logo
How spousal maintenance is taxed after divorce

How spousal maintenance is taxed after divorce

Mint5 days ago
NEW DELHI
:
While a failed marriage causes immense emotional distress, its financial and tax implications can't be understated.
In India, a court decides how much maintenance one spouse will pay to the one earning less or having no income at all. The maintenance could be in different forms: one-time, periodic, or transfer of assets. Different types will have different tax treatment.
However, it must be noted that the Income Tax Act,1961, does not contain specific provisions on the same. Relevant case laws, along with analogous provisions, are used to determine its taxability.
Tax on maintenance
The lump sum maintenance a spouse receives is not taxable. It is tax-exempt because it is considered a capital receipt, which does not fall within the ambit of the Income Tax Act.
Sometimes, a spouse might prefer regular maintenance, that is, a monthly payment. Regular maintenance is taxable as 'income from other sources" as it is considered a revenue receipt, said chartered accountant Naveen Wadhwa, vice-president, research and advisory division at Taxmann, an online source for taxation research.
However, chartered accountant Ashish Karundia has a different view. "The periodic payments are the very condition of divorce, based on which the court issues the divorce decree. The spouses remain married at the time when the periodic payments are agreed, so no question of taxation on this amount for them being relatives. Since divorce was agreed upon on this very condition, the amount remains tax-free even after the divorce decree is issued," he said.
Any fresh arrangement, not part of the initial divorce decree, will be taxable. For example, spouses may demand enhanced compensation adjusted against inflation. 'The enhanced amount becomes taxable in the hands of the receiving spouse because it happens after the divorce decree was issued," Karundia added.
Tax on transfer of assets
Suppose a spouse transfers property to the other spouse as part of maintenance. Under Section 47 of the Income Tax Act, a transfer to a former spouse as part of a divorce settlement is not regarded as a 'transfer" for capital gains purposes. However, if the former spouse generates income from it via receiving rent or sale, it will be taxed in his or her hands.
"If a property is gifted between spouses, no capital gains tax arises to the donor. The recipient spouse will not be taxed either on the value of the gifted property because a spouse falls within the definition of relative. However, the clubbing provisions will apply to any income generated further on the same," Wadhwa said.
'It ceases to apply if the transfer is made in connection with an agreement to live apart, in which case the income from the property would be taxable in the hands of the recipient ex-spouse," he added.
If property is transferred after the divorce has taken place (excluding a transfer that had been agreed upon as a precondition), it will be taxed in the hands of the receiving spouse.
Separation
Any kind of maintenance will not be taxable if a couple lives separately without divorce because, in the eyes of the law, the spouses are still married and would qualify as relatives, Karundia said.
Can a paying spouse claim a tax deduction?
It is not possible. Maintenance is considered a personal expense and not tax-deductible for the payer. However, some courts might consider your post-tax salary instead of gross salary when deciding the amount of alimony. It is important to note that deductions such as employee provident fund, insurance premiums will not be excluded from your salary when the court determines your income.
'Different courts look at it differently. It is up to the spouse and the lawyer to present their case wisely. For example, a person earning ₹1 lakh a month may have to pay ₹20,000 in taxes. If a court asks him to pay 50% of his gross salary, ₹50,000 per month will go to the spouse, ₹20,000 in taxes, and he will be left with only ₹30,000. That said, the court may only consider his post-tax salary, that is, ₹80,000," Karundia said.
In cases where the court has specifically ordered that a certain property will go to the spouse, the income out of such property will be taxable in his or her hands directly. The paying spouse will not have to add such income to his or her taxable income.
For example, a spouse owns a two-floor house. 'If the court orders that rental income from one of the floors will belong to the other spouse, it will be taxable in the latter's hands. This arrangement is called an overriding charge, that is, redirecting income to the other party before it becomes taxable for the original recipient," Karundia added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Planning to sell a property gifted by your parents? This is the amount of tax that you will have to pay
Planning to sell a property gifted by your parents? This is the amount of tax that you will have to pay

