggest) otherwise,' she said. Robertson clarified the release was intended to inform the public about how the service addresses and reports Charter violations. He said the ensuing draft policy wasn't a contradiction to that, but rather, 'we wanted to have a crystalized policy (over) something that is ongoing.' Among the key tenets in the draft policy was that the chief work with the Crown's office to identify Charter breaches that are 'believed to involve a police officer not acting in the good faith performance of their duties.' This point was contested in a delegation from Andrew Bell, a retired assistant Crown attorney with more than two decades experience in criminal litigation, including Charter violations. In his experience reviewing hundreds of Hamilton police investigations, he said he never found 'a single case of a Charter violation that I believed involved an officer not acting in the good faith of their duties.' Bell argued Charter breaches happen when police are trying to solve crimes or apprehend offenders. 'In other words, they happen when police act in the good faith performance of their duties,' he told the board, adding Charter violations arise not from an officer's good or bad faith, but 'because of negligence, mistakes, ignorance, stupidity, habit and police culture.' 'If you vote for this policy, you make the mistake of (assuming) that the only Charter violations that matter are violations made by officers not acting in the good faith performance of their duties,' Bell said. 'All Charter violations matter.' Mayor Andrea Horwath, who was present at board for the first time since injuring her wrist, asked Bell if removing that 'good faith' terminology would help improve the collection of Chater violation data. 'Yes,' he responded, 'because all Charter violations matter. Not those that to lead to discipline or not, and not those that are committed in good faith or not.' Horwath argued it's important the board is thoughtful of language in any potential Charter policy. She said if the goal of the policy is to gather Charter-related data to better inform training — and the removal of the 'good faith' terminology helps in that effort — 'then I would think that's something the board would be interested in.' That portion of the draft policy is one example of what the governance committee will look at. The board heard the committee will draft a document based on the draft recommendation and Menezes's motion before members vote on a single policy. No date has been set for that draft to return to the board for discussion. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Police intelligence behind B.C. call for Bishnoi gang's terror listing: minister
Police intelligence behind B.C. call for Bishnoi gang's terror listing: minister

Hamilton Spectator

time2 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Police intelligence behind B.C. call for Bishnoi gang's terror listing: minister

British Columbia's public safety minister said police intelligence had linked many cases of extortion against the South Asian community to India's Lawrence Bishnoi gang, giving the government confidence to recently seek its listing as a terrorist organization. Garry Begg, who is also solicitor general, said Thursday that the provincial government was providing $100,000 to set up a 60-day Crime Stoppers awareness campaign for victims in an effort to encourage witnesses to come forward. 'It's important that we realize that there is fear in the community at large,' Begg said, adding that it is something the awareness campaign aims to address. 'A situation like this creates a level of awareness that helps people who are victims or who are aware of victims understand that this is a society problem,' he said. 'If I could speak directly to the community — if you are a victim of extortion, if you do receive a call, the most important thing that you can do is report it to the police.' Premier David Eby said last week he would ask the federal government to declare the India-based gang a terrorist organization, which would allow Canada to freeze its assets and give police more tools to combat their crimes. Begg said the Bishnoi gang had 'publicly linked themselves' to a number of cases locally. 'And through our co-operation with international police agencies and local police, we're satisfied — that is, the government is satisfied — that their attempts to link themselves to the crimes committed here comprise enough for the federal government to accede to our request to identify them as a terrorist group,' he said. Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke said on Wednesday that her city supported the action, calling the extortion attempts 'economic terrorism.' She said victims must not stay silent out of fear, and should report all extortion threats. 'The violence and intimidation our community faces are unacceptable,' Locke's statement said. 'We have seen a disturbing rise in extortions, threats of violence, and ongoing shootings linked to these criminal organizations.' Locke also said many Surrey residents were 'too frightened to go to police' to report similar threats. 'Our community members must feel confident to report these crimes,' she said. 'We must ask ourselves why they are scared. Fear should never silence victims or witnesses.' Police have previously said that South Asian community members have been extorted of cash under the threat of violence or death, and that the Bishnoi gang based in India has been linked to some threats. Surrey Police Service Chief Const. Norm Lipinski said on Thursday that there had been 12 files of alleged extortions in the community since the beginning of this year, although none had been put forward to the Crown for prosecution. 'We feel that is under-reported,' Lipinski said of the number of files being investigated as possible extortion cases. Police in nearby Abbotsford, B.C., said in 2023 that they were investigating cases linked to the Bishnoi gang involving affluent South Asian community members being extorted. Surrey community members gathered last weekend to discuss the issue, while police have said there has been an uptick in complaints about threats of violence delivered through letters, calls and online messages. Eby said on Wednesday that B.C. had reached out to both Ontario and Alberta because they were 'similarly affected by this extortion conduct,' encouraging them to also push for the Bishnoi gang to be declared a terrorist organization in Canada. 'We believe that the more provinces that are supportive, the faster the federal government will move on this,' Eby said, adding that Begg had also reached out to his federal counterpart, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree. 'We hope they're able to move very quickly to support police by declaring this organization (and) any other allegedly involved organizations in this designation, so that police have the tools that they need to end this conduct as quickly as possible.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 26, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store