logo
‘Boy George & Culture Club' Review: An Affectionate Look at the '80s Band and Its Flamboyant Frontman That Entertains but Treads Too Carefully

‘Boy George & Culture Club' Review: An Affectionate Look at the '80s Band and Its Flamboyant Frontman That Entertains but Treads Too Carefully

Yahoo10-06-2025
Earlier this month, The Hollywood Reporter published a sharp piece of cultural analysis titled 'Are Music and Other Celebrity Films Killing the Documentary?' Nonfiction filmmakers and programmers interviewed for the feature weighed in on the influence of the major streamers, shifting away from formal invention and probing investigation toward authorized, artist-friendly docs that function primarily as marketing, brand management and fan service. Alison Ellwood's Boy George & Culture Club is a solid example of this anodyne trend. It's candid but seldom reveals much that's fresh, as infectious as one of the Brit new wave band's earworm hits but about as weighty, too.
Still, anyone with fond memories of Culture Club's heyday will likely be hooked from the moment the harmonica enters in the opening bars of 'Church of the Poison Mind,' still one of the catchiest bops of the 1980s, heard here in a concert performance that showcases the powerhouse backup vocals of Helen Terry.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
'Outer Banks' Actor Jonathan Daviss to Star as Snoop Dogg in Universal Biopic
Sony Music Publishing Acquires Hipgnosis Songs Group
Finneas Says He Was Tear-Gassed at Los Angeles ICE Protest
That song is a welcome reminder that while the band fronted with iconoclastic style by Boy George might have emerged out of the New Romantic scene, their musical influences ran from blue-eyed soul to reggae, Motown, calypso and even a dash of country on 'Karma Chameleon.'
But although all four bandmates weigh in extensively in separate present-day interviews, the doc is disappointingly short on insight into how the music came together. As the film would have it, George wrote the lyrics — often displayed in candy-colored '80s-style graphics that mimic Culture Club album covers — while the tunes just sort of materialized once the musicians got together in the studio.
There is of course something to be said for that kind of magical alchemy in a pop band. The name Culture Club itself is a reference to their unusually diverse makeup — a gay Irish lead vocalist; a Black Jamaican Brit bassist (Mikey Craig); a blond Englishman guitarist (Roy Hay); and a Jewish drummer from a punk background (Jon Moss).
Perhaps one reason the four members are interviewed separately is that although they 'took some time' rather than officially breaking up in 1986 (and continued to tour on and off for three decades while also pursuing their own projects), the extent to which George's big personality and transgressive look overshadowed both his bandmates and the music itself — even his own vocal talent — seems to remain a mostly unaddressed sore point.
Footage of the music video shoot for 'Karma Chameleon' on a Mississippi riverboat, with Mikey, Roy and Jon standing around looking uncomfortable in 19th century Southern gent finery, speaks volumes about the divide. Later, over a bonkers video for a rare ballad, 'Mistake No. 3,' which George describes as 'the pinnacle of our excess,' Hay observes: 'We were just like George's little dress-up things.' But it's hard to consider George insensitive when he looks back at it all through such a humorous lens. 'Yeah, I guess the other three felt like they'd been dragged into a gay circus,' he says with a chuckle.
There's plenty of humor also in individual thoughts on their biggest but frothiest hit. 'I think we lost a lot of credibility with 'Karma Chameleon',' says Roy. 'But it's the thing we're remembered for.' Adds George: 'They say it was the nail in our cool coffin. But we were never cool! That song went to No. 1 and stayed there for weeks. Tortured everyone.'
George acknowledges his dominant role but pretty much laughs off any frustration the other members might have felt. He comes across as a likeable, frequently very funny narcissist with a diva streak and an unapologetic sharp edge when challenged. That's not to say his soulful voice and attention-grabbing look were not the crucial ingredients in the band's 1982 breakthrough with the reggae-inflected single 'Do You Really Want To Hurt Me.' And nor do any of George's bandmates deny that he was their chief fame-driver.
It's fun to learn how young working-class George O'Dowd transformed into fabulous Boy George, a fixture at clubs like Billy's and The Blitz, going from a punky blond dye-job at 16 or 17 to full drag within six months. The rise of David Bowie and Marc Bolan was formative, and he talks about the discovery of makeup as a liberation, taking inspiration from Siouxsie Sioux, Poly Styrene of X-Ray Spex and Ari Up from the Slits for the cascading dreadlocks.