Hindustan Times

time17 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Planning to sell a property gifted by your parents? This is the amount of tax that you will have to pay

Ram Naik's father had gifted him a flat in Noida in December, 2023. This flat was purchased by his father in April, 2005 for a total consideration of ₹5 lakh. Naik intends to sell this flat in September 2025, for a total consideration of ₹50 lakh. In such a scenario, how will the capital gains tax be computed? Even though you got the property as a gift, without paying anything, the Income-tax Act doesn't treat the cost of the property as zero. (Photo for representational purposes only)(Pexels) How are taxes calculated on a gifted property? While a property received as a gift from parents is not taxed, if you decide to sell it later, you will be liable to pay capital gains tax on the profit you make from the sale. 'Even though you got the property without paying anything, the Income-tax Act doesn't treat the cost of the property as zero. Instead, you inherit the cost and holding period of the person who gave you the property (the donor),' says Rahul Singh, senior manager, Taxmann, tax and corporate advisor. When a gifted property is sold by the donee, the gains that arise on sale of such assets are subject to long term capital gains. The rate of tax levied will depend on the period of holding in the hands of the donee. In case the donee holds the asset for more than 24 months then his gains shall be taxable as long term capital gains at the rate of 12.5% and in case the period for which the asset has been held is less than 24 months then short term capital gains tax will be levied at the rate of 20%. In case the property has been acquired prior to July 23, 2024, then the donee/seller can also claim the benefit of indexation, however, in such a scenario, he shall be liable to pay tax at the rate of 20%. 'Where an asset is acquired by gift, the period of holding shall be reckoned from the date when the previous owner had acquired such asset. Thus, the period of holding in the hands of the donor shall also be included while computing the period of holding in the hands of the donee,' says Rashi Khanna, Associate Partner, DMD Advocates, a law firm. Moreover, in terms of Section 49 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the cost of acquisition in the hands of the previous owner shall be deemed to be the cost of acquisition in the hands of donee. In terms of the prevailing law, Naik shall be liable to pay long term capital gains tax in respect of gains arising on sale of flat as the period of holding shall be reckoned from the date his father acquired the flat. 'Also, as the property was acquired prior to July 23, 2024, he is entitled to claim the benefit of indexation and pay taxes on the resultant gains at the rate of 20%. Furthermore, the cost at which the flat was acquired by Naik's father will be deemed to be the cost of acquisition in the hands of Naik,' says Khanna. Legal compliance crucial when gifting property As regards the taxation of gifts under Section 56(2)(x), it is imperative to highlight that gifts from individuals who do not fall within the narrowly defined ambit of 'relative', as prescribed under the Explanation to Section 56, may be liable to taxation in the hands of the recipient if the stamp duty value exceeds ₹50,000. The term 'relative' encompasses spouse, siblings, lineal ascendants and descendants, and certain other relations, but does not include cousins or friends. Also Read: Planning to sell your property? Here's why timing it after April 1 makes financial sense 'Therefore, due diligence must be exercised in evaluating the familial relationship to ensure tax neutrality of the gift. Exceptions are also carved out for gifts received on the occasion of marriage, by way of inheritance, or in contemplation of death,' says Tushar Kumar, Advocate, Supreme Court of India. Lastly, from a compliance and legal enforceability standpoint, it is indispensable that the gift of immovable property be executed through a registered gift deed under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, and attract appropriate stamp duty as per the applicable State laws. The absence of registration renders the gift legally void and incapable of being acted upon in law. Everything you need to know about selling a property received as a gift(HT Graphic) 'Proper documentation not only secures clear title but also serves as primary evidence of ownership in the hands of the donee, thereby becoming critical at the time of future alienation and in securing the appropriate tax treatment under the Act,' says Kumar. Legal advice must be sought at the time of execution to ensure that the transaction withstands scrutiny both under property law and the tax statute. Anagh Pal is a personal finance expert who writes on real estate, tax, insurance, mutual funds and other topics

