Volunteers pack bags for hospitals at Charlotte March of Dimes event
Volunteers from Deloitte spent their Friday morning filling more than 300 kits to be donated to nearby hospitals, families with children in the NICU and health practitioners.
The March of Dimes works to improve health for mothers and infants.
Last year, the organization gave North Carolina a D+ grade for the health care provided in the state.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GP surgery rated outstanding by inspectors
A GP practice in Hull has been praised by health inspectors for "embracing new technology" and providing "the best possible care". The Laurbel Surgery, in Bilton, Hull, has been rated as "outstanding" by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) following an inspection in June. The report said the surgery had "continuously" met the 95% World Health Organisation target for childhood immunisations and "made it easy for people to access appointments". The surgery, which provides services to around 3,600 people, thanked staff for their "exceptional care" and said it was pleased with the report. Susan Moody, practice manager, said: "The CQC report reflects the high quality of patient centred commitment of the entire team in providing good quality patient care." After a survey of patients, the CQC found 89% of people found it easy to contact the practice by phone, 95% found it easy to contact through the website and 92% using the NHS app. 'Impressive' Inspectors also found the practice "understood and met people's personal, cultural, social, religious and equality characteristics". Alan Stephenson, CQC deputy director of operations in South and East Yorkshire, said the surgery "embraced learning and innovation to provide the best possible care to people". He said: "It was impressive to see how many residents they had encouraged to take up cervical cancer screenings and childhood immunisations, which was recognised by the Humber and North Yorkshire Integrated Care Board." CQC said the survey also found that 95% of people who use the surgery felt their needs were met during their last appointment, which was higher than the national average of 90%. "Other practices should look to Laurbel Surgery and this report as an example of good care and to see what they could learn," Mr Stephenson added. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices Related internet stories New technology to help in brain tumour surgery New £48m wound research centre to open Care home placed in special measures Related internet links Care Quality Commission

Fast Company
43 minutes ago
- Fast Company
I added Bulletproof coffee to the morning routine and loved it
I'm a coffee drinker. Period. It doesn't matter if it's in the waiting area at Jiffy Lube, in the parking lot at Dunkin', or at a vibey Indie mom-and-pop café that harvests their Arabica. If there's hot bean water, I'm having a cup (or three). Obviously, I'd rather my coffee not taste like it's been sitting in a pot for the better part of the day—slightly burnt and watered down. In a perfect world, or in a world with perfect coffee, it should jolt you from grogginess and at the same time, be bursting with flavor. I want my coffee strong and hot (I swear we're still talking about coffee). A dash of milk, too, please. Oh, and I also want my daily morning bev to be undeniably good for me. You can't always have everything when it comes to your morning drink. It's just coffee, after all. It's not a winning lottery ticket or a miracle drug, you know? Bulletproof coffee is seriously upping the bean water game and making me rethink so many hundreds (thousands!?) of subpar slurps. Bulletproof's founder, Dave Asprey, wanted to create a cup of coffee that offers more than a quick jolt of energy. After learning about the benefits of combining caffeine and fat while drinking butter tea in Tibet, he created a brand that would do just that. Bulletproof Coffee, which contains coffee, MCT oil, and grass-fed ghee (clarified butter), was born. Now, arguments have been made over the years (arguments I'll gladly cling to) that coffee, when consumed in moderation, is actually fairly healthy. It may be especially good for heart health. However, Bulletproof coffee attempts to take the 'coffee is healthy' argument to a whole new level. In addition to the Bulletproof butter recipe, the individual flavors have a variety of different ingredients that may offer mind and body benefits, like MCT oil, which is supposed to support focus and mental clarity, and feeling full for longer. Some Bulletproof Coffee flavors have additions like prebiotics, which research has shown can support gut health, along with slippery elm bark, B vitamins, and lion's mane, which has been shown to help with mood. In June the company launched a rebrand, where it introduced two different packaging options—one for its Enhanced line and one for its Artisan line. The Enhanced line is about energy, focus, and gut health and comes in white packaging. The Artisan line features coffee that's focused on taste and clean ingredients, and comes in black packaging. 