Citizens of nowhere
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Some stateless people entered the United States and remain here legally, protected by asylum or another status. But like many undocumented immigrants, most live in the shadows, careful not to attract attention and unable to do anything that requires state identification. As such, many are unable to find regular work and can only get by on jobs that pay cash and don't ask too many questions. Others take the risky step of fighting for asylum, work authorization, and other protections.
Advertisement
Like other undocumented immigrants, some people who are stateless remain in the country illegally because they also have nowhere to go.
Amadou was allowed to temporarily reenter the United States by the Biden administration. He lives in Ohio with his family.
Huiyee Chiew
One such stateless person is Amadou, a 59-year-old electrician from Mauritania, who arrived in the United States more than 25 years ago, fleeing conflict that had broken out between his home country and Senegal. (Amadou is a pseudonym. His name is being withheld to protect his identity.)
Advertisement
Like thousands of others without nationalities, he became a citizen of nowhere for reasons beyond his control. People may become stateless because they are born to parents without nationalities — one of the world's largest groups of stateless people are the Rohingya, a Muslim minority group who live in Myanmar and face persecution. Or they live through the dissolution of their home country, like Yugoslavia or the Soviet Union, or more recently Sudan or South Sudan, or their government restricts access to citizenship for some groups — like the Bedoons, an Arab minority in Kuwait, who
Born and raised in Arab-dominated Mauritania, Amadou lived an uneventful life until a border dispute erupted with neighboring Senegal in 1989. The conflict escalated into ethnic violence, and the Mauritanian government stripped tens of thousands of Black Mauritanians of their citizenship and expelled them to Senegal.
Amadou was one of them.
Left with nothing and without any legal documents, he survived by doing farmwork. He often went hungry. In 2000, he fled to the United States in the hope of getting asylum.
To enter the United States, he used a passport obtained by a friend with connections in the Mauritanian government. Amadou knew the passport deal was illegal, but he had no other choice. He was able to use the fraudulent passport to apply for a US tourist visa and boarded a flight for New York. Once here, he applied for asylum. In the years waiting for his asylum petition to be decided, he lived in Ohio, working as an electrician. But in 2007 his petition was denied and he was ordered to leave the country. The irony is that Amadou's asylum petition was denied in part because the court said that the conditions in Mauritania had improved and that he was unlikely to face persecution if he returned — which would have been relevant if Amadou was indeed still a citizen of that country.
Advertisement
Lynn Tramonte, the director of the Ohio Immigrant Alliance, is familiar with Amadou's case. She has witnessed how a lack of understanding among lawyers and immigration judges about statelessness in cases involving Black Mauritanians often leads to deportation. 'Every day [people like Amadou] get a reminder that no country claims you. It's like you are a ghost. But you are still a person,' says Tramonte.
Amadou's former attorney, Aneesha Gandhi, says he was not immediately deported in 2007 because Immigration and Customs Enforcement was unable to obtain travel documents for him from the Mauritanian government — unsurprising given that it had revoked his citizenship.
So instead, he was placed under an order of supervision and allowed to remain and work in the United States until a solution could be found.
That meant reporting regularly to ICE. Amadou says he never missed a check-in. He complied with ICE's requirement to apply for travel documents through the Mauritanian embassy, but the officials there ignored his requests.
As an electrician, Amadou always carries his helmet and tool bag to work.
Huiyee Chiew
And so years passed. Amadou worked in construction, married, and had three children. He and his wife, who is undocumented, settled down in an Ohio suburb. He allowed himself to believe he would be able to stay in the United States, even if he couldn't figure out a path to legal residency. ICE officials had told him so.
Advertisement
Amadou lives by his grandfather's words: 'Make it good, make it well, make it right.' He focused on working hard, paying taxes, following the law, and raising a happy family.
But being stateless, he knew his life could be upended in an instant, no matter how hard he worked to make his immigration status right.
Then Donald Trump took office in 2017.
