Werner loses again on issue of deaf driver, but dollar amounts are a lot lower
The financial stakes in the case brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act are now about $335,000, a far cry from a jury's decision in 2023 to award deaf truck driver Victor Robinson about 107 times that figure.
The unanimous decision last week from an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals three-judge panel fully affirmed all the September 2023 decisions from both a jury trial in the U.S. District Court for Nebraska and later decisions handed down from the bench over post-trial motions.
The affirmation includes a reduction in the original punitive damages awarded by the jury. That reduction came after the court ruled that EEOC awards are capped at $300,000.
The EEOC was the plaintiff in the case on behalf of Victor Robinson.The defendants along with Werner (NASDAQ: WERN) included Drivers Management LLC, which is Werner's training subsidiary.
Werner made several points on appeal, all of which were rejected by the appellate court.
A recap of the case in the recent appellate court decision noted that Robinson had a 'medical variance' from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). That waiver is needed for a deaf driver to obtain a CDL. It was obtained in 2015.
With the variance in hand, Robinson enrolled in Roadmaster, the driving school owned by Werner. His training involved not just a regular trainer but also an interpreter for the deaf, 'who communicated with Robinson from the backseat of the vehicle throughout the process,' according to the court's recap of the case's history.
In September 2016, Robinson completed the training and received his CDL. But soon after, according to the recap of the case by the appellate court, Werner Vice President of Safety and Compliance Jamie Hamm told him on a call, 'I'm sorry, we can't hire you because of your deafness.'
The call took place, according to the court, after Robinson had been told he had been preapproved for employment by recruiter Erin Marsh in an email. After calling Marsh–using a relay service for the phone call–the two talked about, according to the court, ''the job, the orientation, providing interpreting services,' and other general matters.'
The district court's decision in January 2024 to award back pay to Robinson of about $35,000 lists several driving jobs Robinson had after not being hired at Werner, none of which lasted very long; only one, with Stan Koch Trucking, reached 12 months. Other jobs on his record included with J.B. Hunt (NASDAQ: JBHT) and U.S. Xpress, now part of Knight Swift (NYSE: KNX).
The roughly $335,000 award is a combination of the punitive damages, capped at $300,000, and the backpay.
In a May 2024 series of decisions on post-trial motions in the case, the district court summed up the basis for the jury's decision against Werner. 'The jury determined that Robinson was qualified to perform the job to which he applied, he could have safely performed the essential functions of the job with a reasonable accommodation, and Werner's refusal to hire Robinson was not based on business necessity,' District Court Judge John Gerrard wrote.
There were multiple issues raised by Werner in its appeal over events in the trial. They included the question of 'causation' and whether Robinson's dismissal was because of his deafness; whether Robinson's overall driving record (which included several accidents) could be introduced to the jury; Werner objections to the admission of emails sent between Werner executives on the decision-making to deny Robinson employment; whether hiring a deaf driver would provide 'undue hardship' for Werner; and whether the FMCSA waiver meant Werner could not deny Robinson employment on the basis of his deafness.
Ultimately, the appellate court did not side with Werner on any of the points made in its appeal.
An email to Werner seeking comment had not been responded to by publication time.
