Senior Edinburgh councillors back giving themselves a pay hike
Senior Edinburgh councillors have backed giving themselves a pay hike, with only one member speaking out in opposition.
In February, Edinburgh Council agreed to freeze pay for senior councillors – including political group leaders and committee conveners – at the previous year's levels.
But at Thursday's meeting all political groups except the SNP voted in favour of raising pay for senior councillors, with most getting an uplift of £4,637 to their annual pay packets – an 11.6% jump.
Council committee conveners, as well as the SNP, Conservative and Liberal Democrat group leaders, will all get £4,637 added to their annual pay, bringing them to £44,644 per year, up from £40,027 from the previous year.
And the depute council leader, Labour's Mandy Watt, will also get a £4,637 pay hike, bringing her total compensation to £52,669, up from £48,032 before.
A council spokesperson said the increase in pay for senior councillors was intended to match the pay hike given to non-senior councillors by the Scottish Government.
While local authorities have the power to set the pay of senior councillors, the rates for all other councillors are set by the Scottish Government, including the council's leader and Lord Provost, based on the fidings of the Scottish Local Authorities Remuneration Committee (SLARC).
Earlier this year, it mandated that the salary for most councillors be raised to £25,982 per year, up £4,637 from their previous pay of £21,345, which stood unchanged for several years.
Labour councillor and council leader Jane Meagher is paid £71,519 per year, while Lord Provost Robert Aldridge is paid £53,640.
Depute council leader, Labour councillor Mandy Watt, said: 'I sat down and read the guidance, and it does say that in your approach to this, you should be doing councillor remuneration from the bottom up, not the top down.
'I very much appreciate the support that I've had [from officers] to get all this together.'
An SNP source said: 'Councillors have been chronically underpaid for decades, and normally I'd take the view that we remunerate the position held, rather than the individual holding it.
'But the current crop of administration conveners are so inept that we could not support them getting a pay hike.'
A council spokesperson said: 'While we don't set the rates of pay for non-senior councillor roles it's appropriate that we publish them and provide elected members with the opportunity to scrutinise rates for full transparency.
'The increase in Senior Councillors' remuneration was agreed by Council yesterday, and now includes the increase to the Councillor basic pay set by the Scottish Government.'
Only one member, Labour councillor Katrina Faccenda, spoke out against the pay hikes.
She said: 'I think you should take note of which councillors are getting extra money, and you should work out whether you are getting value for money from those councillors.
'Since this is public money, and I don't think anyone in here would support the misuse of public money, I'd ask the public to have a look at that, and work out if they think that in Edinburgh Council, the extra money they have to spend to subsidise councillors is being used in the right way.'
Cllr Faccenda, who will not financially benefit from the pay increase for senior councillors, voted to support the hike.
Meanwhile, independent councillor Ross McKenzie voted with the SNP to oppose the pay hike.
Green co-convener, councillor Chas Booth, said: 'Greens think it is right that people are paid appropriately for the work they do, and we welcomed the recommendations of the Scottish Local Authority Remuneration Committee around councillors' salaries.
'Pay is a significant barrier to people from marginalised groups entering politics, and if we want to see more diversity in our councillors to reflect the rich diversity of the communities we serve, then we need to ensure people without independent income can become elected representatives.
'However, we acknowledge that while so many people in Edinburgh continue to face a cost-of-living crisis caused by years of austerity which is now being continued by the Labour government at Westminster, the Labour council administration doesn't feel that big increases in senior councillor pay were not appropriate.
'Therefore Green councillors were happy to support their proposals around this.'
