logo
[Editorial] Resetting the alliance

[Editorial] Resetting the alliance

Korea Heralda day ago
Lee, Trump prepare for summit that may redefine Korea-US alliance
President Lee Jae Myung's summit with US President Donald Trump this month is expected to mark a turning point in the Korea-US alliance. It will be their first in-person meeting since Trump returned to the White House in January, and it follows Seoul's hard-won tariff deal that secured trade terms on par with those for Japan.
But economic parity is only part of the story. As security threats multiply and US foreign policy grows increasingly transactional, the summit presents an opportunity for South Korea to reanchor the alliance in predictability before global volatility intensifies.
Lee, a progressive leader with no personal ties to Trump, is engaging a counterpart known for breaking diplomatic conventions and questioning traditional alliances. But Lee's emphasis on pragmatism — not flattery or defiance — is appropriate. His administration's goal is to reset the terms of engagement on clearer, firmer ground with a White House that demands more and guarantees less.
At the top of the agenda is defense cost-sharing. During his first term, Trump demanded a fivefold increase in South Korea's contribution to the costs for hosting US troops on the peninsula. While a 2021 agreement put the issue on pause, concerns remain that Trump may revive the demand. Lee's team is preparing to resist sharp hikes and reframe the discussion around mutual benefits, not transactional arithmetic.
South Korea's strategic importance cannot be reduced to dollars and cents. Its position between China and US-led alliances, combined with advanced defense and technological capabilities, makes it a regional linchpin. Hosting key military assets and conducting joint exercises strengthens collective readiness and reinforces the US presence in Northeast Asia.
Nuclear deterrence is another critical issue. With North Korea expanding its arsenal and deepening ties with Russia, Lee is expected to push for renewed clarity on the US nuclear umbrella. A credible extended deterrence framework remains essential to South Korea's security, especially as Pyongyang shows no sign of restraint.
Another priority is trilateral coordination with Japan. The Camp David process in August 2023, under the previous Joe Biden administration, strengthened Korea-US-Japan cooperation on missile tracking and early warning systems. Trump has yet to indicate whether he supports this framework or sees it merely as a holdover. Seoul will press for assurance that trilateral security cooperation is not undermined by a return to one-on-one bargaining.
The recent tariff agreement offers a useful model. After months of low-profile negotiations, South Korea secured exemptions from certain US tariffs — a parity Japan already enjoyed. This outcome is viewed in Seoul as proof that diplomacy remains possible under Trump, if grounded in shared interests and quiet persistence. The challenge now is to apply that approach to defense, where uncertainty can be more damaging.
Some critics argue that Trump's approach to alliances remains too mercurial. The broader question is how to 'modernize the alliance' — Washington's term for pressing allies to shoulder more of the defense burden and align with its strategy to keep China at bay. Whether Trump will engage Seoul in a serious, forward-looking conversation or pursue headline-driven concessions remains unclear.
It is also uncertain whether the Trump administration, absorbed in domestic politics, fully appreciates the risks of strategic drift in East Asia, where tensions could escalate without warning.
For Lee, the summit can be seen as a credibility test. His domestic critics are watching for signs of miscalculation or overreach. But if he returns with a firmer security road map, renewed deterrence commitments and no unpleasant surprises, he will have shown that South Korea can chart its course even amid unpredictable leadership in Washington.
The talks are unlikely to smooth every wrinkle, yet they could mark a step toward a more grounded and resilient alliance — one shaped by the demands of a volatile era.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Student startup boom slows across South Korea, but top universities see sharp rise
Student startup boom slows across South Korea, but top universities see sharp rise

Korea Herald

time42 minutes ago

  • Korea Herald

Student startup boom slows across South Korea, but top universities see sharp rise

Student-led startups are losing momentum across most of South Korea for the first time in three years, but at a handful of top universities, entrepreneurship is quietly accelerating. New data released Monday by the Korea Council for University Education and university startup support centers showed that 1,860 startups were founded by university students nationwide in 2024, falling 7 percent from the previous year's 2,000. The number of student entrepreneurs also declined, down 6.6 percent year-on-year from 2,137 to 1,997. This marks the first nationwide decline since 2021, when campus activity was still restricted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The slowdown follows two years of rapid growth in student entrepreneurship; from 2022 to 2023, it surged by more than 23 percent. The drop is thought to be largely due to a tougher investment climate, a slowing global economy and a significant pullback in government support programs. Two of South Korea's most prominent early-stage funding initiatives have seen sharp reductions. The "Pre-Startup Package" funded 1,530 companies in 2021, but only 930 in 2023, a 39.2 percent cut. Similarly, the "Early Startup Package" dropped from 900 companies to 590 over the same period, a 34.4 percent decrease. These programs are a primary funding source for student entrepreneurs who lack access to private venture capital. According to Lee Ki-dae, head of the Seoul-based Startup Alliance Center, reliance on public support creates a delayed but significant impact. 'Most student startups are not backed by private VC investment but by public or university support, so they tend to react to market changes with a time lag,' he said. Despite this cooling trend nationwide, four universities are bucking the pattern. In 2024, Seoul National University, Korea University, Yonsei University and KAIST collectively produced 205 student entrepreneurs, a 31.4 percent increase from 156 in 2023. KAIST alone saw a 53.8 percent jump, followed by Korea University at 50 percent, Seoul National at 44.1 percent and Yonsei at 11.3 percent. Together, these four institutions now account for over 10 percent of all student entrepreneurs in the country, up from 7.8 percent just two years ago. 'At schools like KAIST or Seoul National, you have stronger labs, better access to funding, and a long history of research in advanced fields like AI, semiconductors and robotics,' Lee said. 'So when deep tech becomes the trend, it's natural that students at those universities are in a better position to start companies. They're surrounded by the right people, equipment and support systems from day one.'