Debt by cash transactions of over Rs 20,000 not legally enforceable: Kerala HC
Debt by cash transactions of over Rs 20,000 not legally enforceable: Kerala HC

Economic Times

timea day ago

  • Economic Times

Debt by cash transactions of over Rs 20,000 not legally enforceable: Kerala HC

Synopsis The Kerala High Court made a significant ruling. It involves cash transactions exceeding Rs 20,000. Such debts are not legally enforceable without proper justification. This decision came during a cheque dishonor case appeal. The court acquitted the accused, emphasizing the need to discourage large cash transactions. This aligns with India's digital economy goals. The Kerala High Court on Friday declared that a debt created by a cash transaction of above Rs 20,000 in violation of the Income Tax Act is not a "legally enforceable debt" unless there is a valid explanation for the same. ADVERTISEMENT Justice P V Kunhikrishnan made the declaration while allowing a plea for setting aside the conviction and sentence of a man accused in a cheque dishonor case. The accused was sentenced to one year and imposed with a fine of Rs 9 lakh by a sessions court for the offence of dishonour of cheque due to insufficiency of funds in the account under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act. In his appeal in the High Court against the sessions court decision, the accused claimed that as the amount of Rs 9 lakh given to him by the complainant was in cash, it was an illegal transaction according to the Income Tax laws. "Therefore, a debt created by an illegal transaction cannot be treated as a legally enforceable debt," the accused had claimed. Agreeing with the accused's contention, Justice Kunhikrishnan said that if a criminal court "indirectly legalises such illegal transactions in violation of the IT Act" by treating them as a legally enforceable debt, it will be against the aim of the country to discourage cash transactions above Rs 20,000. ADVERTISEMENT The High Court said that discouraging cash transactions above Rs 20,000 was also "a part of the 'digital India' dream of our country, which is propounded by our Prime Minister to save our economy and to curb a parallel economy in our country". "If the debt arises through an illegal transaction, that debt cannot be treated as a legally enforceable debt. If the court regularises such transactions, that will encourage illegal transactions by the citizens. Even black money will be converted into white money through the criminal courts," the High Court said. ADVERTISEMENT It further said that in such cases the accused should challenge such transactions in evidence and has to rebut the presumption under section 139 of the NI Act that "the holder of a cheque received it for the discharge of a debt or other liability". In the instant case, the accused had rebutted the presumption by claiming that the complainant does not have the source to loan out Rs 9 lakh and therefore, the debt alleged to be due to him cannot be treated as a legally enforceable one, the HC said. ADVERTISEMENT It allowed the accused's revision petition and acquitted him by setting aside his conviction and sentence by the lower court. The High Court said if anybody pays an amount in excess of Rs 20,000 to another person by cash in violation of the IT Act and thereafter receives a cheque for that debt, he should take responsibility to get back the amount, unless there is a valid explanation for such cash transactions. ADVERTISEMENT "If there is no valid explanation in tune with provisions of the IT Act, the doors of the criminal court will be closed for such illegal transactions," the HC said. It also made it clear that its findings would be prospective in nature. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY

No retrospective change in I-T Bill, only simplification: Baijayant Panda
No retrospective change in I-T Bill, only simplification: Baijayant Panda

Business Standard

timea day ago

  • Business Standard

No retrospective change in I-T Bill, only simplification: Baijayant Panda

The old law had become so complicated that even experts couldn't give the clear answer, says Panda premium Monika Yadav New Delhi Listen to This Article The new Income-Tax Bill does not override the intent of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but simplifies its language and structure, says Lok Sabha Member Baijayant Panda, who chaired the 31-member select committee to review its draft. In an interview with Monika Yadav, Panda says with the rising number of filings, resources need to be scaled up. Edited excerpts: Do you believe the Bill has been simplified enough to significantly reduce tax disputes and litigation? This is the first step towards simplification. The law has become complicated. It is 64 years old and has undergone more than 4,000 amendments, resulting

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store