'This rebrand is about more than just a new look, it's a reflection of where we're headed,' said Andy van Ark, CCO of Bulletproof in a statement. 'We've evolved alongside our consumers, and today's Bulletproof is focused on energizing and empowering consumers to own their day.' In the spirit of owning my day, I tried three different Bulletproof coffees: the Original, the High Achiever from the Enhanced line, and the Mentalist from the Artisan line. First up, was the Original, and it was love at first sip. The flavor is smooth, yet bold and robust. I knew I could spend every morning with this same brew and never get bored. It also seemed to provide steady energy, meaning I felt focused for longer than usual. Next, I sampled the High Achiever, which is especially formulated to help with both energy and focus. I wasn't expecting to notice a huge difference from the Original flavor. But wildly, I felt super focused through my entire work day, and beyond. While I'm usually a three-mugs-a-morning kinda gal, I found myself zipping through work, organizing my office, and only requiring one cup to do it. I mean, I still had two, but I didn't need two. Notably, I didn't hit an afternoon slog, which is pretty common for me after my morning caffeine wears off. Instead, I felt energized all day, which my dog especially appreciated because it meant she got an extra long walk. Last, but definitely not least, came the Mentalist. Like the others, I'd gladly drink this one every day, but in terms of flavor, it was the winner. It has the exact flavor I'm always looking for in a cup of coffee, with hints of cherry, almond, and caramel, and while, no, I didn't pick those all up myself, (I read them on the package), they came together perfectly. Like the original, I felt focused for longer than usual, too. A 12-ounce package of ground coffee runs about $16.99, a bit higher than budget brands, although subscribe and save options on the site can shave off a few dollars. Still, I do think it helped my focus and energy—especially the High Achiever—pretty undeniably. If you're looking for a cup of coffee that tastes really great and has even better body and brain-boosting benefits, I'd recommend not sleeping on Bulletproof. After just one cup, you'll be so full of energy, sleep will be the last thing on your brain anyway.


Medscape
43 minutes ago
- Medscape
Point-of-Care Testing Cuts Antibiotic Use in Pharyngitis
TOPLINE: Point-of-care testing for group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (Strep A) significantly reduced antibiotic prescriptions in children and adults with signs of pharyngitis, even when used as the sole intervention. METHODOLOGY: Researchers performed a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials conducted between 2007 and 2021, evaluating point-of-care testing for Strep A vs standard care. The analysis included 4249 children and adults with pharyngitis, cough, or sore throat who underwent point-of-care testing for Strep A either alone or alongside other interventions. Primary outcomes were the impacts on antibiotic prescriptions, clinical decisions, and patient health outcomes. Secondary endpoints assessed diagnostic accuracy of Strep A testing, including sensitivity and specificity measurements. TAKEAWAY: Point-of-care testing reduced antibiotic prescriptions by 38% compared with standard care (risk ratio [RR], 0.62; P < .0001) and by 41% when it was the sole intervention (RR, 0.59; P < .001). The implementation of point-of-care testing also led to a reduction in inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.97; P = .038). However, there were no significant differences in the patient health outcomes, such as days until pain resolution and days of school/work missed, the use of ancillary testing, or other medications such as analgesics with point-of-care testing. The reported diagnostic accuracy of Strep A point-of-care testing showed sensitivity ranging from 65% to 94% and specificity from 85% to 94%. IN PRACTICE: 'Physicians can therefore use Strep A POCTs [point-of-care tests] to inform their decisions on antibiotic prescribing without compromising patient health outcomes. In clinical practice, physicians must be aware of the limitations of Strep A POCTs, in particular, the limited sensitivity for detecting GAS [group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus],' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Ann-Sophie Mägdefrau and Carolin Kathner-Schaffert, Jena University Hospital and InfectoGnostics Research Campus Jena, both in Jena, Germany. It was published online on July 9, 2025, in Open Forum Infectious Diseases. LIMITATIONS: High statistical heterogeneity in the meta-analyses limited the precision of the pooled effect estimates. Only three trials reported patient health outcomes, restricting evaluation of the effect of Strep A point-of-care tests on measures like recovery time. Additionally, none of the trials were blinded, introducing potential bias — particularly in evaluating subjective outcomes like pain and symptom resolution. DISCLOSURES: This study received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.