Lee offers condolences to Korean atomic bomb victims ahead of 80th anniversary of Hiroshima bombing
Lee offers condolences to Korean atomic bomb victims ahead of 80th anniversary of Hiroshima bombing

Korea Herald

timean hour ago

  • Korea Herald

Lee offers condolences to Korean atomic bomb victims ahead of 80th anniversary of Hiroshima bombing

President Lee Jae Myung on Tuesday offered his condolences to the Korean nuclear bomb victims, a day before Japan's Hiroshima marks the 80th anniversary of the devastating 1945 atomic bombing of the city. In a Facebook post, Lee wrote, "I express my deepest condolences and sympathy to the victims of the atomic bombing and their families who were caught in the tumult of history and suffered unimaginable pain in a place that was not their homeland but in a foreign land. "The two atomic bombs that dropped on Japan 80 years ago claimed countless lives in an instant," he said. "Our fellow Koreans in Japan also endured immense suffering, and the victims and their bereaved families have been suffering for a long time." He noted that a special law enacted in 2017 to support the Korean victims laid the foundation for practical assistance but acknowledged that much remains to be done. The government will continue efforts to "heal the scars left by the atomic bombings," Lee said. Around 50,000 Koreans fell victim to the atomic bombing, including 30,000 killed, after many were brought to Japan to work as forced laborers during its 1910-45 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula, according to the Korea Atomic Bombs Victim Association. (Yonhap)

Korea eyes 'K-Steel Act' to rescue industry from tariffs, China glut
Korea eyes 'K-Steel Act' to rescue industry from tariffs, China glut

Korea Herald

timean hour ago

  • Korea Herald

Korea eyes 'K-Steel Act' to rescue industry from tariffs, China glut

Bipartisan bill aims to create presidential committee for master planning, offer financial support for next-gen steelmaking tech Korea is launching an aggressive policy push to rescue its steel industry from mounting global pressure, unveiling a bipartisan bill aimed at helping domestic producers hit hard by a 50 percent US tariff and a surge of low-cost Chinese products. Announced Monday by 106 lawmakers from both ruling and opposition parties, the proposed "K-Steel Act" outlines a long-term industrial strategy that frames steel as a vital base for national security and economic resilience. 'Korea's steel industry has grown rapidly since 1970. But today, it faces an unprecedented crisis, caught between the global push for carbon neutrality, a flood of cheap Chinese imports and steep tariffs from key trading partners,' lawmakers said in explaining the purpose of the bill. They warn that failure to act would leave Korea exposed on multiple fronts. A shrinking domestic steel base could ripple across its broader industrial ecosystem, threatening other sectors from shipbuilding to electric vehicle development. 'This bill is about both survival and transformation,' said Rep. Eoh Kiy-ku of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea and co-chair of the National Assembly Steel Forum. 'With bipartisan support, we plan to pass this quickly and follow up with additional legislation if needed.' Steel remains a pillar of Korea's manufacturing economy, accounting for 4.8 percent of national output and supporting more than 430,000 jobs. But that foundation is under threat. Despite a recent Korea-US tariff deal lowering duties on most goods to 15 percent, the US will maintain a 50 percent tariff on Korean steel. At the same time, the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, set to launch next year, will impose extra costs on Korean steelmakers exporting to the EU unless they decarbonize fast. Korea's push comes as other major economies, including the US, EU and Japan, have already begun ramping up public support for their own steel sectors. From the US Inflation Reduction Act to EU climate subsidies, governments are blending industrial policy with climate action in a bid to secure supply chains while hitting net-zero targets. What's in the bill? The K-Steel Act lays out a comprehensive policy framework that would give the government a more direct role in shaping the industry's future. Central to the proposal is the creation of a presidential committee tasked with crafting five-year master plans and annual action roadmaps to steer the steel sector through economic and environmental challenges. To support the industry's green transition, the bill includes a wide range of financial incentives. These include subsidies, low-interest loans, tax breaks and production cost support for companies investing in hydrogen-based and other low-emission technologies. It also introduces 'green steel zones' -- designated areas where permitting and regulatory processes would be streamlined to encourage investment and innovation. The legislation also strengthens Korea's defensive trade measures. It calls for tighter rules of origin, curbs on low-quality steel imports and expanded authority for the government to counter unfair trade practices. In cases where market-driven restructuring proves insufficient, the government would be authorized to step in with financial and regulatory support, including temporary exemptions from antitrust laws for mergers deemed necessary to stabilize the industry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store