With his wide-brimmed hats, dramatic makeup and Technicolor muumuus, George couldn't help but become the focal point, and while the press mostly danced around the topic of his sexuality at first, he was dismissive of attempts to identify a political viewpoint in his androgynous persona. In one archival interview from the early days, he says they weren't trying to say anything with their music or fashion.
In some ways, that's also reflective of Ellwood's doc, which touches on LGBTQ representation, homophobia and hypocrisy but does so with too little context or overarching perspective to be illuminating. It seems bizarre, for instance, that a film purporting to deal with these subjects in the first half of the '80s shows no curiosity about how the AIDS crisis might have fed into negative reactions.
The band had reached its zenith, with Beatlemania-size crowds greeting them in Australia and Canada, and significant success cracking the American market. But the U.S. is where anti-gay sentiment gathered steam following George's 1984 Grammy Awards acceptance speech when Culture Club won for best new artist: 'Thank you, America. You've got taste, style and you know a good drag queen when you see one.'
It seems inconceivable 40 years later (or would, if not for America's rabid neo-conservatism) that George referring to himself as a drag queen could spark scandalized pearl-clutching. But he says he was more amused than appalled when the family values mob started staging anti-LGBTQ protests outside concert venues.
Moss provides a droll take on it when he recounts chatting with a Kansas fan who parroted one of the most widely used and offensive homophobic slogans, 'God Hates Fags.' When Moss asked the same person, 'Are you coming to the show?' they said, 'Oh yeah, we love Boy George.' In a Carson appearance, George points up the irony of being considered controversial in a country that had Liberace.
The movie's most intimate thread concerns the relationship of George and Jon. George says it was 'love at first sight,' while Moss, who had never been romantically involved with a man, confesses to being 'absolutely smitten,' simultaneously confused and excited. Craig recounts his misgivings about their relationship potentially destabilizing the band. But by the time he voiced his concerns, Moss said it was too late since they had already slept together.
'We were the John and Yoko of the band for a while,' comments George about the resentment of the other two members. But while public displays of affection were the norm between them at the start, that stopped as soon as they had their first hit. Concerns grew that the 'secret' of their relationship being exposed could have a ruinous effect on the band. But the doc is inconclusive about the degree to which homophobia drove the backlash or factored in negative reviews of Culture Club's rushed third album, Waking Up With the House on Fire.
(I was living in London during those years and have to admit I had always assumed George's sexuality and his relationship with Jon — an important gay dreamboat at the time — were common knowledge.)
There are poignant moments in which Moss looks back on the relationship ('It was really proper love') and shares the painful process of getting out of it for his self-preservation, while George conveys a more equivocal view, albeit with sadness. One of the major contributing factors to its end appears to have been George's drug addiction, graduating from weed to heroin in a matter of weeks.
The doc is frank about that dark period and George's erratic behavior as he began hanging out and getting wasted with fellow genderqueer '80s Brit-pop star Marilyn. George's drug use became tabloid fodder, with Rupert Murdoch's The Sun predicting he'd be dead before the year was over.
Craig and Hay felt hurt at the time when they were excluded while George and Jon (as well as Marilyn) were invited to participate in the all-star recording of Bob Geldof's No. 1 Band Aid single, 'Do They Know It's Christmas?' And all three other members express regret about George's indecision costing the group a spot in the lineup for the historic marathon Live Aid concert at London's Wembley Stadium.
George sought treatment after multiple friends died of overdoses — including one in the Culture Club singer's Hampstead mansion — and has been clean now for more than a decade. Is he contrite about the role his drug addiction played in the band's devolution? Maybe a little, though in his outsize blue velvet bowler and Liz Taylor Cleopatra eye makeup, he mostly comes across as a charming rascal, with not much use for guilt. That made him a great pop star though probably a difficult boyfriend and not the most egalitarian of band members.
Ellwood gives Culture Club and its colorful frontman an affectionate salute that should please fans, even if, unlike the director's more forthright 2020 Showtime doc, The Go-Gos, she generally chooses diplomacy over a deep dive.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts
Hollywood Stars Who Are One Award Away From an EGOT
'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Avatar: Fire & Ash' Trailer Leaks Online: James Cameron Returns With Fiery Stunner
‘Avatar: Fire & Ash' Trailer Leaks Online: James Cameron Returns With Fiery Stunner

