Telangana High Court issues contempt notices to Chief Secretary, officials over sweeper's salary
The officials who have been issued notices are Principal Secretary (Education) N Sridhar, the then Principal Secretary (Finance) K Ramakrishna Rao, who is the current state chief secretary, and Director of Public Libraries S Srinivasa Chary. They have been directed to personally appear before the court at 10.30 am on July 24, 2025 and show cause as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for non-compliance with the court's earlier orders.
The contempt case was filed by AV Hema Latha and two others, who have been serving as part-time sweepers in various libraries across Mahbubnagar district. They approached the court after the authorities failed to implement the high court order issued on December 19, 2024, directing the respondents to pay them salaries in accordance with GO 841 (November 28, 2011) and GO 33 (September 24, 2016). The salary payments were to be made retrospectively from January 20, 2017 onwards, provided the petitioners continued to discharge their duties in the same department.
The court observed that despite a clear direction, the concerned authorities had not acted on the judgment, thereby prompting the initiation of contempt proceedings. The case underscores the growing concern over the enforcement of judicial orders, especially in matters involving lower-rung government employees.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
9 hours ago
- The Hindu
BRS urges Telangana HC to step in over recurring food poisoning incidents in residential schools
HYDERABAD The Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) has urged the Chief Justice of Telangana High Court to take suo motu cognisance of the recurring incidents of food poisoning in residential schools across Telangana. The appeal comes in the wake of 111 students from the Jyotiba Phule Backward Classes Welfare Residential School for Girls in Uyyalawada, Nagarkurnool district, being hospitalised on Sunday. BRS leader T. Harish Rao, who visited the school along with party leaders Marri Janardhan Reddy, C. Laxma Reddy, Guvvala Balaraju and others, interacted with students and parents at the hospital. He expressed concern that such a serious incident had occurred in Chief Minister Reddy's home district, despite the CM also holding the Education portfolio. 'When the government can spend ₹1 lakh for a meal during the Miss World beauty pageant, why can't it provide safe food to students in residential schools,' Rao questioned. He further criticised the government for what he termed as a political vendetta, asking if erasing the legacy of former CM K. Chandrasekhar Rao meant neglecting students to the extent of illness and even death. Not a day goes by without distressing news about residential school students, he said, adding that while the government has been talking about integrated schools for the past 20 months, not a single one has yet been established. Rao said that repeated incidents of food poisoning in government residential schools were eroding public trust, leading to a drop in admissions as parents were increasingly reluctant to send their children to such institutions. He urged the Chief Minister to introspect and take immediate steps to improve conditions, at the very least, by ensuring hygienic living environments and safe, nutritious food for students. He also interacted with students at the school and blamed the ongoing issues on the government's negligence and administrative failure, pointing out that such incidents have been frequently reported across the State over the past 20 months. He alleged that authorities rushed students to the hospital only after learning about the BRS team's visit, and in some cases, children were treated under trees on the school campus itself, making them hold IV fluid bottles in their hands. He further claimed that over 100 students have died in residential schools during this period, even as he underscored the urgent need for intervention.