More articles by John Kingston
At a conference of mostly green investors, AlFleet pushes marriage of AI and trucking
Another broker liability case knocks at Supreme Court door, this one involving C.H. Robinson
XPO rating cut by S&P, agency cites continuing weak freight market
The post Werner loses again on issue of deaf driver, but dollar amounts are a lot lower appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Reasons to Buy Energy Transfer Stock Like There's No Tomorrow
Key Points Energy Transfer has improved its balance sheet and its contract structure. The stock has a yield over 7% with a safe and growing distribution. The company also is seeing solid opportunities due to increasing natural gas demand. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) isn't a flashy name, but it has one of the best risk-reward profiles in the market right now and a high yield. It's one of the largest holdings in my portfolio. Here are five reasons to buy the midstream energy company's stock like there's no tomorrow. Keep in mind, however, that investing in a master limited partnership means you'll get a Schedule K-1 tax form and need to take some extra steps with your tax filing. 1. A rock-solid financial position After getting overextended during its last growth cycle, Energy Transfer spent the past few years cleaning up its balance sheet. It cut its distribution in 2020 to reduce leverage, and since then, it has paid down debt and funded much of its growth through free cash flow. Today, leverage is at the low end of the pipeline company's target range. On its most recent call with analysts, management said the balance sheet is the strongest it has ever been. That gives it the flexibility to invest in growth projects and return capital to shareholders without the worry of becoming overextended once again. 2. Predictable cash flow Roughly 90% of Energy Transfer's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) is from fee-based services, where it has no exposure to commodity prices. And many of its contracts are take-or-pay, meaning customers pay whether or not they use the service. That creates stable, recurring cash flow, which is exactly what supports its distribution and growth projects. Last quarter, Energy Transfer said it had a high percentage of take-or-pay contracts. That also helps give the company some of the best visibility it has ever had. 3. A high yield with a safe and growing distribution The company's stock offers a forward yield of 7.5% as I write this, and it's well covered. It is generating twice the cash it needs to support its distribution. Last quarter's distributable cash flow coverage multiple was 2.1, which gives management plenty of room to continue to increase it. It has now raised its distribution for 13 consecutive quarters, and it's well above pre-2020 levels when it had to cut it. Given its coverage ratio, strong balance sheet, and take-or-pay contracts, Energy Transfer is well positioned to grow its distribution in the years ahead. Management plans to raise it by 3% to 5% annually. 4. Increasing natural gas demand is a catalyst Not only has Energy Transfer strengthened its balance sheet and improved its contract structure, the company is also back in growth mode. It plans $5 billion in capital expenditures this year, up from $3 billion last year, and is targeting mid-teens returns on its project slate. These aren't speculative projects; they are tied to real demand with long-term contracts in place. One of its biggest projects is the Hugh Brinson pipeline, which is designed to move natural gas out of the Permian Basin in West Texas to meet growing power demand elsewhere in the state. Energy Transfer has also made progress on its long-delayed Lake Charles liquified natural gas (LNG) project and signed a cost-sharing deal with MidOcean Energy and several other agreements. If the project proceeds, it will open up a new growth avenue tied to LNG exports, with demand expected to rise 60% by 2040. At the same time, artificial intelligence (AI) data centers are becoming a potential source of incremental demand. The company signed a deal with CloudBurst to supply gas to a new AI-focused data center it plans to build in Texas. Management has also said it's in active discussions with more than 60 power plants and over 200 data centers across 14 states. These opportunities require relatively little capital and can generate quick returns. 5. The stock looks too cheap Even with everything going right, Energy Transfer still trades at a forward enterprise-value-to-EBITDA multiple of just 8. That's well below its historical average and a discount to most of its peers. Meanwhile, from 2011 to 2016, midstream master limited partnerships (MLPs) traded at an average EBITDA multiple of around 13.7. Investors still haven't fully adjusted to how much stronger Energy Transfer's business is today. The company has cleaned up its balance sheet, improved its contracts, and is pursuing disciplined growth with solid returns. It offers growth to go along with an enticing yield, making it a solid stock for income-focused investors. Do the experts think Energy Transfer is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Energy Transfer make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,048% vs. just 180% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 867.59%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Energy Transfer. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 5 Reasons to Buy Energy Transfer Stock Like There's No Tomorrow was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Lucid's Reverse Stock Split a Sign of Desperation?