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

‘Avatar: Fire & Ash' Trailer Leaks Online: James Cameron Returns With Fiery Stunner

The action-packed first trailer for James Cameron's next Avatar fantasy epic has leaked online — and the footage looks spectacular. Disney is rolling out the trailer for Avatar: Fire & Ash 'exclusively' in theaters in front of Fantastic Four: First Steps. And just like with Christopher Nolan's 'only in theaters' trailer for The Odyssey early this month, grainy unauthorized copies have begun to circulate. But give some credit to Disney here — the Fire & Ash trailer is, at least, a bit tougher to find than the trailer Nolan's Universal film was, with copies being taken down as fast as they pop up. More from The Hollywood Reporter Billie Eilish Reveals 3D Collaboration With James Cameron Is in the Works James Cameron to Write Movie Based on Joe Abercrombie Novel 'The Devils' After Finishing 'Avatar: Fire and Ash' Les Dilley, 'Star Wars,' 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' Art Director, Dies at 84 Needless to say, fan reaction has been effusive. Fan site The Sietch of Sci-Fi said the trailer 'looks incredible.' Another raved that the trailer was 'some of the most beautiful footage I've seen all year [and I was] struck by the real sense of doom and rage — fist fights inside of cosmic volcanoes, heroes terrified, huge aerial battles.' While another entertainment writer wrote, '[The trailer] started out as 'meh, more of the same' and ended with 'yup, another billion to James Cameron.'' And a film critic wrote: 'The visuals are (somehow) on another level. There is no doubt in my mind that this WILL be the biggest movie of 2025, and 'epic' doesn't feel like it does this trailer justice.' The trailer introduces two new tribes, the Wind Traders and the fire-hurling Ash People clan. The footage shows (trailer spoilers here — if that's a thing) plenty of intense arial fighting between Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his Na'vi family, the Ash People clan and, of course, Colonel Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang, now sporting dramatic white, black and red warpaint, suggesting he might have made an alliance with the Ash People). At one point, a captive Kiri (Sigourney Weaver) is warned by a new villain, Varang (Oona Chaplin), 'Your goddess has no dominion here.' Sully — who warns, 'we cannot live like this' — is taken captive and paraded by the occupation forces. And Spider (Jack Champion) seems like he's in jeopardy quite a bit. The first Avatar, released in 2009, became the highest-grossing film of all time, raking in $2.9 billion globally. The first sequel, 2022's The Way of Water, charted as the third-highest-grossing movie of all time (with $2.3 billion), beating expectations and silencing doubters that the Oscar winner could pull off another Avatar blockbuster. At this point, few doubt Cameron's ability to generate massive box office returns with the Avatar franchise and confidence is high that Fire & Ash will deliver when its released as a major holiday tentpole on Dec. 19. While a run time hasn't yet been announced, Cameron has teased that Fire and Ash 'will be a bit longer' than The Way of Water. The last film was three hours and 12 minutes. 'In a nutshell, we had too many great ideas packed into act one of [Way of Water],' Cameron recently said. 'The [film] was moving like a bullet train, and we weren't drilling down enough on character. So I said, 'Guys, we've got to split it.' [Fire & Ash] will actually be a little bit longer than [Way of Water].' Cameron plans five Avatar films and has said he intends to direct them all, as well. Much of the footage, Cameron has said, has already been shot. Avatar 4 is set for Dec. 21, 2029, and Avatar 5 will arrive Dec. 19, 2031. Cameron also hopes to adapt the Charles Pellegrino books Ghosts of Hiroshima and Last Train From Hiroshima as soon as his Avatar schedule permits. The film would focus on the true story of a Japanese man during World War II who survived the atomic blast at Hiroshima as well as the explosion in Nagasaki. If it comes to fruition, it would mark Cameron's first non-Avatar film since 1997's Titanic. Fire & Ash cast members include Zoe Saldaña, Sigourney Weaver, Britain Dalton, Jack Champion, Trinity Jo-Li Bliss, Stephen Lang, Giovanni Ribisi, Edie Falco, Brendan Cowell, Matt Gerald, Kate Winslet, Cliff Curtis, Bailey Bass, Jemaine Clement and David Thewlis. The official description of Fire and Ash: 'Jake and Neytiri's family grapples with grief after Neteyam's death, encountering a new, aggressive Na'vi tribe, the Ash People, who are led by the fiery Varang, as the conflict on Pandora escalates and a new moral focus emerges.' Disney had no comment on the leak. Best of The Hollywood Reporter The 40 Greatest Needle Drops in Film History The 40 Best Films About the Immigrant Experience Wes Anderson's Movies Ranked From Worst to Best Solve the daily Crossword