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
Uncertainty over ordinance on BC quota a worry for Congress leaders
HYDERABAD: The cadre and second-rung leaders of the ruling Congress are eagerly waiting for local body elections amid uncertainty over whether the ordinance, pending with the governor, will be promulgated or not. If the ordinance is issued, the amendment to the Panchayat Raj Act, 2018, will come into force, empowering the state to hike BC reservations to 42 per cent from the present 23 per cent. Meanwhile, the leaders are also grappling with serious financial strain as they have to prevent their cadre from being poached by rival parties. The Telangana High Court has mandated that the elections to the local bodies — ZPTCs, MPTCs and panchayats — should be completed by September 30. The party's second-rung leaders are compelled to spend heavily to keep their cadre. Both cadre and leaders who are not contesting in the election expect handsome payments from those who are seeking election, which is causing a lot of tension. Fear of defections Meanwhile, the ruling Congress MLAs have been asked to monitor closely developments in their Assembly constituencies and check defections. Despite these challenges, the Congress leaders who are planning to contest in the local body elections believe that the situation at the ground level for the Congress is much better than what it was six months ago. The MLAs are hoping that the issuance of new ration cards, allotment of Indiramma houses, supply of fine rice under PDS, sanction of loans for women groups and payment of Rythu Bharosa are likely to sway voters in Congress' favour. On the other side, the leaders who are in opposition parties like Bharat Rashtra Samithi and Bharatiya Janata Party are also required to keep their cadre under their grip. Even as the opposition parties are guarding their leaders, the ruling party is trying to engineer defections. The Congress contestants are worried over the increasing strain on their finances and the possibility of the opposition parties spiriting away its leaders. They want the dates for the elections to be announced soon so that they can get it over with, as uncertainty is costing them dearly.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
‘Law of limitation binds everybody, including govt': Telangana High Court dismisses TSIDC's appeal due to 514-day delay
The Telangana High Court Friday dismissed an appeal filed by the Telangana State Industrial Development Corporation (TSIDC) against an order of a commercial court, citing an 'unexplained' and 'unreasonable' delay of 514 days in filing the plea. The bench of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice BR Madhusudhan Rao was hearing an appeal filed by TSIDC challenging a commercial court order dated February 16, 2023, which dismissed its appeal seeking a decree of over Rs 1.3 crore with an annual interest at 17.5 per cent against the respondents. The appeal was filed on December 26, 2024, accompanied by an application for condonation of the significant delay of 514 days. The high court's rejection of TSIDC's appeal means that the original claim of Rs 1,30,31,000, with interest, which was already dismissed by the commercial court, remains dismissed. During the proceedings, the TSIDC filed two affidavits citing the delay and attributed it to several factors such as long time taken to understand the impugned order, officials being occupied with the state and Union election duties leading to a halt in decision-making on legal matters, the file going untraceable, and a change in leadership with three vice chairpersons and managing cirectors taking charge in quick succession. However, the bench found that 'the dates mentioned in the two affidavits contain several unexplained time-gaps..' Specifically, it found a four-month gap between the day the certified copy of the order was ready and the day when the Telangana Assembly elections were announced. Similarly, it found another six-month gap between the polling dates of the Telangana elections and the general elections, for which no explanation was provided. The court also observed that the TSIDC only realised the matter was pending in November 2024 when respondent No. 1 sought the return of original title deeds. This prompted the search for the missing file that was eventually traced in the second week of December 2024. The appeal was filed on December 26, 2024. While TSIDC relied on section 5 of The Limitation Act, 1963, which allows filing of an appeal or any application beyond the prescribed period of time subject to the court being satisfied of the sufficiency of cause shown by the appellant or applicant for the delay, the bench noted that 'the burden of proving the sufficiency of cause lies with the appellant or applicant.' Referring to various Supreme Court judgments, the high court reiterated that delay beyond the prescribed period, particularly in matters under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, should be condoned by way of exception, not as a rule. 'There is little doubt that the objective of a special statute like The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, is to ensure speedy resolution of high-value commercial disputes, without any exceptions. The focus is on quick resolution which includes government entities when they are parties to commercial disputes,' the order read. The judgment firmly stated that the 'law of limitation binds everybody, including the government'. Noting that the exercise of discretion under section 5 of The Limitation Act, 1963, empowers the court to entertain an appeal or application beyond the prescribed period of limitation subject to the court being satisfied of the sufficiency of cause shown by the applicant/appellant, the court observed, 'Sufficient cause must reflect a sense of purpose and a willingness to restore diligence. The reasons shown cannot be slipshod or nonchalant so as to demand condonation as a matter of entitlement. It must be borne in mind that delay may have created equity in favour of another in the interregnum.' The bench also noted that one of the grounds for the original impugned order against TSIDC was that its claim was already barred by limitation. 'Thus, it is all the more difficult to accept that the appellant would slip into a slumber for 514 days after having suffered an order, inter alia, on the ground of delay,' the court noted. Finding no satisfactory reason to condone the 514-day delay, the high court dismissed TSIDC's application for condonation of delay, consequently rejecting the commercial court appeal. Rahul V Pisharody is an Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting from Telangana on various issues since 2019. Besides a focused approach to big news developments, Rahul has a keen interest in stories about Hyderabad and its inhabitants and looks out for interesting features on the city's heritage, environment, history culture etc. His articles are straightforward and simple reads in sync with the context. Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of district correspondents, centres and internet desk for over three years. A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. Long motorcycle rides and travel photography are among his other interests. ... Read More