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
33 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer's plan to win back ‘authoritarian-leaning' voters
Sir Keir Starmer wants to win back 'authoritarian-leaning' voters by ramping up Labour's messaging on tackling migration and crime. Downing Street strategists have drawn up plans to restore trust in politics among two groups of people identified as 'grafting realists' and 'striving moderates'. The former are largely disengaged with political news, but likely to live in social housing and receive benefits, meaning they have often have direct contact with the government. According to official documents seen by The Times, these voters have lower than average levels of trust in politicians. Internal polling commissioned by Downing Street said these 'grafting realists', who make up about 14 per cent of the population, exhibit 'authoritarian-leaning views, particularly around crime and immigration'. Guidance drawn up by the Cabinet Office's New Media Unit suggests that this group, mostly female and with an average age of 45, are more likely to get their news online or from social media, although a notable portion 'avoid the news due to anxiety'. It says: 'They are more disengaged with the news, politics and current affairs than average, see politicians and the media as more of a force for bad than for good, and feel the truth may be being hidden from them.' The strategy team, launched by No 10 last year, recommends advertising in supermarkets, on buses and through social media influencers to target this group. Topics such as 'controlling immigration' and 'tackling crime' should be prioritised, it adds. • Keir Starmer on the benefits U-turn and his toughest week yet The second group being targeted by Starmer are known in No 10 as 'striving moderates'. With an average age of 44 and likely to have children, they are 'slightly more' trusting of the government but despondent about their own prospects, and also make up 14 per cent of the population. According to the guidance: 'This segment are more pessimistic than optimistic about their own future and are the most likely of all segments to feel powerless to change their own lives. Despite this, they feel more positively towards politicians and pay higher levels of attention to the news, politics and current affairs than average. Overall, they hold moderate political views.' Migration is identified as an important issue for 'authoritarian-leaning' voters TIMES PHOTOGRAPHER JACK HILL Prioritising evidence of action on plans to build 1.5 million homes is advised. Martin Lewis's Money Saving Expert website and the advice forum Mumsnet are given as examples of 'how to reach' the second group of voters, as well as traditional newspapers, TV and radio news. • No 10 seeks influencers to spread Starmer's word on social media The strategy is a government one being implemented by civil servants, rather than overtly political. However, Labour insiders said it was crucial to their plans for the next election as they aim to restore trust in the government to deliver on its promises and see off the threat of Nigel Farage's Reform party, who they see as 'populist'. Last week Starmer admitted that his first year in office has been blighted by a struggle to sell his plans to voters. 'We haven't always told our story as well as we should,' he told Sky News during a trip to the G7 summit in Canada.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
I have walked amongst Scotland's largest gulls - they are a menace
They are big too. Very big, probably the biggest in Scotland, and with their size comes with equally large beaks, and that is where the problem lies. Have anything edible about your person at that time of the morning then you really are in trouble. For gulls, like some of us humans, seem to have forgotten all about their traditional diet of healthy fish discarded over the side of a trawler, and now prefer fast food – and more of it the better. And you can see their point in a way. Why would you want a measly fish straight out of the sea, when you can gorge on plump ones wrapped in batter and served with chips. However, it is not a laughing matter really, as there are increasing examples of people getting hurt by the hungry birds up and down the country. Now the problem (again) has been raised at Holyrood with former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross warning that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'dominating' gulls if action is not taken to stop them. That is quite the claim but at least had evidence to back it up. In the chamber, Mr Ross spoke of gull horror stories including one woman who fell outside her house as a result of a gull attack, broke her leg, went to hospital and then, upon her return, was attacked again. It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500 Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains Alan Simpson: Giving CalMac contract is right - now give them better ships Alan Simpson: Scotland's tourism sector needs to be heard before it's too late The debate was led by Mr Ross after he submitted a motion stating that the parliament should note concern around the reported changes to the approach taken for granting licences to control gulls in recent years by NatureScot. He argued that this has led to fewer licences being approved. A total of 2,041 licences were granted in 2023, however this figure fell to 505 in 2024. He told the chamber there is a 'clear conflict' in the Scottish Government body Nature Scot between conserving and preserving bird numbers and controlling the applications to regulate bird numbers. Mr Ross also criticised NatureScot and the Scottish Government for being on the side of seagulls and not humans during a sometimes heated debate at Holyrood. The Former Scottish Conservative leader said: 'Currently they are clearly conflicted between conserving and preserving bird numbers and also being the agency that looks at and deliberates on applications to control birds. 'It is not possible any more for Nature Scot to do those dual roles'. Mr Ross pointed that NatureScot keep a record of bird deaths or injury but not take any record of people injured. He said communities and businesses in his own constituency of Moray, Nairn and Inverness have had significant problems with gulls in recent years, but that many communities across Scotland also experience similar problems. He also said the gulls are causing 'mental health issues' as their constant screeching torments the general public. 