Stateless in the age of Trump
President Trump has called the asylum system the '
Unlike the Obama administration, which prioritized the deportation of people who had recently been ordered to leave and allowed both ICE attorneys and immigration officers more discretion in individual cases, the first Trump administration targeted all noncitizens who had outstanding orders of removal, old and new, according to the
In late 2018, ICE arrested Amadou without warning during a routine check-in. The officers, he recalled, were aggressive, questioning how someone like him with a removal order could have children here. He did not answer but lowered his head. They handcuffed him and took him into custody.
Amadou's wife became the family's anchor after his deportation.
Huiyee Chiew
Amadou spent eight months in ICE detention before authorities finally obtained a temporary travel document to deport him back to Mauritania. The catch: His travel document, issued by Mauritania, only allowed him to stay in that country for 90 to 120 days. (The Mauritanian embassy did not respond to questions about Amadou's case.)
Advertisement
When Amadou landed in Mauritania, immigration officers barred him from entering the country, saying, 'You are not a Mauritanian.' With nowhere else to go, Amadou traveled to neighboring Senegal to meet relatives of his with the help of a friend. The only things he had were a cane to help him walk, because of a quickly deteriorating necrotic hip, and a plastic bag holding some clothes.
'You don't have papers, you don't have anything,' Amadou said.
Back in Ohio, Amadou's family struggled to stay afloat. They didn't see Amadou again for six years.
Living in limbo
At the end of 2024, Amadou was granted humanitarian parole by the Biden administration, allowing him to temporarily enter the United States. He returned to his home in Ohio.
Amadou's humanitarian parole, however, has an expiration date. He is now trying every possible avenue to find a legal way to stay.
He has reason to worry. President Trump has called for mass deportations, enhanced ICE enforcement, and the rollback of parole programs. In January, he suspended asylum applications at the southern border, citing an '
Samantha Sitterley, a staff attorney at
The bill, first introduced by Representative Jamie Raskin and Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland in 2022, addresses statelessness by establishing a federal definition, determination procedure, protective status, and a pathway to permanent residency and citizenship. It was written by advocates and experts in the field, including United Stateless, and stateless individuals themselves. If passed, the bill could end the legal limbo for stateless persons like Amadou.
Advertisement
But the chances of passing the bill seem slim for now. Realistically, Sitterley said, the Department of Homeland Security should at least adopt a statelessness definition to ensure a more consistent and humanitarian approach toward stateless people.
David Baluarte, a law professor specializing in immigration at the City University of New York School of Law, and who previously worked with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees on a study of statelessness, recalled that when he started working on the issue during the Obama administration, few even knew what 'stateless' meant. And although awareness has grown, political will to do anything about the problem has not. 'The perception [of the current administration] is that they [immigrants] are the problem: 'We need to get rid of them,'' he says. 'Congress is not going to prioritize immigration legislation right now.'
He is also concerned about attacks on birthright citizenship. If that constitutional right were taken away, the United States would face a growing stateless population of children born within its borders to undocumented and stateless immigrants.
Amadou prays regularly and gives thanks to God for helping him get through difficult times.