Key Points Lucid announced a preliminary filing for a reverse stock split. Typically, reverse stock splits are done by companies in financial distress. Lucid has no immediate threat of being delisted. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › While all the headlines screamed about Uber Technologies' (NYSE: UBER) partnership with Lucid Motors (NASDAQ: LCID) and Nuro, an autonomous driving technology start-up, and the multimillion-dollar investment between them, there was a separate development that nearly everyone overlooked: a potential reverse stock split. Let's take a look at what exactly a reverse stock split does, what it doesn't do, and what it means for Lucid investors going forward. Is this a desperate move? Fair or foul? EV maker Lucid announced Thursday that it filed a preliminary proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding a special stockholders' meeting to authorize the board of directors to complete a reverse stock split of the company's Class A common stock at a ratio of 1-for-10 (1:10). Let's break this development down into what it means, and what Lucid hopes to achieve with its potential reverse stock split. A 1-for-10 reverse stock split simply means Lucid will reduce its outstanding shares by a factor of 10, essentially combining 10 old shares into one new share. The stock price will then be multiplied by 10. In the simplest example, a company with 100 shares with a $1 stock price will reverse split into 10 shares, valued at $10 per share. It's important to note what this doesn't do, which is change the value of what investors own. While the stock price changes, proportionally to the reduction in the number of shares, the company's market capitalization will remain the same, as will the investors' voting power and position value. Now to the question on investors' minds: Is this a sign of desperation? Not necessarily, because there are a few reasons that can drive a reverse stock split. It's true that typically a reverse stock split is done by a company in danger of being delisted from major exchanges such as the NYSE or Nasdaq -- both require companies to maintain a minimum share price of $1.00. If a company's stock price falls below that threshold for 30 consecutive trading days, it receives a deficiency notice and is given a set period to raise its price -- perfect for a reverse stock split. But as we know, Lucid is currently trading at roughly $3.15 per share, and its 52-week low was $1.93 per share. While that's a little close for comfort, especially given the gloomy electric vehicle market currently mitigating tariff impacts, it's not in immediate danger of being delisted. There is also potential upside for Lucid's potential reverse stock split, as many companies try to push the price of their stock higher to entice big institutional investors. Many institutional investors and mutual funds have policies against owning positions in a stock with a price below a minimum value -- raising the price could enable more large investors to jump into the company's stock, pushing it higher. This is not what typically happens, but Lucid's goal is to make its stock more attractive to more investors. What it all means At the end of the day, the market generally views a reverse stock split negatively. It's often a company in financial distress with a falling stock price and potential to be delisted -- not qualities of a great investment. Lucid is still burning through tons of cash, it's still slowly accelerating deliveries -- although consistently, as it's turned in seven straight quarters of higher deliveries -- and much of its future hinges on the success of its new electric Gravity SUV and its upcoming midsize platform that will underpin at least three more electric SUVs. Currently, Lucid has the liquidity to fund operations flawlessly through the second half of 2026, and while the market doesn't tend to favor reverse stock splits, this shouldn't raise many red flags for Lucid investors that they weren't already aware of. Lucid is simply a high-risk, high-reward stock, and big swings in its price are inevitable. Invest accordingly. Do the experts think Lucid Group is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Lucid Group make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,048% vs. just 180% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 867.59%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Lucid's Reverse Stock Split a Sign of Desperation? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald
15 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
History suggests stocks could have more upside, says analyst
There weren't many beating the bullish drum on the stock market in early April. The S&P 500 and tech-laden Nasdaq Composite were mired in a brutal downturn following harsher-than-hoped tariff announcements and growing economic concerns on jobs and inflation. The S&P 500 retreated 19% from its mid-February highs before finding its footing on April 9. That near-bear market had everyone a bit antsy, particularly given President Donald Trump's mounting trade war. Nevertheless, stocks' decline was fast and steep enough to cause most sentiment measures to signal oversold, suggesting that those willing to step into the fray could be rewarded for buying the dip. And boy, have they been rewarded. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The S&P 500 has marched 25% higher, and the Nasdaq has surged over 30%. President Trump's pause on most reciprocal tariffs fueled the gains on April 9. Hope that tariffs would settle at more manageable levels and significant new stimulus associated with trillions of dollars in tax cuts from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act kept the rally humming along to new all-time highs. The big question on most minds now is whether this record-setting run can continue. Those in the bearish camp point toward weaker GDP, cracks in the jobs market, and inflation risks. Bullish investors think most of those risks were priced in during the spring sell-off, and the bar has been set low enough that anything less than disaster would be good enough to push forward revenue, earnings, and economic outlooks higher, rather than lower. The debate has prompted many popular Wall Street analysts, including Carson Group's Chief Strategist Ryan Detrick, to update their outlook. Image source: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images Stocks are forward-looking and are considered a leading, rather than lagging, indicator. The ability of stock prices to predict what may happen to the economy can be messy, with short-term fits and starts. However, stocks' ability to aggregate market participants' collective wisdom is generally considered a valuable tool for economists and investors. Related: Market legend makes surprising stock market bet The predictive nature of markets is one reason behind the old Wall Street adage, "stocks climb a wall of worry." Often, stocks bottom when everyone thinks the worst has yet to happen, and they top when everyone sees roses and daisies. Over the past three months, the stock market has climbed a big wall of concern. U.S. employers have announced over 696,000 layoffs through May, up 80% year over year, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The unemployment rate has inched up to 4.1% in June from 3.4% in 2023. And inflation, while much lower than in 2022, when the Federal Reserve declared war on it by significantly raising interest rates, is still above the 2% level targeted by many, including the Fed. The backdrop still suggests that stagflation or, worse, recession is a possibility. But so far, stocks indicate the economy will sidestep most damage. While we don't know when the Fed may support the economy with interest rate cuts, most are modeling lower rates over the coming year, helping fuel economic activity. Also, the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act contains significant tax cuts, including new Social Security income tax breaks and a higher State and Local Tax deduction, which provide additional money to support spending and GDP. If so, analysts who cut revenue and growth outlooks this spring will shift gears, increasing forecasts and potentially fueling additional upside. Those upward revisions would go a long way toward appeasing those concerned about the S&P 500's valuation, given that the recent rally has inflated its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. The S&P 500 topped out in February when its forward price-to-earnings ratio eclipsed 22. It bottomed out when the P/E ratio reached about 19. The recent rally has again pushed the S&P 500's P/E over 22, which historically doesn't correspond with favorable one-year returns. Ryan Detrick has been correctly banging the bullish drum for a while, and his team's midyear outlook also tells a bullish tale. Detrick's optimism is partially rooted in history. He often shares data highlighting how the stock market has historically behaved after catalysts, and this time is no exception. Fortunately, for bulls, history is on the side of more gains. The strategist points out that since the early 1970s, there have been five instances when the S&P 500 rose by 19% in 27 trading days like this year. Each time, the market was higher one year later, returning a median of 32.6%. Since 1950, the S&P 500 has been up one year later 74% of the time, returning a median of 10.4%. Related: Billionaire Ackman has one-word message on stock market We've already made a big chunk of returns, but Detrick's team writes, "This is still a young bull market." The average bull market lasts 67 months, and this one has only lasted a little over 30 months so far. "Like a cruise ship that is very hard to turn once it gets moving, bull markets tend to carry their momentum forward, another reason this one could last much longer than many think," wrote the analysts. As for valuation, they believe there's a bull case that a "low tariffs, big tax bill" environment will provide a catalyst for earnings, helping keep the P/E ratio in check. "It's hard to imagine that the tariffs will go back to where they were, but perhaps we're left with about 15% additional new tariffs on average- not at all trivial, but far from worst case," wrote the analysts. "Companies should be able to navigate the additional tariffs and maintain profit margins, especially larger companies with less fragile supply chains." Carson Group thinks the S&P 500 could reach 6,550, a 10% to 12% gain for 2025. Add in dividends, and the index's total return could be 12% to 15%. Currently, the S&P 500 is up about 7% in 2025. "Stocks came soaring back in one of the largest reversals ever, suggesting the lows for 2025 are likely behind us and better times could be coming for investors," said Detrick. "While 2025 has already been a wild ride - and we should still prepare for more ups and downs - we see reasons to expect this bull market to continue." Related: Legendary fund manager has blunt message on 'Big Beautiful Bill' The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.