FIA urges neutrality after Mayer launches presidency bid
Mayer launched his campaign Friday at Silverstone, ahead of the British Grand Prix, with an attack on the controversial Ben Sulayem.
'The FIA Presidential election is a structured and democratic process, to ensure fairness, transparency, and integrity at every stage. It is conducted in accordance with the FIA Statutes,' said the FIA statement.
'In line with the FIA's commitment to impartiality and to preserve equal treatment of candidates, FIA staff members are required to maintain strict neutrality throughout the process.
'The Federation will continue to operate as normal, delivering on its responsibilities to its Members and across all areas of motor sport and mobility.'
The election will take place during the FIA General Assemblies on December 12.
The statement followed Mayer's attack on Ben Sulayem's time in office. The American said the president had delivered on none of his promises and had gone 'in completely the other direction'.
'We have the illusion of integrity and what we've seen is wave after wave of statute changes, which are designed to concentrate power in one office, which is the exact opposite of what he promised.'
Mayer added that he would reverse the statute changes. He said the sport's two World Council 'have been gagged and are not able to represent the people who elected them'.
Mayer, 59, the son of former McLaren boss Tim Mayer, is an experienced motor racing official who was dismissed as a Formula One steward last year in a text message sent by an assistant of Ben Sulayem.
He launched his 'FIA Forward' campaign on Friday and was given a warm welcome by most F1 team bosses.
'I like Tim,' said compatriot and McLaren chief Zak Brown. 'And he's got some family history with McLaren.
Aston Martin's Andy Cowell also pointed to Mayer's Formula One heritage.
'Racing is in his blood,' Cowell said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
US officials accuse Hamas of attacking two aid workers in Gaza
The United States on Saturday blamed Hamas for an attack that injured two American aid workers from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation at a food distribution site in US and Israeli-backed GHF said in a statement that the injured Americans were receiving medical treatment and were in a stable condition with non-life-threatening injuries."The attack which preliminary information indicates was carried out by two assailants who threw two grenades at the Americans occurred at the conclusion of an otherwise successful distribution in which thousands of Gazans safely received food," the GHF US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce blamed "Hamas terrorists" for the attack."This act of violence against the people actually bringing relief to Gazans lays bare the depravity of Hamas," she said in a post on X."GHF has contributed over 62 MILLION MEALS - nothing will stop these courageous aid workers. We are praying for the rapid recovery of the injured Americans."The Israeli military earlier accused what it called "terrorist organisations" of sabotaging the distribution of aid in which began distributing aid in Gaza in May, employs private US military contractors to provide security at their has seen an escalation in violence as efforts continue to reach a ceasefire agreement. Hamas on Friday said it had responded positively to a US-brokered deal and was prepared to enter talks. US President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on NEAR AID DISTRIBUTION SITESGazan authorities reported at least 70 people have been killed in the territory by the Israeli military in the last 24 hours, including 23 near aid distribution sites. The ministry did not specify where or how exactly they had been Israeli military had no immediate comment on the a statement on Friday, the military said troops had killed 100 militants in Gaza in the past week, and that it had "operational control" over 65% of Gaza after an offensive against Hamas fighters in the Hamas-run interior ministry in Gaza on Thursday warned residents of the coastal enclave not to assist the GHF, saying deadly incidents near its distribution sites endangered hungry GHF bypasses traditional aid channels, including the United Nations, which says the US based organisation is neither impartial nor Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on Gaza on May 19, the UN says more than 400 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid handouts. A senior UN official said last week that the majority of people killed were trying to reach aid distribution sites of the latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide and war crimes. Israel denies the accusations. - EndsTune InMust Watch
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Only good faculty can bring colleges up to speed
I have long held the view that one of India's erroneous strategies in the realm of education and research has been the emphasis on setting up numerous research institutes at the cost of universities. I know of several mathematical research institutes that have been set up with the specific mandate of fostering blue sky research. In principle this is indeed a commendable policy but what bothers me is the fact that there has been no major course correction based on genuine assessment of the needs of the nation. I am disappointed to state that these institutions have not really helped the cause of mathematics. A country like India has had many pressing and important needs for the applications of mathematics. Unfortunately, most of these venerable research institutes have failed to take cognizance of this. The way I see it, they have essentially used precious resources for developing and researching mathematics of the mostly pure kind which has not led to any important tangible gains for the wellbeing of the nation. Our policy makers poured in scarce resources into these institutes that were essentially pursuing what can be termed as art for the sake of art. What our planners failed to realise is that the nursery of good research is always a university that has a plethora of young minds who need to be trained and inspired. Some years ago, I undertook a study of mathematical research in the US. I discovered two things; a vast majority of all research seemed to stem from the universities that have been at the forefront of the uses and applications of mathematics. I have been personally associated with a US university in terms of research and collaboration for many years and I have always wondered at how the mathematicians at that university have produced both kinds of research; blue sky and high-end applicable mathematics. The other thing of value that I picked up is the manner in which all American universities compete to attract students who can be trained and mentored for high-end research. Of course, there have been some highly commendable research from our institutes but the US universities have produced much better research.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Take it or leave it' tariff letters ready, says US President Donald Trump