Huiyee Chiew
For Amadou, life remains uncertain. But his years away from his family have shown him to embrace what time he does have with them. After all, everything could change tomorrow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Britain waves the white flag to Islamization and illegal immigration
With almost every day that passes, Britain is progressively embracing its own destruction by groveling to its mortal foes and dumping big-time on its most loyal friends. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government is increasingly surrendering to Islamization while presiding over a poisonous culture of antisemitism that's roaring out of control. For the past decade, more than 170,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the English Channel from France in small inflatable boats. Successive governments have failed to deal with this people-smuggling trade, which has provoked fury among the British public aghast at the unsustainable levels of immigration, both legal and illegal. Brits are also horrified by the impact of large numbers of Muslim migrants who refuse to integrate into British society. 4 Abu Wadei, a pro-Hamas Gazan, captured his arrival in Britain via the English Channel in a Facebook post. While most UK Muslims sign up to Western values, a very large minority do not. Of the 43,000 active terrorists on the books of security service MI5, some 90% are Muslim — a community that's a mere 6% of the population. And now the illegal immigrant trade poses an acute danger to British security. With MI5 issuing urgent warnings of an imminent threat of Iranian terrorism within Britain, there are indications the all-too-obvious risk of terrorists coming in across the Channel is real. In May, three Iranian men who arrived in Britain on small boats and a truck to claim asylum were charged with spying for Tehran. 4 Farhad Javadi Manesh, 44, Shapoor Qalehali Khani Noori, 55, and Mostafa Sepahvand, 39, appear in May at Westminster Magistrates' Court after their arrests on spying charges. Julia Quenzler / SWNS In March, an Arab from Gaza who arrived in southern England on a small boat and posted on social-media support for Hamas and calls for the death of Jews was arrested and jailed after pleading guilty to attempting to enter Britain illegally. The UK TV station GB News revealed this month that cross-Channel smuggling gangs are marketing themselves with ISIS recruitment videos and execution footage on social media. Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Courage Media reported a 'credible' intelligence source warns people-smuggling gangs are facilitating trained Islamic militants' passage across the Channel and have trafficked arms across Europe and into Britain. Intercepted 2015 telephone calls and letter correspondence between ISIS members divulged their ambition to use migrants in boats crossing the Mediterranean as a 'psychological weapon' against Europe. Britain already has an estimated 1.2 million illegal migrants, with one in every 13 people in London thought to be there illegally. Despite all this, Starmer's attempts to deal with the small-boats crisis have been feeble in the extreme. He just agreed a 'one migrant in, one migrant out' deal with French President Emmanuel Macron. This deal will reportedly be limited to just 50 illegal migrants a week, or 1.5% of all those who've arrived in Britain since the crisis began. On the very day the deal was agreed, some 573 illegal migrants landed on British shores in small boats from France. The Starmer-Macron agreement provoked ridicule and fury in equal measure among the British public as a hopelessly inadequate response to a national-security emergency. 4 Inflatable dinghies and outboard motors illegal migrants used to cross the English Channel from France are displayed in Dover. Getty Images This must be set in the context of the British state's craven response to the growing political power of British Muslims intent upon Islamizing British society. Britain commemorated the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 human-bomb attacks on the London Underground and a bus in which 52 people were murdered with wreaths laid and solemn speeches made. Yet no one — not the prime minister nor the king nor London Mayor Sadiq Khan — mentioned these were Islamist atrocities. Ludicrously, Starmer hailed 'the unity of Londoners in the face of terror,' saying 'those who tried to divide us failed.' But the bombers didn't try to divide Londoners. They tried to murder as many as possible and in the name of Islam. Starmer tries to pretend there are no divisions between Muslims and the rest of the public by shutting down all criticism of the Muslim world. Accordingly his government is busily working out ways to give the pseudo-offense of 'Islamophobia' real teeth. While seeking to stifle any mention of Islamist terror, the government is trying to criminalize those seeking to defend the British way of life. Thus an online training course hosted on the government's website for the anti-extremism body Prevent lists concern about mass migration as 'cultural nationalism' that could lead to an individual being referred to the deradicalization scheme for subscribing to a 'terrorist ideology.' Starmer has been much criticized for his reluctance to set up a national inquiry into the pimping gangs, composed overwhelmingly of Pakistani-heritage Muslims, that have kidnapped, raped, prostituted and otherwise abused thousands of very young white girls over the past two decades. Yet astoundingly, Muhbeen Hussain, who led a Muslim-community boycott of South Yorkshire police over its admission it had failed to act on rape-gang allegations 'because of fears of being called racist' — which he said attempted to 'scapegoat' Muslims — has been awarded the MBE, a prestigious national honor, for 'services to integration' and 'cohesion.' 