‘South Park' creators reveal battle with network over wild Trump depiction, joke they're ‘terribly sorry'
‘South Park' creators reveal battle with network over wild Trump depiction, joke they're ‘terribly sorry'

New York Post

time2 days ago

  • New York Post

‘South Park' creators reveal battle with network over wild Trump depiction, joke they're ‘terribly sorry'

'South Park' creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone discussed their controversial season 27 premiere at San Diego Comic-Con on Thursday, revealing a behind-the-scenes battle with network executives over airing a less-than-flattering depiction of President Donald Trump's penis during Wednesday's episode. The duo behind the long-running Comedy Central series spoke alongside a panel of other adult cartoon creators at the event, including 'Beavis and Butt-Head' creator, Mike Judge, and 'Digman!' co-creator, Andy Samberg. When asked if they had been following the reaction to their season 27 premiere by the panel's moderator, Josh Horowitz, Parker jokingly replied, 'We're terribly sorry.' As reported by The Hollywood Reporter, that's about as far as the creators went in responding to the controversy stirred by the episode, although Stone did address Trump more directly later in the discussion when the duo were asked about how they originally met. 'For me and Trey, we met over 'Monty Python,'' he said. 'In this day, when PBS is getting their funding cut, that's how I found 'Monty Python.'' Stone's comments on PBS come on the heels of a congressional vote last week to cut funding for public broadcasting. Trump signed the $9 billion spending cuts package into law on Thursday. 'South Park' creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone revealed they went toe-to-toe with network executives before airing their controversial season 27 premiere at San Diego Comic-Con. Getty Images According to Parker, the show's team finalized the season's premiere episode just shortly before it aired. 'Just three days ago, we were going, 'I don't know if people are going to like this,'' Parker said, adding that the duo were reading news headlines and said to each other, 'Let's put that in there.' Horowitz questioned the 'South Park' creators about whether there were any concerns about the season premiere from higher-ups at Comedy Central, with Parker detailing a discussion with the network about showing Trump's penis on the show. The creators of the long-running Comedy Central series detailed how the executives wanted Trump's penis blurred, as the duo told them, 'No, you're not gonna blur the penis.' REUTERS 'They were like, 'We're gonna blur the penis,' and we're like, 'No, you're not gonna blur the penis,'' Parker responded, adding that the show's team agreed to add eyes to the depiction of the president's penis to make it a character. The White House, however, did not seem thrilled about the season 27 premiere of 'South Park.' White House Assistant Press Secretary Taylor Rogers issued a statement regarding Wednesday's episode to Fox News Digital on Thursday. 'The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end — for years, they have come after South Park for what they labeled as 'offense' [sic] content, but suddenly they are praising the show,' Rogers stated. 'Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows. This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history — and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.'