US President Donald Trump said on Friday he has signed letters to 12 countries outlining tariff levels they will face in what he described as 'take it or leave it' offers, with the communications set to go out on Monday. New Delhi and Washington have been attempting to thrash out a trade deal since Trump's February 13 summit with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, where both leaders agreed to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. (AFP) Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump declined to name the countries involved. He also raised the stakes, saying tariffs could now reach as high as 70% - up from previously threatened levels of 50% - with most set to take effect August 1. 'I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve,' Trump said, according to news agency Reuters. 'Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs.' India appears likely to be among the 12 countries receiving the letters, according to officials familiar with the matter in New Delhi, after intensive negotiations failed to produce a complete breakthrough that would have averted higher tariffs. 'It may not be surprising if India figures in the list because outcomes of the bilateral trade negotiations since March this year until middle of current week were not as per Trump's expectations,' said one person aware of the matter, speaking anonymously. 'Had it been so [if Trump accepted the terms], both Washington and New Delhi would have announced a deal by now.' Trump's announcement came immediately after India's negotiating team returned from Washington following week-long talks that began June 26 - the fourth face-to-face negotiating round since March. The team, led by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, had been pursuing what officials called an 'early harvest' or mini trade deal. Fundamental disagreements remain over market access, with 'the US wanting unfettered access for American agriculture goods in the Indian market, a highly sensitive area for New Delhi as it involves the livelihood of millions of subsistence farmers,' the person said. India has consistently refused to fully open its agriculture sector, particularly around genetically modified crops and dairy products. The country remains unwilling to allow items like soybean and corn unless certified as non-GM, since such crops are banned domestically. Another major sticking point is 'duty-free access in the Indian automobile sector,' the person added. 'The Trump administration wants all without committing to withdraw the Liberation Day tariff, and other punitive tariffs on Indian steel, aluminium, automobiles and auto parts.' Faced with the deadlock, India escalated the dispute beyond bilateral channels, the person added. 'Hence on return of its negotiating team from Washington, India on July 3 put the US on 30-day notice at the WTO before suspending concessions or other obligations on American imports,' the person explained. Officials of the commerce ministry did not respond to requests for a comment on the matter. A second person said bilateral discussions continue through virtual channels and a breakthrough remains possible. 'If India's interest is served, an initial deal can still be achieved by July 9,' this person added, requesting anonymity. He added that 'irrespective of deadlines, India will not sign any deal that is not balanced, equitable and a win-win.' 'Both countries remain committed to reaching the first tranche of a bilateral trade agreement by October 2025, as directed by Modi and Trump during their February 13 meeting'. That broader deal would include services and investment provisions beyond the current focus on goods. New Delhi and Washington have been attempting to thrash out a trade deal since Trump's February 13 summit with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, where both leaders agreed to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. Despite the ambitious target, tensions escalated as Trump reimposed and expanded tariffs. In March, the US imposed 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from all countries, ending exemptions that had protected some trading partners. On March 26, Trump added 25% duties on passenger vehicles, light trucks and certain automobile parts, specifically targeting imports from countries including India. The situation deteriorated further when Trump declared April 2 as 'Liberation Day,' announcing a global 10% baseline tariff plus additional country-specific levies. India faced a combined 26% tariff - the 10% baseline plus an additional 16% reciprocal tariff. Trump suspended the additional tariffs for 90 days to allow negotiations, but that reprieve expires July 9. India had initially demanded complete withdrawal of all punitive tariffs but softened its position to focus on partial relief in exchange for limited agricultural concessions. Commerce minister Piyush Goyal on Saturday defended India's approach, saying the country 'negotiates from a position of strength and not under deadlines.' He reiterated this position on Saturday when he rebutted opposition leader Rahul Gandhi's charge that the Modi government would 'meekly bow' to Trump's tariff deadline. Goyal accused the previous Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government of 'negotiating and signing agreements that were not in the national interest.' The day before, Goyal had emphasised that 'India never negotiates trade deals with a deadline' and would announce any agreement only when it is 'fully finalised, properly concluded and in the national interest.' Trump's ultimatum strategy reflects broader challenges in completing complex trade agreements on an accelerated timeline. Most traditional trade deals take years to negotiate, but Trump's administration has sought to compress that process into months. To date, Trump has reached agreements with only Britain and Vietnam. Britain secured a deal in May but accepted a pact to keep tariffs at 10% with preferential treatment for sectors including autos and aircraft engines. Vietnam, threatened with a 46% combined rate, negotiated a reduction to 20% with many US products allowed to enter duty-free. EU diplomats said on Friday they have failed to achieve a breakthrough and may seek to extend current arrangements to avoid tariff hikes.