4 London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Prime Minister Keir Starmer commemorate the 7/7 terror attacks. Getty Images Compare all this with the treatment meted out to Britain's inoffensive, law-abiding Jewish community, which is experiencing epidemic antisemitism that's off the scale. Lord Mann and Dame Penny Mordaunt, respectively a Labour and a Conservative politician, this month expressed deep shock in their government-backed report that antisemitism has become 'normalised' in middle-class Britain. The report, commissioned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the country's largest Jewish-community organization, found antisemitism to be pervasive in the health service, universities and the arts. Mann and Mordaunt said what really scared them is 'the increasing normalisation of far more extreme, personalised and sometimes life-changing impact directed at individuals purely and simply because they are Jewish.' Ever since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led atrocities against Israelis, British Jews have run a gauntlet of hatred, intimidation and attacks, both verbal and physical, as the direct result of incitement based on a systematic campaign of demonization and eye-watering falsehoods about Israel's behavior in Gaza. Through distortion, decontextualization and outright lies, Britain's media — led by the BBC and Sky — have channeled Hamas propaganda day in, day out. They have wickedly misrepresented Israel's just and agonizing war to defend itself against extermination and its attempts to safeguard as far as possible the lives of Gazan civilians being used as human shields and cannon fodder as genocide and war crimes. With Israelis being painted as diabolical child-killers, British Jews find themselves being personally accused of 'killing babies' and restaurants and pubs refusing to serve 'Zionists.' No other group is spoken of in such a vile manner. No other people is subjected to such profound and obsessional injustice. No other nation is told it has no right to its own country and its national-liberation movement is a source of evil. Yet instead of defending the country's Jews against this pre-pogrom incitement, the Starmer government has poured petrol on the flames by parroting the same Hamas lies about Israelis killing 'too many' civilians or depriving Gazans of food — this while Israel and America are providing millions of meals to Gazans for the first time receiving food aid that's not being stolen from them by Hamas. Starmer's behavior displays the dire effects of the alliance that's been forged between Western liberals and Islamist radicals. It's laying waste to America's Democratic Party and found its most alarming expression in Zohran Mamdani, the Islamist poised to become New York mayor. He too channels Hamas lies about Israel; he too will make his city's Jewish community more unsafe; he too will undermine America's security. Americans should gaze upon Britain and be warned. Melanie Phillips' latest book is 'The Builder's Stone: How Jews and Christians Built the West and Why Only They Can Save It.'
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Minneapolis mayor who oversaw BLM riots loses Dem backing to Somali-American socialist
The mayor of Minneapolis — who oversaw the city during the 2020 Black Lives Matter riots — has lost the backing of the Dem party to a Somali-American socialist following a contested vote by party members. Omar Fateh, 35, a Minnesota state Senator, won the endorsement of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party for Minneapolis mayor over Jacob Frey, who has been in office since 2018. Fateh (MN-62), who is the first Somali American and Muslim to serve in the Minnesota state Senate, received more than 60% of the vote from delegates at the Minneapolis DFL convention late Saturday — despite complaints from the Frey campaign over the election process. 3 Somali American Omar Fateh has been endorsed as the Dem candidate to be Mayor of Minneapolis. Facebook/Omar Fateh Issues with electronic balloting at the convention saw paper ballots brought in, while the final vote was taken via a show of raised badges, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Frey's supporters left the Target Center arena in protest in an attempt to deny the convention a quorum. 'This election should be decided by the entire city rather than the small group of people who became delegates, particularly in light of the extremely flawed and irregular conduct of this convention,' Frey's campaign manager Sam Schulenberg said. 3 Fateh, 35, is the first Muslim to serve in the Minnesota State Senate. Facebook/Omar Fateh 'Voters will now have a clear choice between the records and leadership of Sen. Fateh and Mayor Frey. We look forward to taking our vision to the voters in November,' he said. Frey, who was elected mayor in 2017 and reelected in 2021, was in charge of Minneapolis while the city burned during 2020's BLM riots in the wake of George Floyd's death at the hands of a white police officer in the city. Despite Frey's sops to the left on police reform, his words and actions didn't go far enough for many progressives in the city. 3 Incumbent mayor Jacob Frey's family has slammed the vote. The Washington Post via Getty Images In 2020, Frey was booed and heckled at a demonstration after saying he didn't support defunding the Minneapolis Police Department. Fateh, a Democratic Socialist, ran on a campaign similar to that of New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, calling for rent stabilization, more affordable housing, and higher taxes on the wealthy. 'I am incredibly honored to be the DFL endorsed candidate for Minneapolis Mayor,' he said on X following his victory.. This endorsement is a message that Minneapolis residents are done with broken promises, vetoes, and politics as usual. It's a mandate to build a city that works for all of us. 'November 4 is around the corner. Join our coalition of voters who share our vision for a Minneapolis where housing is a human right, public safety means sending the right responders, and city government stands for working people, not corporate donors,' he added.