Is Happy Gilmore 2 worth watching? Critics deliver verdict on Adam Sandler sequel
Is Happy Gilmore 2 worth watching? Critics deliver verdict on Adam Sandler sequel

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Is Happy Gilmore 2 worth watching? Critics deliver verdict on Adam Sandler sequel

Adam Sandler's anger-prone golfer returns to the green - but is Happy Gilmore 2 worth spending your precious free telly time on? Adam Sandler dusts off his clubs for Happy Gilmore 2 after a nearly 30-year break. The film officially hits Netflix today but with so much content vying for your attention, is this highly anticipated comedy sequel worth spending your precious free telly time on? Picking up in real-time after the events of 1996's first film, Happy Gilmore 2 finds its titular hero in need of money once more — and a bit of a pick-me-up. Last time we saw Happy, he entered the prestigious PGA Tour in order to bag the prize money and save his poor grandma's house from being repossessed. This time, he's washed up and willing to do anything to secure the funds needed to send his daughter to a swanky Parisian ballet school. Cue a return to the links and plenty of Sandler-esque tomfoolery. That's the elevator pitch, but is Happy Gilmore 2 actually any good? Well, reviews for the sequel have started to make their way online, each painting a picture of its worthiness. For the most part, many outlets seem to be aware of the movie's flaws but remain insistent that fans will love it regardless. Over on The Hollywood Reporter, their write-up said: 'Like the first film, the sequel (directed by Kyle Newacheck) proves moronic, witless and relentlessly vulgar. Which is to say, Happy Gilmore fans will love it.' Their review continued, suggesting viewers may need a "cheat sheet" to fully appreciate its throng of guest star cameos. In case you missed it, the movie features guest appearances from sports stars like Travis Kelce, to musicians like Eminem and Bad Bunny. Speaking of which, the outlet happily admitted that the latter was a particularly fun watch. 'Surprisingly, Bad Bunny turns out to be utterly endearing, and very funny, as a busboy whom Happy hires as his caddie." Critic Frank Scheck adds: 'Although it's unlikely that anyone had the Puerto Rican superstar slathering a bare-chested Travis Kelce with honey, as he does here, on their cinematic bingo card.' Variety echoed the film's dedication to giving fans exactly what they want to see. Their critique called Sandler's sequel "a happy orgy of raucously well-executed Adam Sandler fan service" and a "pointed exercise in nostalgia" complete with a "present-tense edge." For all those reading this who recently found themselves wondering where all the big stupid comedies have gone, Variety's critic Owen Gleiberman thinks Happy Gilmore 2 could answer that question. "It takes us back to a time when idiot comedy was really built," suggested the critic, adding that the film feels like "the 30-year high-school reunion" of its predecessor. Meanwhile, IndieWire believes that Sandler and original Happy Gilmore scribe Tim Herlihy (who returned to pen part 2) bring nostalgia to a new place. To illustrate their point, they call upon the movie's opening sequence. We won't spoil it here but needless to say, it uses raw emotion to reintroduce us to Happy at a time where he's anything but. "There's something impressive about Sandler and Tim Herlihy's script using that as a jumping-off point," says Kate Erbland's review of this heart-wrenching moment. They also commended the film's recognition of those who starred in the original but who are sadly no longer with us. "That's all baked in, and while not always successfully (three of those characters are ultimately revisited by way of the use of on-screen sons, who provide tenuous fill-in work), there's something to be said for how the film doesn't look away from those implications," explained the critic. "Time has marched on, and not everyone has continued on that walk." This thought was mirrored over on The AV Club, who discussed the film's handling of perhaps its biggest missing character: Happy's golfing guide Chubbs, played by the late Carl Weathers. Jesse Hassenger's review said the film acts "as an ongoing memorial to the many Gilmore cast members who have passed away since 1996, including Carl Weathers (whose Chubbs was already dead, but surely would have popped up for a ghostly consultation)." Overall, Hassenger thought that while Happy Gilmore 2 may not be far-and-away better than its predecessor, it's at least on par with it. "Happy Gilmore 2 doesn't stand on its own enough to rate alongside the company's best work for the streamer," they explained. Quickly adding that "the sequel is another indication that Sandler is still undertaking his longtime mission of making silly comfort-food comedies with the stealth seriousness of older age." Of course, it's important to note that these reviews are just the opinions of a select few. An official critical score is yet to hit movie aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes. However, at the time of writing, the comedy follow-up is currently sitting sweet with an audience rating of 67%. Clearly, most viewers seem to be glad that Happy is back at long last. Happy Gilmore 2 is available to stream on Netflix now. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store