'They are a menace,' he emphasised to parliament. Mr Ross said he is not ignoring that people are encouraging gulls by feeding them and he accepted that was 'part of the problem'. Gulls 'dominating areas' are also seeing a reduction of other smaller birds, he argued. Mr Ross called on more 'robust action' from the Scottish Government and NatureScot to protect humans and businesses from 'the menace of dangerous gulls'. It is hard to argue with Mr Ross on this one as we can all probably recall being menaced by seagulls at one point or another in recent times. His point about smaller birds being driven from some areas is also true, as I can vouch from my own garden, which can suddenly become full of gulls, particularly when people put bread out. Of course, this is always well intentioned as it put out for smaller birds who cannot get a look in as everything is hoovered up by the aggressive gulls. I live a good 30-odd miles from the coast too, proving that the problem with gulls is not confined to seaside communities. Residents and businesses in the former fishing port of Nairn on the Moray Firth believe gulls have become a serious problem. Alan Simpson: Build more houses for rural Scots, not tax second home owners Alan Simpson: NatureScot may be threatening a rare mussel it should be protecting Alan Simpson: Forcing landowners to sell to locals is not the best solution We thought the good times would last forever. We were wrong. What next for Aberdeen? A survey by Nairn Business Improvement District (Bid) last year received 85 reports of gull attacks. Manager Lucy Harding told the BBC: 'That was quite worrying. It is an issue I regularly get reports on, of people being attacked for food particularly.' Gulls, like other birds, are protected by law and Scotland's nature body, NatureScot, has strict rules around how they are controlled. A licence is needed for the removal of nests and eggs from the roofs of buildings in areas where gulls are deemed to be a nuisance. But Ms Harding said it was now harder to obtain the necessary paperwork. Nairn Bid has put in place other measures to discourage gulls from nesting in the town, including reflective devices designed to scare birds away from rooftops. Gulls are a coastal species, but they have been drawn into towns and cities due to the plentiful places to build nests, a lack of predators - and lots of opportunities to find food. In their natural habitats - the coast and farmland - the birds eat carrion, seeds, fruits, young birds, eggs, small mammals, insects and fish. NatureScot issued 2,633 nest removal licences across Scotland in 2023, and 1,601 in 2024. It said it understood gulls could sometimes cause problems in towns and cities, but at the same time populations of the birds were facing 'serious declines'. NatureScot said it would continue to issue licenses where gulls were causing a health and safety issue. RSPB Scotland say that people and gulls could coexist if the right action was taken. Numbers of herring gulls, a species people are most likely to encounter in urban areas, have fallen by 48% in Scotland since the 1980s, according to RSPB Scotland. Clearly the answer then is not just mass culling of gulls, but it is fair to say that more robust action needs to be taken before somebody does get seriously hurt. But the answer ultimately lies with all of us and the amount of food that we just casually throw away, which then attracts gulls. We all need to look at our own behaviour and stop blaming the gulls, however menacing they are, for everything. Ultimately, we are the problem and therefore we are the solution too.
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Anas Sarwar opens door to ending Scotland-England tax divergence in dig at SNP 'performance'
The Scottish Labour leader has hit out at the SNP's tax strategy. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has suggested he would move to end the tax divergence with the rest of the UK if he becomes first minister. Mr Sarwar has accused SNP ministers of 'government by performance' over their higher tax regime for the super-rich, but risks being faced with less money to spend on public services if he does cut tax. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scotland's higher earners pay more income tax than the rest of the UK. Photo: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire The Scottish Government's top rate of tax - 45 per cent - comes in at earnings of £75,001, while those reaching £125,140 face a 48 per cent levy. In the rest of the UK, the top rate of tax is 45 per cent and only comes in when earnings reach £125,140. Speaking to the Scottish Sun on Sunday, Mr Sarwar said: 'Any government with analysis showing 90 per cent of what it says it's going to raise is actually going to be lost due to behavioural change, and they still go ahead, is not a serious grown-up government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'That is government by performance. They think they are playing a game, but they are actually playing with people's lives and livelihoods.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. Picture: Jane Barlow/PA Wire | Jane Barlow/PA Wire Mr Sarwar's position could anger trade unions who have welcomed higher earners being targeted for tax increases. Unions have called for his Labour colleagues at Westminster to introduce a wealth tax, which could then be adopted by the Scottish Government. The Scottish Labour leader said: 'You have to have a much more honest conversation about what is actually happening in Scotland. We don't have the breadth of that so-called super wealth to do the things we need to do to fix our economy. 'That can only come from attracting investment, private and public, and also foreign direct investment, and it means having a growth-first agenda.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Concerns have been raised over whether the higher tax rates for the super-rich in Scotland have brought in more funding for Holyrood. Research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), published last year found the Scottish Government's strategy of increasing the top rate of income tax 'may have reduced revenues', but warned 'significant uncertainty remains'. READ MORE: SNP ministers urged to hike taxes on wealthy ahead of Scottish Budget Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A spokesman for SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison said: 'In Scotland, people on lower incomes pay less and we ask those on higher incomes to pay a bit more.