Miami Herald
9 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Donald Trump should be ashamed of betraying our Afghan allies
The United States owes the Afghan people who helped us in our failed 20-year effort to democratize and modernize their benighted country. Now controlled by the same Taliban who allowed the 9/11 plot to be hatched there, the Muslim extremist government continues to persecute anyone with ties to the United States. Faced with the dire situation in Afghanistan, Donald Trump's first instinct when he took office in January was to make it worse. Among the first things he did was to stop about 1,000 already vetted Afghan refugees from coming to the United States under the Special Immigrant Visa program meant to save our allies from Taliban retribution. Trump's refugee pause order caught at least another 15,000 Afghans in a bureaucratic limbo in Pakistan where that country was trying to get them to leave and the United States wouldn't take them while their paperwork was paused. Caught up in cuts, rules The move was the first of many. Secretary of State Marco Rubio disbanded the office set up to help our Afghan allies get to the United States. DOGE cut state department funding to fly those left destitute in refugee camps into the United States. Funds to help with resettlement costs were also cut. Others may be caught up in the rules for Trump's successor policy to the Muslim travel ban. Now Donald Trump is taking away another safety net for Afghans in the United States, potentially subjecting them to deportation to their Medieval homeland. For those who somehow managed to get to the United States before the paperwork for their refugee or CIV status was complete, the Biden administration offered Temporary Protected Status or TPS so they could stay while the bureaucrats and lawyers worked things out. Trump just ended that for about 8,000 Afghans who still haven't sorted their affairs, a challenge given that many fled their homeland just ahead of Taliban troops leaving identification and other important documents behind. It is not just those who worked with the U.S. military and the U.S. supported Afghan government who deserve our help. Others backed our efforts by grasping the freedom we offered. Some became independent journalists who can no longer work freely in Afghanistan. Others worked with U.S.-funded western charities rebuilding their country, ties that taint them in the eyes of the Taliban just as surely as work with the U.S. military. Women, who jumped at the chance for high school or college education, shouldn't be abandoned in a place where any sign of sentience is punished by Sunni virtue cops. History of mistreatment Trump is far from alone in leaving Aghans worse off than when he came into office. Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama pushed, cajoled and ultimately forced Pashtun, Tajic and Uzbek militias, who had managed to keep themselves free of Taliban rule under the banner of the Northern Alliance, to either disband or become part of the Afghan military. When Joe Biden ultimately withdrew U.S. troops from Afghanistan, knowing full well that the U.S.-backed government might fall in a matter of months, these fiercely independent communities used to tribal self-rule were left defenseless. The mess that Afghanistan remains has plenty of responsibility for Republicans and Democrats alike. But Republicans who launched the invasion of Afghanistan bear a heavier burden. Once Republicans were fierce backers of protecting our allies. As much as Trump has betrayed the Afghans, he has betrayed what once were Republican principles, too.
